Kansas Regulator Rejects New Power Plants
Cites CO2 Emissions For Blocking Construction Of Coal-Fired Facilities
-
Sunflower Electric Cooperative coal-fired power plant in Holcomb, Kan., photographed in February 2007. Sunflower's permits to build two new coal-fired plants were rejected by state regulators, citing CO2 emissions. (AP)
-
Interactive Eye On Energy Explore the production and consumption of energy in the U.S. Find out more about energy costs, and the use of fossil fuels, nuclear power and renewable energy sources.
-
Interactive Alternative Energy Learn about the types of renewable energy that are used in the U.S. and the regions of the country considered to be most suitable for each kind.
In turning down the permit, the state's top environmental regulator cited emissions of carbon dioxide, which have been linked to global warming.
Rod Bremby, secretary of health and environment, said in a statement, “I believe it would be irresponsible to ignore emerging information about the contribution of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases to climate change and the potential harm to our environment and health if we do nothing.”
The ruling was hailed as a victory by environmental groups.
An attorney for the environmental group Earthjustice called it “a big deal.” He said it may be the first time an air permit for a coal-fired power plant has been denied based on concerns about carbon dioxide emissions.
The utility, Sunflower Electric Power Corp., and state lawmakers are expected to challenge the ruling.
The Thursday decision by Bremby blocks Sunflower from starting construction on a $3.6 billion project outside Holcomb. The utility is expected to challenge the ruling.
Sunflower called the decision arbitrary and predicted it would raise electric rates and delay construction of larger transmission lines. Spokesman Steve Miller said the utility is troubled because Bremby “reached up and did this” without any legal standards on CO2.
“We've got lawyers all over the place, and they're gathering to see how best to next proceed,” he said.
The decision quickly became a hot political issue in the state.
Supporters of the plant, including House Speaker Melvin Neufeld and Senate President Steve Morris, saw the project as vital economic development for rural Kansas. Some Republicans accused Bremby, an appointee, of knuckling under to political pressure from his boss, Democratic Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, and exceeding his authority.
“The Legislature will clearly have to look into how a cabinet officer can exceed his authority with impunity,” said GOP Sen. Jay Emler, chairman of the Senate Utilities Committee.
Finney County Democratic Party chairman Lon Wartman resigned in disgust, calling the state party's leaders “despicable” in an e-mail to reporters.
This decision is just further evidence that the days of business-as-usual for coal are over.
Mark Brownstein, Environmental Defense“I'm very confident that this will move forward,” Depperschmidt said.
That opinion is at odds with the state attorney general's.
Despite the state's lack of regulations, Attorney General Paul Morrison advised Bremby last month that Kansas law gave him the power to declare CO2 a health and environmental hazard and deny a permit over potential emissions.
Bremby noted that in April, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that carbon dioxide was a pollutant regulated by the federal Clean Air Act.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
International recording artist Shakira on love, career and more.




