February 11, 2009 4:13 PM

Our Opinions On Iraq Strategy Don't Matter

By
Bob Schieffer
(CBS)  Weekly commentary by CBS Evening News chief Washington correspondent and Face the Nation host Bob Schieffer.


As I listened to the debate over Iraq policy last week, what struck me was how people could look at the same situation and come to such opposite conclusions about what they saw - let alone what to do about it.

Think about it. General Petraeus told us the administration policy has led to some success in Iraq. Critics said it has led to total failure.

The general said violence is down in Iraq. Critics challenged his figures and said violence is up.

The general and the president said it is the success we have had that has made it possible to bring home some of our troops. Critics said success had nothing to do with it; we simply don't have an army large enough to keep the current number of troops in Iraq past April.

The president said being in Iraq has made us safer. Critics said it's made us weaker.

General Petraeus said he did not to know.

The administration says Iraq will require a long term American military commitment. The critics say the president is just making an excuse to justify the 100,000 American troops that will still be in Iraq when the next president takes office.

To my ear, the only thing the two sides agreed on was that the internal factions in the Iraqi government are still a long way from working out a way to share power and make the compromises necessary to form a stable, efficient government.

The discouraging thing is that until the Iraqis resolve that who's right or wrong about the rest of it doesn't really matter

Not at all.

E-mail Face the Nation.

By Bob Schieffer

Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 25 Comments
by alanrobisch September 18, 2007 9:03 PM EDT
But having been mislead either accidently or intentionally I remain skeptical of the surge working.
Posted by IMNHO at 10:08 PM : Sep 17, 2007

I can''t be sure it will be sucessful but I found I trusted general petraeus and think that sufficient troops from the beginning may have prevented the present civil war
Reply to this comment
by imnho September 18, 2007 1:08 AM EDT
Its hard to take the adminastration seriously. There ratanole for the war keeps changing and all of there predictions have been wrong. I would rather see the general be right then wrong; But having been mislead either accidently or intentionally I remain skeptical of the surge working.
Reply to this comment
by alanrobisch September 18, 2007 12:08 AM EDT
I did not think he would be a great president or even a good one I was turned off by his lack of erudition. It was pretty clear that republicans would lose seats in the Senate and house because of the mess that the war was and the poor manner in which Katrina was handled.

I didn''t think nor ever assumed that saddam was involved in 9/11 and I believe there was legitimate reasons to believe that he had WMd''s but did not back invasion

As far as honoring the constitution I don''t think he has dishonored it as dems and liberals have obsessed with. this wouldn''t even be a issue if the war in Iraq was going well
Reply to this comment
by aidamm-2009 September 18, 2007 12:00 AM EDT
Why not quit critisizing Bush and Petraeus and let them do there job. You don''t knoww what is going on over there to make a good decision. I believe they are doing the best that can be done. If you can do better, go to Iraq and do it.
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 September 17, 2007 11:49 PM EDT
Cut me a break. Bush isn''''t going to bomb Iran. If we were person to person I''''d be glad to wager $1000.00 that he has no intention to do so and will not and Im not a betting man unless its a sure thing
Posted by alanrobisch2 at 08:07 PM : Sep 17, 2007

LOL and were you SURE, that the Republicans would not lose in 2006? Were you SURE that Iraq had WMD and helped in 9/11? How about were you sure, that each time Bush said we were turning corners it was true and that no one in Bush''s administration leaked the name of a CIA agent? Were you SURE Bush would be a really great President? Were you SURE that Bush would respect and honor the constitution? Because if you were wrong about any of these obvious things---then it is indeed GOOD that your bet remains an idle claim. The one thing we can be sure of about Bush, is that he will not give up his power easily--that being a given--we have no idea what such a person might do.
Reply to this comment
by alanrobisch September 17, 2007 11:07 PM EDT
It will matter and even more will it matter if Bush bombs Iran, as he is expected to do. sted by clestes at 09:53 AM : Sep 17, 2007

Cut me a break. Bush isn''t going to bomb Iran. If we were person to person I''d be glad to wager $1000.00 that he has no intention to do so and will not and Im not a betting man unless its a sure thing
Reply to this comment
by clestes-2009 September 17, 2007 12:53 PM EDT
It sure as hell will matter in the next election. Anyone who thinks Iraq won''t be the MAJOR concern next year is out of touch with American people.

It will matter and even more will it matter if Bush bombs Iran, as he is expected to do.
Reply to this comment
by alanrobisch September 17, 2007 12:28 AM EDT
I would agree that YOUR opinion does not matter, because you have demonstrated that you are an eager boot/arse-licker of the illegitimate and criminal Bush cabal, and a shameless apologist for the illegal war of aggression against Iraq.

With this in mind, why not retire, rather than risk further exposing yourself as a dottering old fool?

Posted by FeelFree1 at 06:17 PM : Sep 16, 2007

Having a bad day need to attack other people to get your aggression out. Because he doesn''t agree with you you call him a dottering old fool Puhlleze.
I have always heard when people can''t win the fight of ideas they resort to insults. I guess that''s where you are
Reply to this comment
by doctor--o September 17, 2007 12:04 AM EDT
If you infect your mind with FOX propaganda you may not know that there is anything amiss in.... where?
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 September 16, 2007 11:23 PM EDT
FeelFree1,

Bob has more wisdom and experience than G.W. Bush will ever hope to have. Bush has no introspection nor humility, thus he is unable to see his own mistakes and correct them. He can not grow as a person without this and as such remains the lame excuse for a president that people know he is.
Reply to this comment
See all 25 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook