Giuliani Adviser: "Too Many Mosques"
Rep. Peter King's Remark Draws Fire From Muslims, Democrats
-
Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., seen in this April 2005 file photo, is under fire after saying there are "too many mosques" in the United States. Some Democrats and Muslim groups have demanded King step down as an adviser to Rudy Giuliani's presidential campaign. (AP)
-
Play CBS Video Video Giuliani In England
Republican presidential candidate and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani was in England to discuss Middle East politics with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown. Charlie D'Agata reports.
-
Video Giuliani: Gotta Be On Offense
CBS News RAW: Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani responds to Democratic criticism of Gen. Petraeus and what Giuliani calls "withdrawal appeasement."
-
Video Wayne Barrett On Giuliani
Only On The Web: "Rudy!" author Wayne Barrett and CBS' Jeff Greenfield discuss Giuliani's leadership style and campaign for the Republican presidential nomination.
-
Interactive Campaign 2008 Profiles of the candidates, polls, fund-raising, blogs, video and more.
-
In-Depth 2008 Presidential Hopefuls Profiles and the latest news on the Democrats and Republicans running for the White House.
Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., the former chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee and the top GOP member on the panel, said his comments to the Politico Web site were taken out of context. Democrats said Giuliani should drop him as a campaign adviser.
“I stand by everything I said other than the fact that the Politico totally took it out of context,” King said Thursday.
In the Politico interview, King said: “Unfortunately we have too many mosques in this country, there's too many people who are sympathetic to radical Islam. We should be looking at them more carefully, we should be finding out how we can infiltrate, we should be much more aggressive in law enforcement.”
Giuliani, speaking to reporters Thursday in Northern Virginia, chuckled at the suggestion he dump King as an adviser.
"I've known Pete for 41 years, so I'm not about to do that," Giuliani said. "I know exactly what Pete meant. I knew before I even heard the clarification. What he means was that there are mosques in which violence is preached. I know that from my own investigations of Islamic terrorism. I also know that there are many mosques in which it isn't."
As for any political fallout, King told The Associated Press: “Rudy can take care of himself. He's a tough guy, but I would think that campaigns would respect someone like myself who says things that might be politically incorrect but are accurate in that too many Muslim leaders in this country do not denounce extremism.”
The congressman was denounced by the DC-based Council on American-Islamic Relations, a group that has long accused King of lobbing unfair attacks against American Muslims.
“We call on Republican leaders and other people of conscience to repudiate Representative King's bigoted remarks and to support the civil and religious rights of all Americans,” said CAIR official Corey Saylor.
Both the Muslim group and the Democratic party called on Giuliani to drop King from the campaign. Giuliani spokeswomen did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Democratic party spokeswoman Stacie Paxton called on King to apologize and urged Giuliani to drop King as his homeland security adviser, saying “this type of bigoted language has no place in public discourse.”
King said his point was not that there were too many mosques in the United States, but that too many of those mosques do not cooperate with law enforcement - a claim he made in 2003 and 2004 which also prompted criticism.
“I know of any number of mosques in New York that are under surveillance by law enforcement because they have suspicious links, at the very least radical links, that are inappropriate,” he said.
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
- I know. Lets all just say the things that won''t offend people. All''s well and the truth doesn''t matter.
Political Correctness gives me a rash.
If the muslim''s are in opposition to the welfare of this nation, then yes, there are too many mosques. - Reply to this comment
- Just another example of leftwing media bias. The man said, "there were too many mosques who are sympathetic to al-Crapola." The leftwing must really be getting scared if they have to resort to stuff like this.
- Reply to this comment
- and we are given any of them 25000 in grants to up grade their security..our tax dollars, i have tryed to get a grant for my all american mosques and was told no you dont qualifie because you are a american..
%u201CI stand by everything I said other than the fact that the Politico totally took it out of context,%u201D King said Thursday.
In the Politico interview, King said: %u201CUnfortunately we have too many mosques in this country, there''s too many people who are sympathetic to radical Islam. We should be looking at them more carefully, we should be finding out how we can infiltrate, we should be much more aggressive in law enforcement.%u201D
so keep it up washington,keep bending over for all non-americans just keep it up.. - Reply to this comment
- Another politician caught saying what he was really thinking.
We need to bring back vaudeville--as job security for all the tap-dancing politicians. They''d make a great chorus line, if they could be kept from fighting for the spotlight. LOL - Reply to this comment
- "...once we stomp out religion, there will be no more suicide terrorists.
Posted by SFTodd at 07:50 PM : Sep 20, 2007"
Then how do explain the North Vietnamese terrorists in the Viet Nam war? Religion is sometimes the justification, but territory disputes are the real root of terrorists'' actions.
It''s also interesting that your rhetoric ("stomp out religion") is also violent. A tad hypocritical, don''t you think?
Most of the modern leaders who embraced non-violence were religious: Ghandi, Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela, etc.
Religion isn''t the problem--it''s the competition for wealth, whether in the form of land or other material possessions. Stomping out religion, even if it were possible, wouldn''t change that. - Reply to this comment
- Is this guy repeating history rather than learning from it?
Wasn''t it the late 30''s through mid 40''s that a National leader and his minions DEMONIZED A RELIGION and progressively banned it''s followers until they were nearly exterminated with millions of innocents killed being called "collateral damage" to insure "national security"? - Reply to this comment
- The nazis are happy to see their legacy living on!
- Reply to this comment
- LIBERAL = TERRORIST APOLOGIST
Posted by screen_verif at 10:32 PM : Sep 20, 2007
Has the Dept. of Homeland Security found you yet, traitor? You shouldn''t threaten ex-presidents! - Reply to this comment
- LIBERAL = TERRORIST APOLOGIST
- Reply to this comment
- you''re not gonna find any muslims in the south.
muslims and rednecks don''t mix.
in order to live in the south you gotta be white trash, redneck, phony christian, bush loving repubican snakes.
war, hate, flag wavers, bible thumpers...
oh well, that''s the south for you, folks. - Reply to this comment
- I hear you Cyber, but I''''d rather have zombies without kings than stupid sheep carrying out the orders of some lunatic like Pat Roberston
Posted by SFTodd at 08:44 PM : Sep 20, 2007
If you take away one king, a new king always arises from the zombie ranks. Better to keep Pat Robertson than risk the rise of a new charismatic luny like Adolf Hitler! - Reply to this comment
- I hear you Cyber, but I''d rather have zombies without kings than stupid sheep carrying out the orders of some lunatic like Pat Roberston
- Reply to this comment
- I always try to image no religion but I keep waking to a startling realization: There would be a lot of zombies with no King.
That is a scarier image than priests sodomizing children. - Reply to this comment
- Wow, I bet King would have been leading the effort to round up Jews in Nazi Germany -- it''s scary how similar republicans are to the Nazi''s who scapegoated and then slaughtered millions of innocent people. Too bad Americans can''t remember last year, let alone what happened 65 years ago.
- Reply to this comment
- Impupsdad -- uh, excuse me, but the Bible is not the law of this land . . . yet, to wit: keep your f''ing mouth shut. It''s you and your christian buddies who legitimize religion and make Islamic extremist possible -- Imagine no religion, no god to kill or die for, I wonder if you can.
If we believe absurdities (that god exists), we shall commit atrocities (9/11) -- Voltaire
It is religion that makes terrorism possible, once we stomp out religion, there will be no more suicide terrorists. - Reply to this comment
It would be career ending if any politician were to say the same thing of Synagogues. I guess Muslim-bashing is okay in the US of 2007.
Posted by cdfoxtrot at 07:41 PM : Sep 20, 2007
Just imagine what would happen if a politician said the same thing about fundy churches?! Even though it''s the fundy Christians voted in these stupid neo con war mongers!- Reply to this comment
- yeah, and while they are at it, they should shut down Christian churches also since, Eric Rudolph, the bomber of the 1996 Olympic Games was an ultra right wing bozo just like Timothy MacVeigh, another militia patriot Christian. Another terrorist organization they should shut down that also spreads hatred is the kkk as well as all the neonazi groups, why should they have more rights than muslims?, they also blow up people, and kill them as well, they have the blood of thousands. While we are at it, since we banned the president of Iran from walking to the 9-11 memorial, we should also ban militia members and right wing para military groups from driving in front of where that Federal building in Oklahoma stood.
- Reply to this comment
- It would be career ending if any politician were to say the same thing of Synagogues. I guess Muslim-bashing is okay in the US of 2007.
- Reply to this comment
- Creepy -- like Giuliani.
- Reply to this comment
- typical hatemongering by repuglicans who get more desperate each year as they stoop to even lower levels, once thought beneath them -- their time is gonna come
Guilliani has repeatedly proven himself to be an enemy of the First Amendment and the Freedom of Speech -- just look at his blatant and repeated attempts to intentionally violate the U.S. Constitution with respect to public funding for art museums that did not share his religious beliefs. He knew he was violating the U.S. Constitution, but he did it anyway. - Reply to this comment




