Oct. 13, 2007
Despite Gore's Nobel Climate Not Top Issue
Former VP In An Effective Advocate, But The American Public Focuses On More Iraq, Health Care
-
Photo
Former Vice President Al Gore and the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change were co-awarded the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for spreading awareness of man-made climate change and laying the foundations for counteracting it. (AP)
Former vice president Al Gore's Nobel Peace Prize meant the same thing yesterday to both his supporters and detractors: He ranks as the world's most effective advocate for curbing global warming.
While an array of activists, politicians and business leaders have all called in recent years for more stringent limits on greenhouse gases linked to climate change, no one more than Gore has reshaped public perception of what was once a wonkish scientific debate. But for all that, the issue remains far down the priority list for Americans.
Through his tireless travel and slide-show presentations, captured on screen in the 2006 film "An Inconvenient Truth," Gore has inserted himself into the policy debate at home and in other countries across the globe.
"It's difficult for Americans to comprehend how Gore is one of the most influential global leaders of our time," said Icelandic President Olafur Ragnar Grimsson, who met Gore more than two decades ago. "He is influential not only for his views, but for how he is mobilizing action and awareness in all countries, on all continents."
Polls show that Gore's efforts have helped raise the profile of global warming among Americans -- an April Washington Post-ABC News survey found that the percentage of respondents identifying climate change as their top environmental concern had doubled from a year earlier, to 33 percent -- but in the public's mind, it still lags far behind such issues as the war in Iraq and health care in importance.
In a September Washington Post-ABC News poll, less than 1 percent identified global warming as their top issue for the 2008 presidential campaign, and a January poll by the Pew Research Center ranked it fourth-lowest out of 23 policy priorities that Americans want the president and Congress to address.
Susan Solomon, a senior scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration who co-chaired the international scientific study this year that called the evidence of global warming "unequivocal," said she was not surprised that the U.S. public does not rank global warming as a higher priority.
"The world has many problems, and just like every person, we tend to put on the back burner the ones we don't think will erupt tomorrow morning," Solomon said in an interview. "The key thing is that people understand the problem, and I have a lot of faith in humanity's ability to solve the problem it understands."
Rep. Jay Inslee (D-Wash.), who had dinner with Gore and a few friends in Seattle two weeks ago, said he jokingly chided Gore for not being "sufficiently alarmist" about the possible consequences of climate change in his movie and public appearances.
"I said, 'You really dropped the ball. You really undersold this global warming thing,' " Inslee said, adding that new scientific results consistently show that the climate is changing more rapidly than researchers had anticipated. "He said, 'I agree. Virtually everything you see is going faster, and in a more negative direction, than I described.'"
Regardless of its immediate policy impact, the Norwegian Nobel Committee's decision to honor Gore -- along with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change -- speaks to the emerging political and scientific consensus on the need to make more dramatic cuts in the carbon dioxide emissions generated by human activity.
John P. Holdren, a Harvard University scientist who chairs the board of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, said the award establishes that "climate change is the most challenging of all environmental problems that threaten peace and prosperity. It's a recognition that he has done more as an individual, and the IPCC has done more than any organization, to bring the reality and the urgency of that danger to the rest of the world."
Hollywood producer and environmentalist Laurie David recalled that, when she first proposed making the documentary in 2004, Gore was skeptical that people would watch it.
"That was the hardest part, to convince him to make the movie," David said. She added that though she initially had to beg friends in Los Angeles and New York to attend Gore's climate lecture, she remained confident that his message would resonate with the public.
Some skeptics, such as Myron Ebell, who directs energy and global warming policy at the libertarian Competitive Enterprise Institute, said they now fear that Gore's heightened fame would lead to a carbon cap that they and many Bush administration officials oppose. "Clearly, the momentum in this country is for mandatory energy rationing policies," Ebell said.
Polling director Jon Cohen contributed to this report.
© 2007 The Washington Post Company
- Latest in Washington Post
- Does Race Play a Role in Coverage?
- Troop Levels to Remain Flat in Afghanistan
- Have We Forgotten Iraq?





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 168 Comments" Get your sun screen-grab those shades,
Cats on tin roofs must evade,
The heat that in my estimation''s new,
and Al Gore''s blamin'' me and you.
Broken clock right twice a day,
Hot or cold we''re gonna pay.
''Cause if its hot then I''m a sage,
and if its cold its ''climate change...''
hear it @
www.conservativemusiconline.com
There are vile "solutions" which some may anticipate will allow them to continue their own behaviors at the expense of others.
Those people are depraved.
There is no real proof that it''s round.
I think schools should be Fair and Balanced and teach both sides of the Earth shape controversy.
I''m so tired of all this round Earth propaganda from the Liberal Media!
but India and China won''t budge! D..arn it! They''re finally on the map when it comes to making progress in their own economies and here comes Gore trying to sell them on government regulation and caps that slow production but make the environment so much happier. When it comes out, due to actual scientific data, that Gore is full of s*it...whose going to make him give back his Nobel Peace Prize?
People have been talking about conservation for decades, to save money, to increase physical activity, to beautify the environment, and to preserve natural resouces. Gore is a cash cow who has found a way to create an entire movement based on fear that the earth is going to implode if things aren''t done his way...today!! Have people forgotten he is a politician? Politicians do what politicians do...find ways to create issues they can dominate and win votes. He has latched on to a basic idea people have been tending to for decades...conservation and cleaner air...and turned it into a critical ''doomsday forcast'' just to keep him tuned up for another campaign. He''s a phony. I''m waiting to hear he''s heading to China to convince them they will cause a total earth meltdown if they don''t compl, which would make Hillary''s day....but I''m not holding my breath.
Global warming refers to the increase in the average temperature of the Earth''s near-surface air and oceans in recent decades and its projected continuation.
The global average air temperature near the Earth''s surface rose 0.74 1 0.18 0C (1.33 1 0.32 0F) during the last 100 years.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes, "most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations"[1] via the greenhouse effect. Natural phenomena such as solar variation combined with volcanoes probably had a small warming effect from pre-industrial times to 1950 and a small cooling effect from 1950 onward.[2][3] These basic conclusions have been endorsed by at least 30 scientific societies and academies of science, including all of the national academies of science of the major industrialized countries.
Less than 3/4 degree increase in 100 years, that''s really heating up.
Gore has partnership in a company that will sell you someone else''s "carbon credits" that will make your pollution contribution go away, just be non-existent.
Perhaps he will also start a company that sells murder credits, for a fee he will make the murder you committed just go away.
He''s so right, Americans are at an all time high of stupidity and ignorance. And they prove it by thinking personal attacks make them right.
"An Inconvenient Truth" = Algore''s junk.
2007 Nobel peace prize = junk.
It matters little whether or not he runs for President. He has already established himself as a great man.
Posted by hopetrumps
Good to see self-righteousness isn''t limited to the Christian population. Personally, I don''t see participating in conservation and being personally accountable for being responsible with regards to our natural resources a religious/non-religious issue. I think of it as a human responsibility. But that''s just me. I''m sure you have your reasons for laying it all at the feet of religion..and I really don''t need to know what they are, thank you.
http://www.badapple.biz
(his input and effect on Apple''s not-so-green policies, since 2003...)
From a year ago: http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2006-08-09-gore-green_x.htm
(he''s since then made some improvements, but probably because he was called on his hypocrisy.)
What was he going to say in China? "Buy Apple"? Or "Don''t pollute"? Why did he decide to put aside something critical to humanity''s success to pick up an award? Or is the Nobel the only award where you HAVE to be there in person, and not get somebody to accept the award by proxy?
There are other incidents, but it''s not about politics. It''s about veracity. There is an old Chinese proverb, or at least an old Chinese fortune cookie: "A person of words and not of deeds is like a garden full of weeds."
better we start it now.The work has definetly brought the right attention and awareness in people.It''s good start.Somebody making money it alright if atleast something good happens
You are the ignorant one amigo. Don''t blame others for your stupidity.
Will we destroy species by putting all that carbon into the air? We probably already have, but then that is what evolution is all about. Change the environment and some species will die and others will evolve to exploit the new ecological nitches.
Ultimately, we might be able to burry our heads in the desert sand and ignore the moral issues. We cannot ignore the current business ones though. Gore''s movie really hits home when it shows how global warming can cause a massive loss of property. Will we be one of the species that does not survive the environment that we are producing? Situations like darfur make me wonder about this. Global warming hurts people''s property and they have a right to demand restitution. Global warming can cause wars that make darfur look like heaven on Earth. Gore deserves his part of the peace prize for bringing this to people''s attention.
Maybe the sea levels will rise... But stick an ice cube in a glass of water and note the water level. As the ice melts, keep track of how much higher the water level becomes. Will the melted water go over the top of the glass and wet the counter it''s sitting on? (Of course, that''s not the only concern climate change could bring; possible (or not) big flooding. And I say "could".)
You called the tune, liberals, now you can pay the piper.
Posted by karly68 at 06:29 PM : Oct 13, 2007
Thank you Karly68, we, who still have some sense left in America feel as you ,and we love Canada. I know Bush has hurt our reputation deeply, along with these neocons, but the real and true America will be back, It may be awhile before all this mess is cleaned up, but we will get it done some way, THANKS AGAIN.
Posted by One_American at 05:23 PM : Oct 13, 2007
+ report abuse
Just what would you call that other lobbyist from Tennessee Fred Thompson Gomer Pyle
earth was going to have "global cooling"
So tell me, who won the Nobel "Peace" Prize in the 1970''s for
their work on "global cooling"?????
Seig Heil, Hillary.!!! ROTFLMAO
Its time to change massively, now, and see massive change not simply "STARTING TO HAPPEN" within 10 YEARS-- but it must be quite far along in that span to save the planet.
This is the message Al Gore is transmitting, and an "ABC POLL" does not change the message, this time it is not about the messages popularity.
Only animals like lemmings kill themselves because its popular in the moment.
Want self respect? Stop being ignorant enough to think ABC, or C B S, or C I A, or D A D or M O M, will do it for you.
What about Mother Earth???
1- Nailed a big tipper.
2- Nailed the same award as J. Carter.(snicker)
3- Make all fat folks feel good again.
4- Proved the bigger the lie the more believe it.
5- Invented the internet(snicker).
6- Friends in Hollywood. (snicker)
7- Controls climate warming by Casting a large fat shadow.
8- Promoted the "Do as I say, not as I do" agenda for all.
9- President of hypocrites anonymous club.
10- Has all Demon. candidates scared to death he may run on Green Party ticket.
Perhaps we should wait until every last person on earth thinks the earth is "popular", before we realize we have been asking eachother for millenia if we are having enough fun yet, and the answer is usually no --so we trash our home planet.
Its time to change massively, now, and see massive change not simply "STARTING TO HAPPEN" within 10 YEARS-- but it must be quite far along in that span to save the planet.
This is the message Al Gore is transmitting, and an "ABC POLL" does not change the message, this time it is not about the messages popularity.
Only animals like lemmings kill themselves because its popular in the moment.
Want self respect? Stop being ignorant enough to think ABC, or C B S, or C I A, or D A D or M O M, will do it for you.
What about Mother Earth???
And this solves the energy problem for them too!
Many of the sneering posters here would no doubt fall into the disposable catagory in such a rectification of the problem.
Yuh, I know, the cave man driving to the rock quarry in his SUV and heating his over sized cave with electric heat.
Al Gore, bless his unbalanced mind and power grubbing heart, has yet to achieve this stature. But Big Al has one up on Jimmy,in that he is a con of the first order. Now in the midst of an international hustle using his Global Warming fraud, he will certainly eclipse Grin''n Jimmy and become King Idiot of the Idiots.
10%u2014Planet schmanet, who needs one?
9%u2014Can%u2019t stop thinking about Al Gore
8%u2014Can%u2019t possibly stay on topic.
7%u2014Got a prescription from Rush Limbaugh%u2019s doctor.
6-- Passed-up for an opening as janitor at FOX NEWS.
5-- Needs to get a check up from the neck up.
4%u2014 Wanted to take his guns to school, but mom made him stay home today because he looked kind of like the really crazy guy she bumped into when she got pregnant.
3-- Wants to get into politics someday, if only he can get Al Gore out of his way.
2%u2014 Suddenly realized President Bush won%u2019t be winning any Oscars or Nobel prizes.
1%u2014Promised Satan he would do his bidding for a stick of Juicy Fruit.
We must find out before we are enslaved by Exxon, but we will have to sacrifice to do so. People of the world, put down your cans of hairspray to save the ozone from one more spaceship launch. Lets send a rocketship up there right away and nab those sinister corporate baddies before they use up all of the Martian oil and destroy Mars!
It will be hard I know, I have bad hair days and require lots of hairspray. Superglue should work until we have those people in jail, and Im ready to save Mother Earth and Sister(Cousin, Aunt, Grandma?) Mars.
As usual, people like you prove my point. Name calling and confusion are the tools of the ignorant. I am far from stupid because I pity you.
"...Climate Not Top Issue."
It is by deffinition THE Top Issue, because with the planet becoming inhospitable to human life, there will be far less other "important" issues to speak of, if any at all.
If it isn''t the most "popular" issue, so what?
If we had only understood this sort of logic, we could have made Elvis Pressley President while he was alive.
On second thought, BUSH IS MUCH WORSE, and you know what?
There''s somthin'' wrong with his lip!
It was 500 years ago people thought the Earth revolved around the sun and there were few scientists at the time and none that specialize in particular disciplines as today...the Enlightenment was only just beginning (it doesn''t seem to have gotten to you yet)and "truth" was dicatated by religious authority. Today scientific consensus is the best guide to what is considered "truth" at any particular moment, albeit certainly not infallible. Face it homes, you haven''t got a clue about global climate change...do you really think that somehow, someway you know global climate change isn''t driven by the burning of fossil fuels but the most eminent scientists in their field don''t? I want some of what you''re smoking dude!
It was 500 years ago people thought the sun revolved around the earth and there were few scientists at the time and none that specialize in particular disciplines as today...the Enlightenment was only just beginning (it doesn''''t seem to have gotten to you yet)and "truth" was dicatated by religious authority. Today scientific consensus is the best guide to what is considered "truth" at any particular moment, albeit certainly not infallible. Face it homes, you haven''''t got a clue about global climate change...do you really think that somehow, someway you know global climate change isn''''t driven by the burning of fossil fuels but the most eminent scientists in their field don''''t? I want some of what you''''re smoking dude!
You would think that ignorance and lack of competency would make people humble rather than arrogant.
Go figure.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 168 Comments