Poll: More Think The "Surge" Is Helping
35% Say Iraq War Strategy Is Making Things Better, 70% Doubt Iraqi Government
-
Play CBS Video Video Eye To Eye: Gen. Petraeus
Gen. David Petraeus takes Katie Couric on a tour of Fallujah, which he sees as an example of how Iraq can make a comeback.
-
Video Eye To Eye: Iraqi Refugee
Only On The Web: Leaving the dangers of Iraq, one refugee starts a new life in Syria with nothing.
-
Video Al-Assad: False Allegations
CBS News Exclusive: Syrian President Bashar al-Assad tells Katie Couric that his country does not support terrorism, and criticizes the U.S. for mistakes made in Iraq.
-
A U.S. soldier patrols through the streets of the Kadamiyah neighborhood September 8, 2007 in Baghdad, Iraq. (Getty Images)
-
Interactive Battle For Iraq The government, the insurgency, key players, background and photos.
U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker and Gen. David Petraeus are expected to warn Congress on Monday that making any significant changes to the current war strategy will jeopardize the limited security and political progress made so far.
Later in the week, Mr. Bush plans a national address.
The poll finds 35 percent say the surge has made things better, up from 29 percent last month and 19 percent in July. Only 12 percent say it has made things worse, but nearly half see no change in either direction, according to the poll.
NOW: IMPACT OF U.S. TROOP SURGE
Made things better
Made things worse
No impact
AUGUST, 2007: IMPACT OF U.S. TROOP SURGE
Made things better
Made things worse
No impact
Belief that the U.S. is winning the war in Iraq has grown a bit since January. Still, that perception is well below the levels of early 2006, and most Americans continue to see the war as a stalemate.
NOW: WHO IS WINNING IN IRAQ?
The U.S.
The insurgents
Neither side
JANUARY, 2006: WHO IS WINNING IN IRAQ?
The U.S.
The insurgents
Neither side
On the political front, Americans overwhelmingly criticize the Iraqi government, the poll finds. Just 22 percent say the Iraqi government is meeting a relatively low bar - doing all it can realistically be expected do to bring about stability in Iraq. 70 percent say it is not meeting that standard.
On the military front, Americans' views of the impact of the "surge" strategy are divided by political affiliation. Fifty-six percent of Republicans think surge is making things better in Iraq, while only 19 percent of Democrats and 32 percent of Independents do.
When it comes to evaluating the Iraqi government, there is no partisan divide. Less than one in four Republicans say the Iraqi government is doing what it can.
The poll finds a long-term pessimism remains about the Iraqi government: a 53 percent majority thinks Iraq will never become a stable democracy. Almost no one thinks it will occur within a year or two.
WILL IRAQ EVER BECOME A STABLE DEMOCRACY?
Yes, in year or two
Yes, but will take longer
No, never
The poll finds that, in retrospect, a majority of Americans view the war in Iraq as a mistake.
DID U.S. MAKE A MISTAKE GETTING INVOLVED IN IRAQ?
Yes
No
Eighty-six percent of Democrats and 68 percent of Independents say the war was a mistake, while 31 percent of Republicans agree, according to the poll.
The 62 percent figure is reminiscent of the numbers recorded in Gallup Polls in the early 1970’s when respondents were asked whether the U.S. made a mistake getting involved in Vietnam. Sixty-one percent thought the Vietnam war was a mistake in May, 1971, and 60 percent thought American involvement in Vietnam was a mistake in January, 1973, according to Gallup polls.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Michelle Obama tells how her role as the First Lady has changed her perspective.





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 13
- next
See all 251 Comments"mudrose" kind of reminds me of "*** blossom"
Posted by gretagreen at 03:59 PM : Sep 10, 2007
I think our government has a hand in that. Something on the order we will not show the caskets of fallen military you see? We do not see a count of killed wounded either rolling across the bottom of your screen. The better question is why are our media falling into this trap and denying us this information so the war will look good, Propaganda.You tell me?
-Tell PetAreUs, that Iraqis can better sense the security in Iraq then him, and his aides moving around in Apache Choppers and Armored Tanks, and probing.
-The real probers have done their jobs of decent journalism and are reporting to your lap-petty highness that security has deteriorated in the last six months. Ignorant, half-brained! You think that Fellow Americans will believe you?
-You too, will be held responsible of the embezzlement your boss has started with the illegal invasion of Iraq.
its helping more and more americans die everyday.
its been a big help
"mudrose" kind of reminds me of "*** blossom"
These results also show that all the right wing neocon nutjobs that live on these boards all day long are the few crazies left in support of Bush and his seven years of failures.
I will not support any candidate or leader who votes to give any more money for the Iraq war. We have lost (wasted and actually lost) too much money over there already (spent almost one trillion). We need our money here along with our soldiers.
OUT OF IRAQ NOW (or as soon as possible)!!!
Posted by getagrip54
Mill attempts to reply to misconceptions about utilitarianism, and thereby delineate the theory. Mill observes that many people misunderstand utilitarianism by interpreting utility as in opposition to pleasure. In reality, utility is defined as pleasure itself, and the absence of pain. Thus another name for utility is the Greatest Happiness Principle. This principle holds that "actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure." Pleasure and the absence of pain are, by this account, the only things desirable as ends in themselves, the only things inherently "good." Thus, any other circumstance, event, or experience is desirable only insofar as it is a source for such pleasure; actions are good when they lead to a higher level of general happiness, and bad when they decrease that level.
Mill like the rest of the secular progressives lives by the pleasure principle. There is no morality in utility other than what feels good. Like Marcuse if it feels good do it or do your own thing. It''s the only thing your people concentrate on. That''s why according to him Conservatives are stupid. They happen to think, unlike you.
Posted by leftyintexas
Well, that''''s because dimwits are so surefooted in their delusions and immorality. Nothing could ever move the conscience or astound the spirit. After all, the believe is in the survival of the fittest so therefore you die, well then you weren''''t fit to live. Isn''''t that how it goes lefy?
Posted by mudrose"
Here''s another quote for you mudrose, fits right in with your comments - "Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives."(John Stuart Mill)
[Posted by mudrose at 10:41 AM : Sep 10, 2007]
that''s not a problem at all ... cause that''s obsolete technology ... we got nuc-u-lar technology now ... and it''s all in bush''s head.
either way ... nobody has died ... the world wasn''t made less safe ... an arms race in the middle east wasn''t fueled ... and the price of oil didn''t triple.
idiot!
'' ... if you want seven billion songs and dances and get well soon bouquets, just bomb vanhatten and they will be yours, but why bother, you can have them anyway just by asking for them ... ''
'' ... the garden was crafted of useless star swallowing compost that craves to breathe and drink ... and to dance like haphazard moss draped across haphazard bones of branches swishing around in haphazard dirt splintered with speckles of drip air and drip water and drip fertile ... ''
STANDING IN THE DARK TELLING EVERYONE IT IS DAYLIGHT!
It is time to cut the funding for the Bush Cheney Oil war.
Bush & Cheney should go to jail over these acts!
Posted by mocaleo
Gee, too bad you weren''t so upset when Clinton gave nuclear secrets to the chinese.
Posted by leftyintexas
Well, that''s because dimwits are so surefooted in their delusions and immorality. Nothing could ever move the conscience or astound the spirit. After all, the believe is in the survival of the fittest so therefore you die, well then you weren''t fit to live. Isn''t that how it goes lefy?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 13
- next
See all 251 Comments