NASA Court-Ordered To Search For UFO Docs
Space Agency To Check Its Archives For Info About A Mysterious 1965 Crash Incident
-
Photo
(CBS/AP)
-
Interactive
Bush's Space Boost
Details of the president's plan for a new American campaign in space.
The government has refused to open its files about what, if anything, moved across the sky and crashed in the woods near Kecksburg, Pa., 40 miles southeast of Pittsburgh.
Traffic was tied up in the area as curiosity seekers drove to the area, only to be kept away from the crash site by soldiers.
The Air Force's explanation for the unidentified flying object: a meteor or meteors.
"They could not find anything," one Air Force memo stated after a late-night search on Dec. 9, 1965. Several NASA employees also were reported to have been at the scene.
Eyewitnesses said a flatbed truck drove away a large object shaped like an acorn and about the size of a Volkswagen bus. A mock-up based on the descriptions of local residents sits behind the Kecksburg Volunteer Fire Department.
UFO enthusiasts refused to let the matter die and journalist Leslie Kean of New York City sued NASA four years ago for information.
"This is about the public's right to know," Kean said. "We would be doing this lawsuit regardless of whether UFO groups were interested in it or not. It's a freedom of information issue."
The agency has turned over several stacks of documents which Kean says are not responsive to the request, an argument that U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan agreed with.
In March, Sullivan rejected NASA's request to throw the case out of court, resulting in negotiations that led to the agency promising last week that it will conduct a more comprehensive search.
Kean said Friday that she sued NASA rather than the Army because the space agency a decade ago released some relevant documents on the case.
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 93 CommentsAnd while they''re at it take Hillary with them.
dead astronauts that the US Government, at the time, was
too embarrassed to admit to the public or to the Soviets.
.
DEAD ASTRONAUTS THAT THE US GOVERNMENT, AT THE TIME, WAS,
TOO EMBARRASSED TO ADMIT TO THE PUBLIC OR TO THE SOVIETS.
More logical than anything else on this thread.
.
SinGinRick must have been a HUGE SINNER to make him feel it is necessary, or even advisable, to spend his time on these comment boards telling us all about his imaginary friend.
Does it make you feel "more saved", Rick, when you blather on and on about your imaginary lover?
Look up the word "witness" sometime, Rick. It most definitely does NOT mean "to blather on and on about being saved" and it definitely does NOT mean "to try to convert everyone to your way of thinking". To witness is to observe, without being involved. Later on, to witness came to mean "to provide reliable testimony based on what one has witnessed". What you "Christians" are doing is a far cry from what you were instructed to do.
For example, Jesus said you should pray silently, in secret. He said that those who pray loudly, in public, are hypocrites. That pretty much condemns ALL of the current batch of "Christians".
If you knew Jesus (who is dead, BTW, so who is this imaginary friend you''re playing with now?), then you would just ****. The ignorance you spread helps no one, least of all yourself. And you''re going to need a heap of help, buddy!
Lacking any intelligent counter argument, you repug re/tards fall back on the old standard of trying to slime your opponent by innuendo. That simply adds another layer of proof that you are, in fact, wrong and you know it!
If Jesus is the "Lord or Lords", then that means there are OTHER Lords. Hmmm...
Sounds kind of like the Mormons! Except they believe that the ONE TRUE GOD is Elohim, and that He is the Father of Satan and Jesus and Jehovah. So that would make Jesus the baby child of the Lord of Lords, wouldn''t it?
Didn''t you say somewhere that you''d happily vote for Mutt Romney, the mormon? Maybe not.
In any case, I''m certain that the average "Christian" believes there is only ONE Lord. They''re so fanatical about it that they don''t like Jews, who don''t believe in Jesus (but they do believe in the same God, Jehovah), and they don''t like Muslims, who believe in Jesus and believe in the same one God, only problem is, they think his name is Allah (which means "The God"). Apparently, these tiny little differences in beliefs matter a great deal to you people. So, I''d be careful about using phrases like, "the Lord of Lords", if I were you.
SinGin, you''re really on a roll today!
The "Christian" "truth" you refer to changes ALL THE TIME. It''s an ever-changing mess of bad translations and phoney interpretations by a priestly class who want to control you, mixed in with slimy politics and greed. The re/tards who did the translations couldn''t get right even VERY BASIC concepts, like "sin"! The word in the Bible that is always translated as "sin" actually means "to miss the mark", like in archery. All the sinners that you''re so worried about are just people with bad aim! Leave them alone!
For what my opinion is worth, UFOs are probably not extraterrestial. The physics behind star formation, planet building, "Goldilocks" zone placement and water availibility preclude life beyond the simple and unicellular on the overwhelming majority of our worlds. Expecting other planets to have the exact conditions necessary to encourage civilizations as curious as we about "what''s out there" is really shooting the moon. We may have company, but there isn''t an awful lot of it.
I don''t know. I don''t think I''ve ever really seen a UFO, though I have seen things I couldn''t identify at the time. (And I have seen other things that defy the classical world view.)
This universe is UNBELIVABLY HUGE, so it seems unlikely to the point of absurdity that there is no other intelligent life out there. Though why they would want to come here is beyond me.
Furthermore, current thinking in the fields of physics and cosmology indicate that this universe is simply one among an infinite number of alternate universes. The odds of this being the ONLY world in the ONLY universe with "intelligent" life on it are just so low as to be unthinkable.
But, if it makes you feel "special", and if that special feeling lets you get to sleep at night, go ahead and believe whatever you like. Just don''t expect anyone else to share your narrow view of life.
SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!
Posted by LloydBest1 at 10:56 AM : Oct 27, 2007
You make the assumption that all life must be carbon based and use liquid water as a catalyst. Considering the size and diversity of the universe, I say that''s an assumption we can''t rely on. There just simply isn''t enough evidence one way or another to make any kind of estimate as to how populated our universe is (considering that we have only one data point, us). Any attempt to do so would have an unbelievable amount of error associated with it.
was ''star trek'' filmed on location?
It''s like when a squirming politician says, "no comment!", to charges that are leveled.
C''mon, NASA. You decided to stonewall a report about safety among airlines, and now this.
The Freedom of Information Act shall set you free.
DEAD ASTRONAUTS THAT THE US GOVERNMENT, AT THE TIME, WAS
TOO EMBARRASSED TO ADMIT TO THE PUBLIC OR TO THE SOVIETS.
More logical than anything else on this thread.
.
Not likely. For of all, there are no "missing" US astronauts - all present and accounted for in 1965. Plus, I''m sure families of these supposed dead astronauts would have noticed they weren''t around anymore. Secondly, I''m sure people in Florida would have noticed an unannounced launch. They are kind of hard to miss for those living around the Cape.
NASA was sold to the public back in the Sputnik (1957) era as America''s answer to the Russians, and various "gaps", ranging from bombers to missiles.
The current imposture of NASA with regard to space shuttle safety is a case in point. A blue-ribbon scientific panel commissioned by congress following the Columbia reentry disaster presented NASA with a list of recommendations.
To date, however, NASA still has not addressed major concerns such as ice and foam debris. NASA has not developed a viable, in-flight repair kit for the shuttle''s vulnerable leading edge (carbon-on-carbon fiber).
In its July, 2006, launch of the first shuttle since Columbia, NASA claimed it had done all that it could. The shuttle and its crew were held secure and safe by NASA''s fervent hope nothing would go wrong.
That situation persists as NASA adopts low-profile, ad hoc adjustment of its politics to the fact of its technical inadequacy. And yes, there appears to be something of a cost-benefit decision, as well. After all, the remaining shuttles are expensive beasts, and all are due for retirement.
More logical than anything else on this thread.
.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by MCVett at 12:18 PM : Oct 27, 2007"
Seig Heil Herr MCVet, for bringing to light another glaring DEMOCRAT (circa 1965) cover-up.
loooool. What Bush is most responsible for is making us look like total morons in the international community. People laugh their a''s off at us having Bush as president. What group of people would choose a president who has no skill at communicating at an international level.
You are mistaken. Clinton DID get it, but not what he was being PAID to get (i.e. Monica)
"NASA wants our tax dollars and have given us nothing but promises for 40 years except some fairly decent pictures that didn''''t improve my life a bit.
Posted by crzmeat at 06:35 PM : Oct 27, 2007"
GROUND PROCESSING SCHEDULING SYSTEM
SEMICONDUCTOR CUBING
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
WINDOWS VISUAL NEWS READER
AIR QUALITY MONITOR
VIRTUAL REALITY
ENRICHED BABY FOOD
WATER PURIFICATION SYSTEM
SCRATCHRESISTANT LENSES
POOL PURIFICATION
RIBBED SWIMSUIT
GOLF BALL AERODYNAMICS
PORTABLE COOLERS/WARMERS
SPORTS TRAINING
ATHLETIC SHOES
MICROSPHERES
SOLAR ENERGY
WEATHER FORECASTING AID
FOREST MANAGEMENT
SENSORS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
WIND MONITOR
TELEMETRY SYSTEMS
PLANT RESEARCH
FIRE RESISTANT MATERIAL
RADIATION INSULATION
DIGITAL IMAGING BREAST BIOPSY SYSTEM
BREAST CANCER DETECTION
LASER ANGIOPLASTY
ULTRASOUND SKIN DAMAGE ASSESSMENT
HUMAN TISSUE STIMULATOR
COOL SUIT
PROGRAMMABLE PACEMAKER
OCULAR SCREENING
AUTOMATED URINALYSIS
MEDICAL GAS ANALYZER
VOICECONTROLLED WHEELCHAIR
MAGNETIC LIQUIDS
WELDING SENSOR SYSTEM
MICROLASERS
MAGNETIC BEARING SYSTEM
ENGINE LUBRICANT
INTERACTIVE COMPUTER TRAINING
HIGHPRESSURE WATERSTRIPPING
ADVANCED WELDING TORCH
RADIATION HAZARD DETECTOR
EMERGENCY RESPONSE ROBOT
PERSONAL ALARM SYSTEM
EMERGENCY RESCUE CUTTERS
FIREMAN''S AIR TANKS
PERSONAL STORM WARNING SYSTEM
You are mistaken. Clinton DID get it, but not what he was being PAID to get (i.e. Monica)
"NASA wants our tax dollars and have given us nothing but promises for 40 years except some fairly decent pictures that didn''''t improve my life a bit.
Posted by crzmeat at 06:35 PM : Oct 27, 2007"
GROUND PROCESSING SCHEDULING SYSTEM
SEMICONDUCTOR CUBING
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
WINDOWS VISUAL NEWS READER
AIR QUALITY MONITOR
VIRTUAL REALITY
ENRICHED BABY FOOD
WATER PURIFICATION SYSTEM
SCRATCHRESISTANT LENSES
POOL PURIFICATION
RIBBED SWIMSUIT
GOLF BALL AERODYNAMICS
PORTABLE COOLERS/WARMERS
SPORTS TRAINING
ATHLETIC SHOES
MICROSPHERES
SOLAR ENERGY
WEATHER FORECASTING AID
FOREST MANAGEMENT
SENSORS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
WIND MONITOR
TELEMETRY SYSTEMS
PLANT RESEARCH
FIRE RESISTANT MATERIAL
RADIATION INSULATION
DIGITAL IMAGING BREAST BIOPSY SYSTEM
BREAST CANCER DETECTION
LASER ANGIOPLASTY
ULTRASOUND SKIN DAMAGE ASSESSMENT
HUMAN TISSUE STIMULATOR
COOL SUIT
PROGRAMMABLE PACEMAKER
OCULAR SCREENING
AUTOMATED URINALYSIS
MEDICAL GAS ANALYZER
VOICECONTROLLED WHEELCHAIR
MAGNETIC LIQUIDS
WELDING SENSOR SYSTEM
MICROLASERS
MAGNETIC BEARING SYSTEM
ENGINE LUBRICANT
INTERACTIVE COMPUTER TRAINING
HIGHPRESSURE WATERSTRIPPING
ADVANCED WELDING TORCH
RADIATION HAZARD DETECTOR
EMERGENCY RESPONSE ROBOT
PERSONAL ALARM SYSTEM
EMERGENCY RESCUE CUTTERS
FIREMAN''S AIR TANKS
PERSONAL STORM WARNING SYSTEM
You are mistaken. Clinton DID get it, but not what he was being PAID to get (i.e. Monica)
"NASA wants our tax dollars and have given us nothing but promises for 40 years except some fairly decent pictures that didn''''t improve my life a bit.
Posted by crzmeat at 06:35 PM : Oct 27, 2007"
GROUND PROCESSING SCHEDULING SYSTEM
SEMICONDUCTOR CUBING
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
WINDOWS VISUAL NEWS READER
AIR QUALITY MONITOR
VIRTUAL REALITY
ENRICHED BABY FOOD
WATER PURIFICATION SYSTEM
SCRATCHRESISTANT LENSES
POOL PURIFICATION
RIBBED SWIMSUIT
GOLF BALL AERODYNAMICS
PORTABLE COOLERS/WARMERS
SPORTS TRAINING
ATHLETIC SHOES
MICROSPHERES
SOLAR ENERGY
WEATHER FORECASTING AID
FOREST MANAGEMENT
SENSORS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
WIND MONITOR
TELEMETRY SYSTEMS
PLANT RESEARCH
FIRE RESISTANT MATERIAL
RADIATION INSULATION
DIGITAL IMAGING BREAST BIOPSY SYSTEM
BREAST CANCER DETECTION
LASER ANGIOPLASTY
ULTRASOUND SKIN DAMAGE ASSESSMENT
HUMAN TISSUE STIMULATOR
COOL SUIT
PROGRAMMABLE PACEMAKER
OCULAR SCREENING
AUTOMATED URINALYSIS
MEDICAL GAS ANALYZER
VOICECONTROLLED WHEELCHAIR
MAGNETIC LIQUIDS
WELDING SENSOR SYSTEM
MICROLASERS
MAGNETIC BEARING SYSTEM
ENGINE LUBRICANT
INTERACTIVE COMPUTER TRAINING
HIGHPRESSURE WATERSTRIPPING
ADVANCED WELDING TORCH
RADIATION HAZARD DETECTOR
EMERGENCY RESPONSE ROBOT
PERSONAL ALARM SYSTEM
EMERGENCY RESCUE CUTTERS
FIREMAN''S AIR TANKS
PERSONAL STORM WARNING SYSTEM
There is to much black op Special Access Program MONEY sloshing around-- and that is a problem that must be dealt with.
NASA and OTHERS (alphabet agencies, Space Command, Navy, Air Force, Huachuca, Belvoir, Fermilab,...etc., will soon realize that they need to start owning up to the reality of the UFO situation--even if this one turns out to be an old Soviet Capsule with a nuke in it.
I hope the war criminal you voted into office ends up in a cold wet concrete cell with nothing but a shoelace. Spandau Prison would work - and they have enough openings for Cheney, Condi, Rummy, and the rest of the cabal.
What have YOU done in your life you don''t want anyone else to know, because it''s too painful, too frightening, too repulsive, or none of their business?
OK, let''s say this. The governments knows aliens are real. They''ve been in contact with them for 40 years. The aliens have been telling the governments all this time that the Earth will be destroyed on 1 Jan 2007.
So, what do you do? Tell everyone, and watch the world writh in agony as the Human race tears itself apart over its impending doom, or let everyone go about their ordinary lives until ''pop'' we all die.
Me, I''d rather have the ''pop'', than watch the world kill itself.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 93 Comments