N.Y. Considers Anti-Noose Legislation
State Senate Approves Bill Making It A Felony To Use Threatening Symbol
-
Photo
(CBS/AP)
-
Interactive
Civil Rights In America
A look back at the key people and events of the civil rights movement.
-
Photo Essay
Rally In Jena
Louisiana town at center of racism debate after black teens are charged in beating of white student.
"We won't tolerate this," said Sen. Dean G. Skelos, a Long Island Republican who sponsored the measure that passed Monday in the Senate. "There is no place for racism and intimidation in America and this rash of incidents clearly demonstrates the need for tough new penalties."
The bill is sponsored in the Democrat-led Assembly by Rules Committee Chairman Joseph Lentol of Brooklyn. The Assembly may convene Tuesday and could consider the bill. There was no immediate comment from the Assembly.
Monday's Senate vote came as New York City police said a black high school teacher in Brooklyn had been targeted with a letter containing racial slurs and a string tied into a noose.
The 44-year-old teacher at Canarsie High School told police she received the letter and the noose through the mail. Police say they have no suspects.
The discovery is among a number of recent incidents involving symbols of lynchings in the Old South.
Nooses were found earlier this month on a black professor's door at Columbia University, outside a post office near ground zero in lower Manhattan and in locations on Long Island. There have been no arrests.
There have been a number of other nooses found in high-profile incidents around the country - in a black Coast Guard cadet's bag, on a Maryland college campus, and in the Jenna Six case in Louisiana, where six black teenagers were charged with beating a white student. The incident happened after nooses were hung from a tree on a high school campus there.
Skelos said he is optimistic the Assembly will pass the bill. He said that, as in the case of Nazi symbols and burning crosses, an intent to threaten or harass would be part of an anti-noose law.
By Michael Gormley © MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



The only reason for the recent increase in noose displays is because the media is making a huge deal out of the Jenna 6 case. Why can''t they make a huge deal out of the millions of law breakers which 10''s of thousands are commiting felonies every day? Is that not news???
I hate this country''s priorities.
AND burning the flag? Its illegal to make a statement by hanging a noose, but its okay to burn the very symbol of these United States.
Yep, sounds like New York...
Don''t even ban the "N" word, let everyone say whatever it is they wish to say, just let the system of public excoriation work, as it did with Imus.
The constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech does not mean guaranteed freedom from the consequences of your speech...
Posted by brianbwb at 08:07 AM : Oct 23, 2007
Exactly!
I agree with you. I was speaking tongue in cheek. If NY can ban the hanging of the noose, then the US can ban the desecration of the flag. I could personally care less about the noose thing. Doesn''t apply to me as I have no use for one. But, I''ve known hundreds, maybe thousands of men and women who have given up all to serve under the principle the flag stands for. Yet, to desecrate the flag is merely, "making a statement". Government says its freedom of expression. I see no difference between that and the display of a noose.
You know? A lot of haunted houses and other halloween displays use nooses in their decorations.
As for nooses (am I still allowed to say the word?), ignore them. The more we notice, protest, pay attention, the more people will do this. If they get zero attention, they will stop.
Don''t these dipwads have something better to do than insult the Constitution? What''s next?
They are getting a big kick out of doing so. Since no one is being physically damaged, just ignore them. This is a fad that will soon dissapear if it is ignored.
This is stupid. We need to laugh at overly sensitive people, not bend over for them.
Posted by superchez1 at 10:22 AM : Oct 23, 2007"
Just wondering, how do you feel about swastikas painted on Synagogues?
Republican, no need to say any more.
But show a couple nooses & get a story written - and it''s to hell with freedom of speech, we need to enact laws against saying this sort of thing!!!
Amazing the thought process liberals go thru and where their priorities lie...
Posted by mudrose at 09:02 AM : Oct 23, 2007
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I wish it WERE no more than political correctness!
This type of law against free speech and demonstration serve more to control people, period, than PC.
As a matter of fact America is fast becoming a total police state with %u201Cwe the people%u201D being controlled by those in power rather than the other way around.
It doesn%u2019t matter which party is in power. A republican AND a Democrat-led Assembly sponsored this bill.
Prosecuting people for making a SERIOUS, EMANATE, threat is certainly justifiable, but the prosecutor should have to prove that a specific threat was intended against a particular person or persons.
Stopping a revolution of ARMED citizens would be a formidable task for any domineering government.
People in power know this, and for all who vote for republicans, or any other party, strictly because of a stated stance on gun control, a word of warning:
Some/most in BOTH parties are using your intense feelings about guns, (just as they do with religion) to control you.
When the country reaches a certain point of police state the total disarming of ALL citizens (by their own government) , will be a simple matter indeed
They already go after people for hate and racial crimes. Doesn''t the noose fall under those.
The Government State of the Liberals will mother us where everything will be a crime they do not like. They will protect us to death with little or no room for personal freedoms.
Next: Outlaw Thought?
Most legislators are already half-cocked, Demo and Repub.
Posted by papabc at 11:24 AM : Oct 23, 2007"
You got that right.
And
Posted by sftodd at 11:43 AM : Oct 23, 2007
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you were to reformat the above two comments to omit the name-calling and personal insults you would be conveying a message of importance for consideration.
I, and I am sure, many others can and do agree with your basic thoughts, however, insults and name-calling destroys any real value in what you write, in addition to being extremely divisional.
If we cannot unite as Americans first, rather than be divided simply as republicans or democrats, we can never control our government as originally intended by the founders.
And that, my fellow Americans, is OUR responsibility and the %u201Cbuck%u201D truly does stop here.
Posted by jn122736 at 12:39 PM : Oct 23, 2007
I''m not sure I agree -- it seems to me that name-calling is the only language conservatives understand, and if you don''t dumb it down for them, you sound like John Kerry, intelligent, but no one listens to him. I''m trying shame conservatives who on the one hand support Guilliani when he violates the First Amendment by cutting public funding to museums based on the content of their artwork, but scream and cry like babies when someone wants to prohibit their hate speech. I''ve found that with simple-minded conservatives, their opinions are based on what they feel, not what they think. I''m trying to help them feel differently.
-
by toolmangler-2009
October 23, 2007 9:24 PM PDT
- Don''t make ''new'' laws, enforce the ones on the books now!!!!!
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 40 Comments