State Dept.: Go To Iraq Or You're Fired
Due To Lack Of Volunteers, State Department Ordering Some Employees To Baghdad Embassy
-
The State Department will require some diplomats to serve in Iraq because of a lack of volunteers willing to work at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad. (AP / CBS)
-
Photo Essay Week In Iraq Photos A daily diary with scenes of the latest attacks and snapshots from the effort to rebuild a nation.
-
Interactive Iraq: 4 Years Later The conflict wears on as the nation struggles to rebuild.
Beginning Monday, 200 to 300 diplomats will be notified that they have been identified as “prime candidates” to fill 40 to 50 vacancies that will open next year at the embassy, said Harry Thomas, director general of the Foreign Service.
Those notified that they have been selected for a one-year posting will have 10 days to respond. Only those with compelling reasons, such as a medical condition, will be excused from duty, Thomas said.
He said those being sent to Iraq will receive extra pay and vacation time. About 50 diplomats will be needed in Iraq by January over the current level of 200.
However, those refusing Iraq duty may face disciplinary action up to and including dismissal for failing to uphold their oath to serve the United States and the Constitution, Thomas said.
“If someone decides that they do not want to go, we will then consider our options,” he told reporters in a conference call. “We have many options, including dismissal from the Foreign Service.”
All U.S. diplomats were being informed of the step in a cable from Thomas. The decision to move to so-called directed assignments is rare but not unprecedented.
In 1969, an entire class of entry-level diplomats was sent to serve in Vietnam, and on a smaller scale, diplomats were forcibly assigned to work at embassies in West Africa in the 1970s and 1980s.
In Other Developments:
revert to Iraqi control, despite U.S. President George W. Bush's prediction in January that the Iraqi government would have responsibility for security in all of the provinces by November.
workers. Two police officers and two women were among the wounded, the
officials said.
Those refusing Iraq duty may face disciplinary action up to and including dismissal for failing to uphold their oath to serve the United States and the Constitution.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
- two fascist nazi terrorislamistic countries down, iran next, then syria, then???
Bashar Assad and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad looking for spider holes hahaha - Reply to this comment
- My safety is more important than any paycheck. And I certainly wouldn''t trust or follow any of Bush''s screwed up priorities!
- Reply to this comment
- You know what?
WE will have diplomats that are willing to go in there, popular or not.
They are evidence that the whole country has not gone Bush Bonkers.
These are the ones who may be willing to "give peace a chance" and WE should give them their due-- instead of making it out as if they are caving in to threats from Bush and his administration.
These can be heros-- not automatic dupes, according to the spinning press-- or a single "reporter". - Reply to this comment
- I think that any admission by this particular administration that they admit they will require more diplomats is a step up from intimidation and a refusal to talk.
I don''t get the spin that its somehow un-cool, in this article.
Lots of jobs are hard...
And NO, I don''t mean every diplomat should be tickled to be there. - Reply to this comment
- "State Dept.: Go To Iraq Or You''''re Fired"
Iraq isnt that bad. The surge is working pretty good thanks to GWB the greatest terrorist hunter in history and gen. Petraeus.
If i was a state dept. employee id be more afraid to live in NYC,LA,Washington or Chicago than in Baghdad.
There are more people dying in those cities than in Iraq. - Reply to this comment
- good nite then. Talk to you soon!
- Reply to this comment
- hello j-whitman!
Long time since I''ve posted here, How ya been? - Reply to this comment
- Good night amigo.
- Reply to this comment
- dontb1,,, About the only good thing I am seeing is finally we have started cleaning up our mistakes over the years.... Which Fred Thompson seems to be saying now also, maybe what he''s caught will spread to the loyalist republicans.
- Reply to this comment
- J, if federalism is instituted like it already is in the North, then no problem. Three regions: Sunni, Kurd and Shia.
See you tomorrow. - Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




