February 11, 2009 4:10 PM

House OKs Child Health Insurance Bill

(AP)  The House voted Tuesday to expand health insurance for children, but the Democratic-led victory may prove short-lived because the margin was too small to override President Bush's promised veto.

Embarking on a health care debate likely to animate the 2008 elections, the House voted 265-159 to expand the State Children's Health Insurance Program, or SCHIP, by $35 billion over five years. Bush says he will veto the bill due to its cost, its reliance on a tobacco tax increase and its potential for replacing private insurance with government grants.

SCHIP is a state-federal program that provides coverage for 6.6 million children from families that live above the poverty level but have trouble affording private health insurance. The proposed expansion, backed by most governors and many health-advocacy groups, would add 4 million children to the rolls.

The bill drew support from 45 House Republicans, many of them moderates who do not want to be depicted as indifferent to low-income children's health needs when they seek re-election next year. But most Republicans, under pressure from the White House and party leaders, sided with Bush, a move that Democrats see as a political blunder.

It hardly matters that the expansion would be expensive or a step toward socialized health care, Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., said during the House debate. When lawmakers go home, he said, "the question is, Were you with the kids or were you not?"

To overturn a presidential veto, both chambers of Congress must produce two-thirds majorities. The 159 House votes opposing the SCHIP bill should give Bush enough cushion to sustain his veto, as House leaders expect few members to switch positions.

The Senate appears poised to pass the SCHIP expansion by a large margin later this week, but a Senate bid to override a veto would be pointless if the House override effort falls short.

Despite the expected veto, many congressional Democrats welcomed the SCHIP debate as a way to open a second political front - in addition to Iraq - on which they feel Bush and his allies are out of step with voters. Rep. Rahm Emanuel, D-Ill., said the president willingly pours billions of dollars into the war but resists a significant expansion of a health program for modest-income children.

"It's no surprise the president finds himself isolated," Emanuel said at a Democratic event that included a Maryland mother who relied on SCHIP coverage when two of her children were badly injured in a car wreck.

Some Republicans agreed that the debate over a greater government role in health care will resonate far beyond Capitol Hill this week.

"This vote is huge for the next president, regardless of who it is," Rep. Jack Kingston, R-Ga., said in an interview during the floor debate. "I don't think anybody underestimates the philosophical importance."

Eight Democrats opposed the bill. Some, from tobacco-growing districts, object to raising the federal cigarette tax to $1 a pack, a 61-cent increase. Some Hispanic members complained that the bill would make legal immigrant children wait five years to qualify for SCHIP.

A Republican-controlled Congress and President Clinton created SCHIP in 1997 to provide health coverage for families with incomes too high to qualify for Medicaid but not high enough to pay for private coverage. Under the expansion proposal, states could seek federal waivers to steer funds to some families earning at least triple the official poverty-level income, provided the states showed progress enrolling the main target: children in families earning up to double the poverty rate. That would be $34,340 for a family of three, or $41,300 for a family of four.

The Bush administration says the legislation could qualify some New York families of four making about $83,000 a year, or four times the poverty level. Such a scenario is unlikely, the bill's proponents say, because it would require waivers the administration has rejected.

Bush proposes a smaller increase in SCHIP - $5 billion over five years - although some Republican lawmakers say he might agree to a larger increase later.

In a statement of administration policy Tuesday, the White House said the bill "goes too far toward federalizing health care." Republicans said a veto was certain. In his nearly seven years in office, Bush has vetoed three bills. One would have withdrawn troops from Iraq, and two would have expanded federal research involving embryonic stem cells.

SCHIP is set to expire Sunday. To avert that, congressional Democrats plan to extend it temporarily with a larger spending bill to keep the government running when the new fiscal year begins Oct. 1. The strategy would prevent Democrats from being blamed for letting the health program lapse by not reaching an accord with Bush, lawmakers said.

House Republican leaders berated Democrats for including several targeted spending items, known as "earmarks," in the 299-page SCHIP bill, which was not available for public review until Monday night. Democrats had declared the bill earmark-free. But Republicans found language directing funds to programs in Tennessee, California and Michigan.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 45 Comments
by randaids September 26, 2007 5:39 PM EDT
You highlight the main problem with this bill perfectly. By using average income as a gage, there will still be many uninsured in expensive areas and have everyone insured in ths rest of the country. Duh. That makes sense to me, not!
Reply to this comment
by muzzlebush September 26, 2007 5:20 PM EDT
This was a test of character.
Like most of the tests he''s taken, George flunked.
Reply to this comment
by getloud1 September 26, 2007 3:50 PM EDT
Ron Paul has it all.

**** TAKE AMERICA BACK ****
**** STOP THE WAR & Corporate Corruption****

He has NEVER voted:
* to raise taxes
* for an unbalanced budget
* to raise congressional pay
* for a federal restriction on gun ownership
* to increase the power of the executive branch

He HAS voted:
* against the Iraq war
* against the inappropriately named USA PATRIOT act
* against regulating the internet
* against the Military Commissions Act

He will eliminate the IRS, Wasteful Government Spending & Stop The Iraq War Immediately!

Most importantly, he voted NO on anything in Congress that is not allowed by the Constitution.

He is the only candidate not a member of the CFR!

Shouldn''t ALL members of Congress uphold the Constitution? Aren''t they SWORN to uphold it? You can bet Paul WON''T call the Constitution "just a G**D***ed piece of paper" like George Bush is reported to have.

If you want a candidate you can TRUST due to a proven track record, visit www.ronpaul2008.com and get busy spreading the word. The Mainstream Media is a lagging indicator!!

Join The ReVoLuTiOn In Your City Stand Up America:
http://ronpaul.meetup.com/cities/

Also checkout http://video.google.com search for Federal Reserve Fraud
Reply to this comment
by likeitis5050 September 26, 2007 12:59 PM EDT
The Dems are to blame on this one. They attached, very carefully, too many side items, AND didn''t include provisions that would keep illegals from lining up...all they were going to require was A social security number that would not have to be verified as being authentically the child''s. The Dems are just shooting themselves in the foot because the whole purpose of this showdown is make the Republicans look like they aren''t concerned about children, when in fact, it''s going to backfire once the truth comes out about how sneaky they were with this one. It always comes out in the end. I''m not even a Bush supporter, but the Dems are dead wrong on this one, and they know it.
Reply to this comment
by dragonmouse-2009 September 26, 2007 12:15 PM EDT
I have a bit of a problem with this. I have to pay out the nose for health insurance for myself and child. This program NEVER even remotely benefited my child in the least. If they can come up with a plan that treats ALL people fairly then maybe I''ll consider it. I''m tired of paying for OTHER people.
Reply to this comment
by crater7 September 26, 2007 12:10 PM EDT
DID ANYONE HEAR THE ONE ABOUT CONDI, COMPARING ZARQAWI (AS DIABOLICALLY BRILLIANT)TO THE LIKES OF ROBERT E LEE & ULYSSES S GRANT?

STAY THE COURSE............
Reply to this comment
by shanev137 September 26, 2007 11:59 AM EDT
tax and spend Democrats

----------

What a freaken joke.

Your sugar daddy Bush has spent more than Ronnie Raygun and all the last democratic presidents combined.....ON ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!!!

Republicans love bankrupting our country every time their in office.
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 September 26, 2007 11:55 AM EDT
The normal grave is as the saying goes is six feet under, who are the 159 that voted against children over sending more and more money to a country that wants us to leave. America take note, once again American issues in this country mean absolutely nothing, what they care about is Iraq, and whatever there leader wants, there leader gets. The grave needs more shoveling and the republicans are doing the digging and we will take care of the voting.
Reply to this comment
by crater7 September 26, 2007 11:47 AM EDT
CHANCES OF SOMEONE RECIEVING THIS AID WITH AN YEARLY INCOME OF 80,000 ARE SLIM TO NONE.

SOMEONE WHO HAS AN INCOME OF 80.000 OR MORE WOULD REQUIRE A WAIVER, SOMETHING THIS ADMINISTRATION IS AGAINST.

JUST MORE OF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION USING THE HIGHEST POSSIBLE NUMBER''S, IN ORDER TO SCARE PEOPLE INTO SPEAKING OUT AGAINST THE BILL. HEY! STICK WITH WHAT WORKS FOR YOU.

STAY THE COURSE............
Reply to this comment
by jon_mccain September 26, 2007 11:35 AM EDT
The easiest way to pass this is to add a zero to that figure making it 350 Billion dollars and letting the pharmaceutical companies or KBR administer the thing.
Reply to this comment
See all 45 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook