DES MOINES, Iowa, Sept. 21, 2007

Edwards Calls For Universal Preschool

Presidential Candidate Also Wants $15,000 Raises For Teachers In High-Poverty Areas

  • Interactive Education In America

    Backpack ready? Learn more about education in America through fun facts, national statistics and unusual schools.

  • Interactive Campaign 2008

    Profiles of the candidates, polls, fund-raising, blogs, video and more.

(AP)  Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards rolled out a program for reforming primary education in the United States on Friday, proposing to pay teachers up to $15,000 more in high poverty areas and initiating universal preschool.

Edwards was to detail the proposals, which also include longer school years and reforming No Child Left Behind, later in the day in a speech at a Des Moines middle school.

In a copy of his policy statement provided to The Associated Press, Edwards said giving all children an equal chance to get a quality education is a commitment that is at the core of his plan to build a country "where everyone has a chance to succeed."

He said schools are still separate and unequal 50 years after a Supreme Court ruling required desegregation in public schools.

"No longer legally separated by race, our children are sorted by economics, often with a racial or ethnic dimension. At the same time, our children are preparing for unprecedented global economic competition," Edwards said in the policy statement.

He criticized the Bush administration's No Child Left Behind law, saying it's not working and needs a radical overhaul.

Rather than requiring students to take cheap standardized tests, Edwards said assessments that measure higher-order thinking skills must be developed, including open-ended essays, oral examinations, projects and experiments.

Edwards' plan calls for federal funding for the creation of universal preschool for all children when they turn 4. The preschools will teach skills students will need in school, including language abilities and introductions to early math, reading and other academic concepts.

The program, which will be voluntary, will begin in low-income neighborhoods where schools are struggling. Tuition would be charged on a sliding scale based on family income and waived for children from low-income families.

Edwards also proposed creation of a national program to promote health screening for problems related to speech, hearing, vision, dental and learning disabilities. The program would promote home visits by nurses to 50,000 low-income new parents.

Edwards also said he would raise teacher pay by up to $15,000 for educators in high-poverty areas.

©MMVII, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 28 Comments
by signof4 September 24, 2007 2:14 PM EDT
PRESS RELEASE: Edwards calls for top tier hair care products in every bathroom! ''No one should have to deal with bad hair.'' Details to follow.
Reply to this comment
by glaswolf September 24, 2007 1:53 AM EDT
The failure of US schools resulted from integrating students indifferent to IQ''s and watering down material accommodating lowest common denominators, replacing truth with political correctness, and confusing what humans create with what mythical gods are believed to produce. In reality, political refugees are all able to educate their young as do civilized indians. Many EM immigrants of generations are Jefferson''s serf stock and never really "educated their children" ... the Jesuits and Manor management did. Educational dysfunction pervades serf sourced pseudo white as well as black urban blocks, and these would benefit from available free preschools, whereas required attendance retards children from our legitimate civilized political refugee families. "Testing beyond the limits of performance" must be the standard, no esteem nor motivation concerns allowed.
Reply to this comment
by prinzowhales September 23, 2007 8:42 PM EDT
What a charming picture of Lawyer Edwards...looks like he just pulled something rather intriguing out of his nose and is deciding whether to eat it or try and put it back....no, best wait and see what his campaign manager, Mr. Bonoir, says his position should be...after all, he had 26 years in the House making just those kinds of tough decisions...
Reply to this comment
by me4prezz September 23, 2007 2:39 AM EDT
PJ66:

Thank you! Somewhere they drew a line that divided the upper class from the lower class and crossed out the middle class, forgetting that we are still here.

My husband and I make just enough money to not be lower/poverty class, which means that we make enough money to be poor, but have to pay for everything ourselves with no help.

College scholarships for nursing school? Forget it! I am a middle class, white, married woman. I qualify for nothing but student loans, and even those don''t cover the expense. My children are the ones who will suffer because we call in the middle and I am so sick of seeing them suffer because we make too much money to not be poor, but not enough money to have money.

Reply to this comment
by me4prezz September 23, 2007 2:34 AM EDT
This may be the only thing I have liked that came out of the Edwards campaign. However, on that note, if you are going to have a universal preschool, then make it free and don''t charge for it. That is what taxes are paid for. If I have to pay for it, then I will find a private school and opt out of government education. I have 3 children, 2 of which are in preschool.

Second, at least where Michigan is concerned, that extra $15,000 a year would be a nice bonus, but at this point, teachers would just like to have job security. Our teachers are leaving en masse because there are no jobs due to budget cuts, budget cuts, budget cuts. Nearly every school you go to in Michigan will have some story of how many teachers were cut that year due to budget cuts.

So, forgive me for not jumping for immediate joy and falling in the more skeptic category, but I have seen too many teachers and students fall by the wayside to government failure to be secure in anything that comes by way of education.
Reply to this comment
by prinzowhales September 22, 2007 6:17 PM EDT
hopetrumps--Yes, I said "human garbage" and I stand by it--I called the cowardly little punks who applauded the torture of a young man, "Hitler Youth", and I stand by it.

We''ve seen the kind of ''American education'' that you endorse--its brought us from being the most literate nation on earth to being a nation of illiterates and dullards--a full 20% of whom cannot find their own country on a map! Just how much more money will it cost the taxpayers to provide more of this kind of ''education''?

We rank 37th in health care excellence in the world today and number one in health care expense. Edwards wants the government to pour money into the US Death Care system--He wants more corporate control through the Freakin'' Death Administration. A Cuban peasant has a longer life expectancy than an American doctor. Edwards isn''t interested in a good health care system--he''s dead set on making everyone suffer under the one we have.

What''s the matter ''Hopetrumps'', can''t find any talking points in your Edwards'' brochures for camp followers to explain away the surrender of victory in Ohio in 2004? The campaign had over $40 million to fight the theft. Today we have the same crooked machines, the same crooked politicians and the chances are pretty good that we will have the same kind of crooked election that we had in 2000 and 2004.
Reply to this comment
by standlee5 September 22, 2007 4:20 PM EDT
Let''s not repeat past mistakes. There is no need to have big top heavy entitilement programs. Some public service campaigns on early childhood education directed at parents grandparents will be much more cost effective than a massive program. After universal preschool and daycare then universal transportation to get there. What kids need is a safe neighborhood so they can run around outside and play in safety.
Reply to this comment
by pjj66 September 22, 2007 3:56 PM EDT
I am sick of hearing low income needs this their children need this from health care, preschool etc. How about the middle class people. We pay for everything out of our pockets with no help. The middle class people vote. I hope Edwards and everyone running for office remember the middle class have a strong vote.
Reply to this comment
by pjj66 September 22, 2007 3:55 PM EDT
I am sick of hearing low income needs this their children need this from health care, preschool etc. How about the middle class people. We pay for everything out of our pockets with no help. The middle class people vote. I hope Edwards and everyone running for office remember the middle class have a strong vote.
Reply to this comment
by my2centss September 22, 2007 3:38 PM EDT
In my personal finances, if I do not have the money, I am unable to purchase the product. How much are we able to borrow and spend before our country collapses? The dollar is slowly becoming worthless. This spending needs to stop before China stops loaning it to us.
Reply to this comment
by prinzowhales September 22, 2007 3:25 PM EDT
The Democratic mainstream is not about change...its not about redressing the crimes of the Bush Regime--it is all about continuing them...with a ''kinder and gentler fascism''.

Edwards is all about making low wage corporatism palatable to the working class--the new generation of scabs who won''t organize and fight the criminal elite.

His is the nanny government that will force you to see the corporate doc in a box and take the poisonous and murderous concoctions that his FDA has approved for you--approved! 60,000 dead from Vioxx...approved! Aspartame... Cancer, Migraines, Parkinsons and other neurological and cardiological maladies...But don''t you dare call Stevia a sweetner...the FDA doesn''t put up with that!

Edwards said he was lied to ? Where is his demand that the liars be prosecuted? Where is his call for impeachment? Over a million dead for a lie and all he has to say is..."dey twicked po little ole me.''
Reply to this comment
by prinzowhales September 22, 2007 3:14 PM EDT
hopetrumps- Edwards is also for expanding the power of the Freakin'' Death Administration--the FDA--so that it can busy itself with supplements, herbs and alternative health under the guise of protecting Americans from good health. This is a man who supports an organization that has made it impossible for healers like those utilizing the Gerson protocols to cure diseases--like his wife''s advanced cancer and the colon cancer of the Press Secretary--from working in the US...they had to locate their clinic in Tijuana...ironicly, that''s probably the biggest favor the Washington Regime has ever done for Mexico.

Edwards is a Bilderberger--human garbage. Kerry--the man he played second fiddle to in the last election-- stood before an auditoreum with Hitler Youth--the Young Democrats--who applauded loudly when a young student was tasered while being held down by five cops because he asked a question that Kerry hasn''t answered truthfully and Edwards hasn''t dealt with at all, to my knowledge--WHY DID YOU BETRAY THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY BY FAILING TO FIGHT THE THEFT OF THE OHIO VOTE!?

Is this the kind of scum you want running the country?
Might as well have Romney, Giuliani or Thompson as this slinking weasel, Edwards.

Reply to this comment
by likeitis5050 September 22, 2007 3:03 PM EDT
standlee5 better Hillary and Edwards than Obama and Hillary or vice versa. The problem I have with Edwards is his inablility to see that what he accuses one candidate of doing is something he, himself, is just as guilty of doing. He would be very effective if he stopped the knit-picking and accusations and just ran his campaign on his own record and intentions. Candidates seem to think we''re too stupid to come to our own conclusions if they don''t ''finger point'' and ''tattle'' on other candidates. That''s what we have the media for, isn''t it?
Reply to this comment
by solothinker September 22, 2007 2:07 PM EDT
Some of you people obviously have not cut a daycare check in quite a while. I don''t care for Edwards too much but if I have to pay for taxes anyway I would rather pay it for the kids. You can blame it on the parents all you want but that won''t fix the problems in this world. You also can''t blame everything on Iraq, Democrats had the White House for 8 years before Iraq and we still did not fix these issues. Whether your a democrat or republican you should not be happy with the performance of Congress. There needs to be a fundamental change in the U.S. beginning with the crumbling school system. No one wants more government but helping kids with school is entirely different then paying welfare to someone capable of working that plays video games all day.
Reply to this comment
by solothinker September 22, 2007 2:05 PM EDT
Some of you people obviously have not cut a daycare check in quite a while. I don''t care for Edwards too much but if I have to pay for taxes anyway I would rather pay it for the kids. You can blame it on the parents all you want but that won''t fix the problems in this world. You also can''t blame everything on Iraq, Democrats had the White House for 8 years before Iraq and we still did not fix these issues. Whether your a democrat or republican you should not be happy with the performance of Congress. There needs to be a fundamental change in the U.S. beginning with the crumbling school system. No one wants more government but helping kids with school is entirely different then paying welfare to someone capable of working that plays video games all day.
Reply to this comment
by greco99-2009 September 22, 2007 11:34 AM EDT
The cost of this program is probably nothing compared to the money we spend for even one week in Iraq (or even just the contractor fraud for a week).

In related news, it seemed just downright evil that Bush will veto a 37 million (over 5 year) program extensio for children''s health care. At two billion per week for Iraq, this is what we spend in less than 2 hours.

Billions for war, billions for foreign aid, billions for corporations...what about America''s most precious resource: Our kids !
Reply to this comment
by sandycat2 September 22, 2007 7:56 AM EDT
Where are we going to get the money to pay for this program that we don''t need? If parents want to send their children to preschool then let them do that and pay for it themselves just like we do now. The US government is in skyhigh debt and should be thinking of ways to reduce the debt instead of adding to it with programs we don''t need. Children should be able to get a wonderful education with the schools we have today. If they aren''t coming out of school with a wonderful education, then it''s the child''s fault for being too lazy to learn. Now there''s a novel thought. Making the child responsible for learning. Many kids are lazy and don''t even do homework assignments. Well, school isn''t a video game, I guess.
Reply to this comment
by incog-nito September 22, 2007 7:39 AM EDT
There are three things that define a civilized society:

Universal healthcare
Universal schooling
Universal childcare

Most everything else can be privatized.
Reply to this comment
by standlee5 September 22, 2007 12:17 AM EDT
Why should we pay for universal preschool. We have universal kindergarten. Enough already. They also want universal daycare. Cradle to grave is NOT an American trait. If people want to send their kids to preschool fine if they don''t fine. It makes no difference. It''s not like kids are going to be in 8th grade and not know their colors and numbers.
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds September 21, 2007 11:58 PM EDT
Head Start has existed since 1965 and has shown itself to be effective. The problem is that it''s not universal. Still it shouldn''t cost an outrageous amount to fund the already existing structure to make it universal. I think the idea itself is wonderful as it seems. that investing in kids when they''re young pays off in the long run with them being more productive and less likely to be involved in criminal activity. While there are exceptions I have to believe that many of the men in our prisons are there in large part due to illiteracy.
Reply to this comment
See all 28 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: