Oct. 2, 2007
Goodbye Gingrich
The Nation: Former Speaker Offered Something Lacking In GOP Field Competence
-
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich delivers remarks to the National Rifle Association in Washington, Friday, Sept. 21, 2007. He announced he would not run for president Sept. 29, 2007. (AP)
-
Play CBS Video Video GOPs Gavotte For Position GOP candidates are trying to figure out the right amount of distance to keep from a president popular with only about half of U.S. voters. Nancy Cordes reports.
-
Interactive Campaign 2008 Profiles of the candidates, polls, fund-raising, blogs, video and more.
-
In-Depth 2008 Presidential Hopefuls Profiles and the latest news on the Democrats and Republicans running for the White House.
The amusing thing about Newt Gingrich's latest flirtation with a presidential bid was the notion that Republicans needed the former Speaker of the House to enter the race because of his "big ideas."
So what earthshaking advice did Gingrich offer Mitt Romney, Fred Thompson, John McCain and Rudy Giuliani upon concluding that he would not join the men who would be Bush in their little romp?
Don't forget to use the Internet in your campaigning, guys.
Seriously.
That's the "big idea" with which Gingrich exited the competition.
The truth is that Gingrich has never been an ideas man.
Original thoughts were never what distinguished Gingrich from his fellow Republicans - and, frankly, from most Democrats. Rather, he has stood out as someone who recognizes that ideas exist. Unlike the current president, Gingrich reads the papers. He reads the books that matter - or at least the reviews. He is conversant with the zeitgeist, and capable of mustering independent observations that might be considered, if not groundbreaking, at least valid. As such Gingrich is, like Gene McCarthy and Ronald Reagan were and Jimmy Carter and Gary Hart remain, capable of adding something more than mere talking points to the political discussion. That cannot be said of the announced candidates for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination, with the exception of Ron Paul and, perhaps, Mike Huckabee.
This explains why grassroots Republicans were excited - genuinely and broadly so - by the prospect that Gingrich might make a late entry into the race for their party's nomination.
Republicans were looking for a competent candidate.
But it should be made clear that no one who was engaged in the search for "next" or "big" ideas was looking to Newt Gingrich for smart. The former speaker is a strategist. He's good at playing the political game - good enough to get most of the national media to engage in speculation about him as presidential timber at precisely the point when he happens to be selling a book and launching a website.
Gingrich's brief flirtation with a candidacy offered the Republican Party no more than a prospect with basic skills and an ability to think on his feet. Once upon a time - when the party faced choices between the likes of Wendell Willkie, Robert Taft, Tom Dewey and Earl Warren, or even Richard Nixon, Nelson Rockefeller and Reagan - it would have been absurd and insulting to suggest that evidence of basic intellectual engagement was enough to distinguish a presidential contender.
But after two terms of following George W. Bush and Dick Cheney deeper and deeper into a desert of intellect, Republicans can perhaps be forgiven for confusing a fellow with a half-empty canteen for an oasis. As for the media that Gingrich played so masterfully, let's be honest: If mainstream print and broadcast reporters had any interest whatsoever in ideas, as opposed to horserace metaphors, does anyone honestly imagine that the empty pronouncements of a Fred Thompson or a Rudy Giuliani - or, for that matter, a Hillary Clinton or a Barack Obama - would be treated seriously?
By John Nichols
Reprinted with permission from the The Nation.
| If you like this article, check out www.thenation.com for more investigative reports, timely editorials and incisive columns |

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





He is a member of the Republishit Party, the party that gave us Ronny Ragoon, the Great Drooler, who gave our nation to the religious Reich and allowed Jerry Falwell and his ilk to call national policy on morals and other matters....all the while believing that his roles in B-movies during the War Years actually happened. This pathetic excuse for a human being died in a dirty diaper...exactly what he deserved for ruining our nation.
The Republiturd Party offers Mutt Romney, a cross-eyed, inbred jack-a-napes that is all for multiple marriages and raping young women...and Fred "BassetFace" Thompson, whose second - or is it his third? - wife is half his daughter''s age.
What Would Jesus Do ?
Posted by Xlib
OK, since you asked.
Both parties have been nothing more than a corrupt mafia type organization, run by rich "white" males, who all follow the principle of "white supremacy".
The Republicans are just a little more obvious about it, allowing the racist Nazis like David duke, Pat Robertson, and their ilk to declare themselves the core of the republican party, and there are no republican voices raised to counter them. Indeed, many of the bills and laws they try to enact have racism at their heart.
I have to go, I''ll continue this tomorrow
In all my years of watching politics starting back with Nixon, I have never seen a party so completely out of touch with the American people and reality in general.
They must all be on drugs, because they are acting like they see life through an acid trip or maybe ectascy????
Tell me why, when an AA such as Thomas, Rice, Powell dares to be conservative are the demeaned and vilified? Is it because they rose above the nannies of your party? Tell me brian.
- by rushlimpdrug October 2, 2007 6:08 PM EDT
- Now if he could only make a contract with America to stay out of politics.
- Reply to this comment
See all 12 CommentsThis man is one of the cancers that has afflicted and fed of this country for too long.