Owe The IRS? No Problem!
Contributor Lloyd Garver Says the Tax Agency Seems To Be Rewarding Its Worst Customers
-
(AP / CBS)
-
Interactive U.S. Taxes Find out more about where your dollars go, and take a quiz on filing with the IRS.
The above is a paraphrase of the many commercials that I've been seeing on television lately. The premise is that through no fault of your own, you have failed to pay the taxes that you owe, and the mean and nasty IRS wants its money. There is no reason for you to despair, because there are companies who can help you negotiate a settlement with the government.
Online, you can see even more explicit ads:
"How To Settle With The IRS For Pennies On The Dollar."
"Average Savings of 90% On Taxes"
The people behind that last ad don't stand a chance. Why would I want to save only 90 percent on my taxes, if somebody else can save me 99 percent? They're actually advertising that some people can pay only 1 percent of what they owe. Do you think the place where you bought your car would make that kind of deal? Or how about the bank that holds the mortgage on your house? Somehow, I don't think if you gave them a check for 1 percent of what you owe, they'd say, "Congratulations! The house is yours now." So why is our government doing it?
I understand that people can get in financial trouble and have difficulty paying the taxes that they owe. I also understand the IRS working out a payment plan with these people so they can pay their taxes without ruining their lives. What I don't understand is why the government negotiates "settlements." Shouldn't people have to pay 100 percent of what they owe eventually?
E-mail your questions and comments to Lloyd Garver
The "forgiveness" that the government offers to some people is not necessarily a terrible concept. It's just applied to the wrong people. If you're going to give it, give it to those who went through Katrina or are victims of the current fires in California, or to those who have been fighting in Iraq, not to those who just feel that paying taxes isn't a high priority for them.
Or if the government is really intent on having a "sale" in which they mark down what they're charging people, shouldn't they be offering this discount to its good and loyal customers? Give a little break to those of us who pay our taxes every year. Why not? Some stores offer discounts and special sales to their good customers. And who's the owner of the corner drugstore more likely to take a few cents off an item for: the customer who always pays on time, or someone who hasn't paid for those glow-in-the-dark condoms for six months?
Just to be clear, it's the IRS that I'm blaming. I don't blame the people who want to pay as little as possible. We all would like to pay as little as possible. And I don't blame the companies who offer this service. I'm sure they are legitimate businesses.
However, I did see something surprising when I went online to check out one of these companies' Web sites. I'm no expert in advertising or marketing, but I just don't think I would've chosen the celebrity spokesperson that they picked. It's former baseball great Pete Rose. I'm not kidding. In case you're not familiar with Pete's tragic story, he spent five months in jail in 1990 for tax evasion.
Lloyd Garver has written for many television shows, ranging from "Sesame Street" to "Family Ties" to "Frasier." He has also read many books, some of them rather taxing.
By Lloyd Garver
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.






Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- next
See all 24 CommentsAMENDMENT XVI
Passed by Congress July 2, 1909. Ratified February 3, 1913.
Note: Article I, section 9, of the Constitution was modified by amendment 16.
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
National sales tax is the way to go. But yes, all the IRS employees would lose their jobs. The same reason there will never by a cure for cancer....hundreds of thousands of dollars would be lost and all those people wouldn''t have jobs.
Stupid world
ronpaul2008.com
Replace the income tax with a sales tax. No more loopholes, no more tax shelters, no more special interest tax credits, no more social engineering, no more class warfare.
IT''LL NEVER HAPPEN.
Why?
Because thousands of IRS employees will lose their jobs. In order to protect themselves they always take action to ensure that taxes remain complicated.
Any Congressman who makes tax simplification proposals is immediately threatened with an IRS audit. They''re all tax-evading crooks with something to hide so the propsals are always "inexplicably" withdrawn.
I love the fact you throw political correctness out the window.
I do not like your way of thinking with the blanket statement, but never let PC get in your way.
YOu say you are 6 times more likely to be audited if you make $25,000 a year than $200,000 a year? Could that be because there are 12 times more people making $25,000 a year than $200,000 a year? Seems your odds are better if you only make $25,000 a year.
It is all the spin that is put on the stats, you can make anything look the way you want it to.
Get an eduaction, then pop off.
"The IRS needs to audit every foreigner in this country. The middle-easterners are crooks and lie about everything. They seem to be obsessed with money and will steal from their mothers if it means getting ahead.
Hire more investigators. They are the backbone of America and we need much more enforcement. No negotiations. Collect it all with penalties, or send the violators to jail."
To this next question, drivelphobe, please say "No."
Do you own a gun?
Hire more investigators. They are the backbone of America and we need much more enforcement. No negotiations. Collect it all with penalties, or send the violators to jail.
Passed by Congress July 2, 1909. Ratified February 3, 1913.
Note: Article I, section 9, of the Constitution was modified by amendment 16.
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 24 Comments