Subtle Racism Might Make Your Brain Hurt
Decoding "Ambiguous" Prejudice Can Tax The Brain, Interfering With Mental Tasks
-
Photo
(CBS/AP)
-
Interactive
The Nation We Live In
Who are Americans and what do they do? A comprehensive look at our economic, sociological and racial breakdown.
For whites, who are much less often the targets of prejudice, overt racism interferes with mental function more.
"It appears that blacks are particularly vulnerable to cognitive impairment resulting from exposure to ambiguous prejudice -- a level of prejudice whites may not even register," conclude Princeton University psychologists Jessica Salvatore, PhD, and J. Nicole Shelton, PhD.
"Blatant" vs. "Ambiguous" Racism
Salvatore and Shelton enrolled 122 African-American and 128 white Princeton undergraduates in their study. They were told they were going to participate in two different studies (in reality, they were two parts of the same study).
In the first part of the study, participants were told they would be evaluating a company's hiring decisions. They were shown resumes from job candidates. One was from a candidate who was clearly unqualified because of mediocre grades from a "mediocre" school. Another was from the most-qualified candidate, a Yale graduate with good grades, strong job experience, and impressive school activities.
It was clear from the resumes whether the job candidates were white or African-American. Half the time the unqualified candidate was white and the highly qualified candidate was African-American. For the other half, the conditions were reversed.
The study participants were also shown hiring recommendations from what they were told were human resource officers for the company. Participants were told the officer was a white male when the unqualified job candidate was white and the highly qualified candidate was African-American. They were told the officer was an African-American male when the unqualified job candidate was African-American and the highly qualified candidate was white.
Participants were assigned to one of three groups: blatant prejudice, ambiguous prejudice, or no-prejudice. The no-prejudice group saw recommendations that advised hiring the most-qualified candidate. The prejudice groups saw hiring recommendations that always chose the least-qualified subject -- a person of the same race as the officer.
Under the blatant prejudice condition, the hiring recommendations contained obviously racist comments (such as noting that the African-American candidate "belonged to too many minority organizations" or that the white candidate "was a typical white prep-school kid").
Under the ambiguous-prejudice condition, the hiring recommendations contained no such racist comments -- the least-qualified, same-race candidate was recommended without a clear reason
In the second part of the study, participants then were given a test requiring full concentration, in which they had to name the color in which words such as "red" or "blue" were written.
Subtle Racism Wastes Brain Power
Witnessing the blatant prejudice lowered white participants' scores on the test, but not the scores of African-American participants. However, African-American participants did much worse on the test after witnessing the ambiguous prejudice.
"Blacks are better prepared to cope with blatant prejudice than whites are, at least in terms of the short-term effects on performance of cognitive tasks," Salvatore and Shelton suggest.
This, they say, is because African-Americans have experienced prejudice and have learned to deal with it, not because such prejudice is harmless.
But when African-Americans have to deal with more subtle prejudice -- prejudice that whites tend not to recognize -- it consumes mental resources.
"Targets of prejudice may experience cognitive impairment as they try to determine the cause underlying the negative events they encounter in their lives," Salvatore and Shelton conclude.
They report their findings in the September issue of Psychological Science.
By Daniel DeNoon
Reviewed by Louise Chang
(C)2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved.



they really need us, i''m just another white elephant.
by the time we got of out of college, everything
we had learned was obsolete, irrelevant and immaterial. and we constantly had to be reeducated,
rehabbed, rewired, reprogrammed, because of some
new crackpot''s theory again and again. as m.d.''s
they have to stay up on all the new stuff all the
time. same with lawyers, same with c.p.a.''s.
**** computerus would solve the whole problem
of health. who needs m.d''s then? for what?
go ahead, enjoy yourselves, smoke free, drink free,
dope free, and sexless, and be really, really
super healthy. and enjoy every pure breath as if
its your last. its always the last day of the
rest of our lives. lol. had fun writing that.
good story. malthusian economics.
beyond my ability to withstand it. did the
master race have a nice yom kippur? they are
always a cut above the common herd, in intelligence,
in savoir faire, kindness, decency, idealism, practicality and never are hypocritical. such role
models for all the world to follow. if only
there more jewish people in the world. having grown
up in a 90% jewish neighborhood in the san fernando
valley, i was discriminated against for being
w.a.s.p. i was the oddball. wearing a cross
to school i was called a hotzi totzi nazi every
other day in the halls. but i was elected president
of my junior high school. but i had a spanish
surname. but i was adopted. but i didn''t know
it, nor care if i was. no, there no negroes
in the general vicinity. they were in watts.
they broke out of the ghetto in 1966 with the
riots and the appointing of tom bradley as mayor
of los angeles, ca. the master race, gave permission
for them, to leave watts now and then. but basically
they still have to know their place.