February 11, 2009 4:04 PM

Is Imus' Return Too Much, Too Soon?

(AP)  A six-month vacation, a multimillion-dollar contract settlement and the prospect of a new, nationally syndicated gig. Does that qualify as penance for acid-tongued Don Imus, fired last spring amid a national furor sparked by his racist on-air remark?

Hardly, say his critics. The idea of the broadcasting icon returning to the public airwaves just months after his public meltdown is nearly as insulting as his crude and misogynist comments about the Rutgers women's basketball team, the anti-Imus contingent maintains.

"To put him back on the air now makes light of his serious and offensive racial remarks that are still ringing in the ears of people all over this country," said Barbara Ciara, president of the National Association of Black Journalists.

But Imus' return appears a fait accompli, barely an eye-blink after his four-decade career seemed ruined and his ouster was supposed to foster a national dialogue on offensive language.

Photos: Don Imus
Rumors about Imus' return began over the summer, with recent reports suggesting he could resume broadcasting by December -- most likely on New York-based WABC-AM, owned by Citadel Broadcasting.

Imus, through attorney Martin Garbus, has declined to comment on his radio future, as did Citadel Broadcasting CEO Farid Suleman. But the Citadel executive recently defended the shock jock.

"He didn't break the law," Suleman told The New York Times last week. "He's more than paid the price for what he did."

Imus was fired in April after his infamous "nappy headed hos" comment. He sued CBS Radio for breach of contract, later reaching a lucrative settlement for the remaining time on his five-year, $40 million deal.

Imus then spent much of his "free" time at the New Mexico ranch where he hosts dying children, one of his philanthropic interests.

Among the first to give Imus a "get on the air" pass was the Rev. Al Sharpton, who said in July that Imus had a right to make a living -- barely three months after his was the most strident voice against the Hall of Fame broadcaster.

Others are less forgiving. The NABJ, one of the first groups to call for Imus' dismissal, was joined by the National Organization for Women in protesting the radio star's return -- even before it's official. Count the Rev. Herbert Daughtry, a veteran New York civil rights activist, among those perplexed by such talk.

"It seems he has benefited from his hiatus," the Brooklyn preacher said. "I'm not really sure there is any real, real repentance, and therefore you kind of hold judgment until you see what happens."

NOW President Kim Gandy said the specter of Imus coming back to the radio dial was like "a bad dream."

"Didn't they learn anything?" she asked about broadcasting executives.

Whatever they learned, they didn't forget that Imus makes money. His core audience is older, affluent and likely to rejoin the I-man.

"Imus brings, potentially, large national advertisers," said Tom Taylor of the industry Web site radio-info.com. "And there's also syndication, not only on radio but television."

Suleman's WABC-AM is already home to several syndicated hosts: Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Mark Levin. And Imus' national presence would trump the local Arbitron ratings, where his WFAN-AM show consistently drew fewer listeners than WABC's current morning drive time team of Curtis Sliwa and Ron Kuby.

Taylor said he expected Suleman to stick with Imus unless the backlash becomes too intense.

"I think he understands Imus' potential power," Taylor said. "Farid is a fan, and he seems determined to do this -- absent thousands of angry people gathered outside his office."

For weeks after Imus' offensive crack, attention focused on offensive rap lyrics that used the same language. Civil rights leaders pressed music industry officials to eliminate racial or misogynist words from their artists' repertoires.

Daughtry said he was skeptical from the start about suggestions that the Imus case might spark widespread reevaluation of insensitive language.

"I was reminded of the story of the man who fell out of a 50-story building," Daughtry said. "When he reached the 25th floor, he said, 'So far, so good.' So the optimism, it seemed to me, was without firm grounding."

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment
by dylanxxv October 13, 2007 5:39 PM EDT
JackSteen1, WaaaaWaaaWaaaaa...No one is forcing you to either look at him or listen to his show...Get over it...
Good for you Imus...
Reply to this comment
by keithle1 October 12, 2007 12:05 AM EDT
Nothing I hate more than incessant "happy talk" in the morning. Some chef cooking food at 8:15 am. "Morning Joe" has taken the place of Imus
on MSNBC from 6am to 9am. I hope he doesn''t say anything that upsets any racial group in the USA. Call me crazy but I prefer Imus. Joe''s amiable enough but the highlight to me is sexpot Mika Brzezinski.

People who scream about how bad Imus is must never watch rap videos. There is no comparison.
So please save your "wailing & gnashing of teeth"
for something that really deserves it. Like Britney absentmindedly putting one of her kids in the trunk or whatever.

Look at what goes on in black urban neighborhoods in the USA every day. Homicide.
Gangs. Every day on the local news, you see black man after black man being hauled away in handcuffs for one thing or another. Real problems.

Wasn''t the Imas brouhaha the proverbial tempest in a teapot?

Oh, I''m sorry. I didn''t mean to make fun of the Rutgers women''s basketball team. I''m sure they''re
still in therapy trying to deal with the outrage that was inflicted on them by Don "Satan" Imus.


Reply to this comment
by jacksteen1 October 11, 2007 11:23 PM EDT
What does this ancient, ugly piece of human excrement need with a job on radio ? Hasn''t he managed to save any of these millions his useless ''talents'' have netted him over the years ?

He is not funny - he is not controversial. He is a wastrel and a pig. It is unconfortable to listen to him and it is excruciating to look at his ugly face.

If pickets around the Muzzie station-owner''s office is what will get Imus put out to pasture, then why aren''t the nappy heads of New York and New Jersey organizing just that kind of protest ? The filthy Muzzie hates American greed but he sure knows how to feed at the trough.

Spare us any more stories with pictures of Imus; I actually lost my appetite for dinner looking at his basset-jowled hideous rictus.
Reply to this comment
by thenicks3 October 11, 2007 9:53 PM EDT
How appropriate that he is going to be on with Limbaugh and Hannity (I''ve never heard of Levin). That way everyone will see just how offensive all them are and that either all of them get to be on the air or none of them. Rush has been at least as offensive as Imus, if not more so, and Rush is not billed as Shock Jock. Call me silly, but if you are paid to be a shock jock, I expect to be shocked by what you say. There is no excuse for Rush -- he''s just an idiot.
Reply to this comment
by lil_d3vil October 11, 2007 8:45 PM EDT
I''m not a listener of Imus, but the man should have never been taken off the air in the first place. The girls excepted his apology.
Then later one tried to sue him for defamation & money. She pulled out of the suit. Those two opportunists Jackson and especially Sharpton need to be held to the same standards that they scream for others to follow.

In my book their both hypocrites.
Reply to this comment
by b21239 October 11, 2007 8:16 PM EDT
Imus should not be allowed to return to the air at least 2 or 3 years. He needs to hurt in the pocket book to the extent that his extreme racist, hurtful and inflammatory remarks about the Rutgers Women''s Basketball players hurt not only the players but a whole people. He''ll never take the condemnation seriously unless he has to suffer in some way. His was not some private remark made to one person; he shouted his racist feelings to millions, thereby probably influencing the thinking of others - the kind of thinking that we do not need in this multi-ethnic,cultural society. We have enough things dividing us. We don''t need some rascist, ascinine critic adding to the dissension.
Reply to this comment
by lawandorder7 October 11, 2007 7:41 PM EDT
The people that are againest him are all on the loss side, like not playing with a full deck. So go get a life dunb dumb
Reply to this comment
by steyce October 11, 2007 6:54 PM EDT
Thank heaven for his return!
Reply to this comment
by kmlee4 October 11, 2007 6:29 PM EDT
He should have never been taken off !
This world we live in is all about politcal correctness , or all about someone being offeneded,and who can sue who , well if you dont like it shut it off ! if you dont want to watch it dont ! if it offends you get over it.
With so many other inportant things in this world going on like our soldiers dieing for our right to free speech and everything we have here in america you think all these poeple could focus on something more productive.
Reply to this comment
by pghlady3 October 11, 2007 5:43 PM EDT
did we forget that the Imus'' radio show had a delay like most other radio shows, and that higher ups were listening and they decided that what he said was alright, and that they were the ones how should have lost their jobs?
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook