Oct. 28, 2007

Sarko The American

Lesley Stahl Interviews France's New Leader

  • Play CBS Video Video Sarko L'Americain

    "Sarko the American" is what the French are calling their new president, Nicolas Sarkozy, who has been siding with the U.S. on policy. Lesley Stahl profiles the energetic, sometimes volatile leader.

  • Video 'Sarko The American' Walks Out

    "Sarko the American" is what the French are calling their new president, Nicolas Sarkozy, who has been siding with the U.S. on policy. Lesley Stahl profiles the energetic and sometimes volatile leader, as you will see in this clip.

    • French President Nicolas Sarkozy, center. Photo

      French President Nicolas Sarkozy, center.  (CBS)

    • French President Sarkozy leaves his interview with <b>Lesley Stahl</b> of <i><b>60 Minutes</b></i> when she asks him about his wife, Cecilia, with whom he was going through a divorce at the time.  The interview, conducted at the Elysee Palace in Paris on Oct. 5, was broadcast Sunday, Oct. 28, 2007, on CBS. Photo

      French President Sarkozy leaves his interview with Lesley Stahl of 60 Minutes when she asks him about his wife, Cecilia, with whom he was going through a divorce at the time. The interview, conducted at the Elysee Palace in Paris on Oct. 5, was broadcast Sunday, Oct. 28, 2007, on CBS.  (CBS)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Fast Facts France

    Learn about the people, economy and history.

(CBS)  When Nicolas Sarkozy, France's new president, visits the White House next week it'll symbolize how much French-American relations have improved since the war in Iraq. Like most of the French, Sarkozy opposes the war, but he's a fan of almost everything else American: from Hollywood movies to the American work ethic. On issue after issue -- from Iran to Israel to the war on terror -- he sides with U.S. policy. He is so pro-U.S., the French call him "Sarko the American."

The son of an immigrant from Hungary, Sarkozy is a real departure from past French presidents: he's prone to flashes of quick temper, and as of last week, he's divorced. As correspondent Lesley Stahl found out, he's young, high energy, and thoroughly intriguing.



When Sarkozy became president in May at age 52, he waved goodbye to the old political order and started his own. The inauguration was a dazzling beginning, after a tough election in which Sarkozy asked the French people for a mandate for radical change. And he got it.

Sarkozy showed off his family, happy with comparisons to the Kennedys: his glamorous wife Cecilia, a former model, her two daughters, his two sons from previous marriages, and their own 10-year-old, Louis. Sarkozy's affection for his wife was evident.

The five months since then have been a whirlwind of made-for-TV appearances: fiery speeches, a drop-in at a mosque, and meetings with a parade of world leaders. Sarkozy is so omnipresent, his countrymen have started calling him "super Sarko," the "energizer president." His style is something the French aren’t used to: plunging into crowds and glad-handing.

When Stahl first met him for a quick, impromptu conversation on his presidential airplane, he was in a playful mood, grabbing her notes.

"Égalité," he joked.

Which he said would put himself and Stahl on an equal footing. But he refused to wear a microphone, which made the audio difficult.

"They call you 'Sarko the American.' Why?" Stahl asked.

"‘Cause I love America. I want to be friend of America," the president replied.

"But the name?" she asked.

"I am proud of this nickname. J’aime musique Américaine," Sarkozy explained, saying he likes U.S. music.

"Elvis Presley of course," he said.

"This story will introduce you to the American people. What do you most want them to know about you?" Stahl asked.

"I want the Americans to know that they can count on us," Sarkozy explained. "But, at the same time, we want to be free to disagree."

U.S.-French relations have been sour for decades, but in 2003 disagreement over the war in Iraq plunged them to a new low when then-President Jacques Chirac openly opposed the Bush administration. In the U.S., all things French were denigrated: their cars were smashed, their wine was dumped and their fries renamed "Freedom Fries."

"It became very heated, unpleasant at times," remembers Jean David Lévitte, France's ambassador to Washington at the time.

Now Sarkozy’s national security adviser, Lévitte told 60 Minutes improving U.S. relations is a top Sarkozy priority.

"He even mentioned it in his acceptance speech the night he was elected president. Why did he go that far as to mention how much he likes America on that occasion?" Stahl asked.

"Well, because he thinks it’s important. He thinks that in his campaign he had to say to the French people, 'Beware, if you elect me, I will implement this program.' And part of the program is to rebuild strong, good, friendly relations with the U.S. And I think he's succeeding magnificently," Lévitte explained.

To underscore his message, Sarkozy went so far as to spend his first vacation as president of France on a lake in New Hampshire with his family. The Bushes, nearby in Kennebunkport, invited them over for hot dogs, hamburgers and a little Franco-American bonding. But Sarkozy's personal life and his own temperament began to intrude. His wife Cecilia created an embarrassing situation when she snubbed the Bushes by pulling out of the event at the last minute.

Continued



Produced By Harry Radliffe and Magalie Laguerre-Wilkinson
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Add a Comment See all 383 Comments
by dlawbailey October 28, 2007 2:44 PM PDT

How proud you must be to have offended the most pro-American President in years of our nation''s oldest ally. Ah but at your important question in. What journalism!

You did remember that France is our nation''s oldest ally?

Lesley Stahl can now put herself up there with President George W. Bush and Donald Rumsfeld as a champion of American diplomacy in Europe.

I think that if Ms. Stahl is so offended by Europeans (this is not the first story to reveal such an attitude), maybe her editors should consider having her report on other parts of the world.
Reply to this comment
by tildentech65 October 28, 2007 8:07 PM PDT
Having the priviledge to interview the President of France, to ask any questions of earth-shattering importance, and to hear Leslie Stahl ask about his wife''s affair and their pending divorce, is gutter-level journalism not worthy of 60 Minutes. Let''s raise the bar, not lower it.
Reply to this comment
by jeanettwh October 28, 2007 8:11 PM PDT
The interview with Nicolas Sarkozy was interesting until asked about his personal life.What don''t you understand about personal? I don''t agree with the way most of the French chooses not to go to Iraq, thats the story, not "So you and your wife are seperated?"
Who cares. I believe unless their personal life effects my choices in life,it''s none of our business.

J. White,
minding my own business in St. Clair Mo.
Reply to this comment
by pianokey1 October 28, 2007 8:14 PM PDT
Did I just hear Leslie Stahl say that Sarkozy became the President of France in May of 52? I take that to mean 1952. Unless she is using a different calendar, that would mean that he has been president for 55 years and almost 6 months. Can someone please clarify what she meant and if this was what she intended to say.
It seems that Ms. Stahl was more interested in his personal life than what his goals are for France. I would love to have heard more on his social reform and how the average citizen of France feels about what he wants to do for their country.
Reply to this comment
by ss1800 October 28, 2007 8:20 PM PDT
I always considered 60 Minutes as a "serious" and professional news magazine, that does not resort to "sensationalist" media methods. I don''t understand why Ms. Stahl was allowed to pose an indiscreet question to President Sarkozy when it is widely known that he doesn''t want to share his private life with the entire world! The importance is whether an elected President can successfully run his country, and it is none of anybody''s business what goes on behind closed doors in his personal life!!! Please don''t denigrate your esteemed program with such "uncouth" tactics. thank you.
Reply to this comment
by taresler October 28, 2007 8:22 PM PDT
Leslie Stahl was way out of line in asking about French President Sarkozy''s personal life. Leslie needs to stick to the main story line not gutter journalism or she should go to work for the National Enquirer!
Reply to this comment
by pteirab October 28, 2007 8:27 PM PDT
I was also extremely embarassed by Lesley Stahl''s personal questions to Sarkozy about his wife. What has happened to our sense of decency in journalism?
Reply to this comment
by shellyworthy October 28, 2007 8:30 PM PDT
A once well respected news magazine like 60 minutes should be ashamed to have produced such a frivolous piece of nonsense as the interview with Sarkozy. Ms. Stahl wasted a perfectly good opportunity to enlighten her viewers about the Presidents polices, instead choosing to engage in the gutter journalism that has destroyed American politics.
Reply to this comment
by shellyworthy October 28, 2007 8:31 PM PDT
A once well respected news magazine like 60 minutes should be ashamed to have produced such a frivolous piece of nonsense as the interview with Sarkozy. Ms. Stahl wasted a perfectly good opportunity to enlighten her viewers about the Presidents polices, instead choosing to engage in the gutter journalism that has destroyed American politics.
Reply to this comment
by shellyworthy October 28, 2007 8:33 PM PDT
A once well respected news magazine like 60 minutes should be ashamed to have produced such a frivolous piece of nonsense as the interview with Sarkozy. Ms. Stahl wasted a perfectly good opportunity to enlighten her viewers about the Presidents polices, instead choosing to engage in the gutter journalism that has destroyed American politics.
Reply to this comment
by shellyworthy October 28, 2007 8:34 PM PDT
A once well respected news magazine like 60 minutes should be ashamed to have produced such a frivolous piece of nonsense as the interview with Sarkozy. Ms. Stahl wasted a perfectly good opportunity to enlighten her viewers about the Presidents polices, instead choosing to engage in the gutter journalism that has destroyed American politics.
Reply to this comment
by MadameReed October 28, 2007 8:40 PM PDT
How truly annoying to watch Ms. Stahl interview Monsieur Sarkozy in English, see him respond in French and have to listen to someone else talk over his answers!!! Some people in this country speak French and many still read English, so CBS could have put in subtitles.
Reply to this comment
by MadameReed October 28, 2007 8:48 PM PDT
CBS You really are desperate for viewers aren''t you? M. Sarkozy thought he was on a news program, not Entertainment Tonight. Frankly, he told Leslie Stahl he would not answer that kind of question and thanked her politely. He didn''t storm off. You''re probably disapponted.
Reply to this comment
by jrandall128 October 28, 2007 8:50 PM PDT
Your kidding, right? I''m not custom to viewing the program, but on this occasion i was intrigued about the interview with President Sarkozy. What a disappointment that turned out to be...Thank YOU Leslie, for proving that we as "Americans", are more interested in tabloid journalism than the much larger world issues that we should be.
It seemed to me that he knew what to expect from this particular interview, just by his comments about not wanting to do it, due to an already full and important schedule. BUT, with true style, he decided the interview was over when the questions obviously were going nowhere, and left without compromising his integrity. He should have punched her in the mouth, but his support of "everything American" doesn''t extend to our increasingly brash and aggressive nature...
Reply to this comment
by krissacole October 28, 2007 9:04 PM PDT
I have always been a fan of 60 minutes, but this interview disgusted me. It fully represents why most of the world view Americans as obnoxious and rude. Instead of respecting cultural/social differences (as when Mr. Sarkozy let anger show with his assistant- a well known European cultural difference), 60 Minutes decides to air this personal moment. I wasn''t embarrassed for Mr. Sarkozy. I was embarrassed for my country. (Way to represent, there Leslie!)
The questions regarding his divorce were completely uncalled for, as well. This is supposed to be a respectable and informative program - not gossipy trash news. President Sarkozy really put Ms. Stahl in her place by handling himself with dignity. If you notice, he only decided to leave after she kept pressuring him to talk about his wife.
Inappropriate questions regarding his personal affairs (divorce is very difficult), airing his agitation with his assistant (instead of acknowledging cultural differences), and then alluding to his responses/actions as being a representation of bad character is IRRESPONSIBLE. Maybe he does have some controversial ideas/methods for his own country, but this man HAD a desire to mend the relationship between our countries. Hopefully he doesn''t judge the rest of us by this rude, in-your-face, "America has a right to know" type of interview. Learn some courtesy and stop acting as though our social customs/culture is the only way.
Reply to this comment
by nyckate October 28, 2007 9:06 PM PDT
Bravo Sarkosy -- he let Stahl know without any doubt that he''s a very busy leader of a country with a lot on his plate and she went for the ''wife/divorce'' question??? SHame on her - she took the chance for a brilliant interview and went for the ''supermarket tabloid'' question and got what she and any and all reporters should get - nothing.

There were and are so many interesting questions to ask the newest leader of France and if this is the best Stahl could come up it may be time for her to move over to Fox.
Reply to this comment
by nyckate October 28, 2007 9:08 PM PDT
krissacole -- good point about allowing in the remarks about his press officer - it was pretty uncouth and unnecessary of 60 Minutes - they probably did it to even out the stupidity of Stahl asking the tabloid questions - she wasn''t bright enough to realize that she was interviewing an important Head of State and not Britney Spears.
Reply to this comment
by jvititoe October 28, 2007 9:10 PM PDT
Leslie,
What did you hope to accomplish by putting the French president on the spot with the personal questions? How were they important to Franco-American relations or, for that matter, to anything? You might see if there is an opening at The National Enquirer.
John
Reply to this comment
by stdg October 28, 2007 9:24 PM PDT
As a French citizen, I am very delighted to read CBS viewers'' comments on what happened during this interview. French newspapers have already started to criticize Sarkozy''s supposedly lose of temper, arguing that doing so, the French President gives the American people a bad image of France. Coming from journalists who used to practice the most stupid anti-Americanism so shamelessly, this criticism is funny at best, cynical at worst. The truth is that the French press simply defends an American show in a very "corporatist" way. Hopefully viewers from all over the country have more common sense and do regret that what could have been a interesting event of political journalism at the highest level between our two countries eventually turned into a mean episode of gutter journalism.
Let us hope that journalists from both side of the Atlantic ocean will one day give "a good image" of journalism...
Reply to this comment
by yr1944 October 28, 2007 9:28 PM PDT
Lesley Stahl''s interview of French President Nicolas Sarkozy qualifies her for another to join Dan Rather as a has been from CBS.
Reply to this comment
by verwey1 October 28, 2007 9:31 PM PDT
Ms. Stahl maybe you should brush up on your etiquette.Mr.Sarkozy had every right to walk off your set.That personal question was a boorish example of a journalist seeking sensationalism over the REAL STORY - American-French relations. American journalism seems to have lost It''s way. I expected more from you!
Reply to this comment
by libsluvsuvs October 28, 2007 9:31 PM PDT
I guess its just the AMERICAN liberals are the only ones left who hates america..oh..just iran, syria, velenzuela and cuba..
Reply to this comment
by stdg October 28, 2007 9:33 PM PDT
As a French citizen, I am very delighted to read CBS viewers'' comments on what happened during this interview. French newspapers have already started to criticize Sarkozy''s supposedly lose of temper, arguing that doing so, the French President gives the American people a bad image of France. Coming from journalists who used to practice the most stupid anti-Americanism so shamelessly, this criticism is funny at best, cynical at worst. The truth is that the French press simply defends an American show in a very "corporatist" way. Hopefully viewers from all over the country have more common sense and do regret that what could have been a interesting event of political journalism at the highest level between our two countries eventually turned into a mean episode of gutter journalism.
Let us hope that journalists from both side of the Atlantic ocean will one day give "a good image" of journalism...
Reply to this comment
by stdg October 28, 2007 9:36 PM PDT
As a French citizen, I am very delighted to read CBS viewers'' comments on what happened during this interview. French newspapers have already started to criticize Sarkozy''s supposedly lose of temper, arguing that doing so, the French President gives the American people a bad image of France. Coming from journalists who used to practice the most stupid anti-Americanism so shamelessly, this criticism is funny at best, cynical at worst. The truth is that the French press simply defends an American show in a very "corporatist" way. Hopefully viewers from all over the country have more common sense and do regret that what could have been a interesting event of political journalism at the highest level between our two countries eventually turned into a mean episode of gutter journalism.
Let us hope that journalists from both side of the Atlantic ocean will one day give "a good image" of journalism...
Reply to this comment
by godofredo29 October 28, 2007 9:41 PM PDT
You all have restored my faith in the ability of the public to discern hack Mcjournalism when they see it. My low opinion of Stahl dates from the piece she did some time ago for sixty minutes on the Boy Scouts refusal to allow *** in the Scouts. The Scouts are the next pedofile scandal to come, but did Stahl go there? No! That would have conflicted with her agenda she was promoting in the piece she was doing, even though several of her interviewees gave her an entree to bring it up.
Reply to this comment
by nly_113 October 28, 2007 9:42 PM PDT
I was happy to see Sarkozy get up and leave the interview. He indicated more than once that he would not discuss his wife, yet the reporter would not stop. Perhaps if more people would stand up and leave a reporter sitting there when inappropriate questions are asked, the delving into private matters which are none of our business might stop. I was interested in the reforms he was working on in France and the relationship between our two countries. I have no interest in his personal life. WHEN will these so-called journalists focus on what matters?
Reply to this comment
by maereese October 28, 2007 9:44 PM PDT
Ms. Stahl,
You forgot your manners.
But I guess if you are part of the paparazzi that manners do not mean anything anymore. Shame on you!
Show some courtesy. That is what makes America, America!
Reply to this comment
by woodsam-2009 October 28, 2007 10:14 PM PDT
I am probably one of 15 or so 22 year olds who enjoy "60 Minutes." Tonight however, instead of offering poignant commentary on relevant issues, %u201C60 Minutes%u201D acted less like a valuable source of insight and more like a teen gossip page. Why would anyone concerned about the future of Franco-American relations, or America%u2019s image abroad in general, care about Sarkozy%u2019s marital issues? Completely irrelevant were the questions pertaining to his personal life. It seems as though %u201C60 Minutes%u201D may be only weeks away from covering the ever unimportant saga of Britney Spears%u2019 custody battle. At that point, I%u2019ll change the channel!
Reply to this comment
by amazedd October 28, 2007 10:33 PM PDT
Da Do Run Run
Reply to this comment
by hereandnwo October 28, 2007 10:57 PM PDT
Ms. Stahl, Please resist your writers need to inject the tabloid questions. Overall, the interview was a light review of the French president. I enjoyed it. Good for the general public but don''t stoop to the "tell me about your personnel life because eveyone else has." I can get that from YouTube.
Reply to this comment
by bubbert October 28, 2007 11:04 PM PDT
Dear Ms. Stahl: It is no wonder there is such a lack of trust and respect for people in the media today. Your lack of respect for the French President was deplorable and extremely tacky. I think you were trying to make him look bad, but as usually happens - when you throw mud sometimes more sticks on you than the person you are throwing it at. Wash your face and apologize, like a professional would. We were interested in the real issues and his thoughts on the US, but you were interested in being a gossip columnist rather than a professional journalist.
Reply to this comment
by equinlan2004 October 28, 2007 11:06 PM PDT
It is hard to believe that I dislike something more than Andy Rooney on 60 Minutes. We just witnessed an embarrassing train wreck of an interview. For the record, if I was the president of France or my own living room, I would have shutdown that interview too. The president may have been confused as he thought he was being interviewed by a professional not a gossip columnist. I thought the quality, topics and professionalism were lacking. I was mortified that she actually tried to calm the president with amateur and condescending breath work. She should take a deep breath and look for a new job! Terrible imature ugly american move! A true opportunity was missed. PS - I''m NOT French
Reply to this comment
by mjabin October 28, 2007 11:10 PM PDT
Here is a country leader who wants to improve political relations between his country and ours. He is agitated, states he has a busy schedule. The shows host states agitated to the point where he calls his own people names.( Been to French board meetings and this is common practice.) So now the personal questions are asked. Good for the French president for walking out. He has no time for that, and I , who turned it on to view the new french attitude, turned the channel.When I go back to France, I want to be aware on how I will be welcomed, not the statsis of the Presidents personal life.
Reply to this comment
by rubenm2 October 28, 2007 11:10 PM PDT
Well, I guess we can write-off fixing our relations with France any time soon. On behalf of America, thank you, Lesley, for bringing the American stereotype to the forefront. I may not be a reporter, but I know that Iraq, oil costs, economies, environment, or any other MAJOR world issue is more important than someone''s personal problems. Let''s all raise a glass of French wine in honor of Lesley wasting our time.
Reply to this comment
by surferchic08 October 28, 2007 11:15 PM PDT
Ms Stahl...your interview of French President Sarkozy was lightly informative and heavily inappropriate. We applauded him when he walked out on you...shame on you for stooping to be no better than the gossip columnists that must have every detail about the personal lives of anyone who happens to be in the public eye. Pres. Sarkozy sounds very much like a person committed to improving his country, both at home and around the world...in the face of tremendous odds against him. Yet you were mostly interested in private information that is absolutely none of your business. The world has become so jaded today by the likes of My Space and You Tube that decency and common sense have gone out the window...and you just put 60 Minutes down there right with them.
Reply to this comment
by tarakayan October 28, 2007 11:23 PM PDT
Ms. Stahl, As always you sounded arrogant in your interviews asking personal questions. No wonder he had to cut you off
Reply to this comment
by katkeown October 28, 2007 11:34 PM PDT
The only thing that is going to help me sleep better tonight, is knowing that the majority of comments posted felt that Lesly Stahl''s interview was an unsophisticated embarassment...an absolutely cringingly smarmy, overly-intimate interview with a President who was giving her his valuable time. I have no commentary on President Sarkozy''s politics as I am not educated enough about his views, but to be so self-important to say to a President (in a worse than Dr.Phil tone) "Now Mr. President, I know you are angry..." And then that weird breathing suggestion? Insulting.

When she asked where his wife was, unlike the anger she suggested he possesed in her commentary, he actually did not seem mad and kept it together and was quite respectful. I don''t know if it would occur to a self-promoting, social climbing shrew like Lesly that maybe, just maybe the fact that his wife wasn''t there and that his marriage was on the rocks would be painful for him and his family, and not fodder for her grinning mug. Lesly has a knack for bringing out the worst in people (I still remember her asking Felicity Huffman an inappropirate question, and Felicity telling her she was offended... repeatedly.) Surely there is another woman out there who can maintain a sense of dignity in her interviews for both her guest and herself.

Kathryn
Sausalito, CA
Reply to this comment
by heathernc-2009 October 28, 2007 11:40 PM PDT
Shame on you Leslie Stahl, As a respected newscaster and a face of American Media, you have reconfirmed what many Europeans already think of us, that we are a shallow, gossip obsessed public, that is marginally interested in what other global powers think of our values and politics. You had an opportunity to engage a head of state that, unlike his predecessor, was willing and apparently eager to make strides with the American public, and I am sure that many find that almost gracious, considering the "*** the torpedos" sentiments coming from the White House the last 6 years. Instead of engaging in important topics what may be America''s most significant ally in the EU, you chose to make an mockery of the interview, invading the privacy of a man in the recent aftermath of a divorce in a short-sighted grab at ratings and post press. Not the story that most of us watching are interested in.
Reply to this comment
by edla67 October 28, 2007 11:43 PM PDT
Too bad the journalist did not elevate the conversation to important themes (immigration, Kyoto, energy etc) and the interview was aborted. But no worries Sarkozy likes America and will be back for many interviews and articles. I am glad the old Mitterand Chirac monarchal era is over, a warmer Franco-American relationship is about to start with younger and pro-American president Sarkozy. Like two brothers we definitely have a lot to learn from each other. For example America has a tendency to ''give up''
on illegal immigration and its 12M illegal immigrants, America should better observe how France under Sarko is going to crackdown and regulate like never before. If France can do it so can America. Vive Sarko!
Reply to this comment
by josh_ff8 October 28, 2007 11:48 PM PDT
Absolutely right this was a stupid interview. If this "journalist" Stahl (or her staff) knew anything about French politics, she would know that asking about Sarkozy''s obviously rocky marriage is out of the question. The media in France is actually respectful of its leaders'' personal lives (unlike the US, obviously) and know how to distinguish what is personal and what is business.

So thanks, Ms. Stahl, for making Americans look like we fit the arrogant stereotype. Especially since this is the man who is trying hard to rebuild the Franco-American divide.

Sarkozy is the president of a G8 country, one the Security Council, possessing a nuclear arsenal, with one of the world''s largest economies. Don''t interview him as if he were Britney Spears.
Reply to this comment
by josh_ff8 October 28, 2007 11:49 PM PDT
Absolutely right this was a stupid interview. If this "journalist" Stahl (or her staff) knew anything about French politics, she would know that asking about Sarkozy''s obviously rocky marriage is out of the question. The media in France is actually respectful of its leaders'' personal lives (unlike the US, obviously) and know how to distinguish what is personal and what is business.

So thanks, Ms. Stahl, for making Americans look like we fit the arrogant stereotype. Especially since this is the man who is trying hard to rebuild the Franco-American divide.

Sarkozy is the president of a G8 country, on the UN Security Council, possessing a nuclear arsenal, with one of the world''s largest economies. Don''t interview him as if he were Britney Spears.
Reply to this comment
by josh_ff8 October 28, 2007 11:50 PM PDT
Absolutely right this was a stupid interview. If this "journalist" Stahl (or her staff) knew anything about French politics, she would know that asking about Sarkozy''s obviously rocky marriage is out of the question. The media in France is actually respectful of its leaders'' personal lives (unlike the US, obviously) and know how to distinguish what is personal and what is business.

So thanks, Ms. Stahl, for making Americans look like we fit the arrogant stereotype. Especially since this is the man who is trying hard to rebuild the Franco-American divide.

Sarkozy is the president of a G8 country, on the UN Security Council, possessing a nuclear arsenal, with one of the world''s largest economies. Don''t interview him as if he were Britney Spears.
Reply to this comment
by josh_ff8 October 28, 2007 11:51 PM PDT
Absolutely right this was a stupid interview. If this "journalist" Stahl (or her staff) knew anything about French politics, she would know that asking about Sarkozy''s obviously rocky marriage is out of the question. The media in France is actually respectful of its leaders'' personal lives (unlike the US, obviously) and know how to distinguish what is personal and what is business.

So thanks, Ms. Stahl, for making Americans look like we fit the arrogant stereotype. Especially since this is the man who is trying hard to rebuild the Franco-American divide.

Sarkozy is the president of a G8 country, on the UN Security Council, possessing a nuclear arsenal, with one of the world''s largest economies. Don''t interview him as if he were Britney Spears.
Reply to this comment
by trish225 October 28, 2007 11:51 PM PDT
I was looking forward to watching the interview on 60 minutes with President Sarkozy, and he didn''t disappoint me at all. Even though the actual interview seemed brief, President Sarkozy came off very positive and - get this - he is STILL PRO-AMERICAN whatever his reasons - God bless the man for having a new vision and really seeing ahead for his country. He knows he has to be a deliberate decisive force in France and throughout the world. I am thrilled he is actually not slamming America, but praising its culture and its opportunities and attitudes. Wow! That was refreshing to hear from a European head of state.

I have reaffirmed my interest and admiration for this man. He was elected by his country - a country where the majority vote has reflected a need for change and for President Sarkozy''s leadership. BRAVO, President Sarkozy!

Reply to this comment
by josh_ff8 October 28, 2007 11:52 PM PDT
Absolutely right this was a stupid interview. If this "journalist" Stahl (or her staff) knew anything about French politics, she would know that asking about Sarkozy''s obviously rocky marriage is out of the question. The media in France is actually respectful of its leaders'' personal lives (unlike the US, obviously) and know how to distinguish what is personal and what is business.

So thanks, Ms. Stahl, for making Americans look like we fit the arrogant stereotype. Especially since this is the man who is trying hard to rebuild the Franco-American divide.

Sarkozy is the president of a G8 country, on the UN Security Council, possessing a nuclear arsenal, with one of the world''s largest economies. Don''t interview him as if he were Britney Spears.
Reply to this comment
by sharncedar October 28, 2007 11:56 PM PDT
The French fell for a big lie - they kept hearing what a great economy America has and they decided to dip their foot into the puddle. Wiat until they find out what it really means - 30% of the people replaced by violent ignorant immigrants, no job security for anyone ever again, no social security, and the "great economy" is only for the rich and their worthless scum children.

You live in a house where you owe more than the house is worth, and next door is a hell trap packed with 13 illegals, their cars and vans parked all over the place and the stink of their garbage rising up through the neighborhood.

The French think they can get just a little of American capitalism, they don''t get it that these ghould like Sarkovsky don''t do anything a little, you give them a crack in the door, they come through it with all the demons of NAFTA and hell.
Reply to this comment
by cloefaye October 29, 2007 12:12 AM PDT
Thank you, thank you.
I''m french and i''ve always been amazed by your curiosity for people''s private life.
And i''m relieved to see how you all have react after lesley stahl interview.
We , french, have elected a president to fight for us, to built with us, and we are sad for him about his divorce but we don''t want to know more, it''s his life.
Thank you to have post all these comments, sarkozy is doing his best to re-create warm relations between our countries, shame on stahl.
Reply to this comment
by dav9210 October 29, 2007 12:22 AM PDT
It''s amazing, among all the comments that have been left so far, not a single person sides with Lesley Stahl. There was absolutely no reason to start the interview with such an objectionable, intrusive question. The above comments are a testimony to the genuine interest that Americans hold for President Sarkozy and cbs has deprived them of a valuable opportunity to hear what the new French leader has to say. Instead, Ms. Stahl has vigorously reinforced a negative stereotype of Americans as a base and superficial people. How ironic that Sarkozy who promotes American solutions and American values to a nation skeptical of American ways would fall victim to a uniquely American taste for that scandalous ''scoop'' involving a leader''s personal life.
Reply to this comment
by dav9210 October 29, 2007 12:23 AM PDT
It''s amazing, among all the comments that have been left so far, not a single person sides with Lesley Stahl. There was absolutely no reason to start the interview with such an objectionable, intrusive question. The above comments are a testimony to the genuine interest that Americans hold for President Sarkozy and cbs has deprived them of a valuable opportunity to hear what the new French leader has to say. Instead, Ms. Stahl has vigorously reinforced a negative stereotype of Americans as a base and superficial people. How ironic that Sarkozy who promotes American solutions and American values to a nation skeptical of American ways would fall victim to a uniquely American taste for that scandalous ''scoop'' involving a leader''s personal life.
Reply to this comment
by sround-2009 October 29, 2007 12:25 AM PDT
I think is is funny how bad this once favorite show of mine has gone down hill. It used to be a no holds , hard news story-now you have female reporters asking a sitting President about his wife and his personal life-Sure dont recall this during the Clinton years? And believe me I have not missed an episode during that time frame.

It will be nice if the agendas are put aside and some real news stories are produced. This used to be what distinguished 60 minutes from the pack. Some I have heard say that there is too much female influence at CBS due to hiring Couric. I disagree. Incompetent people, regardless of gender, are what is bringing down the news. PLEASE stop asking questions that one would expect from watching entertainment tonight. Just because it worked for O Reilly-doesnt mean it works for you guys.

Reply to this comment
See all 383 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
60 Minutes RSS Feed