Aug. 17, 2008

Valerie Plame Wilson: No Ordinary Spy

In Her First Interview, Former CIA Officer Speaks To Katie Couric

  • Play CBS Video Video No Ordinary Spy

    Valerie Plame Wilson, the former covert CIA officer whose leaked identity resulted in a national scandal that reached all the way to the White House, appears in her first interview since her cover was blown. Katie Couric reports.

  • Valerie Plame Wilson Photo

    Valerie Plame Wilson  (CBS)

  • Interactive The Leak

    People and events surrounding the leak of a CIA officer's name.

ADVERTISEMENT
"Fair Game"
by Valerie Plame Wilson

(CBS)  The special prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, found evidence there were four leakers: deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, the vice president's Chief of Staff Lewis "Scooter" Libby, President Bush's closest confidante Karl Rove, and White House spokesman Ari Fleischer.

All avoided the most serious charges by claiming not to know she was undercover. But Joe Wilson says that's no excuse.

"It was a mafia-like tactic. And the idea of going after your family, even in Washington, was an outrage. Nobody went after Karl Rove's family. Nobody went after Scooter Libby's family. They went after my family," Wilson says.

"But in all fairness, Karl Rove's wife doesn't work for the CIA," Couric remarks.

"How do you know?" Wilson says.

"Scooter Libby's wife doesn't work for the CIA," Couric says.

"How do you know? How do you know?" Wilson asks.

"I don't know for sure. But I think it's a safe assumption," Couric replies.

Says Wilson, "Yeah, you don't know. And we don't know what they did because nobody went after their families. And that's the way it should be. That's the way it would be. However you wanna play the game, the idea of going after somebody's family is an absolute outrage."

"You are still seething," Couric says.

"Oh, I think - absolutely," Wilson admits, laughing. "Absolutely. I'm seething because it was first and foremost a great betrayal of the national security of the country."

In March 2007, Libby was convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice. Fitzgerald said that by lying, Libby had prevented him from getting to the bottom of the leak, and he said "there is a cloud over the vice president," and "there is a cloud over the White House." A few months later, President Bush commuted his prison sentence.

"When all is said to done, the top aides to both the president and the vice president, leaked your name to reporters. Do you think President Bush was in on this?," Couric says.

"I don't know about that," Plame Wilson says. "But I, like most other Americans, saw President Bush say on TV that he would fire anyone from his administration found to be involved in leaking my name. It turns out the President is not a man of his word."

She hopes her book will allow her to clear the air. But even this, she says, has been a bitter fight and her manuscript has the scars to prove it: CIA censors blacked out 10 percent of the copy.

Today, their shared office in Santa Fe speaks volumes. On one side sits the outspoken former ambassador, his walls adorned with pictures and mementos from a storied career. On the other, the walls are practically bare, reflecting the secret life of a 20-year veteran of the CIA.

"Our critics would love nothing more for us to go away, and just be quiet. And we won't give them that satisfaction," Plame Wilson tells Couric. "We have young children that one day when they understand more of what's happened and what's transpired, we wanna be able to say to them, you know, we did our best. And we told the truth. We weren't perfect. But we tried to do the right thing."


Produced By Graham Messick
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Add a Comment See all 1544 Comments
by wmgray1 October 17, 2007 4:39 PM PDT
Covert? YES, covert. To attempt to deny that fact in light of all evidence proving such a status reeks of desperation and delusion.
If anyone has a problem with Plame''s book deal, interviews or media attention, blame the four Bush administration officials who leaked our nation''s classified information. Without them, none of this would have been possible. In fact, that should have been her book''s dedication.
Reply to this comment
by angelb6 October 17, 2007 4:52 PM PDT
"Covert? YES, covert. To attempt to deny that fact in light of all evidence proving such a status reeks of desperation and delusion." The title of her book says it all. Bush&Co payback for Joe Wilson telling the truth about no WMD''s. #1 Reason for Impeachment!
Reply to this comment
by beppo21 October 17, 2007 5:14 PM PDT
Tiddsandbeer:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18924679/

She WAS covert....She is NOT covert any more and can no longer work for the CIA because SOMEONE leaked her name...when someone dedicates themselves to protecting this country for 20 years and is then BETRAYED, why are you angry with the BETRAYED person?
Reply to this comment
by feelfree1 October 17, 2007 9:22 PM PDT

Re: "Valerie Plame Wilson, the former covert CIA officer whose leaked identity resulted in a national scandal that reached all the way to the White House"

The Bush *** admitted that someone from his office exposed this agent. This treasonous act alone should be enough for some regime officials to be facing the possibility of a firing squad.
Reply to this comment
by tnt1954 October 17, 2007 10:36 PM PDT
as only crackpots call talk shows, or send letters
to the editor, or make posts and comments, in
the california crackpot tradition, i must say that
valerie was really special to me years ago when
i worked for the l.a.p.d. briefly in 1980. we met at nighttime at the red onion in woodland hills, ca
near where i lived at that time. had a beautiful
night together and then undercover of a miraculous
fog, i took her home to the northridge area, and
then i had to go to work to martial with my fellow
employees at parker center to work overtime on
saturday. i got about one hours sleep. and was
pretty hungover. i got special permission to
go home and enjoy my love hangover. she said her
name was sandy. sure. said she worked at litton
industries. that i believe, its right near valerio
street. valerie also was a famous song by the monkees. old plames do show up in the news.
Reply to this comment
by tnt1954 October 17, 2007 11:08 PM PDT
when indulging in the fantasy of love affairs,
it is most apropos to consider the dangerous
facts of the situation. women leaking items
in the powderroom, to make for a kegger situation.
never watch her mouth, or listen to her, for
its always the same plame. but make sure that
the book gets sold. what is written is more
important than what is said, because obviously
you heard it all wrong. your ears must be tested.
can you prove you heard that? since handwriting
can be faked, graphology is useless. and bunco/forgery can be applied to religion also.
can you read hebrew as it was spoken 4000 years
ago. how do you know your bible is the right one?
it was compiled after st. jerome wrote it, in
about 300 a.d. by men at nicea. it was always
so funny at church to hear them say it was the
''inspired'' word of God. bologna. if that be
the case, everything said or done is inspired by God.
malarky mumbo jumbo fumbo dumbo and his flying
elephants, pink ones at that. plan 401z was denied
permission to be implemented. nanosecond decisions
needed.
Reply to this comment
by MonsterSound October 18, 2007 4:37 AM PDT
Sure the facts show she was covert. The facts show was a dedicated intelligence officer trying to keep America safe. But when you believe in your President, belief trumps fact. And that''s a fact. Btw, is it more patriotic to be loyal to the President or to the Constitution?
Reply to this comment
by j_flood October 18, 2007 5:33 AM PDT
AirmanC5 --- you have issues....... instead of pretending to be a flyer --- go for some counselling...


Go Katie GO
Reply to this comment
by atlas011 October 18, 2007 11:32 AM PDT

In "The Leak" interactive feature, isn''t it curious that the name Richard Armitage does not appear?

Isn''t it also strange that there is no mention of the fact that Fitzgerald knew very shortly after he was appointed that it was Armitage who actually leaked Plame''s name?

And wouldn''t it be helpful for readers to know that leaker Armitage was Deputy Secretary of State and not a "White House Staffer."

Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 October 18, 2007 2:29 PM PDT
So this administration and the GOP think this issue along with all the rest child health, a fake war based on lies and the list just keeps growing is going away. I am taking bets on that one, even the American people who for the most part are chilled and laid back are not going to forget how the leader of the Republican party made a mess of every thing.
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 October 18, 2007 2:30 PM PDT
Oh and one other thing of course he didn''t keep his word he never keeps his word nor does his party.
Reply to this comment
by terrorislam2 October 18, 2007 2:33 PM PDT
Posted by antoniof123 at 02:30 PM : Oct 18, 2007

hahaha like the demonic-rats do,,, LOL

hahaha
Reply to this comment
by terrorislam2 October 18, 2007 2:35 PM PDT
PLAME & WILSON ARE LIARS

Ex-CIA officer called on to explain varied accounts
Senator: Plame''s versions add to ''misinformation''
Former CIA officer Valerie Plame should explain "differences" in her various accounts of how her husband was sent to the African nation of Niger in 2002 to investigate reports Iraq was trying to buy uranium there, the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee said.
Plame''s differing versions have furthered "misinformation" about the origins of the case that roiled Washington beginning in July 2003, said Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo. Plame gave those accounts to the CIA''s inspector general, Senate investigators and a House committee in March.
A February 2002 CIA memo released last week as part of a study of pre-Iraq-war intelligence shows that Plame suggested her husband, former State Department official Joseph Wilson, for the Niger trip, Bond said. That "doesn''t square" with Plame''s March testimony in which she said an unnamed CIA colleague raised her husband''s name, Bond told USA TODAY.
Here are Plame''s three versions of how Wilson was sent to Niger, according to Bond:
http://usatoday.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=USATODAY.com&expire=&urlID=22512034&fb=Y&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usatoday.com%2Fprintedition%2Fnews%2F20070530%2Fa_plame30.art.htm&partnerID=1660
Reply to this comment
by terrorislam2 October 18, 2007 2:36 PM PDT
PLAME & WILSON ARE LIARS

%u2022She told the CIA''s inspector general in 2003 or 2004 that she had suggested Wilson.
%u2022Plame told Senate Intelligence Committee staffers in 2004 that she couldn''t remember whether she had suggested Wilson.
%u2022She told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee in March that an unidentified person in Vice President Cheney''s office asked a CIA colleague about the African uranium report in February 2002. A third officer, overhearing Plame and the colleague discussing this, suggested, "Well, why don''t we send Joe?" Plame told the committee.
http://usatoday.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&title=USATODAY.com&expire=&urlID=22512034&fb=Y&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usatoday.com%2Fprintedition%2Fnews%2F20070530%2Fa_plame30.art.htm&partnerID=1660
Reply to this comment
by terrorislam2 October 18, 2007 2:39 PM PDT
PUT THE BLAME ON PLAME BOY,,, hahaha

Valerie Plame''s Lawsuit Dismissed
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8QFR71G1&show_article=1

hmmmmmmmmm if i had a cia wife would i pay to put her in who''s who as valerie plame wife of joe wilson???
www.talkingpointsmemo.com/docs/wilson.whoswho.pdf

if i was a cia agent would i send my non cia husband on a cia mission???

if i was a cia agent would i give the gore campaign a donation listing the cia front company???
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A40012-2003Oct3?language=printer

talk about "get smart"
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058805/
Reply to this comment
by sonotso October 18, 2007 2:42 PM PDT


'' ...

imagine shoving trillions of dollars

of drugs

down kids throats,

imagine waving trillions of dollars

of guns

in kids faces,

imagine all the people

sharing all the world,

i hope some day you''ll join us

and the world will live as one,

... ''


Reply to this comment
by jntlw-2009 October 18, 2007 2:42 PM PDT
Cheney/Bush/Rove/Addington/R.Novak are probably about the most hated men on planet earth right now. They are evil and it appears they are proud of it. Very evil and sick men.
Reply to this comment
by actornaught October 18, 2007 2:42 PM PDT
I''m not gonna bother looking it up, but you''ll find w, at least at first, only said the leaker ''would be dealt with''.

And he was.

He was pardoned.

Whatta (sick) sense of humor...
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 October 18, 2007 2:45 PM PDT
Aw, she could get a lawsuit out of Cheney so it''s another let''s hit up on GB. Poor little Valerie Plame. Poor little victim.
Reply to this comment
by terrorislam2 October 18, 2007 2:53 PM PDT
Posted by actornaught at 02:42 PM : Oct 18, 2007

ARE PRESIDENTS ABOVE THE LAW???
wow, the president says he has the right to perjury????
President to Senate: Perjury is my right...
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_199901/ai_n8836610
PARDONS FOR SALE PARDONS FOR SALE
PARDONS GRANTED BY PRESIDENT CLINTON TO EVEN TERRORISTS
http://www.usdoj.gov/pardon/clintonpardon_grants.htm
My Reasons for the Pardons
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/18/opinion/18CLIN.html?pagewanted=all&ei=5070&en=66ba82eaf117b24b&ex=1183521600
Do the Clintons Now Support Jail Time for Perjurers?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,288392,00.html
In a bone-chilling chapter of her new book "The Final Days," late heroine-author Barbara Olson warned that ex-president Bill Clinton''s pardons of terrorists who had repeatedly bombed buildings in New York City "send a signal" that the U.S. isn''t serious about fighting terrorism.
http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/olson.htm
Bill Clinton pardons controversy
FALN Pardons of 1999
On August 11 1999, Clinton commuted the sentences of 16 members of FALN, a violent Puerto Rican nationalist group that set off 120 bombs in the United States usually in New York City and Chicago, convicted for conspiracies to commit robbery, bomb-making, and sedition, as well as for firearms and explosives violations.
http://www.answers.com/topic/bill-clinton-pardons-controversy
Reply to this comment
by tiddsanbeer October 18, 2007 2:53 PM PDT
HI! MY NAME IS VALERIE PLAME....AND I WAS A "COVERT" OPERATIVE FOR THE CIA DOING SECRET ASSIGNMENTS.....yeah right ms V....she can kiss my milky white a sss....she is just another greedy lib that want''s a sweet book deal to finance her self serving desire to be rich...what a fu kkin biotch....
Reply to this comment
by smirk5 October 18, 2007 2:55 PM PDT
I love watching Republicans trying to distract from or defending treason from the Bush Administration. How fall they''ve fallen.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan October 18, 2007 2:56 PM PDT
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."
- Joseph Goebbels, Adolf Hitler''s Propaganda Minister
Reply to this comment
by tiddsanbeer October 18, 2007 2:57 PM PDT
She LOVES the lime light and all the left biased media attention to get her 15 minutes of "PLAME"....such a crock of shi tttt.....any true covert operative would never expose themselves like this....jeeesssus H .....
Reply to this comment
by greeneyes222 October 18, 2007 2:57 PM PDT
I have no doubt the Bush administration has much to answer for, but I just have a hard time viewing Plame Wilson as an innocent victim. Her story has varied, her husband''s story has varied, and the media has done nothing to really clear things up. Enough, already.
Reply to this comment
by gsoguy October 18, 2007 3:01 PM PDT
Poor Valerie. I guess she has no comment on backstabber Pelozi for undermining our troops access to material by ignorning all common sense and making Turkey mad. What was her comment? Well, we need to do it to satisfy those victims that are still alive. Let''s see - it happened in 1915. If they were born in 1915, they would be 92 years old. How many are really alive and boy what a lie! She can''t lie well but the liberal news media takes her word and runs with it. Valerie says she knows some spies had something bad happen but she can''t talk about it but boy does the media blast away at that. Let''s pack it in, give Hillary the white house, and become a 3rd world country. Let the illegals run the country.
Reply to this comment
by smirk5 October 18, 2007 3:05 PM PDT
Man, the GOP will pay any fool money to post on these sites. They''re not getting their money''s worth.
Reply to this comment
by terrorislam2 October 18, 2007 3:05 PM PDT
Posted by greeneyes222 at 02:57 PM : Oct 18, 2007

the media has been outed as partisan hacks for a long time now

AP outed as political propoganda rag
Say no to AP%u2019s shoddy work
When a company defrauds its customers, or delivers shoddy goods, the customers sooner or later are going to take their business elsewhere. But if that company has a virtual monopoly, and offers something its customers must have, they may have no choice but to keep taking it.
http://news.bostonherald.com/columnists/view.bg?articleid=170263
The AP''s Jamil Hussein Scandal
If an Iraqi police captain by the name of Jamil Hussein exists, there is no convincing evidence of it - and that means the Associated Press has a journalistic scandal on its hands that will fester until the AP deals with it properly.
http://www.iraqslogger.com/index.php/post/486/The_APs_Jamil_Hussein_Scandal
Reply to this comment
by terrorislam2 October 18, 2007 3:06 PM PDT
Posted by greeneyes222 at 02:57 PM : Oct 18, 2007

OUTED
THE LIBERAL MAIN MEDIA AND DEMONIC-RAT PROPOGANDA MACHINE

Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez what the media will not tell you,,,
The death knell of your ethics has been enabled by your parent organizations who have chosen to align themselves with political agendas. What is clear to me is that you are perpetuating the corrosive partisan politics that is destroying our country and killing our service members who are at war.
My assessment is that your profession, to some extent, has strayed from these ethical standards and allowed external agendas to manipulate what the American public sees on TV, what they read in our newspapers and what they see on the web. For some of you, just like some of our politicians, the truth is of little to no value if it does not fit your own preconceived notions, biases and agendas.
http://www.militaryreporters.org/sanchez_101207.html
Sanchez Blasts Media, But Media Only Highlight His Criticism of Bush
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2007/10/15/sanchez-blasts-media-media-only-highlight-his-criticism-bush
Sanchez Assaults Drive-By Media
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_101507/content/01125112.guest.html
Retired general issues sharply worded rebuke of ''unscrupulous reporting''
http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2007/10/retired-general.html
Sanchez: Media''s Reporting of Iraq War Endangered Soldiers'' Lives
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,301676,00.html
Reply to this comment
by terrorislam2 October 18, 2007 3:07 PM PDT
Posted by greeneyes222 at 02:57 PM : Oct 18, 2007

the media has been outed as partisan hacks for a long time now

LEFT WING NUT PARTISAN PROPAGANDA RAG DIES IN THE MARKET hahaha

Morgan Stanley Sells Entire New York Times Stake
Oct. 17 (Bloomberg) -- Morgan Stanley, the second-biggest shareholder in New York Times Co., sold its entire 7.3 percent stake today, according to a person briefed on the transaction, sending the stock to its lowest in more than 10 years.
http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aY9iww4X.01g
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 October 18, 2007 3:10 PM PDT
I love watching Republicans trying to distract from or defending treason from the Bush Administration. How fall they''''ve fallen.
Posted by Smirk5

I love watching Non-Covert Covert Agents blaming the Bush Administration for omissions when she was outed by hubby and the CIA and her campaign check to the Bore Campaign. Poor little Valerie.
Reply to this comment
by pared1 October 18, 2007 3:11 PM PDT
"Plame Wilson: President Didn''t Keep Word"

Well duh! When does he keep his word?
Reply to this comment
by susanhelit October 18, 2007 3:12 PM PDT
Funny how Republicans here don''t care to hold the president to his word - I guess even they know he''s a liar. The difference is that they don''t mind it.


Treason was committed, our intelligence agencies had an active agent and active operations publicly outed, and Republicans don''t care. The president lied to the country, and Republicans don''t care. And this was done to try to cover up the President using a known lie in an address to the nation - and still Republicans don''t care. Wilson was right, Saddam wasn''t getting nuclear materials from Nigeria - Bush wanted to use that lie, so he had to discredit Wilson. But now we know it''s a lie, and treason was committed to try to cover up that lie, and where are the supposedly superpatriot Republicans? They''re right behind Bush!
Reply to this comment
by tburzio October 18, 2007 3:14 PM PDT
I wonder if an interview with General Arnold would be almost exactly the same.

"Why did I sell out West Point? Well, General Washington didn''t keep his word to me!"
Reply to this comment
by signof4 October 18, 2007 3:15 PM PDT
Boo-hoo-hoo

What''s a matter, chicky??? No book deal? No reality series offer? Not even an invite to Dancing With the Stars?

Don''t worry....60 minutes will let you sob on air (as long as you''re badmouthing the president.)
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds October 18, 2007 3:18 PM PDT
This is a surprise? Bush has always been a weasel and a lying POS all of his life. Why should he suddenly get a sense of right and wrong now? He''s a piece of cr*ap punk now and he always has been. I wouldn''t trust him to tell the truth on anything.
Reply to this comment
by terrorislam2 October 18, 2007 3:19 PM PDT
Posted by SusanHelit at 03:12 PM : Oct 18, 2007

and randy/sandy burglar stole and shreaded top secret 911 related government documents for bubba klintoon that affects the security of all the american people,,,
Reply to this comment
by talkingham October 18, 2007 3:24 PM PDT
It can simply be said that der Bush the smirker, the decider, the liar is the worst president ever. He would never have won a second term with 911 and everyone knows it. Even the little storm troopers that love licking the soles of his shoes know it. He''s doing everything possible to bankrupt this country morally and financially and he''s done a great job at that and that''s all. I''m sure he''ll damage us even more during his last 15 months. Lord he is a liar.
Reply to this comment
by liberalme October 18, 2007 3:30 PM PDT
Cheney/Bush/Rove/Addington/R.Novak are probably about the most hated men on planet earth right now. They are evil and it appears they are proud of it. Very evil and sick men.
Posted by jntlw at 02:42 PM : Oct 18, 2007

AMEN!

He never met a liar he didn''t like!
What a great example of upstanding Americans these people are--they go out of their way to justify lies and deceit, then blame it on the Dems!!

We can only pray for justice!

Reply to this comment
by kissamaarse October 18, 2007 3:35 PM PDT
Bush was a liar before he became president. What makes anyone think he would be anything but a liar, especially with unparalleled power? After all, he lies to himself.
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 October 18, 2007 3:37 PM PDT
This is a surprise? Bush has always been a weasel and a lying POS all of his life. Why should he suddenly get a sense of right and wrong now? He''''s a piece of cr*ap punk now and he always has been. I wouldn''''t trust him to tell the truth on anything.
Posted by SgtRDS

Part I
So, what does it say that Hillary Clinton chose Mr. Berger as one of her advisers, and that she will rely on the advice of a convicted criminal who is barred from access to the sort of national security information a party''s candidate for President is routinely briefed on during a campaign?

Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 October 18, 2007 3:40 PM PDT
Part II

Many politicians are loyal to their friends. Many Presidents, Republican and Democrat alike, have kept in place people who turn out to be engaged in activity that no one should endorse. And many politicians maintain friendships with associates who have fallen from grace, not condoning their misdeeds, but not abandoning personal ties.

Hillary has done something entirely different. She selected a key adviser she knows has scandalously flouted the law, lied to deflect blame onto others, and subverted the democratic processes that provide accountability for officials'' conduct.
Reply to this comment
by mike71067 October 18, 2007 3:40 PM PDT
Is this fake covert agent bittch spouting off again? I thought she had her 15 minutes of fame already. Her lying husband can''t even show his face around Washington anymore, and she discredited herself by appearing on the cover of a magazine after complaining about her "cover being blown", or whatever.

And she still insists that her name was leaked as revenge, when there is clearly no evidence that anybody intentionally leaked her name in the first place.
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 October 18, 2007 3:42 PM PDT
Part III

She selected someone who has destroyed documents that could be crucial to America''s security to be a trusted councilor on national security matters - documents that could have contained hand-written notes by her husband or information that would have called his judgment into question.

Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 October 18, 2007 3:42 PM PDT
Next

Hillary has had to renounce associates before. She''s had numerous fund-raising scandals involving criminal wrong-doing by people she should have known to be criminals, Norman Hsu being the most recent and notorious. But in all of those instances, she has had the plausible excuse that she didn''t know what they had done wrong.

Reply to this comment
by smirk5 October 18, 2007 3:43 PM PDT
If you want proof that most Republicans believe in party before country, look at how they approach this issue.
If this happened under a Democratic President, I''d call it treason too.
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 October 18, 2007 3:43 PM PDT
Last

In Sandy Berger''s case, there is no excuse. Hillary''s inclusion of Sandy Berger in her circle of advisers demonstrates that, notwithstanding her law license, she really doesn''t care about the law. She doesn''t care whether someone violates the law if they''re on her team, if the violation in some way helps the Clintons. Hillary''s indifference to criminal wrong-doing suggests that she sees herself as above the law, breezily ignoring law when it''s an impediment to something she wants.

During Bill Clinton''s administration, there was no shortage of indications that perhaps the Clintons, husband and wife, were a bit casual about legal niceties. Although the accusations fixated many and resulted in convictions for more than a few Clinton associates, in the end, though he was disbarred for five years, Bill Clinton got something of a break because he was personally charming and his accusers seemed less so. Public reaction was that you might not want him around your daughter, but you''d be happy to go have a drink with Bill.

Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 October 18, 2007 3:43 PM PDT
Hillary, whose stiff demeanor won''t garner the same slack, doesn''t just remind us of prior scandals. Sandy Berger didn''t lie about *** or do something ordinary that isn''t strictly in keeping with law - like speeding on a road where citizens regard the posted limits as advisory rather than mandatory. Sandy Berger committed a serious crime, intentionally, and lied about it, intentionally, and put his nation at risk. Hillary isn''t bothered by any of that. Whatever she says about the rule of law - which limits official power to safeguard all of us - she evidently doesn''t believe it was intended to place limits on her.

Picking Sandy Berger tells us something important about Hillary''s character. We should listen now - while it can do some good.

So much for your lying POS b.s.
Reply to this comment
by mike71067 October 18, 2007 3:44 PM PDT
Not to mention that the liar Wilson and his nutcase wife were left-wing political activists in the first place. The fact that fellow leftie Couric even allowed this bittch to be interviewed is no surprise.
Reply to this comment
by one_american October 18, 2007 3:44 PM PDT
CBS feels compelled to throw their liberal minority following a dry little bone on this one.

Lord knows the liberals have anything else.

Poor, poor little pseudo-spy Valerie Plame and her Clinton stooge, Joe Wilson.

They feel persecuted for concocting a smear against the President published in the New York Times.

And they feel they should be able to smear anyone they want, and make up any story they want, and expect the public to side with them when their plan to take down the President failed.

Of course - they are liberals. Liberals think that way.

Boo frigin'' hoo.

And now the dipstick Katie Couric wants to drag the story out in front of the public for a curtain call.

Liberal bias used to be more subtle, but now the liberal press is getting mighty desparate.

When you have this many clowns on the left, you can expect a circus to break out...
Reply to this comment
See all 1544 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
60 Minutes RSS Feed