Rivals Target Clinton At Debate
Edwards, Obama Assail Democratic Frontrunner Over Iran, Iraq, And Consistency Of Positions
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Clinton Stumbles At Debate
Hillary Clinton made her first stumble in the Democratic presidential debate, accused of taking two different positions on the issue of drivers' licenses for immigrants. Jim Axelrod reports.
-
Video
Hillary Clinton's Challenge
Jeff Greenfield speaks with Katie Couric about Hillary Clinton's stumble in the debate and the potential minefield around restricted records in the National Archives.
-
Video
Democrats Target Hillary
Democratic presidential candidates squared off in Philadelphia and frontrunner Hillary Clinton was targeted by many of her competitors. Jeff Greenfield tells Harry Smith who he thinks came out on top.
-
-
Photo
Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., face off during a debate at Drexel University in Philadelphia, Tuesday, Oct. 30, 2007. (AP/Matt Rourke)
-
Photo
Democratic presidential hopefuls former Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., left, stands next to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., before the start of a Democratic debate at Drexel University Tuesday, Oct. 30, 2007, in Philadelphia. (AP/Rusty Kennedy)
-
-
Interactive
Campaign 2008
Profiles of the candidates, polls, fund-raising, blogs, video and more.
-
In-Depth
2008 Presidential Hopefuls
Profiles and the latest news on the Democrats and Republicans running for the White House.
Obama, the Illinois senator, began immediately, saying Clinton has changed her positions on the North American Free Trade Agreement, torture policies and the Iraq war. Leadership, he said, does not mean "changing positions whenever it's politically convenient."
Edwards, the former North Carolina senator, was even sharper at times, saying Clinton "defends a broken system that's corrupt in Washington, D.C." He stood by his earlier claim that she has engaged in "doubletalk."
Clinton, standing between the two men, largely shrugged off the remarks and defended her positions. She has been the focus of Republican candidates' "conversations and consternation," she said, because she is leading in the polls.
She said she has specific plans on Social Security, diplomacy and health care. "I have been standing against the Republicans, George Bush and Dick Cheney," she said, "and I will continue to do so, and I think Democrats know that."
It was the Democrats' first debate in a month, and during that time Clinton has solidified her front-runner position, gaining in polls, taking the lead in fundraising and dominating the agenda. The Iowa caucuses are scheduled for Jan. 3, and the New Hampshire primary could be even earlier.
Clinton defended her Senate vote in favor of designating Iran's Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist group. Obama, Edwards and others have said President Bush could interpret the measure as congressional approval for a military attack.
Edwards caustically challenged Clinton's claim that she stands up to the Bush administration. "So the way to do that is to vote yes on a resolution that looks like it was written literally by the neocons?" he said.
"In my view, rushing to war - we should not be doing that - but we shouldn't be doing nothing," Clinton said. "And that means we should not let them acquire nuclear weapons, and the best way to prevent that is a full court press on the diplomatic front."
Clinton also was the main focus during a discussion of the Iraq war. Again, Edwards leveled the toughest charges against the New York senator.
"If you believe that combat missions should be continued in Iraq" without a timetable for withdrawal, Edwards said, "then Senator Clinton is your candidate." Edwards vowed to have all combat troops out of Iraq "in my first year in office."
Clinton replied forcefully, saying "I stand for ending the war in Iraq, bringing our troops home." She added, however, that "it is going to take time," and some troops must remain to fight al Qaeda in Iraq.
"I don't know how you pursue al Qaeda without engaging them in combat," she said.
Edwards, drawing a link between Iraq and Iran, pressed on. "What I worry about is, if Bush invades Iran six months from now, I mean, are we going to hear: 'If only I had known then what I know now?"' He was alluding to comments Clinton has made about her 2002 vote to authorize military action against Saddam Hussein.
“Edwards and Obama achieved at least some of what they wanted to do coming into this debate and that was to exploit some of Clinton’s vulnerabilities with the Democratic base, especially on Iran and Iraq,” said CBSNews.com Senior Political Editor Vaughn Ververs. “Clinton defended herself well, but the criticism may play well with voters already uneasy with her past support of the war in Iraq." (Read more debate analysis from Vaughn Ververs in Horserace.)
©MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.





- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 144 CommentsI love watching Clinton take it up the arse from both parties.
- Posted by bobgee_1999 at 09:06 PM : Oct 30, 2007
I cast my first [and proudest] vote for George McGovern in 1972.
How different everything would be today, if he had won.
As it was, Nixon won with 60.7% of the vote.
That is significantly less than the 64% of Americans who now want U.S. troops out of Iraq within a year.
This year I registered as a republican to vote for Ron Paul in the primaries. We NEED him for at least one term, to take everything back to the way it was intended, for which he has pledged to ease us through the transition, stop subsidising and blowing trillions of dollars on every country BUT the U.S., get rid of the deficit, trade freely, gain a surplus, and THEN we can decide whether or not to start funding things.
Extreme times call for extreme measures.
This year I registered as a republican to vote for Ron Paul in the primaries. We NEED him for at least one term, to take everything back to the way it was intended, for which he has pledged to ease us through the transition, stop subsidising and blowing trillions of dollars on every country BUT the U.S., get rid of the deficit, trade freely, gain a surplus, and THEN we can decide whether or not to start funding things.
Extreme times call for extreme measures.
Go Ron Paul!
Ron Paul wants to legalize prostitution, and end the War on Drugs. With that, Ron Paul will be first time I have voted for a Republicon since I WAS GUARANTEED that right to vote in 1964.
There won"t even be a stroll to war with Iran.
Anyone who thinks Bush & company would get away with invading Iran, a large nation with 70 million people, after what has taken place over 4+ years in Iraq, a land of 27 million, just doesn"t have their thinking cap on.
War with Iran now is a Neocon Wet Dream. It should only be discussed in airport restrooms, to the sound of toe tapping.
Posted by Iceman_1960 at 10:17 PM : Oct 30, 2007
I agree, but I also think that Bush and Cheney are insane enough to try it anyway. No one in their right mind would attempt it, but they are not in their right mind. I think they really are that nuts. I also have no doubt that it would be a bloodbath of historic proportions.
Who do you think won the Philadelphia NBC - MSNBC News Democratic Presidential Debate?
---- http://www.youpolls.com/details.asp?pid=842
.
You all remind me of the Wendy%u2019s commercial where everyone one is following one another and jumping off the cliff because everyone else is doing it. Then the guy playing Wendy turns and goes away from the flow to be different and think different from everyone else. This is what we all need to do be free thinkers not the robots that go with the flow.
Ron Paul is just a grouchy old man
no one will ever take him seriously
You''re so right.
Can I get a single combination meal to go please?
Posted by bpm69
The problem is that Paul is aligned with a party whose extremism got us into this mess.
The last thing we need is the Republican baggage of David Duke, the Pats (Robertson and Buchanan) and the bush klan.
Paul blew ir by aligning himself with the Fascists.
The best shot of the evening.
Posted by brianbwb at 11:38 PM : Oct 30, 2007
Ron Paul is the Ralph Nader of the republican party. He can''t win, but he might peel away enough republican votes in his futility, to guarantee a democratic victory. Here''s hoping he runs as an independent. Hell I''ll contribute.
"Kucinich questions Bush"s mental health
Democratic presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich questioned President Bush"s mental health in light of comments he made about a nuclear Iran precipitating World War III.
"I seriously believe we have to start asking questions about his mental health," Kucinich, an Ohio congressman, said in an interview with The Philadelphia Inquirer''s editorial board on Tuesday. "There"s something wrong. He does not seem to understand his words have real impact."
Source:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071030/ap_on_el_pr/kucinich_bush
Ron Paul is just a grouchy old man
no one will ever take him seriously"
- Posted by billpl at 11:11 PM : Oct 30, 2007
I"m not so sure.
Grouchy times call for grouchy old men.
- Posted by bpm69
First stated by Hippocrates:
"Desperate diseases call for desperate remedies."
- Posted by thefarrier at 12:02 AM : Oct 31, 2007
Certainly not.
Stephen Douglas was a grouchy old man.
Who needs that ?
I was starting to wonder if the Bush regime and their Democrat Party collaborators were losing their ability to kill American soldiers in their lie-based wars of choice, but it looks like they are back on track.
3 more dead Americans today. Dead for nothing worthwhile.
###
"Baghdad. Insurgents killed three US soldiers southeast of Baghdad on Tuesday in a bomb attack, the military said, cited by AFP."
Posted by Iceman_1960 at 11:57 PM : Oct 30, 2007
Bush is mentally ill as is his number one puppet-master Di*ck Cheney. They are in turn delusional and power hungry. Both of them are wild-eyed warmongerers who believe they are above the law and will do as they please no matter what Congress, the Courts and the American people want. They will launch a war against Iran because they want to and they don''t care who opposes them. When they do it will come down to one question and one question only, will the military refuse or will they follow orders. Then they will have truly dragged us down to the level of a banana republic where the entire revolution and future of the country depends on do the soldiers go along with the coup by the current leader or do they (as the saying goes) stay in the barracks and refuse. Given the choice between obeying the will of the people or following their mad dream to invade Iran, they will try to seize power and go forward. As a people we have to decide if we''ll let them get away with it. I''m getting up in years, but I know myself and my weapon will be on the side of throwing them out.
The Iraq war started that way too.
The CFR has hijacked the foreign policy of both parties and their main goal is to destroy American soveriengty and our constitution leading to the formation of a North American Union with Canada and Mexico. Once the dollar is destroyed it will be easy to switch to the "Amero".
Dr. Ron Paul is NOT a member of the CFR and he is the only anti-war and pro-liberty candidate running for president.
ronpaul2008.com
'' .. i ran wild cramming trillions dollars pills down throats, waving trillions dollars guns in faces, preaching: be good or else .. ''
'' .. moses went to pharoah to say: you preached feed the world and don''t kill, yet taxed the world and starved, raped, tortured, and slayed trillions dollars of babies, the rest know not what they do, but you, for fear of moses unseen, who screams at your face day after day: you''re doing it wrong, you taxed the world and starved, raped, tortured, and slayed trillions dollars of babies; yet, you preached feed the world and don''t kill .. ''
'' .. as long as the home of the richest cannot be bought by poorest neighbor, economy is crashed and half world goes without toilets, lightbulbs, lunches; and, as long as home of richest cannot be bought by richest neighbor, economy is crashed and half world goes without toilets, lightbulbs, lunches .. ''
Trust me ... no one is taking you seriously ... take your agenda and shove it up your a**
Biden: %u201C%u2026And the irony is, Rudy Giuliani, probably the most under qualified person since George Bush to seek the presidency, is here - talking about any of the people here. Rudy Giuliani. I mean think about it, Rudy Giuliani, there%u2019s only three things he mentions in a sentence %u2014 a noun and a verb and 9/11 and I mean, there%u2019s nothing else. There%u2019s nothing else.%u201D
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 144 Comments