Dow
     -89.23
12801.23
-0.69%
|
     -9.31
1342.64
-0.69%
|
     -108.90
14000.51
-0.77%
|
     -23.35
2903.88
-0.80%
|
     -1.03
53.27
-1.90%
|
     +1.09
116.27
+0.95%
|
     +0.01
2.01
+0.42%
October 9, 2009 12:03 PM

Three Americans Win Nobel Economics Prize

(CBS/AP)  Americans Leonid Hurwicz, Eric S. Maskin and Roger B. Myerson won the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences on Monday for developing a theory that helps explain situations in which markets work and others in which they don't.

The three researchers "laid the foundations of mechanism design theory," which plays a central role in contemporary economics and political science, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences said.

The research helps explain decision-making processes involved in economic transactions determining, for example, what insurance polices will provide the best coverage without inviting misuse, the academy said. It also has applications in job markets and voting procedures, according to academic literature.

"Mechanism design theory, initiated by Leonid Hurwicz and further developed by Eric Maskin and Roger Myerson, has greatly enhanced our understanding of optimal allocation mechanisms," the academy said.

By accounting for individuals' incentives and private information, their theory lets economists, governments and businesses "distinguish situations in which markets work well from those in which they do not," the academy said in its citation.

"My ability to work with people in my field to try to understand the economy better and to understand the problems that face our society, I hope that will be enhanced by this," Myerson told CBS Radio News.

Myerson, 56, has been at University of Chicago since 2001. He previously worked at Northwestern's Kellogg School of Management.

"There were a lot of us working in this area in the late 1970s," he told The Associated Press, describing his work as investigating "How does information get used in society to allocate resources?"

He added, "I really didn't expect it. There were times when other people said I was on the short list but as time passed and nothing happened I didn't expect the recognition would come because people who were familiar with my work were slowly dying off."

"It is a huge honor, I'm just overwhelmed to have my name on that list," he told Sweden's TV4 network.

Hurwicz, 90, who was born in Moscow, is an emeritus professor of economics at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis. Maskin, 56, is professor at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton, N.J.

The economics award is not one of the original Nobel Prizes. It was created in 1968 by the Swedish central bank in Nobel's memory.

Last year American Edmund S. Phelps won the prize for explaining the relationship between inflation and unemployment, work that has had a profound impact on macroeconomic policy.

Nobel Prize winners receive $1.5 million, a gold medal and diploma from the Swedish king on Dec. 10, the anniversary of Nobel's death in 1896.

The other prizes were announced last week, with the Nobel Prize in medicine going to Americans Mario R. Capecchi and Oliver Smithies, and Briton Sir Martin J. Evans, for groundbreaking discoveries that led to a powerful technique for manipulating mouse genes.

France's Albert Fert and German Peter Gruenberg won the physics award for discovering a phenomenon that enables computers and digital music players to store reams of data on ever-shrinking hard disks.

Gerhard Ertl of Germany won the chemistry prize for studies of chemical reactions on solid surfaces, which are key to understanding such questions as why the ozone layer is thinning.

Britain's Doris Lessing won the literature prize, and former U.S. Vice President Al Gore and the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change won the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize on Friday for their efforts to spread awareness of man-made climate change.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 21 Comments
by hungry1968 October 15, 2007 9:38 PM EDT
a consensus is proof of nothing

it is merely an unproven theory

peoples opinions are not facts

Posted by terrorislam1 at 05:09 PM : Oct 15, 2007



Exactly what I said. Opinions are not facts. That''s why the mainstream media isn''t reporting on one crack pot''s goofy theories.
Reply to this comment
by terrorislam1 October 15, 2007 8:09 PM EDT
Posted by hungry1968 at 04:37 PM : Oct 15, 2007

a consensus is proof of nothing

it is merely an unproven theory

peoples opinions are not facts

Scientific consensus is the collective judgment, position, and opinion of the community of scientists in a particular field of science at a ...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&defl=en&q=define:Scientific+consensus&sa=X&oi=glossary_definition&ct=title
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 October 15, 2007 7:37 PM EDT
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/
2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html
why does the above get ZERO media coverage????
Posted by badaxmofo at 03:55 PM : Oct 15, 2007



Because you''re an idiot. Read the last line, from the first paragraph of the article:

"Simultaneous warming on Earth and Mars suggests that our planet''s recent climate changes have a natural%u2014and not a human-induced%u2014cause, according to one scientist''s controversial theory."

Do you see the word "controversial"?

Then later in the article it says:

"Abdussamatov''s work, however, has not been well received by other climate scientists."

In other words, one lunatic doesn''t make a iron clad fact. That''s why it hasn''t been reported on by the major news outlets. Now if he can get some proof of this crazy theory, then I bet he''d get some coverage.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 October 15, 2007 7:32 PM EDT
I think it should have went to Bush, Cheney, and Haliburton.

I mean anyone that can make a pallet of cash worth $9 billion dollars just vanish, without so much as a single question from the Republican led Congress, (at the time), is either an economic, mathematical genius or David Copperfield.
Reply to this comment
by terrorislam1 October 15, 2007 6:58 PM EDT
Posted by ttinsly at 03:21 PM : Oct 15, 2007

stop believing in scientist funded by the left wing socialist/communist,,,

Reply to this comment
by jon_mccain October 15, 2007 6:26 PM EDT
Hey Lars, quit spamming the board with your unrelated cut and paste BS!!!
Reply to this comment
by terrorislam1 October 15, 2007 5:12 PM EDT
Cooling and warming will go on forever.....
Man is too weak to permanently affect nature.....

Who is impious enough to believe that Earth''s contours are permanent? Our eyes are simply too slow to see the shift of tectonic plates that has raised the Himalayas and is dangling Los Angeles over an unstable fault. I began "Sexual Personae" (parodying the New Testament): "In the beginning was nature." And nature will survive us all. Man is too weak to permanently affect nature, which includes infinitely more than this tiny globe.
http://www.salon.com/opinion/paglia/2007/04/11/global_warming/index4.html
Reply to this comment
by terrorislam1 October 15, 2007 5:12 PM EDT
Cooling and warming will go on forever.....
Man is too weak to permanently affect nature.....

However, I am a skeptic about what is currently called global warming. I have been highly suspicious for years about the political agenda that has slowly accrued around this issue. As a lapsed Catholic, I detest dogma in any area. Too many of my fellow Democrats seem peculiarly credulous at the moment, as if, having ground down organized religion into nonjudgmental, feel-good therapy, they are hungry for visions of apocalypse. From my perspective, virtually all of the major claims about global warming and its causes still remain to be proved.

Climate change, keyed to solar cycles, is built into Earth''s system. Cooling and warming will go on forever. Slowly rising sea levels will at some point doubtless flood lower Manhattan and seaside houses everywhere from Cape Cod to Florida -- as happened to Native American encampments on those very shores. Human habitation is always fragile and provisional. People will migrate for the hills, as they have always done.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/paglia/2007/04/11/global_warming/index4.html
Reply to this comment
by terrorislam1 October 15, 2007 5:09 PM EDT
Not the End of the World as We Know It

Arrhenius was merely expressing a view that was firmly entrenched in the collective consciousness of the day: warm times are good times; cold times are bad.

During the so-called Medieval Warm Period between about 900 and 1300 A.D., for example, the Vikings raised livestock on Greenland and sailed to North America. New cities were built all across Europe, and the continent''s population grew from 30 million to 80 million.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,481684,00.html
Reply to this comment
by terrorislam1 October 15, 2007 5:09 PM EDT
Not the End of the World as We Know It
How bad is climate change really? Are catastrophic floods and terrible droughts headed our way? Despite widespread fears of a greenhouse hell, the latest computer simulations are delivering far less dramatic predictions about tomorrow''s climate.
Svante Arrhenius, the father of the greenhouse effect, would be called a heretic today. Far from issuing the sort of dire predictions about climate change which are common nowadays, the Swedish physicist dared to predict a paradise on earth for humans when he announced, in April 1896, that temperatures were rising -- and that it would be a blessing for all.
Arrhenius, who later won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry, calculated that the release of carbon dioxide -- or carbonic acid as it was then known -- through burning coal, oil and natural gas would lead to a significant rise in temperatures worldwide. But, he argued, "by the influence of the increasing percentage of carbonic acid in the atmosphere, we may hope to enjoy ages with more equable and better climates," potentially making poor harvests and famine a thing of the past.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,481684,00.html
Reply to this comment
See all 21 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook