Clinton: Cut Iraq Funding To Force Change
Hillary Clinton Says U.S. Troops Can't "Referee" A Civil War In Iraq
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Clinton On Iraq
Sen. Hillary Clinton tells Bob Schieffer that there is no military solution in Iraq and that American troops cannot referee the country's sectarian violence.
-
Video
Clinton's Campaign Funds
Sen. Hillary Clinton talks to Bob Schieffer about how her campaign was affected by a fundraiser's illegal actions and how she plans to prevent future problems.
-
Video
Roundtable On Clinton
Politico.com's John Harris and David Sanger of The New York Times sit down with Bob Schieffer to analyze Sen. Hillary Clinton's policy and presidential bid.
-
Photo
(CBS)
-
In-Depth
2008 Presidential Hopefuls
Profiles and the latest news on the Democrats and Republicans running for the White House.
-
Interactive
Battle For Iraq
The government, the insurgency, key players, background and photos.
"No matter how heroically and dedicated the performance of our young men and women and their officers are in Iraq - which it has been - they cannot referee successfully a sectarian civil war," Clinton told Bob Schieffer. "So I voted against funding last spring. I will vote against funding again in the absence of any change in policy."
President Bush has said that, by setting deadlines for withdrawal and cutting funding, Congress will embolden America's enemies. Clinton, however, said, "The idea that our having a policy that reflects the reality on the ground will embolden enemies, I think is off base. They have been emboldened by the policies pursued by this administration."
The junior Senator from New York pointed to continued nuclear development by Iran and North Korea - and reported cooperation between Syria and North Korea - as evidence of U.S. enemies growing stronger.
Clinton said, if elected president, she would set deadlines for withdrawing the majority of U.S. combat troops from Iraq, but said there would be a continuing American military presence in Iraq.
"I am committed to bringing the vast majority of our troops home, and I will begin to do that as soon as I am president," Clinton, the early front-runner for the Democratic nomination, said.
Clinton said she recognized "there will be remaining missions" for American forces in Iraq, but she said they would not require the roughly 100,000 troops expected to be in Iraq when the next president takes office. She listed counterterrorism, protecting U.S. personnel and training Iraqi forces as the other missions.
"That's the right way to go because that is a much clearer definition of what we're trying to accomplish than what we face today," Clinton said.
Mr. Bush has compared America's future in Iraq to the peacekeeping role U.S. troops play in South Korea, where they have been stationed for some five decades, but Clinton said that she would review the basis for Mr. Bush's plans.
"I'm going to call my secretary of defense, my joint chiefs of staff, my security advisers to give me a full briefing on what is the planning that has gone on in the Pentagon," she said. "You know, planning hasn't exactly been a strong suit of the Bush administration."
John Harris, the Editor in Chief of politico.com, noted that, while Clinton was presenting a strong platform for her presidential campaign, she was leaving herself plenty of wiggle room.
"You can see her preserving her options," Harris told Schieffer. She's not promising figures or saying that we're going to have a complete exit in January of 2009. That's something a future president wants to do: preserve flexibility."
David Sanger, chief Washington correspondent for The New York Times, said that Clinton's plans for Iraq sounded very similar to President Bush's.
"It's a very small difference, and when you tick off the tasks she said the troops would do while she was president - if that happened - counterterrorism, protection of the Kurds, training of the Iraqi army and then protecting us against Iran, that's a big set of tasks," Sanger said. "And it's very hard when you talk to Pentagon people to have them figure out how you do that with fewer than 100,000 troops."
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Video and Galleries from Face The Nation
- Latest in Face The Nation
- A Little Context
- Separating Icons From Heroes
- A Guide To A Successful Father's Day




- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 8
- next
See all 362 CommentsI find it really amusing that this person is more than willing to accept credit in voting for going into Iraq when Saddam is captured, but then decides to change horses mid-stream when the casualities start to come in.
Any day now, I expect her to change her mind. The surge is working, she has backed the wrong horse and she sees her strategy for getting into the white house evaporating.
She is clearly not a leader, but a follower.
Please look at recent statistics here: http://www3.brookings.edu/fp/saban/iraq/index.pdf
The Brookings Institute is a non-partisian site that has independent information about all sorts of environments affecting politics.
I guess I deserve the comment about the CIC''s brain, given my statment about Hillary. But check out the site. I hope you''ll find the independent source of information (both pro and con) interesting.
I don''t expect it to change your mind, but it''s always good to be well informed.
Better late than never Hillary . . . better late than never.
65% of Americans see it the way Hillary does. Saddam was overthrown! The USAs continued involvement in Iraq is only make up for all the failed decisions that Neocon Fascists made in 2003 - 2006. Neocons are all liars, and now they are only trying to keep their hate fileed Southern Base appeased with more Fascist rheotoric. If you Southern Neocons want to secede from America, no one will try to stop you. But be forewarned, the South on its own will immediately be branded as the number one terrorist state in the world, and economic sanctions will soon follow.
Posted by speakinup at 02:11 PM : Sep 23, 2007
Tooo bad he didn''t "prove it" to the pentagon before they released their report!
Posted by coffee_guy1 at 02:13 PM : Sep 23, 2007
Yeah, but does the carpet match the curtains? That''s the real question . . .
"De kid is not my son."
Posted by coffee_guy1 at 02:18 PM : Sep 23, 2007
It''s fine to mistakes, but then you should admit them and move on . . . Is this her way of admitting her Iraq war vote was a mistake?
Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha! I really can not stop laughing!
Posted by coffee_guy1 at 02:26 PM : Sep 23, 2007
So are you saying it wasn''t her decision to vote for the Iraq war? What is she a meat puppet or something? Has she no will of her own?
Posted by coffee_guy1 at 02:41 PM : Sep 23, 2007
Is there a difference? Without funding there would be no war . . .
If she says she wants to cut funding for the troops, go ahead and let her slit her own throat.
It should be quite entertaining to watch he flailing wildly about, trying to "uncut" the wound.
Posted by coffee_guy1 at 02:39 PM : Sep 23, 2007
I do donnie....on both counts.....
Posted by coffee_guy1 at 02:51 PM : Sep 23, 2007
Donnie, what''s up with your new rasta man persona? Is it some sort of statement? I don''t get it.
the south prefers upstanding, christian , faith professing republicans
and top notch leadership like george bush, jr.
the south would like to find another prez like george bush. jr.
the southern states are considering drafting rush limbaugh to be the republican candidate.
he has all the qualifications...
fat, bigoted, republican, christian, drug user, demogogue.
oh well, that''s the south for you, folks!
Posted by coffee_guy1 at 02:59 PM : Sep 23, 2007
Maybe. Depends wha'' ya think''''n about . . .
Posted by coffee_guy1 at 02:51 PM : Sep 23, 2007
Of course not donnie. It''s not possible for you to hurt my feelings.....
I didn''t answer because I''m cooking along with being online......
Posted by coffee_guy1 at 03:11 PM : Sep 23, 2007
Nope. That''s no mistake. You speak the truth. Making China rich too, just like Walmart.
LONG LIVE THE PRIDE AND STUBBORNNESS (And Stupidity) OF THE GREAT EMPEROR BUSH II!!!
SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!
Where''d ya get the beef? Hansel?
Posted by coffee_guy1 at 03:17 PM : Sep 23, 2007
Ralph''s
Bravo and right down the middle. Now if we can just get a few republican senators to open their eyes to the stupidity of blindly following Bush further into the quicksand. Then maybe we can get this debacle of a war stopped before anymore American soldier''s lives are wasted for nothing then Bush''s ego and his pathetic attempt at a legacy.
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM, HAS NICE RING TO IT.
MADAM PRESIDENT, YEP, SURE DOES.
STAY THE COURSE..............
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 8
- next
See all 362 Comments