Candidates Speak Out On Ahmadinejad Visit
Hopefuls Question Columbia's Decision To Host Iranian President
-
Play CBS Video Video Ahmadinejad Unplugged Scott Pelley sits down with Harry Smith to discuss his recent interview with the "wily" Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and to dissect his planned visit to Columbia University.
-
Video Protesting Ahmadinejad Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is scheduled to address the U.N. and speak at Columbia University. Numerous protests are planned as well. Michelle Miller reports.
-
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaks at Columbia University in New York on Monday, Sept. 24, 2007. (AP Photo/Pool)
-
Photo Essay Controversial Visit Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in New York for U.N. General Assembly.
-
Interactive Campaign 2008 Profiles of the candidates, polls, fund-raising, blogs, video and more.
On the day that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad visited Columbia University in New York, U.S. presidential candidates offered reaction ranging from support for academic freedom to harsh criticism of the university for inviting the Iranian president to speak.
Democratic Sen. Barack Obama said he would not have invited Ahmadinejad to speak on campus, noting that the Iranian president has other forums to air his views, among them the United Nations, where Ahmadinejad was scheduled to speak Tuesday. But Obama, a Columbia graduate, added that "one of the values that we believe in is the value of academic freedom," and said Columbia officials have the right to invite speakers of their choice.
Obama also stood by his position that he would meet with Ahmadinejad and other rogue leaders if elected. He has been criticized by his rivals for vowing to hold such meetings, a position Sen. Hillary Clinton, his rival for the Democratic presidential nomination, has called "irresponsible and, frankly, naïve."
Clinton reiterated her position Monday at a press conference on Capitol Hill.
"We need a much more vigorous, robust and deep engagement, but that does not mean that the president of the United States should take part in such preliminary talks," she said.
Clinton said she " would not have invited" Ahmadinejad to speak if she were a university president. But she said she does not express an opinion about the decision made by Columbia.
Former Sen. John Edwards, a Democrat, also criticized Obama's vow to meet with Ahmadinejad and other leaders.
"In the case of a leader like Ahmadinejad, Kim Jong Il, Hugo Chavez, any of these leaders, you'd have to be extraordinarily careful that they would not use such a meeting for PR purposes or for propaganda purposes," he said.
Edwards characterized Ahmadinejad's positions as "abhorrent" but said it "is for Columbia to decide whether they want a man like this to be able to speak at their university."
Ahmadinejad has called for Israel to be "wiped off the map" and called the Holocaust a "myth." President Bush has called Iran the "world's primary state sponsor of terror."
Former Sen. Fred Thompson, a Tennessee Republican, criticized Columbia while appearing on conservative pundit Bill Bennett's radio show this morning.
"It's a clear double standard and rank hypocrisy" on the part of Columbia to allow Ahmadinejad to speak, he said, and not allow the Reserve Officers' Training Corps, or ROTC, on campus. On Thursday, Thompson said he would not have allowed Ahmadinejad into the country if he were president.
Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, a Republican, also objected to Ahmadinejad's visit. "Instead of inviting him to speak at the United Nations and Columbia University, I believe he should be indicted under the Genocide Convention," the candidate said in a statement.
Romney also released a radio ad today claiming he is "leading the opposition" to Ahmadinejad's visit.
Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain said in a statement that he finds it "astonishing and astounding that Columbia University would welcome the president of a country that has not only dedicated itself to a policy of extinction of the state of Israel, but as he is speaking, most of the lethal and explosive devices are being exported from Iran into Iraq, endangering and taking the lives of brave Americans who are serving."
He added: "Meanwhile, Columbia University's belief in free speech does not extend to Reserve Officers' Training Corps units being allowed on their campus to attract outstanding young men and women to serve in the military."
Former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, who is also running for the Republican nomination, spoke to a reporter today in Portland, Maine, about the Iranian president's visit.
"I think Columbia made the really wrong decision to invite him to be part of a distinguished lecture series," he said. "It makes no sense to give him this type of forum, to give him this type of dignity that Columbia has given him by allowing him to speak there, as if has some kind of serious opinion to offer."
Rep. Duncan Hunter, a California Republican also running for president, harshly attacked the university at a recent press conference.
"If President Lee Bollinger follows through with this hosting of the leader of Iran, I will move in Congress to cut off every single type of federal funding to Columbia University," he said. "If the left-wing leaders of academia will not support our troops, they, in the very least, should not support our adversaries."
©MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 43 Comments-afmca, nice and well-thought posting! I''d add for the problem seekers, some repukons will concentrate on finding homosexuals in Iran, just to show the world that ggays exist in Iran and that AhMandyNJad has lied to us saying there are no Homos in Iran!
-Funny sMutt Romney! isn''t he? Behind his angelic face there is only brown matter in his thick skull. Which contemporary world leader should be prosecuted for such genocide crimes but our Walking-Liar Bush?
**** TAKE AMERICA BACK ****
**** STOP THE WAR & Corporate Corruption****
Ron Paul has it all.
He has NEVER voted:
* to raise taxes
* for an unbalanced budget
* to raise congressional pay
* for a federal restriction on gun ownership
* to increase the power of the executive branch
He HAS voted:
* against the Iraq war
* against the inappropriately named USA PATRIOT act
* against regulating the internet
* against the Military Commissions Act
He will eliminate the IRS, Wasteful Government Spending & Stop The Iraq War Immediately!
Most importantly, he voted NO on anything in Congress that is not allowed by the Constitution.
He is the only candidate not a member of the CFR!
Shouldn''''t ALL members of Congress uphold the Constitution? Aren''''t they SWORN to uphold it? You can bet Paul won''''t call the Constitution "just a G**D***ed piece of paper" like George Bush is reported to have.
If you want a candidate you can TRUST due to a proven track record, visit ronpaul2008.com and get busy spreading the word. The Mainstream Media is Blacking Out Ron Paul From Exposing The Truth! He has won 6 straw polls already and growing daily!
Ron Paul Revolution: http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ron+paul
Get Active Join The Revolution In Your City Today! http://ronpaul.meetup.com/cities/
Also checkout http://video.google.com search for Federal Reserve Fraud
decision to let him speak there. That proves how little freedom they want us to have when they are president. I will not vote for any poltician who
suckers up to those who are brain washed about Iran.
How ironic that they don''t get upset when their president babbles nonsense.
"Non-Arabs are well-represented in government" (in Iran).
Why wouldn''t they be? Most Iranians are not Arabs and their native language isn''t Arabic, it''s Farsi.
There is, however, a minority population of Arabs near the Iraq border. Are they represented in the Iranian government? I''m not interested enough to find out.
It''s ALWAYS good to shine the light of day on what''s REALLY going on in the world.
Yes, there was rudeness, yes, there''s "spin" but there was also HOPE that at least the battle was with WORDS rather than WEAPONS.
Unlike the BLACKWATER "Shooting Gallery" Problem;
NO INNOCENT women and children were maimed or killed in that confrontation - just egos that probably needed some adjusting.
It shows that there are still SOME Americans that aren''t afraid to come out from under their beds and face their imaginary bogeymen with weapons of clear vision, words and logic. It''s the BRAVEST of all options.
That''s what REAL STATESMANSHIP is all about.
In the light of day and reason bogeymen evaporate and we can move on to greater things.
It''s disheartening that there are still NEOCONS and candy-dates such as Hunter that don''t understand that and cling to Genghis Khan style methods and reasoning.
"If President Lee Bollinger follows through with this hosting of the leader of Iran, I will move in Congress to cut off every single type of federal funding to Columbia University," he said.
So this Reaganite is now going to move to have the Reagan library demolished, Ronald Reagan Airport in DC renamed, and Michael Reagan sent to prison. Reagan repeatedly armed the Iranians with U.S. high tech weapons and promoted the military strength of the mullahs and ayatollahs.
Any patriotic American should spit on Reagan''s memory, and brand D. Hunter for the lying hypocrit he is.
"If President Lee Bollinger follows through with this hosting of the leader of Iran, I will move in Congress to cut off every single type of federal funding to Columbia University," he said. "If the left-wing leaders of academia will not support our troops, they, in the very least, should not support our adversaries."
First - Duncan, you should stop our own government from putting weapons into the hands of our adversaries. A GAO audit shows you/Petraeus lost 190,000 weapons and they are most likely in the hands of our adversaries.
Second - Check out the companies the government hires in an effort to prevent them from smuggling weapons and selling them to our adversaries. aka Blackwater USA
Posted by IOWEIGN at 08:16 AM : Sep 25, 2007
I should have added:
Third - What is the connection between supporting the troops and Iran ? You always bring up supporting the troops this or not supporting the troops that. Stick with apples to apples and oranges to oranges. How about NOT holding the troops in front of yourself as a shield to protect your own misfit behaviour !
Thompson, Giuliani, Romney, McCain all proved they are not ready to be President. Obviously they will continue the Bush policy of confrontation over communication. It plays well to their base of neanderthals who think we should bomb anyone who doesn''t think, look, or pray like us.
Ahmadinejad showed his bigotry and ignorance. It was for all to see. I laughed at his answers. I hold him in lower esteem than before. Petty dictators are always exposed when they cannot control the forum. Columbia University did us all a favor; they are a lot smarter than the Repub candidates.
"If President Lee Bollinger follows through with this hosting of the leader of Iran, I will move in Congress to cut off every single type of federal funding to Columbia University," he said. "If the left-wing leaders of academia will not support our troops, they, in the very least, should not support our adversaries."
First - Duncan, you should stop our own government from putting weapons into the hands of our adversaries. A GAO audit shows you/Petraeus lost 190,000 weapons and they are most likely in the hands of our adversaries.
Second - Check out the companies the government hires in an effort to prevent them from smuggling weapons and selling them to our adversaries. aka Blackwater USA
Thank you, Columbia, for using the brains God gave you, rather than your testicles. I was beginning to believe we''d reverted entirely to the beasts we claim so vehemently not to be.
I also look forward to true diplomacy taking place. That said, I''m not buying his new more, tolerant perspective on the holocaust. What about the holocaust needs to be further investigated? Seems like he doesn''t want to come out and say what he actually thinks out of fear of being lynched.
I don''t know why he wants further investigation, I think it may have been a 1/2 attempt at earlier statements he has made....possilbly out of anger...due to the displaced Palestinians.
However, I listened to his answers and his speech. It wasn''t bad overall. I don''t know alot about the Iranian lifestyle....I think if the students and faculty take up the invitation, it will be a great learning experience.
I am looking forward to a better foreign policy in which true diplomacy can take place. The Council for Foreign affairs has an interactive Time-Line between the U.S. and Iran www.cfr.org.
Posted by kraziquban at 06:08 PM : Sep 24, 2007
Sounds like a GREAT idea to me since our President George Bush has been so INCOMPETENT in allowing our military to find and capture that 6 foot tall spoiled SAUDI on dialysis!
Maybe the intellectuals at Columbia can help him out. It''s worth a try at least.
Sure didn''t HELP that our NEOCON Administration HAD Bin Laden''s RELATIVES IN NEW YORK CITY and SENT THEM HOME right after the attack (along with a lot of behind kissing I suspect)Rather than using them as BAIT!
OH! But "we don''t want to OFFEND OUR OIL FRIENDS" now do we?
DIPLOMACY has apparently DIED in this country and the only thing left is a MAFIA STYLE ELITE - bent on CONQUEST, GREED and REVENGE and running our military capability and economy into the ground.
Both SAD and PATHETIC.
Our Constitution and the GREAT PRINCIPLES it showcased has been shredded by selfish morons.
I worry that it''ll be too late before something is done about it.
political reporter Brian Montopoli.
WHAT!? Sounds like more I was for the war, before I was against the war flip flopping, safe, don''t really make sense answers.
Both Hilary and Ahmadinejad can''t just say how it is. Good thing they don''t play poker, they don''t have a clue how to bluff and covered in tells.
What did Gravel and Kucinich, the only Democrats worthy of consideration, have to say about it?
Or Ron Paul, the only Republican worth considering?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 43 Comments