|
Advertisement | Bush Stays The Course On IraqCongressional Opposition Unmoved By President's Arguments For Continued Military Involvement| Page 1 of 2 WASHINGTON, Sept. 13, 2007 ![]() ![]() Politico.com On BushPresident Bush has announced that he'll begin to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq. Mike Allen, senior political editor of Politico.com, weighs in on the president's decision. | Share/Embed (CBS/AP) President Bush defended an unpopular war and ordered gradual reductions in U.S. forces in Iraq in a nationally televised speech from the Oval Office on Thursday night. "The more successful we are," he said, "the more American troops can return home." Still, Mr. Bush firmly rejected calls to end the war, saying the insurgents who threaten Iraq's future are a danger to U.S. national security. American troops must stay in the battle, Bush said, and more than 130,000 will remain after the newly ordered withdrawals are completed in July. "The principle guiding my decisions on troop levels in Iraq is: return on success," the president said. Mr. Bush said 5,700 U.S. forces would be home by Christmas and that four brigades - at least 21,500 troops - would return by July, along with an undetermined number of support forces. Now at its highest level of the war, the U.S. troop strength stands at 168,000. With no dramatic change in course, the president's decision sets the stage for a fiery political debate in Congress and in the 2008 presidential campaign. Democrats said Mr. Bush's approach was unacceptable. Sen. Jack Reed, a former Army Ranger who delivered the Democratic response to President Bush's speech, said that "once again, the president failed to provide either a plan to successfully end the war or a convincing rationale to continue it." Reed said Democrats would work to "profoundly change our military involvement in Iraq." Mr. Bush approved the recommendations of Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, to withdraw five combat brigades - at least 21,500 forces - and an undetermined number of support troops by July. The reductions represented only a slight hastening of the originally scheduled end of the troop increase announced in January. Petraeus' recommendations "basically gave Republicans who are still with the president on this … a reason to stay with the president," said CBS News chief Washington correspondent Bob Schieffer. Mr. Bush's speech was the latest turning point in a 4 1/2-year-old war marred by miscalculations, surprises and setbacks. Almost since the fall of Baghdad, in April 2003, U.S. commanders and administration officials in Washington mistakenly believed they were on track to winding down U.S. involvement and handing off to the Iraqis. Instead, the insurgency intervened and the reality of a country in chaos conspired to deepen the U.S. commitment. Mr. Bush said the U.S. engagement will stretch beyond his presidency, requiring military, financial and political support from Washington. He said Iraqi leaders "have asked for an enduring relationship with America. And we are ready to begin building that relationship in a way that protects our interests in the region and requires many fewer American troops." Bush said his strategy - to leave about 130,000 U.S. soldiers in Iraq to continue fighting - bridges the desires of people who want to bring troops home and those who believe that success in Iraq is essential to U.S. security. "The way forward I have described tonight makes it possible, for the first time in years, for people who have been on opposite sides of this difficult debate to come together," Bush said. That appeared unlikely, however, based on the reaction of Democratic leaders who want deadlines for withdrawals. "The American people long ago lost faith in the president's leadership of the war in Iraq because his rhetoric has never matched the reality on the ground," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. "The choice is between a Democratic plan for responsible redeployment and the president's plan for an endless war in Iraq." Majority Democrats in Congress are unable to muster enough votes to force an end to the war. So they are hoping to win Republican support with legislation to limit the mission of U.S. forces to training Iraq's military and police, protecting U.S. assets and fighting terrorists. "Democrats know that they do not at this point have the votes in the Senate to force the president to go faster," Schieffer told CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric. Speaking of America's frustration with the protracted war, the president said, "Some say the gains we are making in Iraq come too late. They are mistaken. It is never too late to deal a blow to al Qaeda. It is never too late to advance freedom. And it is never too late to support our troops in a fight they can win." "Whatever political party you belong to, whatever your position on Iraq, we should be able to agree that America has a vital interest in preventing chaos and providing hope in the Middle East," the president said. He added, "Let us come together on a policy of strength in the Middle East." Continued 1 |
2 © MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report. | Advertisement |
|
|