Sept. 16, 2007

Greenspan Defends Low Interest Rates

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Talks To Lesley Stahl About Subprime Mortgage Meltdown

  • Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan talks to <b><i>60 Minutes</i> correspondent Lesley Stahl</b>. Photo

    Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan talks to 60 Minutes correspondent Lesley Stahl.  (CBS)

  • Play CBS Video Video Greenspan On Housing Crisis

    Part 1: Alan Greenspan speaks with Leslie Stahl about his tenure at the Federal Reserve and admits that he did not foresee warning signs of a sub prime mortgage meltdown.

  • Video Greenspan On Past & Future

    Alan Greenspan sits down with Leslie Stahl and reflects on the six presidents he worked with, and discusses the future of the U.S. economy and the crippled housing market.

  • Interactive Inside The Fed

    A history of the Federal Reserve, glossary of terms and a look at changing interest rates.

(CBS)  Alan Greenspan may go down as one of the best chairmen of the Federal Reserve in American history. His 18-year tenure was marked by unprecedented economic growth, budget surpluses and a booming stock market. And he was praised universally for shepherding the economy through the shock of 9/11.

Now he has written his memoir, "The Age of Turbulence," which comes out just as he's coming under fire -- something he's not used to -- for today's housing and lending crises. His critics say he established a pattern of bailing out Wall Street investors.

Greenspan sat down with correspondent Lesley Stahl for his first major interview, defending himself against the criticism that he should've done something to stop the shady practices in subprime lending. In a rare admission, he told 60 Minutes he missed its significance.



Asked why he didn't speak out, if he knew these practices were going on or even suspected that there was something illegal or shady, Greenspan admits, "While I was aware a lot of these practices were going on, I had no notion of how significant they had become until very late. I didn't really get it until very late in 2005 and 2006."

But others at the Fed did get it -- that banks and mortgage companies had already signed up millions of home buyers and speculators, many with poor credit, for so-called subprime mortgages with complicated interest rate adjustments that have led to record numbers of defaults. Some of the practices were fraudulent.

One of his former Fed governors, Ed Gramlich, said that he proposed that the Fed examine these lending practices and look into them to see if something could be done. Greenspan rejected that idea.

Why did he reject it?

"I thought that…we would not be capable of doing what he was suggesting," Greenspan says.

"But if sitting on them, taking some regula-what…" Stahl asks.

"Well, I think not," Greenspan replies.

"Even looking into it?" Stahl asks.

"It's nothing to look in to particularly because we knew there was a number of such practices going on, but it's very difficult for banking regulators to deal with that," Greenspan says.

He insists there's nothing he could've done to prevent today's plummeting home prices and the fact that a million families have lost their homes, and many more could. But some economists now say Greenspan actually created the housing bubble and the credit crunch by keeping interest rates too low for too long.

"Just remember we raised interest rates at every meeting from June of 2004 till I got out of office," he says.

"You raised rates in 2004. But only after you held interest rates at historically low level for three years, while the bubble, the housing bubble was forming," Stahl points out. "And that you had 13 rate cuts in that period of time."

"It was our job to unfreeze the American banking system if we wanted the economy to function. This required that we keep rates modestly low," Greenspan explains.

But some of the Fed governors who worked with Greenspan at the time are now saying that they think interest rates were too low for too long.

"I think they were mistaken," Greenspan says.

What this shows is how certain he is about his views, and how firmly he guided the Fed when he was Chairman and dealt with shocks to the financial markets by quickly lowering interest rates. Now in the current turmoil investors are calling on his successor Ben Bernanke, "to do what Greenspan would've done."

"The sense is you would have acted sooner. You would have thrown more cash and liquidity in the system. That you would have acted faster and more dramatically," Stahl remarks.

"I’m not sure that's true and let me tell you why," Greenspan says. "We were dealing in an environment back there where inflation was easing. We could have acted without the fear of stoking inflationary pressures. You can't do that any more. And therefore it's a different world. I'm not certain I would have done anything different were I there."

Asked if he doesn't think he would have acted faster, Greenspan tells Stahl, "I doubt it."

"You don’t see any light between you and what Mr. Bernanke's doing?" Stahl asks.

"I think he's doing an excellent job," Greenspan replies.

"The CEOs of Ford and Chrysler are begging the Fed to lower rates. I mean, on their hands and knees," Stahl remarks.

"I would suggest they focus on selling, creating better cars for their customers," Greenspan says.

Continued



Produced By Karen Sughrue
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Add a Comment See all 92 Comments
by drivelphobe September 13, 2007 12:43 PM PDT
Greenspan left the rate too low for too long. That''s obvious now even though most everyone said there was no housing bubble. Well, now the the price has to be paid by those who thought they could beat the system.

A fool and his money will soon be separated. Let the buyer beware. All words of wisdom. Just as the bubble in the stock market took care of the fools and crooks, so will the housing market. Let the prices fall, the foreclosures pile up, and financial instability hit the lenders and their customers. The proper balance will follow as the natural order resumes.

No bail outs. This is a great opportunity for the disciplined investors and people with money and prudent lifestyles.
Reply to this comment
by darvillis September 13, 2007 1:07 PM PDT
I don''t believe a word of this. I am no genius but yet I knew in late 2004 early 2005 what the impact would be on the economy. And for my next perdiction housing prices will drop dramatically and interest rates will rise. This will inspire a new group of folks to buy homes thus starting the cycle all over again.Anybody want to bet?
Reply to this comment
by feelfree1 September 13, 2007 2:28 PM PDT

Re: "Greenspan Defends Low Interest Rates"

Alan Greedscam is as responsible as anyone else for the current collapse of the housing market, and the coming economic contraction.
Reply to this comment
by jjarden September 13, 2007 2:44 PM PDT
What a LIAR! Then he must be the stupidest Economist ever, and he shouldn''t have been in the job. Here we go again, one of the insiders causing havoc with people''s lives, and getting off scott free. When are we the people going to do something about these "Officials"...he should be tarred and feathered.
Reply to this comment
by bthrasher102 September 13, 2007 3:34 PM PDT
Let me see if I have this straight. You think Greenspan should have increased rates so that the economy would tank and we would have been in a recession for 4 years. Good call, you idiots should be in charge of the economy for sure. You can''t blame the guy running the economy for crooked lenders and greedy homeowners. Face it, half of these people who are crying about being foreclosed on knew good and well what they were getting into. They saw a chance to upgrade to a home beyond their means and ignored the risks. Anybody who has gone to college in the past 50 years has probably taken economics and should know that interest rates will rise. The other half (the lower middle class) were taken advantage of by lenders, but once again, most were probably ignoring the risks they knew were there.
Reply to this comment
by boldwin223 September 13, 2007 3:36 PM PDT
"he "didn''t really get it" that the sub-prime lending trend was significant enough to hurt the economy until very late 2005"

Ben Bernanke and the Fed are going to make the same mistake next week!!! If the Federal Reserve does not stop listing to Bush, the MBA, the U.S. is going to be in one hell of a recession. Oh thats right, it will be Bill Clinton''s fault.
Reply to this comment
by bthrasher102 September 13, 2007 3:41 PM PDT
Let me see if I have this straight. You think Greenspan should have increased rates so that the economy would tank and we would have been in a recession for 4 years. Good call, you idiots should be in charge of the economy for sure. You can''t blame the guy running the economy for crooked lenders and greedy homeowners. Face it, half of these people who are crying about being foreclosed on knew good and well what they were getting into. They saw a chance to upgrade to a home beyond their means and ignored the risks. Anybody who has gone to college in the past 50 years has probably taken economics and should know that interest rates will rise. The other half (the lower middle class) were taken advantage of by lenders, but once again, most were probably ignoring the risks they knew were there.
Reply to this comment
by boldwin223 September 13, 2007 3:41 PM PDT
"The budget should be balanced; the treasury should be refilled; public debt should be reduced; and the arrogance of public officials should be controlled." - Cicero. 106-43 B.C.
Reply to this comment
by bthrasher102 September 13, 2007 3:46 PM PDT
Let me see if I have this straight. You think Greenspan should have increased rates so that the economy would tank and we would have been in a recession for 4 years. Good call, you idiots should be in charge of the economy for sure. You can''t blame the guy running the economy for crooked lenders and greedy homeowners. Face it, half of these people who are crying about being foreclosed on knew good and well what they were getting into. They saw a chance to upgrade to a home beyond their means and ignored the risks. Anybody who has gone to college in the past 50 years has probably taken economics and should know that interest rates will rise. The other half (the lower middle class) were taken advantage of by lenders, but once again, most were probably ignoring the risks they knew were there.
Reply to this comment
by boldwin223 September 13, 2007 3:57 PM PDT
"You think Greenspan should have increased rates so that the economy would tank and we would have been in a recession for 4 years."

Posted by bthrasher102 at 03:41 PM : Sep 13, 2007

Yes. Maybe Bush would have stayed out of Iraq and I would be getting more than 1.5% on my savings. Why put money in savings when you can borrow at such low rates. The odds of a recession in the next year have risen from 25 to 50 percent. If you are smart you will get out of the stock market now.
Reply to this comment
by standlee5 September 13, 2007 4:18 PM PDT
I always thought Greenspan was too reactionary and should have let the markets play themselves out more often. But remember he had Y2K, dotcom and nasdaq bubble, 9/11, and Iraq war. It couldn''t have been easy. Still, we have a free market for a reason. Let it play out.
Reply to this comment
by darvillis September 13, 2007 5:55 PM PDT
BTHRASHER102 Hey we get it OK how about an original thought ! Yes, Greenspan is to blame along with everyone who knew it was a bad Idea. Sure the people who got over their heads are responsable for their own situation but remember they just wanted a piece of the american dream.The lenders should have warned the not to savy and the Goverment should have stopped the crazy lending,but oh yea they all wanted to make money and clear out to wait for the next sucker scheme to come along. I am just sorry that so many people are so naive.There is no law against preying on the not to financially savey.
Reply to this comment
by walt1944-2009 September 13, 2007 6:04 PM PDT
One day, China will call all its outstanding loans with the US and bankrupt the country. The Chinese, with their 1,000,000 man army will march into the US to claim its infrastructure as collateral, much as a typical US mortage lender will repo your house if you don''t pay the mortgage.

Prepare for the day when we will be all working the fields growing rice, like the Cambodians did under the Khmer Rouge, while the big shot businessmen and political crooks will be laughing at us from their offshore villas.

LONG LIVE THE AMERICAN DREAM (PROBABLY NIGHTMARE)!!!

SIG HEIL, BUSH!!!

Reply to this comment
by vancouverboo September 13, 2007 6:48 PM PDT
The inevitable crash keeps getting postponed with more and more cheap money. It''s just going to be worse when it arrives. You can only hold off duesday so long. Europe, China, Japan and Arabia are converting out of dollars as discretely as they can. No one wants to tip their hand to the rest of the world. No one wants the panic, yet. When it comes they will dump dollars as fast as they can. The more cheap money there is, the more they will have to dump. Find a crack to hide in, brothers.
Reply to this comment
by lizardbate September 13, 2007 7:11 PM PDT
To bthrasher??? You must not be a home owner yourself. All these foreclosures are going to cost you as well. However, I agree with your thoughts on greedy lenders, which the government does support, I think they should lose the tales. And, I agree with you that people purchased homes they could not afford, but everybody would like to own a home and they were offered a chance from the golddiggers and it did''t work out.
Reply to this comment
by Skysblue September 13, 2007 9:14 PM PDT
If you believe Greenspan''s take on this...that he was caught off guard.....well I have some tap water to sell you. Only an idiot could have not seen this coming.

If you believe his story then you must be part of the same group that believes the US government has done all it can to stop illegals from crossing out borders.

Wake up. Both of these disasters happened knowingly without government intervention because both benefit wealthy business owners and stockholders. Period.
Reply to this comment
by gmcnally2 September 14, 2007 8:19 AM PDT
I never knew what money really was until I watched ''Money Masters'' on Google video. The Federeal Reserve is a Private bank. As such, they are about profits and not some moral obligation to protect Americans. Business cycles redistribute wealth and it ends up in the hands of, guess who?, the already ultra-rich. The Fed CAUSED the Great Depression on purpose, the withdrawl of money from the system is well documented. We pay almost a trillion dollars a year in taxpayer money for the interest payment on our loans, and for no reason whatsoever. Close the Fed, let the government regulate $, keep the interest. Say ''No, Thanks'' to the Europeans and English who truly run this country. Say ''No Thanks'' to a Debt-Based and unsupportable economic system. Say No more inflation (hidden tax). All this could be regulated and stabilized very easily.
Reply to this comment
by gino171-2009 September 14, 2007 10:56 AM PDT
to walt1944. you are right. scary isn''t it. i am tired of everything made in china. lets bring back our jobs.
Reply to this comment
by hypnotoad72 September 14, 2007 1:17 PM PDT
walt1944 - China cannot sell their investments; their credibility is so far down the gutter... and given how they''ve treated the US with toxic and poorly made products, do you think they''ve got any credibility in attempting what you are suggesting?

Besides, we''re a global marketplace in a globalized economy. Neither side has much of a footing, because we wouldn''t give enemy countries technology and jobs; that and other events have shown China was our friend. Bill Clinton certainly thought so by giving them the MFN status...
Reply to this comment
by lars008-2009 September 14, 2007 2:59 PM PDT
Posted by walt1944 at 06:04 PM : Sep 13, 2007

it will never happen moonbat...

FASCIST NAZI TERRORISLAM / PERFECT EXAMPLE OF FASCISM!!!

Fascist nazi terrorislam is intent on killing or enslaving all non muslims......

Why is there no muslim country that grants equal rights to non muslim citizens???

The most notable characteristic of a fascist country is the separation and persecution or denial of equality to a specific segment of the population based upon superficial qualities or belief systems.
Simply stated, a fascist government always has one class of citizens that is considered superior (good) to another (bad) based upon race, creed or origin. It is possible to be both a republic and a fascist state. The preferred class lives in a republic while the oppressed class lives in a fascist state.
http://www.couplescompany.com/Features/Politics/Structure3.htm
Reply to this comment
by lars008-2009 September 14, 2007 3:01 PM PDT
Posted by walt1944 at 06:04 PM : Sep 13, 2007

DEMONIC-RATS SOLD THE USA OUT TO CHINA!!!

The tale of shady Chinese Clinton donors avoiding U.S. justice is a familiar one that dates back to the 1996 Clinton-Gore fundraising scandal known as Chinagate. The Clintons took millions in laundered foreign campaign donations from Chinese Communists in exchange for liberalizing trade policy with China, dropping pending indictments against influential Chinese figures, spots on a U.S. trade mission and overnight stays at the White House.
Many of the Chinagate donors were successfully prosecuted even though Clinton Attorney General Janet Reno blocked investigators%u2019 efforts at the Justice Department. More than 100 people connected to the fundraising scandal fled the country, however. Norman Hsu seems to be following their lead.
http://www.corruptionchronicles.com/2007/09/hillary_donor_flees_like_china.html
Reply to this comment
by lars008-2009 September 14, 2007 3:02 PM PDT
Posted by walt1944 at 06:04 PM : Sep 13, 2007

and you thought gonzales was bad...

HSU A NO HSU AT HEARING%u2026 LOL
Democratic Donor a No Show at Hearing
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070906/D8RFKG500.html
Dems Dirty Donor Norman Hsu Fails to Show for Bail Reduction Hearing Leading to Speculation He''s On the Run
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,295828,00.html
china buys usa elections???
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=chinese+campaign contributions democrat
Big Source of Clinton''s Cash Is an Unlikely Address
Family''s Donations Closely Track Those Of Top Fund-Raiser
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118826947048110677.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news
Report: Hillary Clinton Big Money Donor Wanted for Grand Theft
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Hillary Clinton Big Money Donor Wanted for Grand Theft&btnG=Search
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,295031,00.html
Leading Clinton Donor Stays Below the Radar
http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB118835199704811801.html?mod=blog
''DIRTY CASH'' MAN FLEES
http://www.nypost.com/seven/03042007/news/nationalnews/pro_clinton_dirty_cash_man_flees_nationalnews_christine_field.htm
RNC pushing the China angle
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0807/RNC_Pushing_the_China_angle.html
Democrats Turn From Big Donor Who%u2019s Fugitive
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/31/us/politics/31hsu.html?ei=5065&en=c3f5afa614172532&ex=1189224000&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print
Reply to this comment
by lars008-2009 September 14, 2007 3:04 PM PDT
Posted by walt1944 at 06:04 PM : Sep 13, 2007

SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION IN THE DEMONIC-RAT PARTY
FBI arrests 11 NJ officials for bribery
All of them are Democrats.
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2007/09/fbi_arrests_11_nj_officials_fo.html
systemic corruption in the Democratic Party
Corruption sting crosses N.J.
12 charged in a widening investigation that began with contracts in an Atlantic County school district.
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/local/20070907_Corruption_sting_crosses_N_J_.html
Hillary campaign honcho among 11 busted in N.J. sting
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wn_report/2007/09/07/2007-09-07_hillary_campaign_honcho_among_11_busted_.html
11 Arrested in N.J. Corruption Inquiry
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/07/nyregion/06corruptCND.html?em&ex=1189310400&en=b504d6c2fbd19cba&ei=5087%0A
Castro''s tip: Clinton-Obama the winning ticket
http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN2825114320070829?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&rpc=22&sp=true
Kathleen Willey: Clintons stole my manuscript
House burglary over weekend targeted copy of book days after details leaked to press
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/staticarticles/article57498.html
Reply to this comment
by sharncedar September 15, 2007 1:39 PM PDT
The most notable characteristic of a fascist country is the separation and persecution or denial of equality to a specific segment of the population based upon superficial qualities or belief systems.

Posted by lars008 at 02:59 PM : Sep 14, 2007

Actually the most notable aspect of a fascist country is the belief in the supremacy of the state over the individual, plus a darwinistic right-wing philosophy. Read the writings of Mussolini, for example. Perhpas I should point out that Mussolini was a famous actual fascist from history, for those who like George Bush had a C+ average and skipped history class.

The Darwinistic right-wing philosophy is also an important component to fascism, as there have been several other state-centric government systems that were based on left-wing collectivist philosophy.

By these criteria, Islam meets the criteria of extreme right-wing philosophy in social matters, but it is not Darwinistic because ther isn''t that strong pseudo-capitalism where the strong survive, or the rich get richer, or the rich deserve to be rich. Islam is also not state-centric, it spans many states and considers the nation/state to be secondary to religion. A very bad candidate for the label "fascism", while George Bush and his followers such as lars are very good candidates for the label "fascism".


Reply to this comment
by feelfree1 September 15, 2007 2:38 PM PDT

It will be funny to watch Alan Greedscam squirm and sweat, as the level of anger against him grows, for having ceated the housing market bubble and the unfolding collapse, out of his own stupidity, short-sightedness, and greed.
Reply to this comment
by crater7 September 15, 2007 2:54 PM PDT
GREENSPAN SHARPLY CRITICIZES BUSH''S ADMINISTRATION AND REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL LEADERS FOR PUTTING POLITICAL IMPERATIVES AHEAD OF SOUND ECONOMIC POLICIES.

"LITTLE VALUE WAS PLACED ON RIGOROUS ECONOMIC POLICY DEBATE OR THE WEIGHING OF LONG-TERM CONSEQUENCES BY THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION. GREENSPAN UNSUCESSFULLY URGED THE WHITE HOUSE TO VETO "OUT-OF-CONTROLL" SPENDING BILLS WHILE THE REPUBLICANS CONTROLLED CONGRESS.

REPUBLICANS "DESERVED" TO LOSE THE CONTROL OF CONGRESS IN LAST YEARS ELECTION BECAUSE IN THEIR WILLINGNESS TO APPROVE SPENDING MEASURES THAT WOULD BENEFIT REPUBLICANS EVEN AT THE COST OF FISCAL PRUDENCE, THEY " SWAPPED PRINCIPLE FOR POWER''

STAY THE COURSE................
Reply to this comment
by fizzal-2009 September 15, 2007 4:31 PM PDT
Stop playing with the money and just hire a few social workers to place someone in your home and if you can,t pay the mortgage just rent a room to help with the expenses.
Reply to this comment
by tylenol6 September 15, 2007 5:46 PM PDT
The wizard evil and slimeball Alan Greenspan knew exactly what he was doing. Anyone would have to be a
complete idiot not to think people wouldn''t jump on this and go and buy a house knowing they had **** poor credit. Idiot Bush will of course bail out the banks, but it sure looks like to me the buyers who signed those hefty mortgages will lose their homes. They should have understood what they were signing......

Reply to this comment
by sharncedar September 15, 2007 6:15 PM PDT
Why is that disgusting old thief still in the media? Why does he feel the need to trot out his disgraceful traitor self? Because, like OJ, the enormous guilt he bears keeps him from resting. He cannot quietly reture with satisfaction because he committed such enormous infamy not only against his country, but agaisnt his own values. That''s right, the young Alan Greenspan wrote and talked about the importance of the Fed not using its powers to serve the thieving hedge fund types on Wall Street, but rather to serve a sound economy. Then in office, after he got that sick and perverted young journalist as a wife, he went over completely to the dark side. He ran our currency and our country into the ground. We will certainly pay for the thievery of this man and his corrupt friends for many, many years.

There was never a reason to put the interest rates below 5%, let alone below 2%. There could never be a reason, short of catastrophic tradgedy such as the loss of half the nation, to keep interest rates below 2% for four years.

Alan Greenspan said it best when he said himself that inflation (and by the same argument any wanton increase in he M2 money supply whether ro not you call it "inflation") is the most evil kind of tax. too bad his younger self didn''t commit suicide, and save us all the giref we are embarked upon.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet September 15, 2007 8:18 PM PDT
lars? You on this late? How you doing you old Nazi... didn''t have a klan rally tonight huh? Is there EVER an American that doesn''t agree with you that you doing hate? I mean really! Just think if the founding fathers hadn''t been more liberal than you where we''d be? There would be no Bill of Rights, your Con brothers apposed it according to records.... come to think of it there would be NO democracy, you guys wanted to keep the king. Is THAT the reason you look at the slime monkey a few still call a President like you do. I mean there has NEVER been a bigger screw up than Bush but you losers just keep saying Yes Master. If it were left to you losers we''d still have Rummy running defense and Bush would still be telling us to stay the course, we''re winning! ROFLMAO I guess Jefferson was right, keeping you reminds us of how bad things were before. Sieg Heil Y''all. ROFLMAO
Reply to this comment
by tnt1954 September 15, 2007 9:10 PM PDT
like they need us. for what? its all arranged comrades. **** computerus, androids running
things, and we just ''vanish'', as ''unnecessary''.
see, we''re ''deadweight''. corporate streamlining.
and bill gates and melinda will have their
train set to play with.
Reply to this comment
by drinuk September 15, 2007 10:12 PM PDT
The collapse in the housing market is a contrived policy by lenders. First, they lend to anyone with or without the means to repay, that in turn creates false increased valuations and false demand. Then, when borrowers can''t repay they pull the rug and place the property on their books usually at a greater value than the original loan. Having held the item for a little time and together with a friendly re-seller it is sold at a greater short term profit than they would have made from the interest. Crooked banks just love repossessions and never loose on the deals, always selling for more than the original debt, even if they have previously sold the debt they still earn on the resale irrespective of the fall in valuations. Profit made should go back to the original borrower but he or she is by then out of the equation.

It is a policy designed by the Elite for the Elite which they repeat at intervals and at a monumental cost to usually ordinary but naive people. Even if they cannot make the desired margin per property immediately they will place it on the rental sector until prices improve, it''s win, win and is repeated all over the country a million times. However deep the so called depression is hyped up, the crooks clean up.

Oh! and they love developers with a street full of new unsold properties, someone up the line is going to take his profit when they call in his loan too.




Reply to this comment
by tnichlsn September 15, 2007 10:20 PM PDT
This administration is run by the same people who were in charge when the Texas real estate market collapsed under similar circumstance. The rest of the US had to bail out the crooks from TX, I wonder who will be in a position to pick up the pieces when the national disaster kicks in fully? We''d all better start practicing our Mandarin.
Reply to this comment
by actornaught September 15, 2007 10:55 PM PDT
A small prediction: as free trade trends down our incomes and lifestyles, real estate values will decline. Either people making $20k will have property they can afford, or more likely, there will be just a few landowners holding most real estate.

On a partially related note, are there tax breaks for commercial property left empty?
Reply to this comment
by actornaught September 16, 2007 12:17 AM PDT
Even tho it''s been news all day, this right-wing CBS news hasn''t reported that Greenspan is a huge detractor of little bush, and most liked how Clinton handled the budget.

How dare CBS pander so...
Reply to this comment
by atr98 September 16, 2007 1:56 PM PDT
The Fed keeps bailing out Wall Street.

Low interest rates destroyed motivation for savings accouts. Low rates prevented workers from saving. Who would open a saving account, paying 2% interest or less. After inflation and taxes - It is a loss.

Money was diverted into other assets. Stock Market bubbles and Real Estate Bubbles.

Greenspan was the cause - Not the cure.

Now we are a nation, with high debt and low savings.

The Greenspan experment did not work.
Low rates

To correct the problems caused by ultra-low interest rates - Interest rates will have to be raised above the norm.........

The out come. Debt held by Japan and China will crash. China has never experienced the downside of capitalism.

Higher rates will result in lower debt levels, and higher savings.
Reply to this comment
by cherylez September 16, 2007 8:20 PM PDT
Geez, Lesley Stahl clearly doesn''t know her stuff. Twice she referred to Greenspan as someone working for the Government...what a disgrace! She asked if he misses working for the government...For God''s sake...he is a Private Banker...he never worked for the government. Then she asks if he misses his boss, George Bush...again George Bush doesn''t control the Private Central Bank.

Aren''t there editors who review this *** before it''s aired? I just lost a LOT of respect for 60 minutes!
What other MYTHS are you reporting on?

What a sham! What a disgrace to mislead the American Public on this issue. Fed Reserve is NOT part of the Federal government at all...and anyone who controls the money...Controls the People!

Abolish the Federal Reserve NOW!
Reply to this comment
by aftf_truth September 16, 2007 8:22 PM PDT
Furious!!!!
LS asked if he invests after leaving "the government"? The Fed Reserve is NOT a government entity! A private banking institution that makes money off the American taxpayers, keeping the public in a state of serfdom. Get your facts right, and tell the truth!
Reply to this comment
by bshlensky-2009 September 16, 2007 8:32 PM PDT
Great interview . It was old 60 minutes ,meshing personality, challenges and disucssion . Why does Greenspan acknowledge his praise of clinton and Hillary and thier economic polices . However he criticizes Bush''s tax cut execution and still says he is a republican . Has he read to much Ayn Rand ?
Reply to this comment
by hannahunter September 16, 2007 8:44 PM PDT
I have never heard anything more rediculous...as a real estate agent for nearly 20 years, in many different markets this has been the most challenging. And, now I have been for quite sometime tossing around the idea of moving on to another proffession. Why??? Idiot!!!
Reply to this comment
by jcray140292 September 16, 2007 8:45 PM PDT
LS interviews Al Greenspan. She asks and he responds about his dislikes for Nixon & the Bushs. He liked Ford personally. He responds fondly over the Clintons. Why no comment of Carter? Could it be that CBS and LS wanted no part of denigrating a Democratic Bafoon who nearly ruined the entire country, kind-heartedly that is!
Reply to this comment
by pjw5610 September 16, 2007 8:58 PM PDT
Leslie Stahl had a perfect opportunity to give us insight in to one of the most interesting and capable people in modern financial governement. Instead the interview and presentation was typical of the nauseating feeding frenzy for the negative and "flip" attitude that has bcome the core of US news today.
Reply to this comment
by kdf_worf September 16, 2007 9:27 PM PDT
Strange....LS kept the story about Greenspan''s life in Public service, but not his dislike of Jr''s handeling of the US......although they did get to cheyney''s dislike of Greenspan.....briefly.

But, as ususual, they whitewash any hatred of this administration, and it''s inept handeling of the War, and the american public at large.
Reply to this comment
by muggs1114 September 16, 2007 9:28 PM PDT
I''m extremely disappointed in the Alan Greenspan segment or your recent program. You failed to air his opinion on George W. Bush and his view on the Iraq war and its connection to oil. In reviewing his past you illuminated things that no longer are prevalent. A review of Greenspan''s recent book tells of Greenspan''s adverse opinion on Bush''s spending and his disappointment that the Iraq war and its oil connection has been hidden from the public. This is what matters today. Is sixty minutes and Ms. Stall afraid of riling the present administration. You fail to tackle the hard questions. It is obvious that you are afraid to front the issues that really impact America. Sixty minutes in my opinion has become a soft, inconsequential television magazine. I would be just as well served as watching reruns of the Simpsons.
Reply to this comment
by donbl1 September 16, 2007 9:31 PM PDT
I was disappointed in Leslie Stahl today, also.

Her lack of understanding indicates she was the wrong person for the interview. Don''t any of the 60 minutes crew have more than a journalism education...... somebody (the producer?) has got to know the subject to make it work.

As much as I respect Greenspan''s dedication to his Fed role, I do think he could have waited a little while longer before publishing. I don''t think he needs to justify his performance nor his decisions. He did a good job. His only other reason for the book would then be publicity which I always thought was below him.
Reply to this comment
by tnt1954 September 16, 2007 10:06 PM PDT
and everyone became multi-millionaires, so they
never had to work anymore, and we had to import
foreign labor to do all the real work. and lo
and behold there were more foreigners in america
than natives. and lo and behold the foreigners
now own america. and lo and behold the national
debt is now 9 trillion dollars. and lo and behold
everyone became beholden way in debt, and lo and
behold nobody could pay the inflated price, and
besides the foreginers had all the money. and
lo and behold the pay toilet, 60 dollars a flush
came into being, including taxes.
Reply to this comment
by feelfree1 September 16, 2007 10:06 PM PDT

Alan Greedscam will bear the brunt of the blame for destroying the U.S. economy, and sending us into a deep and painful recession.

His idiotic and greedy policies will almost certainly lead to crippling stag-flation.
Reply to this comment
by suckanegg-2009 September 16, 2007 10:25 PM PDT
MR GREENSPAN IS OF *** AND IS DOUBLE FACED SOB. HE IS A VAIN AND STUPID. LESLIE STAHL IS TOO DUMB TO INTERVIEW THIS SLIMY SKUNK . IF YOU DON''T KNOW YOUR HISTORY MAKE ROOM FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO DO THE JOB. I THINK YOU NEED TO INTERVIEW SOMEONE TO CHECKMATE THIS SENILE IDIOT AND SETTING HIM STRAIGHT BECAUSE HE IS STUPID LIAR.
Reply to this comment
by bpech September 16, 2007 10:41 PM PDT
I just watch the interview. Lousy job Lesly! You should have left the former fed chairman talk and not interrupt him all the time.
Reply to this comment
by jakemi6 September 16, 2007 10:43 PM PDT
Did I just hear Leslie Stahl advocate the restriction of speech? Would she have asked the question about restricting statements by former Fed chairmen had she liked what Mr. Greenspan said? Free speech should not apply only to popular speech. Tough unpopular statements are precisely the kind of speech that requires protection. Perhaps Ms. Stahl needs a refresher course in basic civics.
Reply to this comment
See all 92 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
60 Minutes RSS Feed