NEW YORK, Oct. 11, 2007

Could Nobel Prize Spur Gore To Run In '08?

Grassroots Groups Urging Former Vice President To Enter Presidential Race

    • Former Vice President Al Gore attends the Annual Oceana Partner's Awards Gala at the home of Jena and Michael King on October 5, 2007 in Pacific Palisades, California.

      Former Vice President Al Gore attends the Annual Oceana Partner's Awards Gala at the home of Jena and Michael King on October 5, 2007 in Pacific Palisades, California.  (Getty Images/Trish Tokar)

    • Former Vice President Al Gore speaks during a panel discussion Wednesday, Sept. 26, 2007, at the Clinton Global Initiative Annual Meeting in New York.

      Former Vice President Al Gore speaks during a panel discussion Wednesday, Sept. 26, 2007, at the Clinton Global Initiative Annual Meeting in New York.  (AP)

    • Former Vice President Al Gore addresses the audience at the Sofitel on September 21, 2007 in Melbourne, Australia. Al Gore is in Australia to discuss climate change and environmental awareness.

      Former Vice President Al Gore addresses the audience at the Sofitel on September 21, 2007 in Melbourne, Australia. Al Gore is in Australia to discuss climate change and environmental awareness.  (GETTY IMAGES/Kristian Dowling)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Play CBS Video Video Nobel Prize Mysteries

    The winners of the Nobel Prize have not always been obvious. Mark Phillips reports on everything you didn't know about the coveted award.

  • Photos Nobel Prize in Pictures

    Images from the awards for the world's best in science, economics, literature and peacemaking

(CBS)  This story was written by CBSNews.com political reporter Brian Montopoli.



The Nobel Peace Prize, which will be announced Friday in Oslo, Norway, doesn't normally play a significant role in U.S. presidential politics.

But the possibility that former Vice President Al Gore might take the prize has some Gore supporters buzzing that the 2000 Democratic Party nominee for president might be convinced to take the plunge once again.

Gore and Canadian Inuit activist Sheila Watt-Cloutier, who were jointly nominated for the prize for their work on climate change, have been identified as likely winners by Nobel handicappers. If they win, Gore supporters say, it could spur the former vice president to make a late entry into the presidential race.

"Winning a Nobel Peace Prize is a life changing event," said Dylan Malone, who runs a Web site called AlGore.org, which advocates a Gore presidential run. "If he wins (the Nobel), he will undoubtedly reassess the situation and think, 'Where do I go next?' He's done the slideshow, made the movie, won every accolade that our society has to give. There's nowhere else to go to take it to the next level in my mind."

On Wednesday, the Web site Draft Gore paid for a full-page open letter to Gore in the New York Times. "You say you have fallen out of love with politics, and you have every reason to feel that way," reads the letter. "But we know you have not fallen out of love with your country. And your country needs you now -- as do your party and the planet you are fighting so hard to save."

The ad said that 136,000 people have signed a petition asking Gore to run for president.

According to Gore spokesperson Kalee Kreider, the former vice president "has no intention of running."

"Vice President Gore truly appreciates the sentiment and the feeling behind the ad (yesterday), but as a private citizen his efforts are going behind a campaign of a different kind," said Kreider. "The vast majority of his energy right now is going into educating people about the climate crisis and trying to get that issue to a tipping point."

That sentiment hasn't stopped Gore partisans. Peter Ryder, who is organizing a rally and concert in Iowa urging Gore to run, acknowledges that his efforts at times seem quixotic. Still, he says, "When I go around just talking to people, they all say, 'Oh my goodness, if Gore was running, there would be no question I'd support him.' If he got in, I think he would attract a great many Democrats."

According to recent CBS News polls, Gore remains popular among Democratic primary voters. In a poll conducted this summer, 55 percent of likely Democratic primary voters said they viewed the former vice president favorably, while only 20 percent had an unfavorable view. In April, a CBS News poll found that 35 percent of Americans believe Gore's positions go too far in protecting the environment at the expense of economic concerns, while 48 percent believe he strikes the right balance. (Read more CBS News poll analysis on Gore.)

Even Gore's staunchest supporters admit that with the first presidential primaries likely to be held in less than three months, time is running out for a late entry to the race.

"Because of his incredible appeal and his name recognition, he still has time, but the window of opportunity is closing pretty quickly," said Draft Gore founder Monica Friedlander. "The registration deadlines are closing for primaries. After the beginning of next month, it's going to be very difficult."

Gore explicitly ruled out running in 2004, something he has not done this time around. But while the politician-turned-filmmaker has passionate supporters, most Democratic primary voters -- 67 percent in a CBS News poll taken in August -- said they are happy with the selection of candidates now in the race. If Gore does decide to enter, he faces an uphill battle: Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama alone have raised around $80 million each since the beginning of the year, and all of his potential rivals have been campaigning, advertising and debating for months.

"There are genuine practical considerations at play here," said Democratic strategist and former Gore aide Chris Lehane. "One, the ability to get on a ballot in all these states with a small window of opportunity to accomplish that. Secondly, to put together a campaign and raise money in a very short time. Most of the activists and key players are already aligned with campaigns. These aren't impossible impediments, but they are significant."

Democratic strategist and longtime Gore adviser Michael Feldman, who is not working on a presidential campaign, said he doesn't see Gore jumping in the race.

"Everything he's said publicly and privately indicates that he's not planning a campaign," said Feldman.

That's a sentiment echoed by Carter Eskew, chief strategist for the Gore 2000 presidential campaign.

If Gore wins the Nobel Prize, Eskew said, "I think it will certainly increase efforts like you saw in the paper, but I really don't think it'll have any impact on him at all. I think he's on a different path right now."

But Gore supporters are holding out hope.

"A lot of people are sacrificing a lot," said Draft Gore founder Friedlander. "People are donating to this cause who can't afford to donate. But we believe very strongly he is very, very desperately needed. This is not a campaign of people who think he's a great guy. This is not about him. It's about the country."

By Brian Montopoli
©MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Candidate Profiles & RSS Feeds


Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 269 Comments
by starleo146 October 12, 2007 4:04 PM EDT
I voted for Gore when he ran for President last time and he won then, why not do it again... and maybe this time the United States won''''t allow the warmongering psychopathic gout-ridden election-rigging lying cheating murderous greedy thieving pieces of *** from the opposing party to be ''''selected'''' by activist judges despite the voters'''' will.

Posted by complainjane at 02:20 AM : Oct 12, 2007

This was beautiful I haven''t forgotten that sunken feeling when the supreme court made that illegal ruling, that was the most horrendous feeling. Right then, I knew we were in for a bad, bad time. Boy was I right. I think people want him to run once more to get that bad felling out and give him the job that was stolen from him.Everything he campaigned came true.
Reply to this comment
by sftodd October 12, 2007 3:27 PM EDT
sftodd -- dont be a dummy......Al BORE is a dummy, your a dummy, and your whole party is dumb
Posted by emsaund1 at 11:53 PM : Oct 11, 2007

emsaund1, wake up and smell the coffee, both parties are owned by corporations. I don''t have a party, I vote for the least dispicable and least corrupt. Republicans are the most dishonest and the most corrupt. Anyone with half a brain can figure that out by listening to their lies every time they open their mouths while proclaiming themselves patriots. I''d rather have a relatively honest democrate as president than false patriots like Bush/Cheney who have duped nearly 50% of this country.
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 October 12, 2007 3:26 PM EDT
Please call or e-mail you congressman and tell them to oppose the retroactive immunity bill for phone companies. Bush knows he committed a crime with the help of these phone companies and they deserve to be punished do it today please!!!!.
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 October 12, 2007 2:49 PM EDT
They doubted him when he was campaigning against Bush, and he was RIGHT ON, I have heard of people who worked in the environment dept have changed wording etc. as to not change the environment, and supposedly these came from scientist so something is happening to this planet.Can anyone doubt that? Also you never heard a word till Al Gore made this film.
Reply to this comment
by shanev137 October 12, 2007 9:16 AM EDT
He''d certainly be better than Hitlery.
Reply to this comment
by cbs_oliver October 12, 2007 8:43 AM EDT
It would be wonderful if Al Gore were President, but I can understand if he prefers to help America and the world in other ways.

It is sad to say, but America may not be ready yet - or maybe ever - for a decent leader.
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 October 12, 2007 8:31 AM EDT
"Burton''s ruling follows a challenge from a part-time school official who complained that Gore''s film was inaccurate and biased and should not be shown to pupils.

Stewart Dimwit, who works part-time on a school governing board, said he was fighting to have his children educated in an environment "free from bias and political spin."

[Same source]
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 October 12, 2007 8:25 AM EDT
"Kalee Kreider, a spokeswoman for the former vice president, said the judge''s decision backed key elements of the documentary.

"The ruling upheld fundamental pieces of the film and the scientific consensus that global warming is real and caused by human activities," she told The Associated Press. "Of the thousands of facts in the film, the judge only took issue with just a handful. And of that handful, we have the studies to back those pieces up."

[Same source]

Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 October 12, 2007 8:23 AM EDT
WHY ISN''T CBS REPORTING THIS ?

"British Judge says Gore film "broadly accurate," but lists nine problems with claims"

Gore''s film "is substantially founded upon scientific research and fact," High Court Judge Michael Burton said.

Out of thousands of facts presented in the film, Burton listed nine as "not sufficiently backed by scientific evidence." These include Gore''s claim that sea level rises of 23 feet might occur in the immediate future, and that Hurricane Katrina, the evaporation of most of Lake Chad and the melting of the snow on Mount Kilimanjaro were all caused by global warming. Burton said there was insufficient evidence to back those claims.

But otherwise he endorsed the accuracy of the film.

Source:

http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/10/12/britain.gore.ap/index.html
Reply to this comment
by human-being-2009 October 12, 2007 7:43 AM EDT
Al is already doing a remarkable job. No need to be in the white house. That''s a misatke a lot of you folks make.
Reply to this comment
by complainjane October 12, 2007 5:20 AM EDT
I voted for Gore when he ran for President last time and he won then, why not do it again... and maybe this time the United States won''t allow the warmongering psychopathic gout-ridden election-rigging lying cheating murderous greedy thieving pieces of *** from the opposing party to be ''selected'' by activist judges despite the voters'' will.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 October 12, 2007 4:18 AM EDT
Yesterday''s "Party of Lincoln" is now today''s "Party of Pat Buchanan, David Duke, Ann Coulter, Bush, Cheney, and most other virulent racist wastes of life", so invoking Lincoln''s name only serves to dishonor the man, and further show the hypocrisy of those invertebrates falsely calling themselves "conservatives".

I will never give my vote to Republicans until such a time as they weed out the psychopaths, and as they now form the core of the party, that probably means never.
Reply to this comment
by dutchfarmer October 12, 2007 3:35 AM EDT
One can easily see what Al''s been up to. He''s been eating grub. Boy, what a puffy slob!
Reply to this comment
by emsaund1 October 12, 2007 3:25 AM EDT
RADIOBOB: I''m sorry, but I havent seen Al BORE GORE in any of the debates yet. No matter, he will get slammed again if he decides to join.

GIULIANI 08
Reply to this comment
by one_american October 12, 2007 3:18 AM EDT
What do you get when you cross Forest Gump with Jabba the Hutt?

You guessed it.

Al Gore.
Reply to this comment
by radiob-2009 October 12, 2007 3:14 AM EDT
sftodd -- dont be a dummy......Al BORE is a dummy, your a dummy, and your whole party is dumb


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by emsaund1

With such "grand" candiates on both side''s of the aisle, this is why people are looking at Al Gore along with Chuck Hagel although neither are running.
Do you want a "poodle" for a president? If so vote for those who are running instead of DRAFTING your candiate. This nation is at a time where it needs a uniter and a person of vision, character and servitude to the America public all of which is lacking in the announced candiates.
Reply to this comment
by emsaund1 October 12, 2007 2:53 AM EDT
sftodd -- dont be a dummy......Al BORE is a dummy, your a dummy, and your whole party is dumb
Reply to this comment
by sftodd October 12, 2007 2:48 AM EDT
Republicans fear Gore because they know he is beyond reproach when held up next to any one of the pathetic group of disgusting liars and political ho''s that make up the republican party.
Reply to this comment
by radiob-2009 October 12, 2007 2:34 AM EDT
56% of respondents when asked if they wanted Al Gore to run said yes. If momentum builds on this Al Gore will have to run. Draft your candiate at Unity08.
Reply to this comment
by sftodd October 12, 2007 2:27 AM EDT
Or could it be he knows how to be a leader in encouraging people to buy "carbon credits" from his bogus company of which he is the founder and chairman?
Posted by hawksprings at 11:22 PM : Oct 11, 2007

Wow, hawksprings, what are you, some kind of commie? What''s wrong with letting the free market take care of this? Why are you crying about Gore''s exercise of his constitutional right to make money any *** way he sees fit? Why don''t you take your commie BS to China? We don''t need it here in the U.S., loser.
Reply to this comment
See all 269 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Lobbyists Pushed Off U.S. Advisory Panels

    (210 recent comments)

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: