February 11, 2009 3:58 PM

U.S. Guns Fuel Bloody Mexican Drug Wars

By
Keach Hagey
(CBS)  The Skinny is Keach Hagey's take on the top news of the day and the best of the Internet.


The U.S. isn't the only country struggling with the effects of what's coming illegally over the U.S.-Mexico border.

The Washington Post reports that 100 percent of drug-related killings in Mexico are carried out with smuggled American weapons, according to Mexican police. About 2,000 enter Mexico each day, according to a Mexican government study.

The guns are "crucial tools in an astoundingly barbaric war between rival cartels that has cost 4,000 lives in the past 18 months and sent law enforcement agencies in Washington and Mexico City into crisis mode," the Post reports.

Officials at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms hope that some of the money will be used to give Mexican police chiefs greater access to U.S. databases for gun traces. Right now, the traces can only be made through federal police headquarters in Mexico City. That takes so long that many local cops don't bother.

They get into Mexico stuffed into the baggy pant legs or hidden in the trunks of "ants," or gunrunners -- often aided by corrupt customs officials. The weapons are often bought legally at gun shows in Arizona and other border states where loopholes allow criminals to stock up without background checks.

Guns are now flooding into the country in part because of the cartel war, and in part because of the ease of buying high-powered weapons since the U.S. assault weapons ban was not renewed in 2004, according to an ATF official.

The American taxpayer must now mop up the bloody results of the ban's demise: President Bush has promised $500 million in U.S. aid to help Mexico battle drug cartels, who are formidable precisely because of their steady supply of AK-47s and grenade launchers that were made In the U.S.A.

U.S. Has Talked Big On Darfur, But Has Done Very Little

There's been enough hot air emanating from the Bush administration over the crisis in Darfur in the past few years to warm the climate a few degrees.

But the Washington Post takes a long, hard look at those promises this morning, and find them coming up very short.

A year and a half after President Bush called for international troops on the ground to protect innocent Darfuris and repeatedly described the situation there as "genocide," the situation on the ground remains unchanged. More than 2 million displaced Darfuris have been unable to return to their homes. Despite a renewed United Nations push, the international peacekeepers have yet to materialize.

In spite of his passionate rhetoric, Bush has been ineffectual on two fronts: unable to mobilize either his bureaucracy or the international community.

Every time the president says he wants to take some direct action in Darfur, his aides block him, pointing out the folly of the U.S. being seen as invading another Muslim country. And then there's the elephant in the room: the U.S. has no strategic interests in Sudan.

"Advisers say Bush came to accept, albeit grudgingly, the arguments against using U.S. military assets - especially the possibility that they might attract al Qaeda," the paper reports.

But Bush's efforts to get other military assets onto the ground to help the strained African Union troops have gone nowhere, according to the paper.

"Overall," concluded John Bolten, the former U.N. ambassador to the United Nations. "Sudan is a case where there's a lot of international rhetoric and no stomach for real action."

Big Law Firms Turn Out To Be Embarrassingly Full Of White Men

Big law firms are getting graded on diversity by a bunch of law students at Stanford, the New York Times reports, and many are failing.

Students are handing out "diversity report cards" ranking firms on how many female, minority and gay lawyers they have, and then asking elite schools to restrict recruiting by those at the bottom of their rankings.

In New York, a third of the big firms have no black partners, and an overlapping third no Hispanic ones. Half the firms in Boston have no black partners, and three quarters no Hispanic ones.

"This is 2007," said Michel Landis Daubner, a law professor at Stanford and the adviser for the project, called Building a Better Legal Profession. "If you can't find a single black or Hispanic partner, that's not an accident."

The students also found relatively few female partners in New York, ranging from 7 percent at Fulbright & Jaworski to 23 percent at Morrison & Foerster.

Those numbers are "a bit of canary in the coal mine," said Deborah Rhode, another Stanford law professor. "The absence of women as partners often says something about how firms deal with work-family issues."

A NOTE TO READERS: The Skinny is available via e-mail. Click here and follow the directions to register to receive it in your inbox each weekday morning.
Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
by usaprophet October 30, 2007 5:14 PM EDT
I don''t know about you, but I''m sick of no-win pseudo-wars, like The War on Drugs and The War on Terrorism. I''m sick of undeclared wars like The War in Iraq and unnecessary and protracted police actions like the one in Korea. I''m sick of income taxes, which are unconstitutional because they are are a direct tax and are not equally apportioned as the Constitution requires. I''m sick of back door national ID cards like The Real ID Act. I''m sick of warrantless domestic spying by the Department of Homeland Insecurity and the loss of my civil liberties as a result of Draconian, fear-based Laws with oxymoronic names like The Patrot Act. I''m sick of secret offshore prisons like the one in Guantanamo, where our government tortures prisoners, who have no right to redress of grievance, or to writ of habeus corpus. I''m also sick of the Federal Reserve (a secret group of private banks) manipulation of our worthless, fiat currency. Do yourself a favor. Support the 2008 candidacy of Dr. Ron Paul for President of The United States. I believe he''s our only hope to restore peace, prosperity and freedom in this country. Presidential candidates with the integrity and bearing the positive message of Dr. Paul only come around only once in a lifetime, if we''re lucky. The cause of freedom is too important to let anything stand in the way of our participation in this 21st Century political revolution.
Reply to this comment
by khc3-2009 October 30, 2007 12:57 PM EDT
Does "Keach Hagey''s take on the top news of the day and the best of the Internet" mean silly *** he just makes up?
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan October 30, 2007 3:34 AM EDT
I LOVE MY AK-47!
All responsible, freedom-loving American families should have one.
www.a-human-right.com/effective.html

Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan October 30, 2007 3:31 AM EDT
Guns are not to blame for a failed drug prohibition policy.
The "WAR ON DRUGS" is a drug gang''s best friend.
How else can they have a monopoly on billions of dollars in black market profits?!?
www.leap.cc
www.mpp.org
Reply to this comment
by mcapek October 30, 2007 2:51 AM EDT
Whining that illegal firearms are coming across the border from USA to Mexico will NOT solve the problem. Reinstating the assault weapon bill will NOT solve anything, because there are already millions of firearms on the market. And the world is awash with firearms, so even if the border between US and Mexico was sealed, the weapons will come from another source (e.g. Chavez in Venezuela, who is building a factory to crank-out Russian AK-74s full auto assault rifles by hundreds of thousands).
Reply to this comment
by mcapek October 30, 2007 2:50 AM EDT
Grenade launchers? Is CBS kidding us? Show me one gun show in the USA where I can buy a grenade launcher and grenades to go with it. Or an RPG rocket propelled grenade. There is no such thing, I call this story ***. Yes, it is easy for crooks to illegally buy and export semiautomatic versions of AK47 and M16, made in or imported into USA. There are already stiff Federal laws and punishments for such behavior (strawman purchases, illegal exportations without a State Department license; which should net the perpetrator 10 years or more in the Federal prison, assuming that law enforcement actually bothers to track the perp down, arrest him and prosecute him). Looking at the mediocre government effort in rooting out illegals in this country, somehow I think ATF and State Department is not serious about doing their jobs. All they have to do is confiscate one of these illegal firearms in Mexico, look at its serial number, go back to the USA manufacturer or importer,
see which distributor they sent it to, then to which FFL dealer it was sent, and then look at the form that the buyer must fill out under penalty of law, with a valid ID card.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus6 October 30, 2007 2:31 AM EDT
"So , is it true that you send all your *** offenders to somene elses country (Like Thailand)?" posted by ToolMangler

Sometimes you come up with the silliest things.
Reply to this comment
by logicanada October 30, 2007 2:28 AM EDT
I have to agree that prohibition is not the answer. Denmark has legalized the use of drugs and the savings from enforcement and incarceration have offset community rehab costs and counseling. How many drug wars in Demark? Mexico''s problems run to the roots of poverty.
Reply to this comment
by usaprophet October 30, 2007 1:32 AM EDT
I agree with Dr. Paul about the issue of illegal immigration. The talk must stop. We must secure our borders now. A nation without secure borders is no nation at all. It makes no sense to fight terrorists abroad when our own front door is left unlocked. Ron Paul has a plan: (1.) Physically secure our borders and coastlines. We must do whatever it takes to control entry into our country before we undertake complicated immigration reform proposals. (2.) Enforce visa rules. Immigration officials must track visa holders and deport anyone who overstays their visa or otherwise violates U.S. law. This is especially important when we recall that a number of 9/11 terrorists had expired visas. (3.) No amnesty. Estimates suggest that 10 to 20 million people are in our country illegally. That''s a lot of people to reward for breaking our laws. (4.) No welfare for illegal aliens. Americans have welcomed immigrants who seek opportunity, work hard, and play by the rules, but taxpayers should not pay for illegal immigrants who use hospitals, clinics, schools, roads, and social services. (5.) End birthright citizenship. As long as illegal immigrants know their children born here will be citizens, the incentive to enter the U.S. illegally will remain strong. (6.) Pass true immigration reform. The current system, and those proposed by ALL other candidates, is incoherent and unfair, and would allow up to 60 million more immigrants into our country.
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 October 29, 2007 11:55 PM EDT
Actually the only reason I post on the U.S. site is to find out what is going on in your country. With us being your neighbors I want to keep up with things there. Afterall if you get blown up by your enemies, we will likely go with you

Posted by erasmus6 at 03:42 PM : Oct 29, 2007


So , is it true that you send all your *** offenders to somene elses country (Like Thailand)?
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook