NEW YORK, Oct. 29, 2007

U.S. Guns Fuel Bloody Mexican Drug Wars

The Skinny: Rival Drug Cartels Battle It Out With Smuggled American Weapons

    • A Mexican federal policeman stands guard as others lift bundles of drugs through a shaft that reaches down to a sophisticated clandestine tunnel which passes under the U.S.-Mexico border in 2006.

      A Mexican federal policeman stands guard as others lift bundles of drugs through a shaft that reaches down to a sophisticated clandestine tunnel which passes under the U.S.-Mexico border in 2006.  (CBS)

    • This photo made available Oct. 1, 2007, by African Mission in Sudan, shows seriously injured African Union (AMIS) soldiers being helped from Haskanita military camp, in Haskanita, Darfur, Sudan, to a waiting helicopter Sunday Sept. 30, 2007, to be evacuated for medical treatment.

      This photo made available Oct. 1, 2007, by African Mission in Sudan, shows seriously injured African Union (AMIS) soldiers being helped from Haskanita military camp, in Haskanita, Darfur, Sudan, to a waiting helicopter Sunday Sept. 30, 2007, to be evacuated for medical treatment.  (AP Photo/AMIS)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Interactive Guns In America

    State-by-state gun laws and death rates, maps of recent school and workplace shootings and facts on who's at risk.

  • Photo Essay Darfur Protests

    Thousands of people join celebrities and lawmakers in urging a greater U.S. role in effort to end genocide in the troubled region.

(CBS)  The Skinny is Keach Hagey's take on the top news of the day and the best of the Internet.


The U.S. isn't the only country struggling with the effects of what's coming illegally over the U.S.-Mexico border.

The Washington Post reports that 100 percent of drug-related killings in Mexico are carried out with smuggled American weapons, according to Mexican police. About 2,000 enter Mexico each day, according to a Mexican government study.

The guns are "crucial tools in an astoundingly barbaric war between rival cartels that has cost 4,000 lives in the past 18 months and sent law enforcement agencies in Washington and Mexico City into crisis mode," the Post reports.

Officials at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms hope that some of the money will be used to give Mexican police chiefs greater access to U.S. databases for gun traces. Right now, the traces can only be made through federal police headquarters in Mexico City. That takes so long that many local cops don't bother.

They get into Mexico stuffed into the baggy pant legs or hidden in the trunks of "ants," or gunrunners -- often aided by corrupt customs officials. The weapons are often bought legally at gun shows in Arizona and other border states where loopholes allow criminals to stock up without background checks.

Guns are now flooding into the country in part because of the cartel war, and in part because of the ease of buying high-powered weapons since the U.S. assault weapons ban was not renewed in 2004, according to an ATF official.

The American taxpayer must now mop up the bloody results of the ban's demise: President Bush has promised $500 million in U.S. aid to help Mexico battle drug cartels, who are formidable precisely because of their steady supply of AK-47s and grenade launchers that were made In the U.S.A.

U.S. Has Talked Big On Darfur, But Has Done Very Little

There's been enough hot air emanating from the Bush administration over the crisis in Darfur in the past few years to warm the climate a few degrees.

But the Washington Post takes a long, hard look at those promises this morning, and find them coming up very short.

A year and a half after President Bush called for international troops on the ground to protect innocent Darfuris and repeatedly described the situation there as "genocide," the situation on the ground remains unchanged. More than 2 million displaced Darfuris have been unable to return to their homes. Despite a renewed United Nations push, the international peacekeepers have yet to materialize.

In spite of his passionate rhetoric, Bush has been ineffectual on two fronts: unable to mobilize either his bureaucracy or the international community.

Every time the president says he wants to take some direct action in Darfur, his aides block him, pointing out the folly of the U.S. being seen as invading another Muslim country. And then there's the elephant in the room: the U.S. has no strategic interests in Sudan.

"Advisers say Bush came to accept, albeit grudgingly, the arguments against using U.S. military assets - especially the possibility that they might attract al Qaeda," the paper reports.

But Bush's efforts to get other military assets onto the ground to help the strained African Union troops have gone nowhere, according to the paper.

"Overall," concluded John Bolten, the former U.N. ambassador to the United Nations. "Sudan is a case where there's a lot of international rhetoric and no stomach for real action."

Big Law Firms Turn Out To Be Embarrassingly Full Of White Men

Big law firms are getting graded on diversity by a bunch of law students at Stanford, the New York Times reports, and many are failing.

Students are handing out "diversity report cards" ranking firms on how many female, minority and gay lawyers they have, and then asking elite schools to restrict recruiting by those at the bottom of their rankings.

In New York, a third of the big firms have no black partners, and an overlapping third no Hispanic ones. Half the firms in Boston have no black partners, and three quarters no Hispanic ones.

"This is 2007," said Michel Landis Daubner, a law professor at Stanford and the adviser for the project, called Building a Better Legal Profession. "If you can't find a single black or Hispanic partner, that's not an accident."

The students also found relatively few female partners in New York, ranging from 7 percent at Fulbright & Jaworski to 23 percent at Morrison & Foerster.

Those numbers are "a bit of canary in the coal mine," said Deborah Rhode, another Stanford law professor. "The absence of women as partners often says something about how firms deal with work-family issues."

A NOTE TO READERS: The Skinny is available via e-mail. Click here and follow the directions to register to receive it in your inbox each weekday morning.


©MMVII, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Add a Comment See all 56 Comments
by usaprophet October 30, 2007 5:14 PM EDT
I don''t know about you, but I''m sick of no-win pseudo-wars, like The War on Drugs and The War on Terrorism. I''m sick of undeclared wars like The War in Iraq and unnecessary and protracted police actions like the one in Korea. I''m sick of income taxes, which are unconstitutional because they are are a direct tax and are not equally apportioned as the Constitution requires. I''m sick of back door national ID cards like The Real ID Act. I''m sick of warrantless domestic spying by the Department of Homeland Insecurity and the loss of my civil liberties as a result of Draconian, fear-based Laws with oxymoronic names like The Patrot Act. I''m sick of secret offshore prisons like the one in Guantanamo, where our government tortures prisoners, who have no right to redress of grievance, or to writ of habeus corpus. I''m also sick of the Federal Reserve (a secret group of private banks) manipulation of our worthless, fiat currency. Do yourself a favor. Support the 2008 candidacy of Dr. Ron Paul for President of The United States. I believe he''s our only hope to restore peace, prosperity and freedom in this country. Presidential candidates with the integrity and bearing the positive message of Dr. Paul only come around only once in a lifetime, if we''re lucky. The cause of freedom is too important to let anything stand in the way of our participation in this 21st Century political revolution.
Reply to this comment
by khc3-2009 October 30, 2007 12:57 PM EDT
Does "Keach Hagey''s take on the top news of the day and the best of the Internet" mean silly *** he just makes up?
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan October 30, 2007 3:34 AM EDT
I LOVE MY AK-47!
All responsible, freedom-loving American families should have one.
www.a-human-right.com/effective.html

Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan October 30, 2007 3:31 AM EDT
Guns are not to blame for a failed drug prohibition policy.
The "WAR ON DRUGS" is a drug gang''s best friend.
How else can they have a monopoly on billions of dollars in black market profits?!?
www.leap.cc
www.mpp.org
Reply to this comment
by mcapek October 30, 2007 2:51 AM EDT
Whining that illegal firearms are coming across the border from USA to Mexico will NOT solve the problem. Reinstating the assault weapon bill will NOT solve anything, because there are already millions of firearms on the market. And the world is awash with firearms, so even if the border between US and Mexico was sealed, the weapons will come from another source (e.g. Chavez in Venezuela, who is building a factory to crank-out Russian AK-74s full auto assault rifles by hundreds of thousands).
Reply to this comment
by mcapek October 30, 2007 2:50 AM EDT
Grenade launchers? Is CBS kidding us? Show me one gun show in the USA where I can buy a grenade launcher and grenades to go with it. Or an RPG rocket propelled grenade. There is no such thing, I call this story ***. Yes, it is easy for crooks to illegally buy and export semiautomatic versions of AK47 and M16, made in or imported into USA. There are already stiff Federal laws and punishments for such behavior (strawman purchases, illegal exportations without a State Department license; which should net the perpetrator 10 years or more in the Federal prison, assuming that law enforcement actually bothers to track the perp down, arrest him and prosecute him). Looking at the mediocre government effort in rooting out illegals in this country, somehow I think ATF and State Department is not serious about doing their jobs. All they have to do is confiscate one of these illegal firearms in Mexico, look at its serial number, go back to the USA manufacturer or importer,
see which distributor they sent it to, then to which FFL dealer it was sent, and then look at the form that the buyer must fill out under penalty of law, with a valid ID card.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus6 October 30, 2007 2:31 AM EDT
"So , is it true that you send all your *** offenders to somene elses country (Like Thailand)?" posted by ToolMangler

Sometimes you come up with the silliest things.
Reply to this comment
by logicanada October 30, 2007 2:28 AM EDT
I have to agree that prohibition is not the answer. Denmark has legalized the use of drugs and the savings from enforcement and incarceration have offset community rehab costs and counseling. How many drug wars in Demark? Mexico''s problems run to the roots of poverty.
Reply to this comment
by usaprophet October 30, 2007 1:32 AM EDT
I agree with Dr. Paul about the issue of illegal immigration. The talk must stop. We must secure our borders now. A nation without secure borders is no nation at all. It makes no sense to fight terrorists abroad when our own front door is left unlocked. Ron Paul has a plan: (1.) Physically secure our borders and coastlines. We must do whatever it takes to control entry into our country before we undertake complicated immigration reform proposals. (2.) Enforce visa rules. Immigration officials must track visa holders and deport anyone who overstays their visa or otherwise violates U.S. law. This is especially important when we recall that a number of 9/11 terrorists had expired visas. (3.) No amnesty. Estimates suggest that 10 to 20 million people are in our country illegally. That''s a lot of people to reward for breaking our laws. (4.) No welfare for illegal aliens. Americans have welcomed immigrants who seek opportunity, work hard, and play by the rules, but taxpayers should not pay for illegal immigrants who use hospitals, clinics, schools, roads, and social services. (5.) End birthright citizenship. As long as illegal immigrants know their children born here will be citizens, the incentive to enter the U.S. illegally will remain strong. (6.) Pass true immigration reform. The current system, and those proposed by ALL other candidates, is incoherent and unfair, and would allow up to 60 million more immigrants into our country.
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 October 29, 2007 11:55 PM EDT
Actually the only reason I post on the U.S. site is to find out what is going on in your country. With us being your neighbors I want to keep up with things there. Afterall if you get blown up by your enemies, we will likely go with you

Posted by erasmus6 at 03:42 PM : Oct 29, 2007


So , is it true that you send all your *** offenders to somene elses country (Like Thailand)?
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 October 29, 2007 11:47 PM EDT
Kindly cite some U.S. firms that make AKs!

Posted by gkc99 at 07:48 PM : Oct 29, 2007


If you Google AK47 +made in USA This is what you find
"Results 1 - 30 of about 822,000 English pages for ak47 made in USA"



These firms are in America and they make AK-47s in America.


Horns Custom Rifles
Ewbank Manufacturing
AK-USA Manufacturing Inc.
Marshall Arms
Arsenal Inc
Vector Arms
Ohio Ordnance Works
Robinson Armament Co
Piece of History Firearms LLC
Global Trades / Armory USA
Ohio Rapid Fire
Krebs of Krebs Custom, Inc
Red Jacket Firearms
Firing Line
Vulcan Arms, Inc.

http://www.ak-47.us/USmade.php
Reply to this comment
by gkc99 October 29, 2007 10:50 PM EDT
"Another thing, in Canada we don''''t like to air our dirty laundry to the whole world like the U.S. does.
"--Posted by erasmus6


That''s why you got so much dirty $hit up there--it never airs out.

Unfortunately, Yourassmus seems to have endless hours to explain to us why we''re such trash.

So what HAS your government taken a stand on since WW2?
Reply to this comment
by gkc99 October 29, 2007 10:48 PM EDT
"steady supply of AK-47s . . . that were made In the U.S.A."


Such as? Since the rifle was invented by a Russian, the U.S. military never used it. Most civilian AKs are made in China or the Eastern European block.

Kindly cite some U.S. firms that make AKs!
Reply to this comment
by usaprophet October 29, 2007 10:43 PM EDT
Like Ron Paul, I share our Founders'' belief that in a free society each citizen must have the right to keep and bear arms. They ratified the Second Amendment knowing that this right is the guardian of every other right, and they all would be horrified by the proliferation of unconstitutional legislation that prevents law-abiding Americans from exercising this right. Congressman, Paul has always supported the Second Amendment and these are some of the bills he introduced in the current Congress to help restore respect for it: H.R. 1096 includes provisions repealing the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act and the Federal Firearms License Reform Act of 1993, two invasive and unconstitutional bills. H.R. 1897 would end the ban on carrying a firearm in the National Park System, restoring Americans'' ability to protect themselves in potentially hazardous situations. H.R. 3305 would allow pilots and specially assigned law enforcement personnel to carry firearms in order to protect airline passengers, possibly preventing future 9/11-style attacks. H.R. 1146 would end our membership in the United Nations, protecting us from their attempts to tax our guns or disarm us entirely. In the past, he introduced legislation to repeal the so-called assault weapons ban before its 2004 sunset, and he has opposed all attempts to reinstate it. Congessman, Paul also recently opposed H.R. 2640, which would allow government-appointed psychiatrists to ban U.S. veterans experiencing even mild forms of PTSD.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan October 29, 2007 7:58 PM EDT
COPS SAY LEGALIZE DRUGS!
ASK US WHY
After nearly four decades of fueling the U.S. policy of a war on drugs with over a trillion tax dollars and 37 million arrests for nonviolent drug offenses, our confined population has quadrupled making building prisons the fastest growing industry in the United States. More than 2.2 million of our citizens are currently incarcerated and every year we arrest an additional 1.9 million more guaranteeing those prisons will be bursting at their seams. Every year we choose to continue this war will cost U.S. taxpayers another 69 billion dollars. Despite all the lives we have destroyed and all the money so ill spent, today illicit drugs are cheaper, more potent, and far easier to get than they were 35 years ago at the beginning of the war on drugs. Meanwhile, people continue dying in our streets while drug barons and terrorists continue to grow richer than ever before. We would suggest that this scenario must be the very definition of a failed public policy. This madness must cease!

Get Involved-
www.leap.cc
www.mpp.org


Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan October 29, 2007 7:36 PM EDT
It is not logical to blame guns for a failed drug prohibition policy.
This story is just more government propaganda demonizing guns and ignoring the real cause of the problem(prohibition).
Reply to this comment
by lfitts1 October 29, 2007 7:28 PM EDT
Gawd if this was the 1800''''s There would be no such thing as Anti-Gun retards.

Posted by Badmofojim

You are so right--let''s return to the good old days of the wild west---saddle up and hand me my six shooters...
Reply to this comment
by badmofojim October 29, 2007 7:05 PM EDT
Gawd if this was the 1800''s There would be no such thing as Anti-Gun retards.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus6 October 29, 2007 6:50 PM EDT
Xlib

Also our media doesn''t advertise our weak spots and give out too much information, so the terrorists can use it to their advantage. Actually I don''t think we have as much of a problem with the terrorists trying to get us like the U.S. does.:)
Reply to this comment
by erasmus6 October 29, 2007 6:42 PM EDT
Xlib

"I''''m getting a bit sick and tired of you Candians coming to the US and using our health care facilities."

Well the only ones that come are the RICH SNOTS that think they are better than everybody else and can''t wait a couple of days. As for everybody else, no one in their right mind would go to the States. We have health care here. We would rather not die from your germ infested, filthy hospitals. Now as for the malls, you might not want to turn us away, you need all the money you can get. Your country is going bankrupt.


"One question there, why are you bothering to post on a US site?? No places to blog up there?"

Actually the only reason I post on the U.S. site is to find out what is going on in your country. With us being your neighbors I want to keep up with things there. Afterall if you get blown up by your enemies, we will likely go with you.

Another thing, in Canada we don''t like to air our dirty laundry to the whole world like the U.S. does.
Reply to this comment
See all 56 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now


For Those Who
Want To Help:
FEMA refers the public to two Web sites, Network for Food and NVOAD (National Voluntary Organizations Active In Disasters).

For more aid resources: click here
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: