February 11, 2009 4:00 PM

Robot Warriors In Iraq

By
Russ Mitchell
(CBS)  The sniper nests and IED-laced roads of Iraq have posed deadly challenges for the U.S. military. The result has been speedy development of soldiers that know nothing about fear or danger: the combat robot.

"It's a tremendous capability to put a robot where you do not want to put a man," said Jim Braden, of the Army's Joint Robotics Program.

Never before have robots played such a wide role in a ground war, reports CBS News correspondent Russ Mitchell. Five thousand robots are working alongside U.S. forces, finding booby traps or searching for the enemy.

"The real trend right now is the infantry and maneuver forces looking at, 'what can a robot do for me,'" said Braden.

That demand has forced technicians to improvise and use parts found on store shelves. Some robot monitors have been purchased at Radio Shack. Certain controllers are from video games.

The Pentagon plans to spend nearly $2 billion over the next five years on robots, ranging in size from a multi-ton minesweeper to tiny devices now used by Special Forces.

Robots in Iraq and Afghanistan have already disarmed nearly 10,000 IEDs. One of the most widely used is built by the same Massachusetts company that has sold millions of robotic vacuum cleaners to American consumers.

IRobot is now one of the chief suppliers of robots to the U.S. military. Their devices have grown in size too, like the Warrior, shown exclusively to CBS News.

"This is a serious robot," said Russ Dyer of IRobot, referring to the Warrior. "This is a 250 pound robot that will be able to run a 4-minute mile."

The Warrior could be in Iraq by 2009, transporting ammunition or wounded soldiers. But another robot recently sent to Iraq is lethal.

It's called Swords and CBS News has learned three of these armed robots could see their first combat very soon. But the military insists it is not unleashing a mindless killing machine. A soldier must press the fire button.

"You need a man in the loop," said Braden. "There has to be a human deciding if there's going to be ordinance going downrange."

But the ability for robots to think for themselves - what designers call "autonomy" - may not be far away.

The Army is already testing supply robots that move across the battlefield without a human operator.

"It's what we call disruptive technology," said Dyer of IRobot. "It's going to change the way we fight, the way we live - it's going to change our entire lives."

Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 33 Comments
by xzavierbrown October 23, 2007 2:46 AM EDT
Posted by Nancy_Naive at 12:59 PM : Oct 22, 2007
+ report abuse

****

btw..thank you for correcting how to spell MY OWN FU CKING NAME...something to think about..you sling very eloquent bullsh*t
Reply to this comment
by xzavierbrown October 23, 2007 2:45 AM EDT
Posted by Nancy_Naive at 12:59 PM : Oct 22, 2007
+ report abuse

************

I hope you do all your thinking while riding your bike.

"you love your stake but you simply try to ignore and deny how the cow was butchered"
Reply to this comment
by erinye_fury October 23, 2007 12:52 AM EDT
That machine, no doubt costing a lot of taxpayer money, looks like it could be shot out of the war with a single well placed AK47 bullet. An RPG round, or an IED and it is a piece of scrap metal.
Reply to this comment
by xzavierbrown October 22, 2007 2:35 PM EDT
History will be kind to George Bush. After all, when was the last time you saw the phrase, "dumb fvck" in a history textbook?

Regards,


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Nancy_Naive at 05:21 AM : Oct 22, 2007
+ report abuse


*****

none..most liberal ''appeasement'' warriors never made it to the history books..NOT UNLESS THEY REWRITE HISTORY BOOKS
Reply to this comment
by mind-matter October 22, 2007 12:14 PM EDT
"But the ability for robots to think for themselves - what designers call "autonomy" - may not be far away."

As an expert in the field, allow me to point out that robot "autonomy" and the ability to "think for themselves" are by no means synonymous. The former is already more or less possible in some instances, whereas the latter is now, and will ever be, totally impossible.
Reply to this comment
by drummer94 October 22, 2007 12:04 PM EDT
"The Warrior could be in Iraq by 2009". Shudder. Let''s hope that will be the only thing there in 2009 and the real warriors will be home.
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 October 22, 2007 11:02 AM EDT
History will be kind to George Bush. After all, when was the last time you saw the phrase, "dumb fvck" in a history textbook?

Regards,

Posted by Nancy_Naive at 05:21 AM : Oct 22, 2007

Nancy that is the best one yet true and funny.
Reply to this comment
by ziparmux October 22, 2007 9:49 AM EDT
"Our troops" just murdered and maimed a bunch more Iraqi civilians in Sadr City!

www.nytimes.com/2007/10/22/worl
d/middleeast/22iraq.html

Posted by FeelFree1 at 03:34 AM : Oct 22, 2007

Just read the article and copied and pasted a few lines from the article as follows:

American soldiers came under heavy fire from gunmen using automatic weapons and rocket-propelled grenades

killing 49 militants

heavy fire continued and the attackers detonated a roadside bomb

Ten other Iraqi fighters were killed as the Americans tried to withdraw

%u201CGround forces reported they were unaware of any innocent civilians being killed as a result of this operation,%u201D
....end quotes.

Not a mention of one single US service personel being even injured !

If the reorting is accurate, then that does not sound right to me, your under heavy fire/rpg''s/roadside bombs, etc and yet not one single US soldier even breaks a nail !!

Reply to this comment
by feelfree1 October 22, 2007 6:34 AM EDT

Related:

"Our troops" just murdered and maimed a bunch more Iraqi civilians in Sadr City!

Maliki-puppet feigns disapproval!

Go team!

www.nytimes.com/2007/10/22/world/middleeast/22iraq.html
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 October 22, 2007 6:30 AM EDT
RE: "This is a 250 pound robot that will be able to run a 4-minute mile."

Could we not use these to replace human athletes in the NFL and elsewhere ?

There would be no more knee or spinal cord injuries, no more steroid controversies, no more racial tensions... not to mention a much higher level of play.
Reply to this comment
See all 33 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook