EL PASO, Texas, Oct. 25, 2007

U.S.-Mexico Border Fence Plan Nixed

Texas Landowners Have Refused To Allow Federal Government To Build 370 Mile Steel Fence

  • A glove abandoned by its owner hangs caught on a barbed wire fence along the US-Mexico border in El Paso, Texas.

    A glove abandoned by its owner hangs caught on a barbed wire fence along the US-Mexico border in El Paso, Texas.  (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

  • Fast Facts Mexico

    Learn about the people, economy and history.

  • Interactive Immigration And Naturalization

    Who's coming to America? Find out what's being done to screen for terrorists and take a citizenship quiz.

(AP)  Cold, hard cash is apparently not enough to quell the anger among landowners over a planned fence along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Opponents of the fence refused federal workers access to their land last month in South Texas. About the same time, the government offered to pay some property owners $3,000 in exchange for permission to conduct surveys for the project.

After many of them balked at the money on principle, the government abandoned the plan.

"I think it's blood money, bribery," said Brownsville Mayor Patricio M. Ahumada Jr.

The proposal to build 370 miles of steel fence is widely opposed in the Rio Grande Valley, the most heavily populated part of the Texas-Mexico border and a region with an economy and culture dependent on cross-border traffic.

The payments were being offered in a region where the median family income is about $30,000. But instead of welcoming the windfall, many residents were outraged when federal officials described the payment plan.

Ahumada, whose border city has already denied fence-planners access to city property, said the payments were insulting and disingenuous.

"The federal government is doing all it can to get access," Ahumada said. "They are thinning the herd (of opposition), so to speak, one by one. These tactics are not unusual when they want to get something done like this."

Johnny Hart, owner of the Riverside Club in Mission, said he sees the money as "nothing more than a bribe." But he wouldn't turn it down.

"Give me $3,000 and you can survey all you want, but it doesn't mean I am not going to fight you" on building the fence, Hart said.

Congress has authorized $1.2 billion to build 700 miles of fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border. The project includes about 330 miles of so-called virtual fence - a network of cameras, high-tech sensors, radar and other technology. The remaining sections, primarily in urban areas are expected to have an actual fence. About 70 miles of actual fence is planned in South Texas.

Noel Benavides, a city councilman and business owner in Roma, said the payments would cloud the issue.

"If this was really something that was going to be beneficial to the whole community and the whole nation, I would be the first person to say, 'My friend, you can go in there and do what you need to do,"' Benavides said. "It's going to be a waste of time. It's not going to stop illegal immigrants."

Benavides, a lifelong resident of Roma, said residents and local governments may eventually lose their battle against the fence, but they plan to keep fighting. State officials, including Republican Gov. Rick Perry, also oppose plans to build the fence.

On Tuesday, Rep. Henry Cuellar, a Democrat from Laredo who is opposed to the fence, said Homeland Security authorities told him the payment plan was off. He did not elaborate.

It was not clear what prompted the change of heart. Customs and Border Protection spokesman Brad Benson did not return several phone calls from The Associated Press.

Ahumada said the issue was also a matter of historical and patriotic pride.

"You are talking about land that Texans and Americans shed blood for to keep," he said. "And now they are trying to move the border further north than established by treaty."


© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 116 Comments
by mattcbsmatt October 26, 2007 11:09 PM EDT
President Bush is a RELENTLESS Butt licker of Mexico. For some stinky reason : ) and so our US Mexico border states representatives.
Reply to this comment
by speakinup October 26, 2007 6:51 PM EDT
"do you not want your 72 virgins...???

hahaha Posted by rerrorislam3

"No I think he''d pass...''cause you''d be one of them!
Posted by ozilot

Dang, rerrorislam3!!! I believe you may be the solution to terrorism if we listen to ozilot! rdrr!
Reply to this comment
by slim1h2o October 26, 2007 3:19 PM EDT
Posted by gunowner407 at 09:31 AM : Oct 26, 2007

These people will have more pesos, than dollars in their future, without fence in place. If you know what I mean.
Reply to this comment
by riggie3 October 26, 2007 2:31 PM EDT
My friend owns one of these stretches of land. He bought it for hunting. He tells me he can''t bring his daughter on the land, because they are constantly being invaded by illegals. He says they litter and defecate all over the land. It''s a health hazard, yet they continue to use his property because there is a small town where they stop further up, where they are welcome, and people profit off of the illegals going thru that town.
Reply to this comment
by gunowner407 October 26, 2007 12:31 PM EDT
This is the classic example of greed being chosen over patriotism. The people who oppose the fence are moer concerned about the pesos than their future.
Reply to this comment
by aldee41 October 26, 2007 5:27 AM EDT
Ah, yes, the border problem. One solution does not fit all. California needs more fences. Texas needs more bridges.
The next President will be a Democrat.
Chose wisely. Chose Richardson.
Reply to this comment
by rudy654-2009 October 26, 2007 4:51 AM EDT
Many of the drug cartels are purchasing land on both sides of the border to simplify their smuggling of drugs and criminal immigrants. Many of those opposing giving the feds access here know that.
Posted by billy1745 at 01:40 AM

Got proof?
Reply to this comment
by billy1745-2009 October 26, 2007 4:40 AM EDT
Many of the drug cartels are purchasing land on both sides of the border to simplify their smuggling of drugs and criminal immigrants. Many of those opposing giving the feds access here know that.
Reply to this comment
by rerrorislam3 October 26, 2007 3:58 AM EDT
terrorislam3 bring it! on try to destroy MOSQUES in the usa. try it SCHMUCK!!!
Posted by sunsetbillyb at 07:01 PM : Oct 25, 2007

please tell me,,, what was muhammad''''s religion before he tried to convert to judaism???

and it was non muslims that destroyed iraq and afghanistan and before that the ottoman empire haji,,,

why have you not become a suicide murderer coward??? do you not want your 72 virgin pigs???

hahaha
Reply to this comment
by brittanicus-2009 October 26, 2007 2:58 AM EDT
Must be getting paid off by the drug cartels or the people smugglers for safe passage across their land? How come the Federal government cannot take a small peice of land by "Eminent Domain?" Make me wonder if the bureaucrats have any real intention to build the barrier, or have they also been influenced by the globalists or open-border zealots?
Reply to this comment
by tnt1954 October 26, 2007 2:00 AM EDT
mr. gorbachev tear down that wall. maybe
we should do the same. stop hyding behind
mother america''s apron strings. will dr.hyde
cure mr. jekyll? or will dr. jekyll cure mr. hyde?
nationalism was main cause of world war one, two
and ???? wanna die for God, and Texas? i don''t.
all that stuff about getting martyred for the
faith in sunday school? really how idiotic.
let me off this cross. then preach eternal life?
how inconsistent, contradictory. the bible contradicts itself every three or four verses. so
do all ''messages from god''.
Reply to this comment
by likeitis5050 October 25, 2007 11:35 PM EDT
Immanent domain...they can use to bull doze us off land they need to build a race track or a casino, but not to implement border security...that''s interesting.
Reply to this comment
by speakinup October 25, 2007 11:04 PM EDT
Build the fence north of their property - let them enjoy their right to refuse.
Reply to this comment
by gkc99 October 25, 2007 10:53 PM EDT
So where is the Mighty Texass Windshield Cowboy? Can''t he drop by, have a barbeque with his home boys, and tell them that the War on Terror demands a fence?

Send in the Bluebellies and teach the Texans what "eminent domain" means!
Reply to this comment
by susanhelit October 25, 2007 10:50 PM EDT
Why are we asking for their permission? This is American soil, and their rights go second to our security. Compensate them a reasonable going rate for the land, and built the fence!
Reply to this comment
by speakinup October 25, 2007 10:48 PM EDT
BareEmperor - I see you are daydreaming again.

You still have another year, dude. Enjoy!

Then Hillary is going to lose to a Republican, so you can enjoy another 8 years... Lap it up fly.
Reply to this comment
by speakinup October 25, 2007 10:42 PM EDT
sunsetbillyb - Gee, you need to let j-whitman and feelfree know about this then...

They are certain it was US government. Why hail, I forget which one of them it was, but they SWEAR up and down the 757 that plowed into the Pentagon never happened.
Reply to this comment
by tburzio October 25, 2007 10:40 PM EDT
New Orleans is a lost cause. The seas are rising. Why spend money there?
Reply to this comment
by bareemperor October 25, 2007 9:46 PM EDT
The administration is really trying to finish the Bu$h Memorial Wall before he retires.
It will never happen. All Bu$h ideas will whimper and die when he is indicted...
Reply to this comment
by rudy654-2009 October 25, 2007 9:18 PM EDT
rudy654

Oh, I gave you credit for following all posts, I obviously should not have done that. I''''ll explane, some earlier posts wanted to return the land to whoever was there/here/wherever first. Try to pay attention!
Posted by thgdriver at 05:09 PM

Well, there is of course that hypocrisy involved in not wanting Hispanics in our country, when nearly a third of the land was originally theirs. Of course, they have been here all along, haven''t they (the Mestizos)? There are documented cases of Native Americans who owned lands around the missions of California and throughout the Southwest. When the US took over the Southwest, people who had no rights to those lands came in, supposedly purchased the lands, and the inhabitants, who lived in their own houses, were thrown out. People like to think history somehow should be forgotten and past wrongs not spoken of, but reality is that it never works that way. History, especially when unjust, always visits the future.
Reply to this comment
See all 116 Comments
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: