Democrats Gear Up To Fight Bush's Veto
Congressional Leaders Seek Allies Across The Aisle After President Vetoes Kids' Insurance Bill
-
-
Photo
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., reacts to President Bush's veto of a bi-partisan children's health insurance bill during a news conference in Washington, Oct. 3, 2007. Left to right are Reid, Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont. (AP Photo/Dennis Cook)
-
Photo
President Bush defended his decision to veto an expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program during a speech to the Chamber of Commerce in Lancaster, Pa., Wednesday, Oct. 3, 2007. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
-
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Bush On Child's Health Veto
"CBS News RAW:" Speaking at the Lancaster, Pa., Chamber of Commerce, President Bush defended his veto of a children's health insurance bill saying his government supports private health care.
-
Video
Health Care Veto Hurts GOP
The Democrats have launched a shame campaign on Republicans after President Bush vetoed a bill that would expand health insurance to poor children. Jim Axelrod reports.
-
Fast Facts
At A Glance: SCHIP
A look at the State Children's Health Insurance Program and the bill vetoed by President Bush.
-
Interactive
Bush Presidency
The president's agenda, plus facts, figures, major events and key personalities.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid decried Mr. Bush's action as a "heartless veto."
"Never has it been clearer how detached President Bush is from the priorities of the American people," Reid, D-Nev., said in a statement. "By vetoing a bipartisan bill to renew the successful Children's Health Insurance Program, President Bush is denying health care to millions of low-income kids in America."
Democratic congressional leaders said they may put off the override attempt for as long as two weeks to maximize pressure on Republican House members whose votes will be critical.
"The President should not be so heartless when it comes to the children of America," Washington State Democrat Maria Cantwell said on the floor of the Senate. "I know my colleagues here are working shoulder to shoulder, Democrats and Republicans, trying to stop the President's veto."
"We remain committed to making SCHIP into law - with or without the president's support," said the leader of the House, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat, referring to the full name of the State Children's Health Insurance Program.
Eighteen Republicans joined Democrats in the Senate, enough to override Mr. Bush's veto. But this was not the case in the House, where despite sizable Republican backing, supporters of the bill are about two dozen votes short of a successful override.
Illinois Rep. Rahm Emmanuel talked to CBS News chief White House correspondent Jim Axelrod about the political advantage the Democratic party sees in this situation.
"So the President of the United States is asking 15 Republicans to stand with him on an argument about government-run health care… and deny American kids health care," Emmanuel said, "and yet, vote at the same time to give Iraq 190 billion dollars."
Never has it been clearer how detached President Bush is from the priorities of the American people.
Senate Majority Leader Harry ReidHouse Minority Whip Roy Blunt, R-Mo., said he was "absolutely confident" that the House would be able to sustain Mr. Bush's veto.
Senate Minority Whip Trent Lott, R-Miss., said Congress should be able to reach a compromise with Mr. Bush once he vetoes the bill. "We should not allow it to be expanded to higher and higher income levels, and to adults. This is about poor children," he said. "But we can work it out."
The White House sought little attention for Mr. Bush's action, with the president casting his veto behind closed doors without any fanfare or news coverage. He defended it later Wednesday during a budget speech.
"Poor kids first," Mr. Bush said. "Secondly, I believe in private medicine, not the federal government running the health care system."
But he seemed eager to avert a full-scale showdown over the difficult issue, offering that he is "more than willing" to negotiate with lawmakers "if they need a little more money in the bill to help us meet the objective of getting help for poor children."
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 19
- next
See all 913 CommentsNo....just slam the door on them so their voice is muffled.
You need a brain to worry and a brain is something Bush does not have.
I guess that would really cut into the $170 billion a year this idiot is spending in Iraq!
Makes my blood boil!
GOPigs = GREEDY OLD PEDOPHILES
Something is wrong with that man - seriously wrong.
The only thing left for the middle class is to work our azzes off to pay for the poor and rich and support imports from china, and outsourcing, and on and on.
Thanks for krapping on the next generation of Americans.
Of course congress and the prez don''t have socialized medicine.
The middle class helps fund their medical bills.
BUSH YOU''RE THE MOST EVIL PERSON ON EARTH ...
I HOPE SOMEDAY YOUR OIL COMPANIES WILL BE DESTROYED YOU *** .... THE BEST PLACE FOR YOU BUSH IS JAIL.. MOTH ***. BAZTARD....
$35 billion over five years for kids health care: VETOED.
But that is okay, at least he''s getting his revenge on the Democrats.
Wonder if the health care he just VETO''D were for the kids of hard-working REPUBLICANS who voted for Bush?
Bush is the Supreme Hater, el diablo.
Go to hell.
IMPEACH THE SCUMBAG NOW!
Might Bush might finally be ashamed of his actions just a bit?
What, he wasn''t strutting around in a flight suit on a carrier deck under a mission accomplished sign when he vetoed this? I wonder why, it would surly have been appropriate.
"Serial Killer Apologizes To Victim''s Kin"
Except Bush will never apologize. I just wonder how people reconcile voting for a serial killer.
But he has all the money in the world for his war in Iraq, and says ugly things about those Democrats who would "deprive our troops" by defunding the war.
IMPEACH BUSH NOW!
How many dead Americans will make the Republicans happy?
- Posted by incog-nito at 10:51 AM : Oct 03, 2007
When the devil reads this post he will sue you for defamation of character.
What the Dems are doing in this political move, and supported by America''s corrupt liberal MSM wolfpack press, is distorting the facts.
Bottom line is this, our President is vetoing this bill because the Dems are trying to expand it for folks making up to $83,000 a year, which is (4) four times the national poverty level.
We need to make sure when we provide benefits to folks that the truely poor folks get the help, first.
The 110th Do Nothing Democrat Congress needs to go back now and make sure this program, created by Repubilcans to serve the poor does exactly that, serves the poor.
It''s disgraceful that America''s free left-wing press can''t be more truthful and balanced.
He can''t help it, he''s a compassionate conservative.
All you Democrats need to get you a job instead of mooching off the government, the people.
jb6599 you are right, he is the worst president in US history.
- perception5
One of a number of falsehoods the Right is busily circulating.
"Bush also misstated the intent of the SCHIP program by claiming it "was meant to help poor children." That''s false as well. Poor children, defined as those in families below the official federal poverty level, were already covered by Medicaid. The stated intent of Congress when it established the program in 1997 was to expand coverage beyond those who were poor to "uninsured low-income" children. And in Washington-speak, there''s a significant difference between "poor" and "low-income."
Source:
"Bush''s False Claims About Children''s Health Insurance"
http://www.factcheck.org/bushs_false_claims_about_childrens_health_insurance.html
Amazing.
And yet he spent $900 billion to lose a war.
The GWOT (global war on terror) was created by Republicans in 2001 for "poor" defense contractors. There are seemingly no upper income requirements for them though.
What the Dems are doing in this political move, and supported by America''''s corrupt liberal MSM wolfpack press, is distorting the facts.
Bottom line is this, our President is vetoing this bill because the Dems are trying to expand it for folks making up to $83,000 a year, which is (4) four times the national poverty level.
We need to make sure when we provide benefits to folks that the truely poor folks get the help, first.
The 110th Do Nothing Democrat Congress needs to go back now and make sure this program, created by Repubilcans to serve the poor does exactly that, serves the poor.
It''''s disgraceful that America''''s free left-wing press can''''t be more truthful and balanced.
Posted by perception5 at 10:55 AM : Oct 03, 2007
Bush campaigned to INCREASE S-CHIP.
Do you even bother to read the article? Bush veteod the bill because it would be expanded to people with higher income levels (lower middle class people). Most rich people inherited wealth. They did not create it.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 19
- next
See all 913 Comments