NASA Will Share Air Safety Secrets

Agency Chief Says He'll Reveal Results Of Survey Finding Airline Mishaps More Common

(CBS/AP)  Faced with having to defend a decision to keep a major study of airline safety secret, NASA's administrator reversed course Wednesday and told the House Science Committee he will order the information released, CBS News correspondent Bob Fuss reports.

The study found that aircraft near collisions, runway interference and other safety problems occur far more often than previously recognized.

NASA had said previously it was withholding the information because it feared it would upset air travelers and hurt airline profits. Citing an insider familiar with the research, The Associated Press reported last week on the survey of some 24,000 pilots.

In testimony prepared for a congressional hearing Wednesday, Griffin said he has directed release "as soon as possible" of all the research data that does not contain what he described as confidential commercial information. Griffin said NASA spent $11.3 million on the research.

"One of the most important NASA principles is to ensure the dissemination of research results to the widest practical and appropriate extent," Griffin wrote.

In an odd twist, Griffin raised doubts in his prepared testimony about the reliability of his own agency's research by telling lawmakers that NASA does not consider the survey's methodology or data to have been sufficiently verified.

Griffin also confirmed in his written remarks that the research showed many types of safety incidents occurring more frequently than were reported by other government monitoring programs. But he cautioned that the data was never validated and warned, "There may be reason to question the validity of the methodology."

Experts who worked on the study say it adhered to the highest survey industry standards. The research was "state of the art," said Jon Krosnick, a Stanford University professor who helped create the survey questions. Disputing NASA's top official, Krosnick told Congress in his prepared remarks that aviation experts from NASA, the Federal Aviation Administration and other groups reviewed the research plans and said further scrutiny would not have been helpful.

"These peer review processes rarely yielded significant changes in the survey process," Krosnick said.

NASA's former head of the research survey, Robert Dodd, told lawmakers in his prepared testimony that the survey was based on "outstanding science," extensively tested and ready for meaningful analysis. Dodd said NASA's earlier explanations for withholding the information were "without merit."

"I don't believe that the NAOMS data contained any information that could compare with the image of a crashed air carrier airplane or would increase passengers' fear of flying," Dodd wrote.

In his testimony, Griffin also expressed regret over NASA's assertion that revealing the survey findings could damage the public's confidence in airlines and affect airline profits. NASA cited those reasons in refusing to turn over the survey data to the AP, which sought the information over 14 months under the Freedom of Information Act. Griffin has directed his agency to reconsider its denial of the data to the AP.

"I regret any impression that NASA was in any way trying to put commercial interests ahead of public safety," Griffin wrote. "That was not and never will be the case."

On Tuesday, Griffin bowed to a request from the lawmakers and sent copies of the raw data - contained on four CDs - to the House Science and Technology Committee.

Officials who have worked on the survey have said it contains no pilot names or airline names. The questionnaire asked pilots to state how many times in the previous 60 days they had encountered a wide range of problems with equipment, weather, tower communication and other safety issues.

NASA's efforts to withhold the safety research sparked tough criticism on Capitol Hill and in the editorial pages of dozens of leading newspapers - including USA Today, The New York Times and the Chicago Tribune - which urged the agency to release its research. The Times described NASA's reasons for withholding the information as "lame excuses."

Griffin also has sought to assure lawmakers that NASA will not destroy the research. Earlier this month, NASA ordered the contractor that conducted the survey to return any project information, then purge all related data from its computers. Griffin said that was according to the contract NASA had with the company, but that he has rescinded those instructions.

Although to most people NASA is associated with spaceflight, the agency has a long history of aviation safety research. Its experts study atmospheric science and airplane materials and design, among other areas.

The survey project, called the National Aviation Operations Monitoring Service, was launched after a White House commission in the late 1990s called for government efforts to significantly reduce fatal aircraft accidents.

[djberson]

They had no right to use tax dollars to conduct a study whose findings would not be revealed to the public. Worse, they have no right to DESTROY records of a study conducted with our tax dollars, without giving the taxpayers the product they PAID for.

[terrapin78]

Like I believe that this document will be released as it is. I expect that these Bu$hies will redact the h3ll out of it and/or change any scientific facts.

We all know how much this mis-Administration hates scientific fact!

[consciousnes]

How are you ever going to get something fixed if it is a secret?

[terrapin78]

This is another symptom of Bu$h mis-administration of public policy.

I remember a time when it was the REPUGs that insisted on TRANSPARENCY in GOVERNMENT at all levels. What happened? They have totally lost their compass, morally and otherwise!

[watcher269-2009]

So are these secrets supposed to be kept from the terrorists so they don''t find out that the air safety system is all F***ed up?

Or are the secrets supposed to be kept from the American people so they don''t find out that the air safety system is all F***ed up and WHAT THE F*** happened to all the Money that was pumped into the Air Safety system since 9/11 gone to?

Who is accountable for this? Bushit? He''ll probably blame it on Clinton!

No Really - where has all that money gone to improve safty for the American citizens? When is anyone going to hold this administration accountable????

All of our elected officials won''t do it - so who will?

[tucano2]

So who do you suppose paid NASA officials to keep public information secret?????

[geneonlbk]

Does my own government, who is paid, in part, by be have the legal right to make up their own rules and laws?

I believed that the huge amount of taxes I pay was, in part, to have my government act in my best interests and protect me from harm. I wonder what''s wrong with this picture.

[usayesterday]

The revelations of these findings will point to one main item...

...air traffic control and the need to improve it as well as increase the staffing in the ATC centers. The crisis will only get worse on a daily basis since many more air traffic controllers are retiring at record rates. Sadly, the age cutoff for joining the ranks are in the low 30s. How many people in their 20s are looking toward a career in air traffic control?!

Air traffic controllers may be paid well, but its far from a "***" career choice and it''s wrought with extreme levels of stress.

We are in for some extremely unfriendly skies, if not downright dangerous in the very near future.

[nordeck52]

I think it''s a good idea to reveal the results. If it can lead to better aviation safety, I''m all for it.