Dow
     -89.23
12801.23
-0.69%
|
     -9.31
1342.64
-0.69%
|
     +0.00
14000.51
+0.00
|
     -23.35
2903.88
-0.80%
|
     -1.03
53.27
-1.90%
|
     +1.09
116.27
+0.95%
|
     +0.01
2.01
+0.42%
February 11, 2009 4:10 PM

GM, UAW Agree On Tentative Contract

(CBS/AP)  General Motors Corp. won its struggle to unload $51 billion in retiree health costs and improve competitiveness in the latest round of contract talks with the United Auto Workers, but not without a short-lived strike that wrung promises out of GM to keep jobs at U.S. plants.

The two sides tentatively agreed Wednesday to a groundbreaking agreement that allows GM to move its unfunded retiree health care costs into an independent trust administered by the UAW. The union also agreed to lower wages for some workers.

That alone should save GM about $50 billion and means that there should be no immediate effect on the price of one of their cars, reports CBS News correspondent Dean Reynolds.

In exchange, the UAW won commitments from GM to invest in U.S. plants, bonuses and an agreement to hire thousands of temporary workers which will boost UAW membership, according to a person who was briefed on the contract. The person requested anonymity because the details haven't been publicly released.

Wall Street applauded news of the deal, sending GM shares up more than 9 percent.

The union said the agreement with the nation's largest automaker was reached shortly after 3 a.m. The UAW canceled its two-day strike about an hour later and workers were back in GM's 80 U.S. facilities Wednesday afternoon. GM lost production of around 25,000 vehicles due to the strike, according to CSM Worldwide Inc. Analysts had suggested a short strike could actually improve GM's outlook because it would cut back on inventory levels.

GM shares rose $3.22, or 9.4 percent, to $37.64. Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said it may raise GM's long-term debt rating, which is currently below investment grade.

"We view the tentative agreement and its apparent terms as a historic milestone toward the long-term improvement in fundamentals and survival at the North American automakers," KeyBanc analyst Brett Hoselton wrote in a note to investors.

The agreement is expected to set a pattern for contracts that now will be negotiated at Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler LLC. UAW President Ron Gettelfinger said he will decide this week which automaker will go next. The UAW may even conduct negotiations with Ford and Chrysler simultaneously, Gettelfinger said during an interview on "The Paul W. Smith Show" on WJR-AM.

The GM contract will be reviewed by local UAW presidents this week and will be subject to a vote of GM's 74,000 rank-and-file members. Voting is expected to begin this weekend, Gettelfinger said. If members vote against the agreement they could go back on strike, but Gettelfinger said he's confident it will be ratified.

"We're very comfortable with this agreement and we're happy to be able to recommend it to our membership," Gettelfinger said.

Tom Brune, who works at a GM plant in Wentzville, Mo., said he was happy to go back to work.

"There is a lot of relief, but that's coupled with anxiety to see details of the agreement," Brune said as he stood near a pile of strike placards at UAW Local 2250.

GM and the UAW said the tentative contract includes the health care trust but said they wouldn't release more details until the contract is ratified.

"This agreement helps us close the fundamental competitive gaps that exist in our business," Chairman and Chief Executive Rick Wagoner said. "There's no question this was one of the most complex and difficult bargaining sessions in the history of the GM-UAW relationship."

GM, which lost $2 billion last year and is in the midst of a restructuring, went into the negotiations seeking to cut or erase what it said is about a $25-per-hour labor cost disparity with the U.S. employees of Japanese competitors. GM has said it pays workers $73.26 an hour in wages and benefits.

By contrast, Reynolds reports, Toyota pays an hourly wage of $45.

The University of Maryland's Peter Morici told Reynolds that even with lower labor costs, U.S. automakers still need to work on building cars that consumers want to buy.

"In order to sustain higher labor costs you really have to have a superior product. General Motors and Ford simply don't have products that are superior to Toyota to sustain a higher labor cost."


© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 33 Comments
by norm_ster September 27, 2007 7:53 PM EDT
I would expect the autoworkers to demand more from the UAW leadership after reading numerous articles about this. The details that have been made public so far reflect a strong similarity to the contract recently ratified by Delphi workers. Those people may now have a job, but the standard of living for them has taken a huge hit. I don''t know how they expect people to pay the bills when only making thirty thousand dollars a year. This is "full time" employment and the company expects to pay less than poverty level wages! For my part Ron Gettelfinger has lost his credibility when he can publicly say that he is proud of this tentative agreement and that he is confident it will be ratified. After calling on the workers to walk off the job and onto the picket lines the rank and file should expect more. In the weeks leading up to the strike the news was that the UAW would be open to negotiating a VEBA trust, in exchange for concessions on 2 tier wages, competitive operating agreements, and other such talk. Yet, when the news broke that a tentative agreement has been reached and the highlights started making headlines . . . They have agreed to the VEBA trust, and all the competitive operating agreement language, and the formation of a two tiered wage plan. I guess Mr. Gettelfinger thinks that the american auto workers should just be happy to have jobs. Personally I am ready to send them all right back to the bargaining table until they can come up with a real proposal.
Reply to this comment
by getloud1 September 27, 2007 5:33 PM EDT
Ron Paul has it all.

**** TAKE AMERICA BACK ****
**** STOP THE WAR & Corporate Corruption****

He has NEVER voted:
* to raise taxes
* for an unbalanced budget
* to raise congressional pay
* for a federal restriction on gun ownership
* to increase the power of the executive branch

He HAS voted:
* against the Iraq war
* against the inappropriately named USA PATRIOT act
* against regulating the internet
* against the Military Commissions Act

He will eliminate the IRS, Wasteful Government Spending & Stop The Iraq War Immediately!

Most importantly, he voted NO on anything in Congress that is not allowed by the Constitution.

He is the only candidate not a member of the CFR!

Shouldn''t ALL members of Congress uphold the Constitution? Aren''t they SWORN to uphold it? You can bet Paul WON''T call the Constitution "just a G**D***ed piece of paper" like George Bush is reported to have.

If you want a candidate you can TRUST due to a proven track record, visit www.ronpaul2008.com and get busy spreading the word. The Mainstream Media is Blacking Out The Truth Spoke By Ron Paul!

Join The ReVoLuTiOn In Your City Stand Up America:
http://ronpaul.meetup.com/cities/

Also checkout http://www.youtube.com search for: RON PAUL
Reply to this comment
by jetranger7 September 27, 2007 6:28 AM EDT
Actually None of this Really Matters Anyway, Because, here before Long, The Big Oil Companies are gonna drive the price of Gas & Oil up so High, any of us will be Lucky to be Driving, any Automobile, which is Why I''m starting me a new Bicycle Factory, and my Employees will belong to the Peddle Union, so far theres only 1 Employee, and he isn''t worth a Hoot, he''s Lazy, Slow, Doesn''t pay attention, Goofs Off, takes excessive lunch hours,Late to Work all the time, takes off all the time, Ohh Wait, thats me !!! My Mistake !! Sorry !!
Reply to this comment
by rfcnj68 September 27, 2007 3:52 AM EDT
The said part of this is that the workers will get it in the end. They will ratify this because the big boys that just figured out away to line their pockets a little more will sell them on it.

I am curious to see where all this new found money will really go and how fast it will disappear over the next thirty years. They won%u2019t do it fast that is too obvious it will be done slow and over time and the VEBA will be bankrupt.
Reply to this comment
by Krazcarl September 26, 2007 9:34 PM EDT
good news glad it''s over support the men that walked the line.
Reply to this comment
by random_radar September 26, 2007 9:08 PM EDT
Wow! This is the win-win deal of the century! GM just dumped a huge liability for healthcare, which is why their stock went up. The union just gained a huge amount of power over their members by taking control of their healthcare (not to mention getting $36 billion), which is why the union officials are all smiles. Who says business management and union management can''t work together? So long as the workers don''t figure out what is happening to them, everyone will be happy!
Reply to this comment
by reporter14 September 26, 2007 6:17 PM EDT
A picture is worth a thousand Words,
www.poconocommunitynews.com
Reply to this comment
by tnt1954 September 26, 2007 5:58 PM EDT
i love the union of soviet america where welfare
pays better than going to work. i earn my welfare.
my charity check. its hard work doing nothing.
its a tuff life being born with a disability.
rush limbaugh complains about having to support
people who cannot support themselves. well, if
you wanna go back to that system fine. i just
adapted to the one that''s in place here in the
union of soviet america. its been that way since
about 1953 when the soviets won the korean war,
and the cold war. we''re no more a free country
than a man in the moon. in real 1967 money, 73
dollars an hour is about 6 dollars an hour in
1967. go unions go, keep raising the cost of
living. higher and higher and higher. you''re
just pedaling to keep up like the rest of us. you
think things are bad? go review old films of
the Great Depression. it''ll blow your mind.
we''re in heaven, honey bunnies compared to then. yay.
Reply to this comment
by rationall7 September 26, 2007 5:41 PM EDT
When the auto makers close in America and re-open in Mexico the Mexicians will still cross the border to do landscaping work or pick fruit because they can still earn more money here compared to what big corp will pay them down there ain''t that right Maytag and others.
Reply to this comment
by getloud1 September 26, 2007 4:35 PM EDT
RESTORE OUR LIBERTY, FREEDOMS & AMERICA! DESTROY CORRUPT POLITICANS & CORPORATIONS GET ACTIVE IN YOUR CITY TODAY, TAKE ACTION! JOIN THE REVOLUTION:
http://ronpaul.meetup.com/cities/

He Will Eliminate the IRS! And Stop The War In Iraq Immediatley! Restore And Protect America From Illegal Immigration! http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues
Reply to this comment
See all 33 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook