BAGHDAD, Oct. 30, 2007

Catastrophic Dam Collapse Feared In Iraq

U.S. Army Warns Tigris River Dam A Serious Threat To Baghdad And Mosul

  • Play CBS Video Video Dam In Danger

    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is working to prevent the collapse of Iraq's largest dam. If they fail, the result could be a catastrophe of biblical proportions. Allen Pizzey reports.

  • An Army Corps of Engineers report warns that if this dam north of Mosul, Iraq, collapses, Baghdad could be under 15 feet of water.

    An Army Corps of Engineers report warns that if this dam north of Mosul, Iraq, collapses, Baghdad could be under 15 feet of water.  (CBS)

  • Photo Essay Week In Iraq Photos

    A daily diary with scenes of the latest attacks and snapshots from the effort to rebuild a nation.

  • Interactive Battle For Iraq

    The government, the insurgency, key players, background and photos.

(CBS)  If a dam north of Mosul, Iraq, collapses it could send a trillion-gallon wave of water roaring through Iraq's two largest cities - and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has warned that is perilously close to happening, CBS News correspondent Allen Pizzey reports.

The dam is on the Tigris River, 45 miles north of the city of Mosul.

A catastrophic failure, engineers believe, could unleash a 60-foot-high wall of water that would be inundate Mosul - and flood Baghdad to a depth of 15 feet.

The casualty count would be in the hundreds of thousands.

The United States has supplied $27 million worth of equipment to upgrade this aging machinery used for reinforcing, which has been a problem since the dam was built in 1984.

Nevertheless, a report to be released today says that because of potential erosion, the Mosul Dam is “the most dangerous dam in the world.”

The problem is that it was built on a type of rock that dissolves when it comes into contact with water.

In a telephone interview, the Iraqi minister of water resources admitted there were, in his words "some problems," but added that his ministry was "planning to design a permanent solution."

In spite of the Iraqi government's professed confidence, Ambassador Ryan Crocker and Gen. David Petraeus sent a letter to the Iraqi prime minister in May stating that the damn presented “unacceptable risks.”

Given that a break could trigger a flood of Biblical proportion, that may go down as a classic example of diplomatic understatement.


© MMVII, CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Add a Comment See all 49 Comments
by morris61 November 1, 2007 8:49 PM EDT
Several million more dead Iraq citizens will never stand in the way of neocon profits.After the dam gives way from the explosive charges attached to it an American Corporation that has already been selected,will rebuild it for only 5 billion dollars.
Reply to this comment
by barbaraf4 October 31, 2007 2:29 PM EDT
"The United States has supplied $27 million worth of equipment to upgrade this aging machinery used for reinforcing, which has been a problem since the dam was built in 1984."

I can''t understand why we are sending money for Iraq to reinforce a failing dam, when our own infrastructure is crumbling.
Reply to this comment
by v_1618 October 31, 2007 12:58 PM EDT
HEY G. BUSH SAVE YOUR PRAYERS MY FRIEND,
FOR WHEN YOU REALLY GONNA NEED''EM...
Reply to this comment
by newsreader2 October 31, 2007 12:14 PM EDT
This could be the answer to our prayers.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 October 31, 2007 11:42 AM EDT
We should send in blackwater!!

BAM!! POW!! BAM!! (picture "Batman" style graphics)

No more dam!! No more problem!!
Reply to this comment
by cbs_oliver October 31, 2007 11:27 AM EDT
It concerns me that some might think it convenient for US forces if this catastrophe were to occur.

It is interesting that this story is suddenly pushed to the forefront.

Surely it was a looming catastrophe two months ago or even a year ago.

Where were our probing journalists then - ever eager as they are known to be (NOT) to uncover the important news and especially the truth?
Reply to this comment
by glossypan October 31, 2007 11:11 AM EDT
Lucky for us that our government is on good footing with a couple of companies who can rush in and take care of this little problem.
What''s a few billion more US taxpayer dollars for our friends in Dubai and Kuwait?
I hope all you neocons are rejoicing at keeping those tax and spend Dems out of power. They would be frittering away your tax dollars on frivolities here in the USA if given the chance.
Reply to this comment
by skyk-2009 October 31, 2007 10:42 AM EDT
I wonder how much THIS is going to cost American Taxpayers. We have Bridges falling down, roads that we can''t drive on and so much more that needs to be fixed. We can''t afford that according to Republican''s but we can afford to fix Dam''s in OTHER nations. What people will do for Greed is without bounds.
Reply to this comment
by watcher269-2009 October 31, 2007 7:52 AM EDT
Maybe this would - as God says - wash away the sinners! The Green Zone too?
Reply to this comment
by downtowner97 October 31, 2007 5:11 AM EDT
Would the breaking of that dam further raise the price of oil and increase the profits of Bush''s cronies? If so, then I''d rent a room on the top floor.
Reply to this comment
by grazinggoat October 31, 2007 4:41 AM EDT
If the Bush regime manages to kill another half-million Iraqis with a dam collapse, he will only have another 20 million, or so, more Iraqis to murder before the country is fully "liberated".
Posted by FeelFree1 at 08:38 PM : Oct 30, 2007

-Just wondering how for a sudden this dam is a danger. United Nations need to send inspectors in order to inspect the state of that dam. Check for holes, deep-drilled holes, in prevision of a gigantic biblical flooding...
Reply to this comment
by jetranger7 October 31, 2007 4:39 AM EDT
Ohhh Don''t Worry, shucks, Bush & Cheney will take care of it, umm people we need another 900-Billion to Fix this ***, how about it, Like its only 900-Billion,, what the heck !!!!
Reply to this comment
by cdfoxtrot October 31, 2007 3:17 AM EDT
This dam would make an obvious target for Al Queda & Co. If it really would cause the loss of hundreds of thousands of civilians, whoever would take it out would achieve in hours or days what it took months for the US military to "accomplish".
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt October 31, 2007 1:15 AM EDT
It"s just a coincidence that both are in favor of frequent colonoscopies.

Posted by Iceman_1960 at 10:03 PM : Oct 30, 2007

I wrote CBS and told them they were out of their mind when I read Couric was being considered. Their ratings since prove that I was right.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt October 31, 2007 1:13 AM EDT
Just for kicks:
http://www.noob.us/miscellaneous
/fox-news-exposed-by-employees/

Posted by hungry1968 at 09:55 PM : Oct 30, 2007

Thanks, hungry. i took a look and while most of what''s stated is just plain common sense, I really was impressed with the gaul of Fox''s CEO stating "we just want to do fine, profssional journalism".

With a penchant for telling lies as he demonstrates, it''s no wonder he''s a neocon supporter, eh?
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 October 31, 2007 1:03 AM EDT
"...since "thefarrier" is the screenname of Katie Couric..."

Just kidding.

It"s just a coincidence that both are in favor of frequent colonoscopies.
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 October 31, 2007 1:01 AM EDT
"Radio and I have both reported theferrier for his non-stop Ron Paul spam to no avail....."
- Posted by formrusmcsgt at 09:47 PM : Oct 30, 2007

A lot of good that will do, since "thefarrier" is the screenname of Katie Couric.

(My confidential CBS sources told me that)
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt October 31, 2007 12:59 AM EDT
I Would rather watch an info-mercial instead of O''''Reilly, but I do have to admit that his garbage is so outrageous at times, that it is pretty funny.

Posted by hungry1968 at 09:55 PM : Oct 30, 2007

I find all FNC programming to be hilarious, although they obviously would wish that it be taken seriously.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 October 31, 2007 12:55 AM EDT
And still there are a sufficient number of morons watching that drivel that he stays on the air. Scary, isn''''t it?

Posted by formrusmcsgt at 09:52 PM : Oct 30, 2007


I''m an Olberman guy myself. I Would rather watch an info-mercial instead of O''Reilly, but I do have to admit that his garbage is so outrageous at times, that it is pretty funny. Funny in a scary way, but funny none the less.

Just for kicks:
http://www.noob.us/miscellaneous/fox-news-exposed-by-employees/
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 October 31, 2007 12:54 AM EDT
"Catastrophic Dam Collapse Feared In Iraq"

Just what they need over there.

A dam collapse flooding a d*amn quagmire.

"Bring the troops home within a year" - the demand of 64% of the American people, a bigger percentage than preferred Ronald Reagan over Walter Mondale.

Source: Rasmussen

"Tuesday, October 16, 2007

For the second straight week, a Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 64% of Americans would like to see U.S. troops brought home from Iraq within a year. Prior to this week"s results, support for bringing the troops home had increased in three consecutive weeks.

Twenty-eight percent (28%) want the troops brought home immediately. That"s unchanged from a week ago but up from 20% five weeks ago."

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/the_war_in_iraq/iraq_troop_withdrawal
Reply to this comment
See all 49 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: