WASHINGTON, Nov. 4, 2007

Remembering Paul Tibbets

Schieffer: The Pilot Who Dropped The Bomb On Hiroshima Means Something

  • In this undated handout picture from the U.S.Army Air Force, the ground crew of the Enola Gay B29 bomber which bombed Hiroshima, Japan on Aug. 6, 1945 with the

    In this undated handout picture from the U.S.Army Air Force, the ground crew of the Enola Gay B29 bomber which bombed Hiroshima, Japan on Aug. 6, 1945 with the "Little Boy" atomic bomb, stands with pilot Col. Paul W. Tibbets, center, in the Marianas Islands.  (AP/U.S. Army Air Force)

  • Photo Essay Hiroshima & Nagasaki

    The world's first and only atomic bombings devastate two cities and bring World War II to an end.


(CBS)  Weekly commentary by CBS Evening News chief Washington correspondent and Face the Nation host Bob Schieffer.

On August 6, 1945, a pilot named Paul Tibbets climbed into a plane named for his mother and flew to Japan on what would be one of the most famous flights in aviation history. The plane was the Enola Gay, and on board was the first atomic bomb ever used in war, which would be dropped directly over city hall in a place called Hiroshima.

In an instant, more than 100,000 people were killed or wounded. Many were vaporized. More would die from radiation poisoning.

The bomb and another dropped at Nagasaki brought an end to the war. And the coming of atomic power marked a turning point in the 20th century.

Tibbets became a national hero, and he expressed no regrets, then or later. He felt the bomb had saved more lives than would have been lost had the war gone on. But as the years passed, the bombing became so controversial that he asked that he be cremated when he died for fear protesters would deface a gravestone.

Yet, when he died last week, his passing drew little comment. His obituary was buried deep inside the major newspapers, and TV gave his passing less coverage than the death of singer Robert Goulet.

In a nation where the median age is now 35, the name Paul Tibbets meant nothing to many.

Not so for those of a certain age. For us, it is a somber reminder that the war we can still remember is getting to be a long time ago.

E-mail Face the Nation.


By Bob Schieffer
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 42 Comments
by jarheadcwo3 November 6, 2007 6:16 PM EST
I do not seek to justify my country''s, or any other country''s, atrocities. It is, however, an unfortunate fact that atrocity accompanies all wars.

In WW2 all American citizens, as well as their Allies, were afforded the opportunity to be repatriated to their country of origin. Most people left. Some, such as the missionaries to which you refer, did not. Presumably, this is because they had a duty to a higher power other than their country of birth.

The point is they were afforded the opportunity to leave and they chose to do otherwise. I do not question their choice and I do admire their courage for living by their professed beliefs.

The targetting of the cities for the atomic bomb campaign was based on the use of the cities for military bases by the enemy, the logistical system of the city, the industrial capability and output of the city and other war support criteria.

I seriously doubt that the planners used the proximity of Catholic churches as a final target selection criteria.

I am really interested in reviewing the aforementioned reference you have cited in a previous post. Please forward name and author at your convenience.

I was in VietNam for 30 months in a infantry battalion of the 1st Marine Division. I know the horror of war and I also know that bad things happen to good people in the heat of battle. I am not trying to excuse bad things but I would like to understnd them so I seek explanation(s).

Charles H.
Reply to this comment
by jarheadcwo3 November 6, 2007 4:16 PM EST
Spectrum108:

You express great concern for alleged atrocities against Catholics of Japanese citizenship or ancestry that may have been committed by the US goverment in time of war.

Do you have any idea how many Catholics/Christians of US citizenship or ancestry may have been subjected to atrocities by the Japanese government in time of war??

I expect that a number of Japanese Catholics may have perished in the bombing of Japan. I also believe that the bulk of the US casualties suffered in the Pacific war against Japan were memebers of Catholic/Christian religious belief.

You tell us to R E A D. I challenge you to R E A D and A N A L Y Z E in an O B J E C T I V E manner.

I have been reading books of military history since 1958. I started reading before I was a Marine and have read many thousands of books in the last 49 or so years. What specific references would you direct me that would support your position???

Charles H.
CWO-3 USMC (ret)
Reply to this comment
by bm6005 November 6, 2007 3:09 PM EST
I worked with a survivor of the Bataan Death March. I always wondered why he had a strange gait as he walked and then one day he told me the march caused it. He was beaten mercilessly and his legs never healed properly since there was no medical care. I also knew people who were in POW camps who told about the beheadings, the beatings, the starvation. I am totally against the war in Iraq, all war is hell. My generation had Viet Nam which was as much as lying fiasco as Iraq but the japanese get no sympathy from me whatsoever. They got what they deserved!!!
Reply to this comment
by jarheadcwo3 November 6, 2007 2:48 PM EST
Spectrum108:

To rephrase my statement. The bomb was dropped by General Paul Tibbets. My mentor, Sergeant Major F*****, who was imprisoned at the Kawasaki Prisoner of War Complex, told me in 1969 that he and all other POW''s had been informed by the Japanese that the Japanese were going to execute all of the estimated 125,000 or so Allied POw''s and civilian internees, upon the beginning of the Allied invasion of Japan.

This is NOT RHETORIC, it is history, based on facts presented by the many POW''s and internees to the Allied authorities AFTER the cessation of hostilities. I am reasonably sure that my uncle, Sergeant Jesse Clyde H*****, would have made a similar statement to Allied authorities should he have been fortunate enough to survive Japanese maltreatment of POW''s.

For reference and an example as to how the Japanese treated the POW''s refer to the ''Palawan Incident'' with a Google search of the Internet. Also a similar search of the term ''Hell Ships'' may help to enlighten you as to the historical facts of Japanese of treatment of POW''s.

This maltreatment was not ''one of a thousand sad war stories'', your statement, that you dismissed in such a cavalier fashion.

Charles H.
CWO-3 USMC (ret)
Reply to this comment
by thgdriver November 6, 2007 2:29 PM EST
The Japanese were begging to surrender, but Truman wouldn''''t allow it. They wanted to prove the a bomb.

Posted by middleman8 at 08:21 PM : Nov 05, 2007

Sorry middleman8 there will be no rewriting of history by you while I am here.
Your right, The Japanese had been trying for a cease fire and then negotiate "conditional terms" of surrender. They had no terms coming according to Truman who insisted on "unconditional surrender" The Japanese wanted to stay in uniform and keep their form of government and Truman would have non of it because that would have left another war to fight with them after they rebuilt.
Reply to this comment
by thgdriver November 6, 2007 2:01 PM EST
Spectrum108 If any Monday morning Quarterbacking is being done here you are the one doing it!!

Naturally the land invasion of Japan was studied long and hard "BEFORE" the bombs were used. It was estimated a million casualties or more of Americans and 3 times that many Japanese. Thats not Monday morning Quarterbacking that was facts and figures using what it cost us at various recent island battles.

The Japanese were prepared to fight door to door house to house city block to city block and that included Civilians. All were expected to fight to the end.

WE only have to look at the human carnage the Russian army faced while taking the city of Berlin. Tokyo Japan would have been two to three times as rough and thats just one city of many.
The Japanese were a beaten people long before the bombs were used, in fact Tokyo was fire bombed and over a hundred thousand were killed without the A-bomb and still they fought on.
Truman warned them to surrender or face a rain of
ruin from the air the likes of witch the world had never seen. Still they fought on.

Truman made the HARD right choice for the "situation at hand", Paul Tibbets did his utmost to carry it out.

God bless them both and give them peace.
Reply to this comment
by Pocko November 6, 2007 2:15 AM EST
Have we forgotten Pearl Harbor?
Reply to this comment
by frankinaz November 6, 2007 1:57 AM EST
God rest your soul, Paul Tibbets. You had difficult orders to follow, and you followed those orders to the best of your abilities, and did what you had to do; knowing not only the consequences of your actions, but also accepting the responsibilities you had to accept for following orders, and the way history would perceive you. May you rest in peace, sir.
Reply to this comment
by Larry Fafarman November 6, 2007 12:13 AM EST
I wouldn''t say that Paul Tibbets'' death was unpublicized -- it made the front page of the Los Angeles Times. Most L.A. Times obituaries are published near the end of the second section.

IMO dropping the A-bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was at least partially motivated by a desire for revenge. It is believed that Japan sent out peace feelers before the bombs were dropped, and the Japanese were not given enough time -- only three days -- to respond to the Hiroshima bombing before the Nagasaki bombing. However, it is hard to fairly judge these actions from the perspective of 62 years later.
Reply to this comment
by jarheadcwo3 November 5, 2007 11:44 PM EST
Spectrum108:

Are you a complete idiot???

In my younger days as a Marine I served with a Sergeant Major who was captured at Corregidor and who endured the Bataan Death March.

He was sent to Japan to be a slave laborer for the Japanese war industry. His ship was sunk by an American submarine because it was unmarked as a POW transport. He was one of a few survivors who were picked up by a second ship. The second ship was also sunk by a American submarine as it too was unmarked as a POW transport.

So he was a slave laborer in japan who saw many of his fellow servicemen die under the Japanese prison camp administration. I also had an uncle named Jesse Clyde H***** who was captured on Corregidor. He died in Japanese captivity about 2 months prior to the surrender.

If the atomic bomb had not been used and the Japanese home islands had been invaded the Japanese were prepared, and had standing orders to do so, to kill all foreigners, whether civilian or military.

General Tibbets helped liberate all of those people, about 125,000, who were held captive by the Japanese. Sounds to me like the General saved a bunch of lives by his direct action.

I have been stationed in Japan and I have been to both Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I like the Japanese people and know a bit of their culture.

I ask you, Spectrum108, do you have ANY knowledge of the history of WW2, the Japanese people and culture and the experiences of the WW2 Allied POW''s????

Semper Fi you clown.
Reply to this comment
by big_family1 November 5, 2007 11:39 PM EST
My grandfather was a Marine with the 2-3-1 in WW2 at the young age of 18. He fought from one end of Okinawa to the other, and then served in China for many months after leaving Okinawa. This man witnessed firsthand the absolute worst horrors committed upon one human being by another. My grandfather spent many years in the military and in the civil service, because he knew that we must never allow ourselves to compromise our freedom. He lived life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness to the fullest by living to watch his great-grandchildren grow up in a country he kept free. Too many of us to not understand the sacrifices of this passing generation, nor do we fully appreciate the freedoms we have. Many do not understand what "duty to God and country" mean. The phrase, "Those who do not learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat them," holds true. I listened well to what my grandfather spoke of about war and freedom, but to whom have you listened to?
Reply to this comment
by imnho November 5, 2007 11:25 PM EST
The atomic bomb was not ready prior to july 1945. Germany and Italy had already surrendered. If the bomb had be ready a few months earlier berlin would have been a targent under serious consideration.

Kyoto was deleted from the target list because it had little value as a target. It had a lot of cultural value. Nagasaki was home of the Japanese Fifth army. That is the army that our forces would face if the invasion went ahead. Hiroshima was a secondary target. The orginal objective was a munitions factory at Kokura. The wheather over kokura was too bad that day. Hiroshima was home to a lot of what the japanese needed to continue the war.
Reply to this comment
by middleman8 November 5, 2007 11:21 PM EST
I remember this well. Pres. Truman and the us gov. wanted to scare Russia and the rest of the world. The Japanese were begging to surrender, but Truman wouldn''t allow it. They wanted to prove the a bomb. I knew people in all theaters and some who were only miles away when the bomb was dropped.
Reply to this comment
by enriquecaliente November 5, 2007 10:22 PM EST
"The war was already over in negotiations which is well documented. The Japanese were already giving up 4 months prior!" Posted by Spectrum108 at 05:52 PM : Nov 05, 2007

Oh really. The Battle of Okinawa, fought from late March through June 1945. The bomb was dropped August 1945. Don''t look like a 4 month gap to me.

"Prior to the atomic attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, elements existed within the Japanese government that were trying to find a way to end the war. In June and July 1945, Japan attempted to enlist the help of the Soviet Union to serve as an intermediary in negotiations. No direct communication occurred with the United States about peace talks.
Many within the Japanese government were extremely reluctant to discuss any concessions, which would mean that a "negotiated peace" to them would only amount to little more than a truce where the Allies agreed to stop attacking Japan. After twelve years of Japanese military aggression against China and over three and one-half years of war with the United States (begun with the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor), American leaders were reluctant to accept anything less than a complete Japanese surrender."

WAKE UP PLEASE.
Reply to this comment
by wooleywews November 5, 2007 10:02 PM EST
To strike fear into the hearts of stupid people! Especially, as they grow nearer the NWO. Ever hear of Shock ''''n Awe? Well, the Iraq invasion campaign was called that for good reason, but here are some definitions of Shockenaw:
1. To attack one with ease and at a great advantage
2. To deliver the pain with ease and no loss
3. To go on a drunken rampage of one man mass destruction.

The NWO has been attempted several times before, such as WWII. It''''s on the move now once again, and no one can check them to date. Perhaps this time they will succeed or blow us all off the planet.

If you still look under your bed, the booggie man is not real.
The boggie man
Reply to this comment
by susanhelit November 5, 2007 10:00 PM EST
No one is asking the question, because it''s a pretty obvious nut asking it.

How silly do you get? Yeah, revenge for Hirosima was taken by giving everyone involved in the war a good long life in a nice boom time with incredible progress, particularly in the medical arts that keep them alive and feeling good far longer than their fathers, and waiting until after they are dead to have some slight troubles hit - and that''s what someone thinks is Karma (someone doesn''t have a clue what the word means).

The Mason thing is a dead giveaway for a typical conspiracy nut. No reason to talk to them, because you (and everyone else in the world) either agree with every nutty thing they say; or you are a poor naive thing to believe your lying eyes; or you are part of the conspiracy. They''re pretty boring - lots of heat, but no light.
Reply to this comment
by wooleywews November 5, 2007 9:22 PM EST
Ok, I will ask the question no one else is asking. What do Masonic leaders have to do with bombing Japan and why would they want to?
Reply to this comment
by susanhelit November 5, 2007 8:11 PM EST
Blair1958 - how racist can you be??? Are you only concerned with American civilian casualties? Are Chinese less than human to you, that you so easily dismiss their deaths? And Europeans too?

You know nothing of history if you don''t know of the enourmous numbers of Chinese women and children slaughtered. I guess they don''t register with you?
Reply to this comment
by bm6005 November 5, 2007 7:29 PM EST
Why was Japan chosen and not Germany. Could it be Asians were not ascribe the same measure of humanity as Europeans?

Posted by blair1958

You''re a drama queen right? Dropping the bomb on Japan instead of Germany was predicated more by the fact that Japan is a large Island where the fallout (over the ocean) was far less hazardous than it would have been if it were dropped on Germany and spread all over populated areas of Europe. Also, the bomb was not ready prior to Germany''s surrender and there were only three available prior to the desert testing. If you feel bad about what we did talk to a survivor of the Bataan death march or the Chinese from Nanking.
Reply to this comment
by November 5, 2007 7:00 PM EST
How many innocent Americans died during WW2. Did we lose hundreds of thousands women and children to attacks? I think not.

Why was Japan chosen and not Germany. Could it be Asians were not ascribe the same measure of humanity as Europeans?

The decision to drop an atomic bomb on civilian non military populations is by far the egregious act of violence ever inflected on other human beings. You would think Tibbets would had later reflected on what he was ordered to do and at least show a bit of remorse of all the lives that were lost in such a horrific manner, but the man obviously possessed no conscience to the day he died. American hero...I think not. Ask the Japanese, and I''m sure the word terrorist would come to mind and I would have to agreed. I

f there''s a heaven or hell, it''s clear to me that Mr Tibbets is presently not in the company of angels.
Reply to this comment
See all 42 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: