Afghanistan Shuts Down 2 Security Firms
10 Other Private Contractors Targeted; Some Suspected Of Murder, Robbery
-
An Afghan private security officer guards a street in Kabul, Afghanistan, on Thursday, Oct. 11, 2007. Afghan authorities this week shut down two private security companies and said more than 10 others, some suspected of murder and robbery, would soon be closed, Afghan and Western officials said Thursday. (AP)
-
Interactive Assault On Al Qaeda The manhunt on the Afghan-Pakistan border.
-
Fast Facts Afghanistan Learn about the people, economy and history.
Authorities on Tuesday shut down the Afghan-run security companies Watan and Caps, where 82 illegal weapons were found during the two raids in Kabul, police Gen. Ali Shah Paktiawal said.
A Western security official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue, said some major Western companies were on the list of at least 10 others tapped for closure, but would not give names.
The crackdown echoes efforts by authorities in Iraq to rein in private security contractors often accused of acting with impunity.
Blackwater guards protecting a U.S. Embassy convoy in Baghdad are accused of killing 17 Iraqi civilians in a shooting on Sept. 16, an incident that enraged the Iraqi government, which is demanding millions in compensation for the victims and removal of Blackwater in six months.
The Associated Press has reported that the State Department, reacting to the Blackwater shooting, is considering limiting or phasing out the use of private security contractors to guard U.S. diplomats in Iraq.
However, a state department official, speaking anonymously to CBS News correspondent Kimberly Dozier, said replacing private contractors with government Diplomatic Security agents would be difficult, as the department is already fighting manpower issues trying to get just one government agent into each convoy.
"We used to have agents in every vehicle ... and cameras and recording equipment," the source told CBS News. Dozier learned that came to a halt little more than a year ago, when the last head of diplomatic security decided to end the oversight of the private guards due to a manpower shortage. They had also lost three agents, and didn't want to lose any more, according to the source.
The Blackwater incident in Iraq, followed by another shooting involving an Australian-run security firm that left two Iraqi women dead, has focused attention on the nebulous rules governing private guards and added to the Bush administration's problems in managing the war in Iraq.
Dozens of security companies also operate in Afghanistan, some of them well-known U.S. firms like Blackwater and DynCorp, but also many others who may not be known even to the Afghan government.
The Afghan government's main complaints against the companies are lack of accountability, intimidation of Afghan citizens, disrespect of local security forces and companies that do not cooperate with authorities.
As many as 10,000 private security guards are estimated to operate in Kabul, the Afghan capital, alone, but the Interior Ministry, which is responsible for the Afghan police and domestic security, has little idea who some of the guards are, said the Western official.
Paktiawal said more than 10 companies would be targeted for closure in raids police planned to carry out next week.
"There are some companies whose work permits have expired, and there are some companies who have illegal weapons with them," Paktiawal said. "We do not want such private security companies to be active in Afghanistan. It doesn't matter if they are national or international."
The Interior Ministry said 59 Afghan and international security companies have registered with them, though the Western official said as many as 25 other security companies could be operating in the country.
Some of the 59 companies are suspected of involvement in criminal activity like killing and robbery, and the police were investigating these cases as well, Paktiawal said. He could not provide the breakdown of how many of these companies are Afghan and how many foreign.
The rules seen by the AP say the main problem faced by the government is the absence of "checks and balances" over the work of private security companies, known as PSCs.
"In a compromise with the large international community, and its legitimate and high demand for security protection, the (Government of Afghanistan) has allowed for limited PSC operations and activities," the draft says.
"However, increasingly, the absence of targeted regulation ... in parallel with unstable security environment has generated an unfortunate and nearly anarchical PSC market with a long series of security problems and criminal activities."
Faced with growing Taliban insurgency, "it is a matter of urgency to regulate and monitor the activities of PSCs in a coordinated and precise manner and through a set of clear mechanisms," the draft says.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
- "We used to have agents in every vehicle ... and cameras and recording equipment," the source told CBS News. Dozier learned that came to a halt little more than a year ago, when the last head of diplomatic security decided to end the oversight of the private guards due to a manpower shortage. They had also lost three agents, and didn''t want to lose any more, according to the source.
This is similar to Rumsfeld''s remark: "As you know, you go to war with the army you have, not the army you might want or wish to have at a later time."
It is NOT a manpower shortage. It is a mis-management problem. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by MCVet at 07:35 PM : Oct 11, 2007
+ report abuse
***
and ''sharp knives'' like you pays for colbert''s porsche and prada suits.
and who the fu ck was ''concerned'' with these ''facists'' killing innocent iraqis???? the ''neocons"??
you wanted a cake..you eat it..watch out for that creamy center...it will be paid for with blood...
*humm wondering if you would spew vomit when the marines leave and the true killing happens.. - Reply to this comment
- Okay...so what is really going on here? Iraq, now Afghanistan. Die the leaders of both countries who owe their power, salary and very continued existence to America both decide ---that the only way to hamstring us was to find fault with and get rid of our auxillary forces? Because that is exactly what these security firms are--they are adjuncts to our military.
I find it interesting that slowly but surely, Maliki and Karzai are wresting the power from American hands back into their own. They are taking the back door approach so that it does not look like they are biting the hand that feeds them. But in challenging the mercs we have put in place and admittedly need, they are hamstringing operations and paving the way for them to undermine US interests while putting their own private armies into power.
Still...These ARE their countries. Too bad they love our money too much to tell us just to get the hell out. - Reply to this comment
- Now i really wish the colbert show would have another segment in baghdad..
mr. colbert..do you know how to handle a weapon?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by xzavierbrown at 04:44 PM : Oct 11, 2007
+ report abuse
LOL Well he''ll come a lot closer than ANY of the Chicken Hawks you bow to every day!! ROFLMAO Sieg Heil Bush! Sieg Heil Darth!! You aren''t really the sharpest knife in the old drawer are you there comrade? ROFLMAO - Reply to this comment
- gotta love these liberals...and thier crusade for the benefit of criminals and terrorists.
Posted by xzavierbrown at 04:48 PM : Oct 11, 2007
+ report abuse
Yeah yeah we know! Those bad old "Liberals" are to blame. YAWN!! Say do they ever teach you simple minded MORON''s any other lines at those Nazi Youth Camps? I mean you can HONESTLY believe people pay any attention to that garbage anymore do you? Oh! Okay, I guess you have nothing better so??? LOL You freaks are truly a sad bunch of Kool Aid Drinkers though!! Sieg Heil Bush!! - Reply to this comment
- the liberal masses and the liberal media are both right on this one..SEE HOW THESE VIOLENT ATTACKS BY CIVILIAN INSURGENCY WOULD JUST IMMEDIATLY CEASE..now that those evil security forces and soon..our military soldiers are not allowed to defend themselves..
Main U.S. Base Near Baghdad Attacked
Rocket Or Mortar Kills 2 Coalition Soldiers And Wounds 40 Others
******
gotta love these liberals...and thier crusade for the benefit of criminals and terrorists. - Reply to this comment
- Now i really wish the colbert show would have another segment in baghdad..
mr. colbert..do you know how to handle a weapon? - Reply to this comment
- GOOD!!! now we can see how these politicians and aid workers and foreign dignitaries manage the mean streets of kabul and bahgdad..
I wonder if they know how to lock and load an m-16?? - Reply to this comment
- The United States cannot reign in its own "cowboy mentality" security firms, so the Afghani''s need to do it. Iraq should similarly clean house. This whole war, from its illegal beginning through Abu Ghraib, to the Blackwater episode is a nightmare. The trouble is, real civilians are getting killed, real soldiers are being slaughtered in the name of democratizing the Middle East, and real dollars are being wasted at the expense of future generations, not to mention the deteriorating infrastructure in the US. And the Reich Wing continues to bury it''s head in the sand, nodding assent to every development, no matter how much it appears similar to what one might find in a comic strip.
- Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




