June 24, 2008

A Time To Kill

A Mother Disappears The Day After 9/11

  • Michele Harris

    Michele Harris  (CBS)

(CBS)  Henry Lee testified that the tiny drops of blood found on the kitchen rug, more than 40 of them, are more evidence of an assault. And he testified they are more consistent with spatter than dripped blood.

Lee also told the jury that the blood, that looked bright red in photographs, had to be fresh. But Cal's defense attorney Bill Easton disputes that. "Dr. Henry Lee never examined that blood. He bases his opinion solely on his examination of photographs," Easton points out.

Asked what's wrong with that, Easton says, "There was no evidence that they accurately depicted the exact shade of red."

The defense says the blood could have been there for years, and that it's scientifically impossible to determine the age of blood. "So Dr. Lee saying it’s within a few days we think is simply incredible. That may be his opinion, based on hunches, based on his experience. It's not based on science," Easton says.

And beyond the blood, say defense attorneys, there is no other physical evidence to tie their client to Michele’s disappearance or death. There's no body and no murder weapon.

"The lack of physical evidence can’t become evidence. 'We can’t find the body, so gee, he must have been really good at hiding the body.' They didn’t find it because it’s not there," Cawley says.

"Isn’t it possible that Cal, if in fact he killed his wife, just had a very secure place to put her body? He knows that property better than anyone does," Moriarty remarks.

"I just think that’s the power of magical thinking -- there’s a special place that he could put it where no one could find it," says Easton.

If he did hide her body, how did he do it? None of Michele’s blood was found in any of Cal's vehicles, nor was blood found in the kitchen sink traps.

"How did he clean up? Where is the blood? Where is the body? How did he do it?" wonders Bill Easton.

The answer, say Cal's attorneys, is simple: they say police are looking at the wrong man. "I think law enforcement went to Herculean extent to try to prove Cal guilty. And their focus was entirely on Cal almost to the exclusion of everyone else," Cawley says.

But D.A. Gerald Keene thinks that's "baloney."

But just how thoroughly did police investigate Brian Earley, Michele’s young boyfriend, who was the last known person to see her alive?

Keene says police never searched Earley's car or apartment to see if Michele's blood was present.

Police also didn’t search the apartment of Michael Kasper, the co-worker with whom Michele had a secret affair, or Michael Hakes', the man with a criminal history for rape, who worked with Michele the night she disappeared.

Sue Mulvey of the state police says Hakes' body was not searched to see if there were any injuries.

Why not?

"We couldn't find where Michele ever had a problem with him, where she ever evinced any fear of him, where he had ever done anything out of line, or untoward to her or any other member of the community," Mulvey says.

Police say all three men fully cooperated and were eliminated as suspects after they took and passed polygraphs, something Cal refused to do.

"He had cooperated with them. He had given them numerous statements, allowed them to search his house," Easton says. "Once you assert your right to counsel, not participating in a polygraph test, I don’t think, is evidence of any guilt at all."

Cal also chose not to testify at trial. On June 6, 2007, after two weeks of testimony, the case went to the jury. Will the holes in the case against Cal add up to reasonable doubt? His attorneys are counting on it.

With the case in the hands of the jury, Cal's friends Tracy and Kevin O'Hara were feeling confident. "It seems like Cal would have to be Houdini to
fulfill this crime the way the prosecution said he did," Tracy comments.

But what do the jurors believe? It took them less than four hours -- spread over two days -- to reach a verdict: guilty of second degree murder.

"When the verdict was read, you could feel the courtroom on the left of us, all of the Harris family just dropping. It was like dominos," remembers Michele's friend Cindy Turner. "And crying from Cal."

"I think I had to wait a minute to digest it. This is the man that killed my daughter with his bare hands," says Michele's father Gary. "He deserves everything he got."

No one was more shocked than Cal's attorneys Bill Easton and Joe Cawley

Asked why he thinks the jury convicted Cal, Cawley tells Moriarty, "I don't know. I don’t. I wish I had a good answer for that."

Continued



Produced By Lisa Freed and Marc Goldbaum
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Add a Comment See all 48 Comments
by klhudson01 June 26, 2008 5:27 AM EDT
I think this is really a sad case for our judicial system. Someone''s love one lost her life and our justice system failed her and her family. I wonder if Cal with his errogant attitude may have paid off the local mortitian to burrie her or to have her cremated without anyones knowledge? Just my thoughts!
Reply to this comment
by dr1321 June 25, 2008 7:02 PM EDT
i worked for cal. he was a hot headed control freak, and oh by the way he did it and recycled her body at the steel yard and everybody in Owego knows it.
Reply to this comment
by carolcape June 25, 2008 5:19 PM EDT
Cal is Guilty, of course. I heard this case before, but did not know what the outcome was. Sorry to hear that he was released . The man that came forward, this man is probably being paid off. If he is not being paid off, he saw someone who Cal hired to abduct her and murder her and dispose of her body far from his land. My opinion is, She is Not on that Land. Someone took her somewhere else and murdered her and placed her in an unknown location, probably even in another state. A fine tooth comb should be taken to any monies he removed from his accounts previous to this, because he could afford to pay a hit man. Also, the fact that he tried to get rid of her possessions two weeks after she went missing, that proves it in itself. I have things here belonged to my mother who died a year ago of natural causes, I have to go through them and everyday, I put it off and it''s over a year. I know there is things I have to throw out. So give me a break, he is Guilty, Guilty, Guilty. And his new girlfriend indicating he said to her when she went to his home that she was afraid his wife would walk in, his words, "oh, she won''t be coming home". He knew she was dead and that is why she wasn''t coming home. I hope he gets the death penalty.
Reply to this comment
by newsreader57 June 25, 2008 4:49 PM EDT
I haven''t read all the comments but a did read quite a few;no one seems to mention the "private lake" that was part of the estate. The police never mentioned any divers searcing the lake for a body or weapon.
Reply to this comment
by dlucero76 June 25, 2008 2:56 AM EDT
Well there is alot of Polumbo''s, Revolver P.I.''s, Miami SUV''s, and old ladies who wrote about it on here and some of you are probably right-she''s probably under that slab but they will never be able to go in there and dig it up and the bottom line is this guy will walk eventually- no body, murder weapon, just little spots of blood that a Court of Appeals will through out. The bottom line is, as usual the police dropped the ball, they should have secured the home from the very beginning and brought in the pro''s but they didn''t....Sorry.
Reply to this comment
by donnaleac June 25, 2008 2:44 AM EDT
Not only was a new concrete floor poured the day after she went missing but has anyone thought that Cal may have also used one of the cars on his lot to remove the body from the house, dispose of it under the floor where the new concrete was to be poured, and cleaned the vehicle or disposed of it? I think that floor should be jack hammered up to look for evidence.
Reply to this comment
by dlucero76 June 25, 2008 2:14 AM EDT
People need to stop watching so much T.V...What happen to "guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt"? Do I think he did it? YES. Would I have found him guilty?NO. Why? Because the prosecution did not prove their case "Beyond a shadow of a doubt". Come on people, the idea is to let a guilty person walk before putting an innocent guy behind bars. That''s why over and over we are seeing people that were wrongly convicted set free after many years behind bars. And it''s because-Oh I think he did it, or he might have did it, or he could have did it or my gut tells me he did it ..GET REAL!
Reply to this comment
by compry June 25, 2008 1:17 AM EDT
the nieghbor who came forward to state he saw Michele at the end of the driveway had told his wife that thier money toubles had been resolved, hinting that he was paid by Cal Harris. The rumours in Owego is that Cal took the body of Michele in the trunk of a car that was then shreded at a local metal recyclable place owned by a criminal named Wietsman who owed a lot of money in taxes and fines. Th fact that the Judge in the murder trial has alowed the testamony of a person whose own wife calls a liar shows that the trial should be moved to a county where the judges would not be bribed so easily by Cal Harris.
Reply to this comment
by leslielyn-2009 June 25, 2008 1:10 AM EDT
WHY HAVE THEY NOT CHECK THE BARN WHERE THE HORSES ARE KEPT, HE COULD HAVE TAKEN HER OUT ON HORSE BACK TO GET RID OF THE BODY, CHECK STABLES, STALLS, AND SADDLES, ETC..... LESLIELYN
Reply to this comment
by mrsjp-2009 November 14, 2007 4:09 PM EST
just a thought.....we have (or did have) Phil Jordan living in Tioga County. He has been featured on Court TV and Discovery Times finding missing people and solving crimes. WHY didn''t anyone consult him?
Reply to this comment
by nikila40 November 14, 2007 3:23 PM EST
OK, you''ll probably think I''m crazy with this post. I do remember while watching 48 Hours that Calvin supposedly said he knew where to hide a body where nobody would find it. He doesn''t seem too concerned about his own land, as it didn''t bother him at all that they searched there. What about a cemetery? A newly dug grave? Any cemeteries nearby that held a burial on 9/11? That''s one place nobody would look - in the grave of another. Yikes...just a thought!
Reply to this comment
by heisguilty1 November 14, 2007 11:07 AM EST
Cal is guilty as sin and I trust that he will be convicted in this next trial and justice will finally be served. Why did he have no emotion? You have to have a heart to have emotion. He was having affairs while they were still married, long before Michele and they were legally separated before she starting seeing anyone. It''s too bad that the courts (or her lawyer?) required that they stay together in the same home during the divorce proceedings. I''m sure that just added fuel to the fire in an already bad marriage. As far as this Tubbs guy, I agree, he is NOT a credible witness and ironically his back taxes were recently paid! I hope they are keeping an eye on his bank account. Something definitely smells rotten in Denmark!
Reply to this comment
by wegoagain November 14, 2007 4:43 AM EST
Erin Moriarty, my concern is for the children in Tioga County. Please contact The National School Safety and Security Services. "School Safety Post Crisis Consulting Support" This community seems to have done some math. They will pay all expenses. Lets help the community move forward. They seem to be flip flopped.
Reply to this comment
by calvindidit November 14, 2007 12:40 AM EST
He is the only suspect who wouldn''t take a lie detector test...Wonder why?
Reply to this comment
by paul_in_va November 13, 2007 11:16 PM EST
I think it is tragic that a panel of 12 jurors can review the evidence, convict a murderer in under 4hrs, and one debt ridden, authority plagued, story teller, can interupt justice and put this man back on the streets for a year. Gee, Maybe OJ didn''t commit murder either!! Justice has not been served here.
Reply to this comment
by sun4girl November 13, 2007 10:33 PM EST
I HAVE KNOWN MICKELLE SINCE I WAS IN SCHOOL , SHE WAS A GOOD GOOD GIRL FROM A GOOD FAMILY , CAL SHOULD PAY FOR WHAT HE DID, SOMEONE SAID THERE WAS A NEW CONCRETE FLOOR PUT IN THE CAR DEALERSHIP THE DAY AFTER SHE DIED I BELIEVE SHE IS BURIED UNDER THERE AND SOMEONE SHOULD CHECK IT OUT. AS FAR AS THE NEW WITNESS GOES THOSE PEOPLE ARE NOT RELIABLE I KNOW THEM TO THEY ARE PROBABLY GETTING PAID GOOD FOR THE NEW INFO.
Reply to this comment
by kimynoregon November 13, 2007 5:45 PM EST
can see Cal''''s lack of emotion concerning his wife. Put yourself in his shoes; he''''s just watched the love of his life, the mother of his children, throw everything away. Reject him and start a life of absolute debauchery and narcissistic hedonism. He''''s watched the most precious person in his life has become a two-bit *** having multiple flings with whoever she could run up against. If it were me, I too would have withdrawn emotionally and just prayed that this whole thing would be over and that she''''d take the shame and insult she''''s brought to him and his family away. He undoubtedly knew that her new behavior would be ruinous, and just wanted it over. How doesn''''t matter how so much as she could have decided simply to move away with some other *** and complete her transformation into a real whorish scumbag. Matter of fact we don''''t know that that didn''''t happen!

Terrible jeff82, poor taste on your comment.
I''ll just leave it at that.

Reply to this comment
by auntblue November 13, 2007 4:54 PM EST
There are plenty of reasons to think he is guilty of murdering his wife. However, proving it a second time won''t be easy. The so called witness was a ridiculous attempt to insure a second tial. More than likely, this one will get him aquitted.
Reply to this comment
by mommyann1 November 13, 2007 4:08 PM EST
For a witness to come forward 6 years after the crime, with a vague at best description, and for that testimony to be deemed worthy enough to grant a new trial is beyond ridiculous. As an area resident familiar with the case, I am disgusted that this man is considered credible. He claims he didn''t hear about the case at first, and then didn''t consider what he says he saw important. (!?!?!?) It''s a true mouth breather moment, folks. Please keep the children in your thoughts and prayers. Imagine their lives for the past 6 years, and it''s only going to continue.
Reply to this comment
by thespectre24 November 13, 2007 4:00 PM EST
Yeah, Owego sure did take the spotlight, wegoagain. Which is why you find out about this roughly three days ago, which if my math tells me right, is roughly 6 YEARS after it happened. No one''s saying that this was more important than 9/11, it merely HAPPENED around that time.
Reply to this comment
See all 48 Comments
Coming Up

A Case for Murder

Saturday, Nov. 14 | 10 p.m. ET/PT

A young man found dead from multiple stab wounds - his family searches for the killer, but was it suicide?

More