Giuliani Will "Clarify" Views To NRA
Presidential Hopeful Seeks To Improve Contentious Relationship With Gun Group
-
Photo
Republican presidential candidate and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani answers questions in London, Wednesday, Sept. 19, 2007. (AP)
-
Play CBS Video Video Giuliani In England
Republican presidential candidate and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani was in England to discuss Middle East politics with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown. Charlie D'Agata reports.
-
In-Depth
2008 Presidential Hopefuls
Profiles and the latest news on the Democrats and Republicans running for the White House.
-
Interactive
Campaign 2008
Profiles of the candidates, polls, fund-raising, blogs, video and more.
Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani said Thursday that he hopes to "clarify” his views on the right to bear arms when he speaks to the National Rifle Association on Friday.
The former New York City mayor is to address the NRA at its “Celebration of American Values” conference in Washington. Other presidential hopefuls on the speaker list include Sen. John McCain, Fred Thompson, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richarson, Mike Huckabee and Newt Gingrich.
"There are certain agreements and disagreements with every single group," noted Giuliani, talking about the event with reporters in Reston, Va. "When I go before the NRA, I'm going to try to emphasize areas I think in which there is a great deal of agreement. And as I have said many, many times, my 80 percent friend is not my 20 percent enemy."
He says his main focus in Friday's speech will be to emphasize making gun laws a local decision, not a federal one.
The NRA and Giuliani haven’t been close in the past. They butted heads while Giuliani was mayor on topics as diverse as Giuliani’s gun control legislation and the attempted opening of an NRA café in Times Square.
In 1994, the group criticized Giuliani’s significant role in the enactment of major federal anti-crime legislation -- for which Giuliani was thanked by President Bill Clinton -- which made it harder for felons to purchase firearms.
The NRA's chief lobbyist, Chris Cox, said that while members will welcome Giuliani to share his views, his record will not be ignored when it’s time to make their endorsement, which is likely to come after primaries have determined the Republican nominee.
"There's no such thing as a clean slate," Cox told CBS News. "The NRA will certainly weigh in past positions and statements."
Giuliani regularly points to the historic drop in New York City crime while he was mayor and has said the change in gun laws was pivotal to the city's efforts.
Some gun-control advocates say the NRA conference is an opportunity for Giuliani to display leadership.
"We hope he will change the way the NRA thinks about gun laws," says Paul Helmke, the president of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Helmke, the former mayor of Ft. Wayne, Indiana, stood just a few feet away from Giuliani when Clinton signed the 1994 crime bill.
"Mayor Giuliani is not an extremist like some in the NRA," Helmke says. "He knows after 9/11, we shouldn't allow people on the terrorism watch list to buy guns -- right now they can do that. This event is the perfect platform for him to show where there should be exceptions."
While Friday’s reception might not be especially warm for Giuliani, political analyst Stuart Rothenberg says it’s better for him to be there than not.
“He’s got to go to traditional Republicans like gun owners,” says Rothenberg. “If he didn’t go, the NRA could see it as dissing them.”
And some gun owners think that despite Giuliani’s past views on guns, he still has a chance to win them over.
"Giuliani has a long, uphill road to convince people -- given his record -- that he is sincere about protecting the 2nd Amendment," says David Kopel, research director of the Independence Institute, a conservative think tank in Colorado and a lifetime member of the NRA. "Not every candidate needs an A, but if Giuliani can work himself to be seen as a B or a B minus, that would be progress for him."
©MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 67 CommentsWhat he means is "Do a Petraeus!"
K I S S A S S !!
This pig organization gave an election opponent of Ron Paul a higher legislative rating, counting one of the anti-gun bills it supported and Paul voted against as a point against Paul''s un-blemished pro-Second Amendment record.
Gun Owners of America is the real alternative to the treacherous NRA.
LONG LIVE REPUBLICAN "MODESTY"!
SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!
**********************************************
I think the NRA does about as much good for the Republican party as MoveOn.org does for the Democratic party. Especially after this last little bit of ugliness about General Petreus. That was dispicible, and no one, and I mean no one, dislikes Bush more than I do, or would like to see the troops out of Iraq yesterday, more than me.
But for the NRA to gripe about it being harder for felons to get guns is ludicrous. There are plenty of laws restricting law-abiding citizens, non-felons, in fact with records clean as a whistle, for getting, owning, and carrying guns.
Lets worry about those laws. I strongly support the 2nd amendment, but I think any reasonable and sane person wouldn''t give a crazed maniac with halucinations a gun.
Under Rudy''s watch, I am not sure about this, but I don''t think you protect yourself with anything in New York. I heard that mace and tazers were illegal. If that is true, then he needs to skip the NRA meeting and go to the meeting of the scaredy-cat''s of America meeting.
flip-flop!
Watch Giuliani do the the flip flop cha cha!
*****************************
Exactly. It is those riduculous,inflamatory statements that lose them credibility. I think every responsible person should have a gun. I have no problem with some restrictions though, if for nothing else, just some safety concerns.
When I was a kid, almost everyone in our town had some sort of gun, shotgun, rifle, hand guns, I don''t remember anyone ever shooting anyone. But not many houses got broken into either.
with about 270 million firearms in circulation.
(Source: the annual Small Arms Survey by the Graduate
Institute of International Studies in Geneva.)
The NRA used to be a great organization .. supporting the hunter, sport, etc. They saw the demographics showing hunting was declining and decided the only way to remain viable was to become the front organization for the gun manufacturers of the world. The U.S. is the only non-third world country without restrictive gun laws. They needed to keep the profit spigot open and American law makers are the easiest to bribe. Now no gun law, no matter how sensible, is fought. The NRA fronts for an arms industry that freely puts guns on inter-city streets that kill police and innocent citizens so fear sends suburbia to gun shops for the expensive stuff. I have no issue with appropriate guns for hunting, sport, and self-protection, but through the NRA sensible left the arena long ago.
His explanation will probably go something like this...
"I used to be against guns. But when the terrorist''s struck us on 9/11, I realized how important it is for every American to carry a fully automatic machine gun. And under my administration, I will provide tax cuts to help lower income americans purchase their very own M16."
How do you liberals like America%u2019s "free left-wing press" now?
Does it feel like Germany 1938 to anyone else?
-- Congressman Ron Paul, June 26, 2006
"To disarm the people is the most effective way to enslave them."
- George Mason
"The principle of self-defense, even involving weapons and bloodshed, has never been condemned, even by Gandhi..."
-- Martin Luther King, Jr
a-human-right.com
FLIP FLOP FLIP FLOP FLIP FLOP!!!!
Fix the list. I am sure there are bad people in the list but not all of them. The NRA is just standing out for our civil rights unlike the liberals who just pick and choose the rights which apply to them.
Giuliani cannot get away with his suggestion that gun laws should be determined locally. An American citizen does not and must not lose his rights depending on where in the nation he happens to live or visit. Giuliani is guilty of abusing the rights of citizens in New York City by enforcing extreme restrictions on firearm ownership and use and he did an extreme disservice to our nation by being party to lawsuits against legitimate firearm manufacturers and dealers for the criminal misuse of their products. If continued, such lawsuits would effectively put every firearm manufacturer and dealer in America out of business in spite of making and selling a legal product under the most extreme regulation imposed on any industry or business in America.
Giuliani cannot get away with his suggestion that gun laws should be determined locally. An American citizen does not and must not lose his rights depending on where in the nation he happens to live or visit. Giuliani is guilty of abusing the rights of citizens in New York City by enforcing extreme restrictions on firearm ownership and use and he did an extreme disservice to our nation by being party to lawsuits against legitimate firearm manufacturers and dealers for the criminal misuse of their products. If continued, such lawsuits would effectively put every firearm manufacturer and dealer in America out of business in spite of making and selling a legal product under the most extreme regulation imposed on any industry or business in America.
You''re dead wrong.. Hitler and Mao armed their citizens plenty well. Think about it man: World War ? Two ?
Oh yeah and Mao in the Chinese ? Civil War ?
And don''t even get me started on Stalin .. The fact is tyrants usually arm their citizenry ..
Sorry to confuse your thought process with logic.
FLIP FLOP!
Check your facts, Hitler and Mao armed para-military organizations, took control of a country and then turned the army against the people!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zs5DxwzEXHQ
Giuliani defends the lawsuit against the gun industry on his radio program. The gun industry was "overproducing guns". Here is the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhe38wJ86Do
And don''''t even get me started on Stalin .. The fact is tyrants usually arm their citizenry .. "
You need to go back and read some history books. No despot ever arms the citizenry, they only arm their followers.
Modern Liberalism is a new form of fascism; they lie, smear and attack anyone who gets in their way. Why don''t they support free speech of their opponents? I say let the liberals say anything they want, and let smart people make their own choice of who is REALLY anti-freedom.
and for the hunters out there I highly recommend the FGM-Javelin as your next purchase (easily available in Texas, Virginia and other great states). With this fire and forget piece of pure firepower your odds increase dramatically...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FGM-148_Javelin
flippity, floppity, flippity, floppity. Disgusting.
-----------------------------------
Posted by SFTodd
No, you simple uninformed believer in stupidity.
If you do your homework you will find that the NRA has financed and fought many court cases to get back the 1st amendment rights that have been taken by the democrats Shumer, Feinstein and Clinton. It used to be that you would be a criminal if you made your opinion known about a person running for office if done within 90 days of an election. This was fought in large part by the NRA and reversed only recently. You did not know that becasue you only pay attention to the biased media. So get offf your sofa and get a grip on realilty.
Clinton, the female one, said if she could get the votes she would make all guns illegal, well all the guns except those guns owned by the people who protect her and the other privledged people. Why should she get more protection than you or I?
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 67 Comments