WASHINGTON, Oct. 12, 2007

The Senate's King Of Pork - And Fish

Sen. Ted Stevens Is Spending Millions Of Your Tax Dollars On Alaska, Including Its Salmon

  • Play CBS Video Video Alaska Senator's Earmarks Eyed

    Sen. Ted Stevens may be under federal investigation in his home state of Alaska but that hasn't interfered with his approving grants on costly projects for his home state. Sharyl Attkisson reports.

  • Video Alaska Senator On Hot Seat

    Sharyl Attkisson talks with Steve Ellis of Taxpayers for Common Sense about the controversial spending of Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska. Ellis argues Stevens has wrongly granted tax dollars to Alaska.

  • Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, walks to the Republican Party luncheon in the U.S. Capitol this past summer. Stevens' staying power in Congress has led to strength in amassing earmarks for local projects, using your tax dollars. Photo

    Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, walks to the Republican Party luncheon in the U.S. Capitol this past summer. Stevens' staying power in Congress has led to strength in amassing earmarks for local projects, using your tax dollars.  (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

  • Interactive 110th Congress

    The balance of power shifts and new leadership takes control as the latest session convenes.

(CBS)  Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, may be under federal investigation in his home state of Alaska, but that hasn't interfered with his Washington job. He's still spending money like there's no tomorrow, CBS News investigative correspondent Sharyl Attkisson reports. Not his money - yours.

How would Steve Ellis of Taxpayers for Common Sense rank Stevens in terms of what kind of an earmarker he is?

“He’s at the head of the pack,” Ellis said. “His ability to bring home the bacon to Alaska is legendary and he doesn’t make any bones about doing that.”

Stevens gets his buying power from his staying power. With nearly four decades in the Senate, now at age 83, he's the longest-serving Republican senator in history.

Less than three months after the FBI searched his Alaska home in a bribery and public corruption probe, Stevens proved he hasn't lost an ounce of clout. He added an incredible $215 million in earmarks to the defense bill - more than any other senator.

An earmark is a grant of money without the normal public review. Thanks in large part to Stevens, sparsely populated Alaska outranks the rest of the nation - getting a disproportionate benefit when it comes to earmarks.

Texans get $98 per person worth of earmarks. New York's about the same. But when it comes to the Last Frontier state, so much federal money is pouring in to so few - it works out to more than $4,300 dollars per person.

What are some of the projects?

Well, it may not seem like a national priority, but more than $1 million has gone to try to create a market for salmon baby food: Alaska salmon baby food.

Stevens, known for funding Alaska's infamous "bridges to nowhere" is also behind what critics might call a "ferry to nowhere." He's earmarked $58 million so far to the ferry project that would serve a little-used port in Alaska.

Ever see a flying salmon? A jet was painted like a giant salmon with a half-million dollar grant from a non-profit group promoting Alaska seafood. Stevens steered tens of millions of dollars to the group - headed at the time by his own son Ben - from a federal fund to promote U.S. fish products.

The Senator wouldn't agree to talk to us, but his office told us: the baby food and salmon jet promote the Alaska seafood industry, which is in crisis, other states get similar earmarks for their industries, and that $58 million ferry will foster growth and create up to 200 jobs in Alaska.

The office also said that many Alaska earmarks are military-related and benefit the service members stationed there.

Read the response sent to CBS News by Sen. Ted Stevens’ spokesman in response to questions before the story aired (Oct. 10, 2007)

Couric & Co. Blog: Why Alaska’s Not Left Out In The Cold

Watch Attkisson's extended interview with Steve Ellis
Some members of Congress might say "we’re just doing our job. We’re supposed to bring home as much resources to our districts as we can," Attkisson said.

“Their job isn’t to bring home every single thing that isn’t bolted down here in Washington back to their home states,” Ellis said.

Some would say that's what Stevens does best: turn federal dollars into pork - or fish - making the 49th state, No. 1 when it comes to those tantalizing earmarks.


© MMVII, CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Video and Galleries from CBS Evening News

Add a Comment See all 31 Comments
by likeitis5050 October 12, 2007 7:53 PM PDT
Term limits would have prevented this, but who expects Congress to cut their own throats?
Reply to this comment
by ringading3 October 12, 2007 8:31 PM PDT
And what about that old geezer Senator from West Virginia? He droans on and on, spends and spends, but not a word from the Liberal Mouthpiece which is CBS! No wonder your ratings are in the can.
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds October 12, 2007 9:24 PM PDT
Ted Stevens has been the biggest pig at the trough for years and years. It''ll be nice to see his wrinkly as*s go to prison when the FBI is done investigating this walking, talking pile of corrupt BS. Hope they nail his lying equally corrupt little bas***** of a son too.
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 October 12, 2007 9:24 PM PDT
So why would the people of Alaska not re-elect him over and over. Pork is the name of the game. Forget term limits. Who is going to push to put themselves out of a job. The Constitution has to be changed to do that, and we know how carefully the Republicans consider the constitution. (Not)
Reply to this comment
by scottm99835 October 13, 2007 4:29 AM PDT
Full disclosure: I live in Alaska.

So, did you really do your research? How much of this so-called federal "Stevens" money is spent on Alaska as payment in lieu of taxes? Did you disaggregate the dollars spent on U.S. military infastructure in Alaska, or did your research begin and end with the bridge and Salmon plane?

Does it matter that the East Coast establishment pulled 240,000 sq miles off the table for development in the form of reserves (yes miles, not acres; Texas = 270,000 sq miles) and another 115,000 sq miles in BLM holdings. Does it matter that Alaska is handcuffed from developing it''''s own resource base to uphold your college''''s board of regents enviro-political agenda?

Consider the congressionally vetted dollars that are spent on trying to kick start a new state into the type of economy that you enjoy in the East as cheap rent for the National Park you have turned Alaska into. Allowing Ivy League Executive Branch agency heads who know little more about Alaska than what their professors warned them about to usurp our electorate and congressional delegation on matters relating to our ability to self determine will not serve our state or future.

I hope Ted has another 20 years in him.
Reply to this comment
by keithle1 October 13, 2007 5:02 AM PDT
SOB needs to die. Almost 40 years in the Senate. Retire already. Give someone else a chance to be Senator. Of course when Stevens does hang it up then Alaska loses its "buying power" in the Senate.

Hardly anyone living in Alaska. 2006 estimate by
the Census Bureau: 670,053. A little more than the population of Washington, D.C. which is 581,530.

Why does Alaska deserve this?

"But when it comes to the Last Frontier state, so much federal money is pouring in to so few - it works out to more than $4,300 dollars per person."

"Stevens, known for funding Alaska''s infamous "bridges to nowhere" is also behind what critics might call a "ferry to nowhere." He''s earmarked $58 million so far to the ferry project that would serve a little-used port in Alaska."

"The Senator wouldn''t agree to talk to us.." Aww.
Isn''t that special. Kind of Senator that the Senate doesn''t need.

Maybe he''ll go on a fishing boat for a tour & fall off during a storm.
Reply to this comment
by scottyusa October 13, 2007 7:24 AM PDT
I can''t help but wonder where he placed his earmarks. The defense bill maybe? That would be something. Take money away from our military for salmon baby food. Of course he is not the only one doing this he is just better at it.
Reply to this comment
by infidel_us October 13, 2007 8:23 AM PDT
This is an out and out LIE! Clinton is on record as the most $$$$ going back to NY. Biased as always, eh CBS!?!?!
Reply to this comment
by mcvet October 13, 2007 9:07 AM PDT
This is an out and out LIE! Clinton is on record as the most $$$$ going back to NY. Biased as always, eh CBS!?!?!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by infidel_us at 08:23 AM : Oct 13, 2007
+ report abuse

I don''t suppose you have any proof of your statement do you? Well outside that magic swastika you carry around! ROFLMAO You fascist are so funny the more disperate you get the more rediculous your claims get. Course you are such a bootlicker things go right over your head and are never noticed. You can''t notice much while on your knees... or are you a Wide Stance kind of Bootlicker? ROFLMAO Sieg Heil Bush!!
Reply to this comment
by mcvet October 13, 2007 9:10 AM PDT
And what about that old geezer Senator from West Virginia? He droans on and on, spends and spends, but not a word from the Liberal Mouthpiece which is CBS! No wonder your ratings are in the can.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by ringAding3 at 08:31 PM : Oct 12, 2007
+ report abuse

Right! Typical Fascist! Can''t defend your OWN slime so you pick on someone else. Strange but I don''t remember Byrd running on "Family Values" or a Promise to stop the "Tax and Spend" economics? But that wouldn''t matter to you freaks would it? You are just a member of a cult and wouldn''t admit wrong doing or lying by the Reich no matter what! Sieg Heil Bush!!
Reply to this comment
by infidel_us October 13, 2007 9:29 AM PDT
I don''''t suppose you have any proof of your statement do you? Posted by MCVet at 09:07 AM : Oct 13, 2007

I DO! But I don''t think you''re smart euough to analyze it. But for everyone else''s benefit, here it is:

According to Taxpayers for Common Sense - ''Clinton, placed $2.2 billion worth of earmarks in spending bills from 2002-2006. One would have to concede that she is good at it. In the fiscal 2008 defense-spending bill alone, Clinton successfully attached 26 earmarks worth $148 million, which was the most of any Democrat except Senator Carl Levin of Michigan, who is now chairman of the Armed Services Committee.''

It''s easy to say this republican leads the pack - if you look at it on a PER CAPITA basis. What''s the population of Alaska? CBS - biased as always.

Reply to this comment
by infidel_us October 13, 2007 9:35 AM PDT
Strange but I don''''t remember Byrd running on "Family Values" or a Promise to stop the "Tax and Spend" economics? Posted by MCVet at 09:10 AM : Oct 13, 2007

No, but I remember democrats coming in to power promising meaningful EARMARK REFORM! That probably explains why she''s trying to bury her record.

Clinton has deftly spread federal taxpayers'' money around to parochial projects of questionable public value, sending, for example, $250,000 to the Seneca Knitting Mill, and $200,000 to the Buffalo Urban Arts Center.

Maybe you should take that metal plate out of your skull and use it for your foot. Sieg Heil - A$$whipe!
Reply to this comment
by infidel_us October 13, 2007 9:58 AM PDT
From the NY Sun, Jan 2006:

''The senator''s remarks about misplaced spending priorities came as a government-spending watchdog group, the Washington-based Citizens Against Government Waste, awarded Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Schumer the "Porker of the Year" award after an online poll rated the New York Democrats as America''s most wasteful legislators. The award is given to politicians "who have shown a blatant disregard for the interests of taxpayers," according to a press release announcing the prize.

The award, and Mrs. Clinton''s comments faulting pork as a cause of insufficient homeland security funding, also come a month after The New York Sun reported that Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Schumer had secured $123 million in Defense Department funds for New York projects for which the Defense Department had not requested funding, but that had benefited contributors to the New York senators'' election campaigns.

Two of Mrs. Clinton''s opponents in this year''s Senate race, John Spencer, a Republican former mayor of Yonkers, and Jonathan Tasini, an anti-war Democrat, immediately pounced on Mrs. Clinton''s speech yesterday as "hypocritical."''

Reply to this comment
by doveak October 13, 2007 11:53 AM PDT
CBS failed to mention a few things about Alaska. Alaska the largest state, largest wildlife refuge, natural resources, OIL!, tallest mtn in North America, military bases, missil launch site, large fresh seafood industry, increasing population and a huge tourism industry.
The ferry they speak of will create more than 200 jobs, with this ferry population expantion will be possible, housing will need to be built, roads, stores etc., plus travel for thousands will be safer every day. Don''t just count the population, size matters elsewhere... I may not agree w/ Stevens, but you better believe he helps increase the value of the entire US by keeping the largest and most valuable state in the nation federaly funded as it should be.
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 October 13, 2007 12:39 PM PDT
Less taxes, less spending, more fiscal government. Unless you are a Republican then it is spend everyone elses money and keep the spin going. LOMAO..
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 October 13, 2007 12:41 PM PDT
According to Taxpayers for Common Sense - ''''Clinton, placed $2.2 billion worth of earmarks in spending bills from 2002-2006. One would have to concede that she is good at it. In the fiscal 2008 defense-spending bill alone, Clinton successfully attached 26 earmarks worth $148 million, which was the most of any Democrat except Senator Carl Levin of Michigan, who is now chairman of the Armed Services Committee.''''

It''''s easy to say this republican leads the pack - if you look at it on a PER CAPITA basis. What''''s the population of Alaska? CBS - biased as always.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by infidel_us at 09:29 AM : Oct 13, 2007

By the way this was over stated by them check the government statics or did you forget that is where we keep really important data. But the Bushbots just change it to make it meet there agenda.
Reply to this comment
by whispyseas October 13, 2007 1:03 PM PDT
'' ... the lord sang scream my name and blame everyone but yourself, and the dared kids sang scream our names and blame everyone but yourselfs ... ''

'' ... 300 hike naked dance dressed folk in 300 days to 300 weeks visiting up to 36 sick beds and 36 villages each night dancing get well feed world songs rallied around 100s millions sick beds drifting 10s millions spore bloom weed dragon trail fickle first aid lunch farm cottage studio trail crossing yseedsberry trail groups can assemble 90,000 little museums of medical you are here map song dance skit kit and still squeeze in up to 20 minutes each day of danceing porno get sick tax world songs ... ''
Reply to this comment
by whispyseas October 13, 2007 1:30 PM PDT
'' ... most disciplinary action is targeted at kids age five and less as they commit most crimes, though they are most likely to suffer injury or death as a result of disciplinary action ... ''
Reply to this comment
by tylenol6 October 13, 2007 3:00 PM PDT
If they don''t end up in jail like they should, people,
VOTE THEM OUT OF OFFICE!!!!!!!!!!!!! Simple as that.
VOTE RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT.......
Reply to this comment
by sparks224 October 13, 2007 3:09 PM PDT
Well, we all know fear and hate are family values, but is corruption a family value too?
I guess so.
Reply to this comment
by airmanc5 October 13, 2007 4:28 PM PDT
Hey Sharyl, did ya forget about the loudmouth in the house John Murtha, the highest earmarks of any congressperson. Of course Sharyl your limited intelligence forbids you to bring this up being he is a demencrat. So much for journalist integrity, and ethics. Sharyl u are like Katie, very irrevelant
Reply to this comment
by tibu987 October 13, 2007 5:04 PM PDT
Stevens personifies the type of person who should not be returned to office. He is typical of those who only represent his state and does does not give a *** for the rest of the country.
Vote for term limits when available.
Vote OUT of office any politician, state or federal, who has spent more than two terms in office.
The Stevens, Byrd, Kennedy, Warner, et al, have outlived their duty to the entire country. Only feathering ones nest is not enough in this day and age. It is time for them to go.
The malingerers, feeding at the public trough for many years, should be replaced with younger people with more idealistic ideas. And then vote them out also after two terms, regardless of party.
Reply to this comment
by likeitis5050 October 13, 2007 6:18 PM PDT
Vote for term limits when available.
Posted by tibu987

That''s the problem...getting them up for vote. Americans can''t make it much clearer in the last election, giving the Dems control. Problem is, the Dems were stupid enough to believe they were voted in because they were so superior and directly connected to what Americans wanted...and they haven''t listened to one word since. They were elected as a statement to all of Congress...no one is in there except that the people want you there. Congress is NEVER going to submit and pass a bill that limits their terms in office. Serving in Congress should not be seen as a career choice, which it is now. Kennedy is so rooted it will take an undertaker to get him out.

I have been saying for 20 years that Congress should only get to stay for two terms and the president one...6 years...and then out. If they can''t fulfill their campaign promises in 2 terms (president 6 years), then they aren''t likely going to do it, given that re-election campaigning take up so much time. Just about 2 years of a presidents time is spent on re-election campaigning. Get rid of the re-election c..rap, give him time to clean up after the last president and the rest of the time is quality service.

Now...whom do you think will ever get this done...Congress? Might as well pass out steak knives for them to cut their own throats...and even then they wouldn''t get it done quick enough.
Reply to this comment
by geezer62 October 13, 2007 7:56 PM PDT
whispyseas....

Are you transmitting some sort of secret coded message or are you just a complete moron? Most of us out here who read these posts don''t possess a secret decoder ring so please give us a break and try to post coherent sentences. Thank you.
Reply to this comment
by oldpilot954 October 13, 2007 9:44 PM PDT
Come on guys get real. While idealism is wonderful and statesmanship is what we really need, the majority of voters vote for one goal--"What can I get out of it?" Republicans vote for the person who will give them what they want whether it is business benefits or specific social issues. Democrats do exactly the same thing except, generally, aiming money in different directions. I agree Sen. Stevens shouldn''t get away with doing things that are illegal and he should be investigated. However, while some of those things are seemingly pointless, Alaska is different from most states since there is a large indigenous population, massive federal land holding, and many of the citizens have to make their annual salary in the 3 or 4 months of summer. Many communities are totally dependent on small aircraft for any outside supplies and therefore those supplies I drive to WalMart for have to be order in as air freight. If I were in his position, I''d be butchering a little pork myself.
Reply to this comment
by armandbeni October 14, 2007 12:58 PM PDT
58 million dollars to create 200 jobs. You do the math...I''m going to the bathroom to throw up!
Reply to this comment
by klingon69 October 15, 2007 11:29 AM PDT
Well, we all know fear and hate are family values, but is corruption a family value too?
I guess so.
Posted by sparks224 at 03:09 PM : Oct 13, 2007
That would depend on the family. Children oftimes emulate their parents/guardians activities, whether by raising/training or self determination.
Reply to this comment
by klingon69 October 15, 2007 11:33 AM PDT
Stevens personifies the type of person who should not be returned to office. He is typical of those who only represent his state and does does not give a *** for the rest of the country.
Vote for term limits when available.
Vote OUT of office any politician, state or federal, who has spent more than two terms in office.
The Stevens, Byrd, Kennedy, Warner, et al, have outlived their duty to the entire country. Only feathering ones nest is not enough in this day and age. It is time for them to go.
The malingerers, feeding at the public trough for many years, should be replaced with younger people with more idealistic ideas. And then vote them out also after two terms, regardless of party.
Posted by tibu987 at 05:04 PM : Oct 13, 2007

I doubt any representative/senator cares that much about anything except keep their job. Thus the pork. If someone is funneling $$$ into your area, maybe employing many people, or helping a particular city/county/state, do you really believe those people are going to vote against him/her?
As for those feeding at the public trough, I have oftimes believed that those people should not be allowed to vote. If you are living on the gov''t dole, what are you going to vote for, someone who will cut benefits, or require stricter guidelines to be eligible, NO, you will vote for the status quo. Many on the public dole don''t pay any taxes, but have a role in determining where our tax dollars go.
Reply to this comment
by ov442 October 15, 2007 3:16 PM PDT
maybe in honor of Mr. "Its a series of TUBES" Stevens, we should change the expression from Pork Barrel politics to Fish-Barrel politics.
How does "pork barrel" make any sense today anyway?
Flying Salmon politics.
Reply to this comment
by bing62 October 15, 2007 5:25 PM PDT
I honestly don''t fully understand what everyone has agains alaska when it comes to federal dollars spending. Please read this to help understand the growing need, wheather it is locally or out of your area code, to even out the idea of corperate america (mainly bush) spending our resources away from our country and do what''s best locally first. Why would you veto a increase in health care for our American childeren that are in a bad situation and ask congress for an increase in funding the war in Iraq, "Mission Accomplished"!

http://www.economist.com/world/na/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9946871
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 October 15, 2007 8:19 PM PDT
The spending should be in the national interest. It should be something that benefits ALL Americans, because we ALL pay for it!
Reply to this comment
See all 31 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs