Aug. 31, 2008

Bombing Afghanistan

Afghan President Tells 60 Minutes That Too Many Civilians Are Being Killed

  • Play CBS Video Video Bombing Afghanistan

    The president of Afghanistan demands that the U.S. military curtail its use of air strikes against insurgents in his country because they are killing too many civilians. Scott Pelley reports.

    • Mujib, age 7, survived an air strike because he was staying at his uncle's home.

      Mujib, age 7, survived an air strike because he was staying at his uncle's home.  (CBS)

    • Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

      Afghan President Hamid Karzai.  (CBS)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Fast Facts Afghanistan

    Learn about the people, economy and history.

(CBS)  60 Minutes wanted to understand how these air strikes are planned. It turns out the mission that made Mujib’s neighborhood look like an ancient ruin was run through a futuristic-looking, classified control center. We were surprised to get into the facility because it has never been seen on television before. We promised the Air Force we wouldn’t reveal classified information, or the Persian Gulf country where the center is located.

Air Force Col. Gary Crowder is deputy director of the Combined Air Operations Center, which runs the air war over both Afghanistan and Iraq.

"You know, I'm curious. How often is an air strike prepared that's called off at the last minute?" Pelley asks.

"Thousands and thousands of times a month,” says Crowder. “We look very, very often, we tracked some of the insurgent leaders we will track for days and days on end. And we are prepared to strike them at any moment. But we can never get all of the criteria necessary to meet our rules of engagement.”

We learned there are two kinds of targets: deliberate targets, which are analyzed for days and watched for patterns of civilians coming and going, and immediate targets, such as when troops are in combat and need air support. In both cases, civilian casualties are estimated in advance and it's up to the commander on the ground to decide whether the strike is worth the cost.

"We rely on those commanders to make the assessment at the time of what the requirement is. He assesses proportionality. He assesses the validity of the military target," Crowder explains.

Asked what he means by " proportionality," Crowder tells Pelley, "If we know that there is a sniper on a roof and the roof is in the middle of a mosque which is a protected site or in the middle of a very populated area, then dropping a 2,000 pound weapon on that would not be proportional to going after the sniper."

"Two men with AK-47s run into a house. Do you bomb the house?" Pelley asks.

"In some circumstances, we will bomb the house,” says Crowder. “It is entirely dependent upon the circumstances on the ground, and the ground commander's assessment of that particular situation.”

"There's this macabre kind of calculus that the military goes through on every air strike, where they try to figure out how many dead civilians is dead bad guy worth," says Marc Garlasco, who knows the calculus of civilian casualties as well as anyone.

At the Pentagon, Garlasco was chief of high value targeting at the start of the Iraq war. He told 60 Minutes how many civilians he was allowed to kill around each high-value target -- targets like Saddam Hussein and his leadership.

"Our number was 30. So, for example, Saddam Hussein. If you're gonna kill up to 29 people in a strike against Saddam Hussein, that's not a problem," Garlasco explains. "But once you hit that number 30, we actually had to go to either President Bush, or Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld."

Garlasco says, before the invasion of Iraq, he recommended 50 air strikes aimed at high-value targets -- Iraqi officials.

But he says none of the targets on the list were actually killed. Instead, he says, "a couple of hundred civilians at least" were killed.

"The bombs that are dropped are really only as accurate as the intelligence behind them?" Pelley asks Crowder.

"That's true. But we have come a very long way in getting that intelligence to be more accurate," Crowder says. "We will collect human intelligence, signals intelligence, overhead full-motion video, all of that tied together, very often in real time. That gives us a better understanding and a significantly higher confidence that the targets we're engaging are in fact valid military targets."

Of course the Taliban are killing civilians too, targeting them deliberately. By contrast, 60 Minutes watched American airmen calculate how to minimize civilian casualties with the choice of timing, weapon, and direction of attack.

"I don't think people really appreciate the gymnastics that the U.S. military goes through in order to make sure that they're not killing civilians," Garlasco points out.

"If so much care is being taken why are so many civilians getting killed?" Pelley asks.

"Because the Taliban are violating international law,” says Garlasco, “and because the U.S. just doesn't have enough troops on the ground. You have the Taliban shielding in people's homes. And you have this small number of troops on the ground. And sometimes the only thing they can do is drop bombs.”

Continued



Produced By Solly Granatstein
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Add a Comment See all 415 Comments
by rtdccpalmer September 3, 2008 8:19 PM EDT
My previous post seems to have been lost. Let me restate my case. This is the second hachet job Pelley has done on our military in two weeks.

He obviously knows nothing about combat, he now nothing about how the military works, he only knows how to impose his own bias onto every story he reports, or better into every story he acts as he is not reporter.

Scott.. a rocket is fired at an american base, it does not matter if it does not hit the base, you don''t wait for them to get better at aiming their rocket you take them out. You see two men with AK-47''s leaving a building you take them out.

The military is not their on a humanitarian mission they are there to find and kill the enemy.

As I stated in my previous post. I am sure that the Military would allow Mr. Pelley to personally go over and knock on the door of each buliding from which fire is received to see if it was an accident.

I would love to see that happen. He wouldn''t make it past the first door he knocked upon.
Reply to this comment
by formerwny September 2, 2008 6:36 PM EDT
Re the bombing Afghanistan segment! Scott Pelley asked whether the life of one terrorist was worth the life of all the civilians killed after jets dropped two bombs on an Afghan village. My answer would be "*** right". If any type of action prevents the loss of any of our troops, it''s done its job. I watch 60 Minutes faithfully and most of the time you''re right on the button, but sometimes I wonder about other stories you report. This is a war and nothing less. Civilians will be killed along with the bad guys. Soemtimes we have to stoop to their level to accomplish the mission.
Reply to this comment
by morganmf September 2, 2008 4:57 PM EDT
If NATO stops the air support to the ground troops the deaths of those troops on the ground will expand and they will not be able to protect the Afghan people and help this country as it works towards freedom. This CBS propaganda is clearly one sided and misguided...why don''t you call for the Taliban to stop utilizing civilians as shields and fighting within their villages.
Reply to this comment
by paulstike September 2, 2008 1:21 PM EDT
Your reporting needs to be more objective. As a veteran of an unpopular war, alot of the time civilians are the local enemy force, men, women and children. If you can''t report on both sides, stay home and enjoy the freedom our armed forces are providing you.
Reply to this comment
by mksuttonenfj September 2, 2008 12:38 AM EDT
I have ceased to be surprised, but I continue to be appalled by the continued hatchet jobs you continue to produce condemning the U.S. military. Starting with Vietnam through today, you constantly promote any situation that puts the U.S in a bad light. None of you have ever walked in the shoes of those who face death every day defending this country. "CBS" really does stand for the "Communist Broadcasting Network."
Reply to this comment
by mksuttonenfj September 2, 2008 12:33 AM EDT
I have ceased to be surprised, but I continue to be appalled by the continued hatchet jobs you continue to produce condemning the U.S. military. Starting with Vietnam through today, you constantly promote any situation that puts the U.S in a bad light. None of you have ever walked in the shoes of those who face death every day defending this country. "CBS" really does stand for the "Communist Broadcasting Network."
Reply to this comment
by mksuttonenfj September 2, 2008 12:32 AM EDT
I have ceased to be surprised, but I continue to be appalled by the continued hatchet jobs you continue to produce condemning the U.S. military. Starting with Vietnam through today, you constantly promote any situation that puts the U.S in a bad light. None of you have ever walked in the shoes of those who face death every day defending this country. "CBS" really does stand for the "Communist Broadcasting Network."
Reply to this comment
by middleman8 September 1, 2008 8:55 PM EDT
These are the results when stupid people follow a silly flag and let the propaganda behind said flag govern their actions.
Reply to this comment
by mitch5511 September 1, 2008 4:29 PM EDT
This is how "blowback" begins. Very cavalier by the US military.
Reply to this comment
by nacalor September 1, 2008 1:19 PM EDT
Provocative, though I missed the reason that this is being reiterated almost a year later. I suppose it''s due to that recent incident involving civilian casualties in Afghanistan. All-in-all, the time between major incidents would seem to indicate that the U.S. has done a fair job of controlling this sort of error. Marc Garlasco provides fascinating background on the whole process of targeting and what the Coalition has done to limit civilian casualties in this interview: http://www.npr.org/templates/player/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=89460867&m=89460864 . Listen to the last 12 minutes, especially, to hear how serious this issue is being taken by the U.S. military.
Reply to this comment
by mrosenthal5 September 1, 2008 8:54 AM EDT
I dont understand the comment that Pelley makes that the missle shot at the US base missed and still we bombed the village. What does it matter if the missle hit or not?
Reply to this comment
by hassankazi September 1, 2008 7:22 AM EDT
wow,after reading this the truth stands out completely?here the u.s military is itself tellin the reprter that the day before they bombed n killed the women n childeren of the house in afghanistan,the u.s evil doers had visited the house and searched it?and had not found any weopens or ammo or any talibans?so the next day after gathering the intelligence that there were only civilians in the house n in the compound they go and bomb it with a two thousand pound bomb?knowing fully well women n childeren resided in the house?what does it tells the right thinkin people?that the u.s intentionally kills civilians and then to cover their shame up they leave weopans and ammo at the site so as to prove to the world that all those killed were terrorists?i say what a freakin shame?even a eunach or hijda if he ever would get in to a fight would not act like this but would either curse n abuse or lift up his saree n show his *** n walk away?but i guess the americans and israelis fall in to a total different catogary all to gether ?but just like they like gathering info first?gustav n hanna will do the same?and saddam n yassin who are near the coast of africa will follow shortly later?inshallah(ameen)
Reply to this comment
by catarina008 September 1, 2008 4:04 AM EDT
You are unbelievable Scott Pelley! Go live in Afghanistan or Russia for the rest of your life. What a pathetic representation of disloyalty to the wonderful country of the United States of America. Thank God we have military soldiers that are much more loyal & brighter than you. Can you seriously think the public would believe that you can ask an Afghan civilian how they feel about the Americans vs. the Russians? They should be more afraid/dislike the Americans. Not because we are the terriorst. We are there to defend & protect America. We were attacked FIRST. Only an uneducated, incompetent person would believe that we can peacefully shake hands & stop this war. The taliban''s philosophy of life & the value they place on their civillian''s lives are the exact opposite of the true American values. Please, go live in Afghan or Russia & stop this disloyalty to America. Hopefully some day you will come to appreciate why American soldiers fight for the values & principals that protect America.
Reply to this comment
by joe_transit September 1, 2008 3:23 AM EDT
It''s not hard to realize that there are better ways to help people then to blow them up. Repeatedly killing innocent people is more then just a careless mistake, incompetence is a more accurate word. It''s just another half ***-ed war. All the while we get the impression that Bush just does not care or does he take it serious enough. The only life Bush seems to value are those making over $5 million a year. McSame is no different. But wait, we''ll have a moose meat eating beauty queen / soccer mom to the rescue, NOT.
Do it right the first time and save some money for home.
Reply to this comment
by nick_rehm September 1, 2008 2:26 AM EDT
Move over Jane Fonda. Scott Pelley is in town. My family and I were appaled at your story. We were sorry to hear about the young boy losing his family, but we are also deeply troubled about the Taliban sending waves of suicide bombers to attack US bases, ambushing and killing Allied troops and unarmed humanitarians. The Taliban are known to use women and children as a shield in the war effort. If they will use women and children, will they not also use a CBS correspndent from 60 minutes?
Reply to this comment
by September 1, 2008 2:04 AM EDT
while the tillybangs chant death to Amrika Amrika chants death to cbs. Winner to be announced soon on focs
Reply to this comment
by September 1, 2008 2:00 AM EDT
CBS the stinking taliboob channel
Reply to this comment
by September 1, 2008 1:57 AM EDT
Just watched the tripe - er, antiamerican propaganda on a dinosaur channel that has been dead for eons but refuses to rot. Shame on you stinking cbs. 300 civilians dead out of 30 million in a war against a coward criminal bunch who hide behind wimin and chirren? And the alleged reporterello looking horrified? Does the reporteretto remember what the russians did ? There was no one to report the mayhem, was there. SHAME, CBS. May you
be off the air soon.
Reply to this comment
by laguna666 September 1, 2008 1:52 AM EDT
Yo Steve,
Why not ask Karzide to send his own military to get the bad guys, then no air power is needed. After all the money, time and blood we have spent, your people should be able to handle things so our soldiers can come home.

If you asked this question, you couldnt paint the military as killers, which is your agenda.
Reply to this comment
by marill2 September 1, 2008 1:26 AM EDT
Your report on how American troops are making careless mistakes in bombing innocent civilians was handled in an irresponsible manner which further encourages dirty fighting by the terrorists and demoralizes those that desire to defeat them. Instead of focusing on the negative actions of the US, why are you so slow to fully portray the evil brutality of the enemy? If the American news reporting during WWII was as anti-American as Scott Pelley''s, Germany and Japan might have won the war. Mr. Pelley, have you no conscience? Mr. Pelley, are you just another political sensationalist who cares more about your ratings than your country?
Reply to this comment
See all 415 Comments
60 Minutes RSS Feed