Sept. 21, 2007
Jena And The Son Of Jim Crow
The Nation: Case Shows Racism Still Pervades The Nation Not Just The South
-
Play CBS Video Video Massive Civil Rights Rally
The small town of Jena, La., was descended upon by thousands of demonstrators demanding equal justice for six black students who have been charged with attempted murder. Byron Pitts reports.
-
Video Civil Rights Fight Revived
Thousands took to the streets of Jena, La., to demand the release of six black students jailed for beating a white classmate as part of a series of racially-charged events. Susan Roberts reports.
-
Video Civil Rights March On Jena
After a series of racial incidents led to the indictment of six black high-schoolers, thousands of protestors are converging on Jena, La. Al Sharpton talks to Hannah Storm about the march.
-
Photo
A woman carries a picture of Martin Luther King Jr., during a march and rally in support of the "Jena Six" in Jena, La., Thursday, Sept. 20, 2007. Thousands of chanting demonstrators filled the streets of this little Louisiana town Thursday in support of six black teenagers initially charged with attempted murder in the beating of a white classmate. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
-
Photo Essay
Rally In Jena
Louisiana town at center of racism debate after black teens are charged in beating of white student.
In the alleyway between de jure and de facto, Jim Crow conceived a son. Even though the deed took place in broad daylight, everybody tried not to notice, and in time some would even try to pretend it hadn't happened. For most of his long life, Jim Crow Sr. had been a powerful and respected man. His word was law, his laws were obeyed and those who transgressed were punished without mercy. But in his dotage these crude and brutal ways became a liability. Finally, and after some protest, he was banished. Some claimed he had died. But nobody found the body.
Junior, meanwhile, was adopted by a local family and raised with all the refinement and courtesy that his father never had. While the father had railed against the changes that ousted him, the son adapted to them. But he cultivated the same allies and pursued the same goals, and in time he too would become powerful and respected. With little use for curse words or ostentatious displays of authority, he was most effective when not drawing attention to himself.
Over the past year the small town of Jena, Louisiana, has vividly established the genealogical link between the two generations of Jim Crow. Paradoxically it has taken the symbolism of the old -- complete with nooses and all-white juries -- for the nation to engage with the substance of the new: the racial inequalities in America's penal and judicial systems. For what is truly shocking about Jena is not that it has happened here but that the most egregious aspects of it are happening all across America every day. Go into any courthouse in any city and you will see it playing out. Like Rodney King, Hurricane Katrina or Sean Bell, it has revealed to the rest of the country what black America already knows. "If the media wasn't watching what was going on then every last one of those kids would be in jail right now," says Tina Jones, the mother of Bryant Purvis, who was there when the recent round of trouble started.
Fittingly for a post-civil rights story, it began with the discrepancy between what you are allowed to do and what you can do. In August last year, Kenneth Purvis asked the principal at Jena High School if he could sit under the "white tree" -- a place in the school courtyard where white students hung out during break. The principal said Purvis could sit where he liked. So the next day he went with his cousin Bryant and stood under the tree. The morning after that three nooses dangled from the tree.
The overwhelmingly white school board judged the nooses a youthful prank and punished the culprits with brief suspensions. Black parents and students were angry, and months of racial tension followed. Police were called to the school several times because of fights between black and white students.
The principal called an assembly at which the local district attorney, Reed Walters, warned, "See this pen? I can end your lives with the stroke of a pen." The black students say he was looking at them when he said it; Walters denies it.
In an unsolved arson case, a wing of the school was burned down. A few days later, Justin Sloan, a white man, attacked black students who tried to go to a white party in town. Sloan was charged with battery and put on probation. A few days after that a white boy pulled a gun on three black students in a convenience store. One of the black students wrestled the gun from him and took it home, only to find himself charged with theft of a firearm, second-degree robbery and disturbing the peace. The white student who produced the gun was not charged.
On December 4, in school, a group of black students attacked a white student, Justin Barker, after they heard him bragging about a racial assault his friend had made. Barker, 17, had a concussion and his eye was swollen shut. He spent a few hours in the hospital and on his release went to a party, where friends described him as "his usual smiling self."
The six black students were arrested and charged with attempted second-degree murder -- a charge that requires the use of a deadly weapon. Walters argued that the sneakers used to kick Barker were indeed deadly weapons. Mychal Bell, 17, became the first of what are now known as the Jena Six to be convicted on reduced charges by an all-white jury, and he faced up to twenty-two years in jail. His black court-appointed attorney called no witnesses and offered no defense. Bell's conviction was overturned by an appeals court, which ruled that he shouldn't have been tried as an adult. At the time of this writing he sits in jail waiting to hear his fate.
These incidents have turned Jena into a national symbol of racial injustice. As such it is both a potent emblem and a convenient whipping boy. Potent because it shines a spotlight on how race and class conspire to deny black people equality before the law. According to the Justice Department, blacks are almost three times as likely as whites to have their cars searched when they are pulled over and more than twice as likely to be arrested. They are more than five times as likely as whites to be sent to jail and are sentenced to 20 percent longer jail time. This would not be a problem for the likes of Kobe Bryant, but in Jena's "quarters" high-powered legal teams are hard to come by.
Convenient because it allows the rest of the nation to dismiss the incidents as the work of Southern redneck backwoodsmen without addressing the systemic national failures it showcases. According to the Sentencing Project, the ten states with the highest discrepancy between black and white incarceration rates include Vermont, Connecticut, Rhode Island and New York and none from the South. What took place in Jena is not aberrant; it's consistent. The details are a local disgrace. The broader themes are a national scandal. Jim Crow Jr. travels well -- unencumbered by historical baggage.
"Jena is America," says Alan Bean, executive director of Friends of Justice, who has been working with the Jena Six. "The new Jim Crow is the criminal justice system and its impact on poor people in general and people of color in particular. We don't always get the exotic trimmings like the nooses."
By Gary Younge
Reprinted with permission from the The Nation.
| If you like this article, check out www.thenation.com for more investigative reports, timely editorials and incisive columns |




Who came up with that?
Do racists like you ever post anything new? You posted this krapp yesterday on the other article. What? You think it''s a brilliant essay or something?
"The principal called an assembly at which the local district attorney, Reed Walters, warned, "See this pen? I can end your lives with the stroke of a pen." The black students say he was looking at them when he said it; Walters denies it."
Who does this Walters think he is? Regardless of who he was looking at, what makes him think he has any such power over anyone? Good grief! What a sick man! No wonder this has gotten out of hand.
1. three white boys beat up a black boy at a party and nothing happened
2. a grown white man hit a black boy in the head with a bottle and only got probation
3. a white boy felt threatened by a group of black teens, so he DROVE home (let me rephrase), he LEFT THE SCENE, went home and got a shotgun, then returned to the scene with it. The black teens took the gun from him and were charged with assault and theft while the white teen got nothing.
Now, you tell me that there is nothing unjust going on!
This whole thing is disgusting! We should have advance MUCH further than we have in race relations.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by missglo at 02:58 PM : Sep 21, 2007
For covicting a kid with three prior convictions who dealt a brutal beating to another kid? I certainly hope not.
as far as racsim, comes in all sizes, makes and colors.
I appreciate your stance on racism....can''t we just make it go away? I got some very racist e-mails & asked to be removed from the senders mass distribution list. I got some "hate" mail in return. I am appalled at the hatred in this country directed at various ethnic groups. One or two people can''t change the world, but we can sure as heck try !
indian land. apache land, choctaw land, seminole
land, blackfeet land, iroquois land, sioux land,
chumash land etc. the revenge of geronimo. they
conquered others yet cannot conquer themselves. all
these non-native americans walk around like they
are god. the native americans, just sit quietly
and chuckle at our folly. waiting till we all
kill each other off. cause obviously, we can''t
get along. no matter what rodney king says with
his magic wand.
Note the basis for the demonstration was the expectation that the young man would be sentenced to time in Jail. It would seem justice did work because the crimes they were accused of were sharply reduced and returned for a proper hearing on the matter.
I might also wonder when the writer makes comparison of jail time for blacks and whites if he is comparing comparable crimes. In other words is he comparing equivalent things. One of the most common crime resulting in black jail time is the the sale of drugs which have very strict and long jail sentences
No need to wonder.
Statistics bear out what the writer says, in fact, on the subject of drugs, the wholesalers, the mostly "whites" that control the flow, and own the drug laden vehicles, rarely even get caught, and when they are, usually get less time than the street vendor, often no time at all.
One example, "Crack" cocaine, a purified version of powder cocaine, and more likely found on inner city street vendors in "black" neighborhoods, carries a much harsher sentence on average than the equivalent amount of "powder" cocaine, which is the form of choice for the "upscale" suburban whites.
I remember reading that the Bush twins were busted with coke, and the word was "it is a family matter", they weren''t even charged.
Try saying that if you are "black", the likely retort would be, "Ok, then your family is also under arrest".
"Justin Sloan, a white man, attacked black students who tried to go to a white party in town. Sloan was charged with battery and put on probation. A few days after that a white boy pulled a gun on three black students in a convenience store. One of the black students wrestled the gun from him and took it home, only to find himself charged with theft of a firearm, second-degree robbery and disturbing the peace. The white student who produced the gun was not charged."
Your turn.
"Justin Sloan, a white man, attacked black students who tried to go to a white party in town. Sloan was charged with battery and put on probation. A few days after that a white boy pulled a gun on three black students in a convenience store. One of the black students wrestled the gun from him and took it home, only to find himself charged with theft of a firearm, second-degree robbery and disturbing the peace. The white student who produced the gun was not charged."
Your turn.
Obviously, a burning cross, even in rural Minnesota is a symbol of racism but there are other things that just don%u2019t get looked at that way. Those jerks with the nooses hanging from their trucks at the rally, that was obviously meant to stir up trouble. They knew what they were doing and the book should be thrown at them for inciting trouble. The kids that were beating up others and the gun incident should have gotten more severe punishment.
We should be able to look back at court records and find that an assault is an assault; white on black, black on white, husband/wife, rich/poor, bar room brawls, all need to be treated the same. Instigators as well as perpetrators should not be tolerated where racism is concerned. The system also needs to be fair and color blind. We need to have some checks and balances and if it%u2019s not, we need to replace some officials.
I am an artist, not a lawyer, but I was able to search the internet in about 20 minutes and find 2 laws pertaining to this case. From reading Louisiana State Laws La. R.S. 14:225 and La. R.S. 14:107.2, I suppose that Mr. Walters could have charged those students with a hate crime, either as a misdemeanor or a felony. Had he done so, he could have followed the law in the State of Louisiana and taken one step towards racial parity in this instance.
Perhaps, Mr. Walters'' failure to prosecute the original offenders who hung nooses from a tree on school property may be seen as a catalyst for all that has happened in Jena since that first offense. I know, from this article and my own knowledge & experience, that he is not the cause of the racial unrest in this small town in central Louisiana, merely a reflection of the current state of American Justice. However, he is culpable for not performing the job he was sworn to do and for allowing this situation to escalate as it has.
Reed Walters is but one man in the midst of this racially charged situation, but he could have possibly been the one man to change everything had it not been for the legacy of Jim Crow.
Posted by brianbwb at 12:46 AM : Sep 22, 2007
harsher punishments for sales of crack came as I understand it from the concern in the black community about the epidemic of crack cocaine use creating stern punishments. this does not seem to me that this proves what the author wants it to prove that blacks are punished with stiffer punishments because they are black.
It proves the not surprising thing that poor blacks are likely to take up selling crack because its a way to get what they want and need more money and status. If this is the differing factor then either we should stiffen the punishment for coke use or lighten the punishment for crack sale. the question would be does this solve the problem of crack addiction.
As far as the big guys getting away as you state, I''d like to see the proof.
Posted by alanrobisch2
Weren''t the Bush twins busted for coke a while back? At the time, those around bush effectively quashed any investigation as to how it could get past SS security by calling it a "family matter'', the twins weren''t even reprimanded.
There are large ships outside US territorial waters laden with drugs, small fast speed boats ferry "manageable" amounts to shore. Who owns the boats, "Blacks"? I highly doubt it. Who is in control of the ports where the stuff comes in, "Blacks"? Again, I doubt it. Who controls the police mafia, who are a willing part in the distribution networks in the inner cities, "Blacks"? Nope. Was Oliver North, who imported coke that was sold in LA, as part of Iran-Contra, "Black"? I don''t need to doubt that one, I am sure he isn''t.
Remember the John DeLorean affair? The video showed "white" guys trying to sell coke to him as a sting that failed. What happened to the "white" guys", not to mention the coke? Who supplies the Washington and Hollywood elite? "Black" people aren''t even allowed into those circles. I could fill a book with examples.
"Black" people are on the low end of the drug totem, making money in inner city areas where gainful employment is purposely kept non existent, and wages kept below the cost of living. But we are on the high end of the prison population for this activity.
-
by alanrobisch
September 23, 2007 9:28 AM PDT
- "Black" people are on the low end of the drug totem, making money in inner city areas where gainful employment is purposely kept non existent, and wages kept below the cost of living. But we are on the high end of the prison population for this activity.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 31 CommentsPosted by brianbwb at 01:54 AM : Sep 23, 2007
I am not convinced. It is routinely more difficult to catch the big guys and much effort is done to catch them. remember our invasion of nicaragua to capture manuel noriega or the vast amounts of money we use to help columbia control the drug trade. Also your statement that jobs are kept intentionally low doesn''t pass the smell test. I can''t imagine this nor have I ever heard this from even al sharpton the king of racial exploitation