February 11, 2009 4:09 PM

Duke Apologizes To Lacrosse Players

(AP)  Duke University President Richard Brodhead apologized Saturday for not better supporting the men's lacrosse players falsely accused in last year's highly publicized rape scandal.

Brodhead, speaking at the university's law school, said he regretted Duke's "failure to reach out" in a "time of extraordinary peril" after a woman accused three players of raping her at a March 2006 party thrown by the team.

"Given the complexities of this case, getting the communication right would never have been easy," Brodhead said. "But the fact is that we did not get it right, causing the families to feel abandoned when they were most in need of support. This was a mistake. I take responsibility for it and I apologize for it."

Brodhead spoke at a school-sponsored forum on legal and ethical issues common to high-profile cases, and he received a standing ovation following his speech. He left afterward and school officials said he would not be available for further comment.

As authorities began to investigate the allegations, Brodhead and the university initially suspended the highly ranked team from play. He later canceled the remainder of its season and ousted longtime coach Mike Pressler. Meanwhile, Durham County prosecutor Mike Nifong labeled the team "hooligans" as he searched for suspects.

But even as Nifong won indictments against players Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty and Dave Evans, it became clear the allegations had no merit.

State prosecutors determined in February the accuser's story was a lie, and North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper called the three players innocent victims of Nifong's "tragic rush to accuse."

Nifong was disbarred in June for more than two dozen violations of the state bar's rules of professional conduct, including withholding results of critical DNA tests, and resigned from office. He spent one night in jail earlier this month after a judge held him in criminal contempt of court for lying to a court about having provided those test results to defense attorneys.

In the early days of the case, Brodhead was generally cautious in his comments, saying the players should be presumed innocent while also insisting the crimes alleged had no place at the elite private university.

Brodhead said Saturday he worried that making numerous public comments could be interpreted as an attempt by Duke to "influence the judicial process," especially since Nifong was insisting a crime had occurred.

That may have created an impression that Duke did not care about the accused students, Brodhead said, which he said was untrue but still something he regrets.

"Duke needed to be clear that it demanded fair treatment for its students," he said. "I took that completely for granted. If anyone doubted it, then I should have been more explicit, especially as the evidence mounted that the prosecutor was not acting in accordance with the standards of his profession."

Brodhead also said the school could have done more to show that some members of Duke's faculty who were openly critical of the lacrosse team did not speak for the university as a whole.

Duke has reached private settlements with Pressler, now the coach at Division II Bryant in Rhode Island, as well as the three cleared players and a teammate who was not indicted but accused a professor of giving him a failing grade because he was a lacrosse player.

Brodhead said the university is planning a national conference of lawyers, educators and student affairs leaders to discuss how schools should deal with students facing serious criminal charges.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 99 Comments
by tbweb October 2, 2007 8:54 AM EDT
I actually feel sorry for Duke University, all those years creating an awesome reputation and just like that, one of the nations top schools trashed. Sad actually. The Blue Devils usually have a lot of class and are smarter than this, I''m shocked, is this the mighty DUKE? Quite the embarrassment ...
Reply to this comment
by keithle1 October 2, 2007 7:05 AM EDT
You''re going to believe some h-o-e over your own students?

Newsflash: just because a woman cries rape, it doesn''t mean it''s true.

"A black lady"? "Lady"? Hmm.. I don''t know about that.
She was putting herself through seminary? I guess this was the end of her stripping business. Pretty
hard-looking s-k-a-n-k.

No good strip clubs near Duke?
Reply to this comment
by hermit22 October 2, 2007 4:42 AM EDT
just because some old fool,or young fool, is rich, doesn''t mean he is not a pervert. duh! = dallas dirty old men.

the very bottom of this DUKE mess is that the little twits on the lacrosse team set up a nasty party but got bit by the little slitherin'' snake they invited.
poetic justice.

the little twit lacrosse team needs to line up and "take responsibility" for starting this DUKE stink in the first place. making excuses for them
makes the adults looks like old fools.
Reply to this comment
by klingon69 October 1, 2007 5:07 PM EDT
Keep in mind: strip clubs are very expensive to visit. This is not a place for bums or the lesser-employed.
Posted by robertkjjj at 04:19 PM : Sep 30, 2007
In Dallas there is a strip club called Caligulas, that specializes is catering to professional men (doctors,lawyers...etc)
In Shreveport, Deja Vu has business lunches for customers.
Reply to this comment
by hwy71so October 1, 2007 5:07 PM EDT
Now hold on. Do you really think Jackson and Sharpton are innocents? If they are that naive, then why in the world are they in the positions they''re in?

That''s scarey.
Reply to this comment
by kailumego1 October 1, 2007 3:51 PM EDT
Klingon69, they hired dancers not hookers, how do you know, they weren''t looking for "extra favors", were you there?

You''re no better than all those black folks eagerly and vociferously charging law enforcement with biasness, because they didn''t take this case seriously, of which if they[black folks] had examined the case more carefully they would have found a mutual agreement between the two parties.

They both are at fault, I''m willing to bet the three along with others engaged in se[x]ual intercourse with the complainant, willingly, of which she decided to "cash" in on their stupidity...

She was a "street hustler" and they were three low-life perverts that liked and enjoyed "kinky" se[x], with which she provided, however, her motive was "money", and Sharpton and Jackson became pawns, yet again, believing every "BS" story someone black laments, just like you believe every "BS" someone white laments.
Reply to this comment
by kailumego1 October 1, 2007 3:35 PM EDT
Klingon69, obviously you''re so blinded by your own social ineptness and stupidity to envision "outside" the box, nowhere in my comment did you read I was championing for the "black stripper", quite the opposite and if you can read beyond the "4th grade" you''ll comprehended that when I blamed Sharpton and Jackson for their inability to discern between legitimate and illegitimate cases, i.e. "the lying black stripper"...

I thought you were more intelligent than what you are representing....

Why, because I''m not jumping on the poor Duke boys'' "bandwagon", you''re confused distorted thinking has pegged me as championing the stripper'', get a grip of reality, I find neither one credible of support, because they both have "blood" on their hands...

And if you''re too blind and inept to see that then shame on you, because I''m not "front-running" these three "seedy perverts" cause, like you, they say "birds of a feather stick together".
Reply to this comment
by klingon69 October 1, 2007 3:27 PM EDT
Dogonit...when is somebody going to stick up for the lying negro prostitute already?

LMAO


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by nukeem123 at 12:49 PM : Sep 30, 2007
Kalimeugo is doing a good enough job of that.
Reply to this comment
by hwy71so October 1, 2007 3:25 PM EDT
tbweb,
good point
Reply to this comment
by tbweb October 1, 2007 2:56 PM EDT
Posted by Simplemind2 at 10:03 AM : Oct 01, 2007,,,
Posted by Xlib at 09:28 AM : Oct 01, 2007,,,

In Grade School my teacher played a trick on our class once when giving us a test to teach us a lesson. Our teacher made us take the test in ink, not the usual pencil, that should have been the give away for us. In BOLD letters on front of the test it said READ EVERYTHING FIRST BEFORE DOING ANYTHING!! There were 10 questions on front of the test paper and 10 on the back and as we rushed to complete the test the last paragraph said; DO NOT WRITE ANYTHING ON THIS TEST PAPER, NOTHING! RAISE YOUR HAND SO THE TEACHER CAN COME COLLECT YOUR BLANK TEST PAPER! Of course the entire class failed that test having taken it in ink! No one read anything first, we just jumped in a took that test, many people still do this until this day, I''ll bet not one person reading this actually reads the Agreements before clicking to install software or joining a web group, you could be giving all your assets away and would not even know it! Its true. The point is you both have accused me of supporting "Crystal Gail Mangum" and not the Duke Players, if you carefully read what I wrote again you will notice I was talking in possibilities, I did not accuse the Duke Players of anything, but I will admit my possibilities were slanted against them because its obvious something bad happened but maybe it just did not reach the level of a criminal act! Oh and I don''t have class envy, who said I was poor?
Reply to this comment
See all 99 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook