Justice Department Nixes Net Neutrality
The Justice Department on Thursday said Internet service providers should be allowed to charge a fee for priority Web traffic.
The agency told the Federal Communications Commission, which is reviewing high-speed Internet practices, that it is opposed to "Net neutrality," the principle that all Internet sites should be equally accessible to any Web user.
Several phone and cable companies, such as AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Comcast Corp., have previously said they want the option to charge some users more money for loading certain content or Web sites faster than others.
The Justice Department said imposing a Net neutrality regulation could hamper development of the Internet and prevent service providers from upgrading or expanding their networks. It could also shift the "entire burden of implementing costly network expansions and improvements onto consumers," the agency said in its filing.
Such a result could diminish or delay network expansion and improvement, it added.
The agency said providing different levels of service is common, efficient and could satisfy consumers. As an example, it cited that the U.S. Postal Service charges customers different guarantees and speeds for package delivery, ranging from bulk mail to overnight delivery.
"Whether or not the same type of differentiated products and services will develop on the Internet should be determined by market forces, not regulatory intervention," the agency said in its filing.
The agency's stance comes more than two months after Federal Trade Commission Chairwoman Deborah Platt Majoras cautioned policy makers to enact Net neutrality regulation.
Such a regulation could prevent rather than promote Internet investment and innovation and have "significant negative effects for the economy and consumers," the Justice Department said in the filing.
Supporters of Internet regulation have said that phone and cable companies could discriminate against certain Web site and services. However, the agency said it will continue to monitor and enforce any anticompetitive conduct to ensure a competitive broadband marketplace.
© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The agency told the Federal Communications Commission, which is reviewing high-speed Internet practices, that it is opposed to "Net neutrality," the principle that all Internet sites should be equally accessible to any Web user.
Several phone and cable companies, such as AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Comcast Corp., have previously said they want the option to charge some users more money for loading certain content or Web sites faster than others.
The Justice Department said imposing a Net neutrality regulation could hamper development of the Internet and prevent service providers from upgrading or expanding their networks. It could also shift the "entire burden of implementing costly network expansions and improvements onto consumers," the agency said in its filing.
Such a result could diminish or delay network expansion and improvement, it added.
The agency said providing different levels of service is common, efficient and could satisfy consumers. As an example, it cited that the U.S. Postal Service charges customers different guarantees and speeds for package delivery, ranging from bulk mail to overnight delivery.
"Whether or not the same type of differentiated products and services will develop on the Internet should be determined by market forces, not regulatory intervention," the agency said in its filing.
The agency's stance comes more than two months after Federal Trade Commission Chairwoman Deborah Platt Majoras cautioned policy makers to enact Net neutrality regulation.
Such a regulation could prevent rather than promote Internet investment and innovation and have "significant negative effects for the economy and consumers," the Justice Department said in the filing.
Supporters of Internet regulation have said that phone and cable companies could discriminate against certain Web site and services. However, the agency said it will continue to monitor and enforce any anticompetitive conduct to ensure a competitive broadband marketplace.
Popular in SciTech
- Chinese supercomputer named world's fastest
- Valentina Tereshkova: First woman in space 13 Photos
- Airborne laser reveals hidden city in Cambodia
- NASA picks 8 new astronauts, 4 of them women
- "Tweet" added to Oxford English Dictionary
- Russian tycoon seeks human immortality by 2045
- Apple unveils overhaul of iOS 7, new iTunes Radio
- Solar plane lands at Dulles Airport Play Video
BThrasher, net neutrality is not about creating one level of service for customers; the idea is that without regulation to protect net neutrality, broadband providers will charge an extra fee (on top of any connectivity charges) to website owners.
I''m not surprised that you''re confused, though: the way the Justice department makes the analogy between these levels of service and the USPS is not only confusing but intellectually dishonest.
BThrasher, net neutrality is not about creating one level of service for customers; the idea is that without regulation to protect net neutrality, broadband providers will charge an extra fee (on top of any connectivity charges) to website owners.
I''m not surprised that you''re confused, though: the way the Justice department makes the analogy between these levels of service and the USPS is not only confusing but intellectually dishonest.
BThrasher, net neutrality is not about creating one level of service for customers; the idea is that without regulation to protect net neutrality, broadband providers will charge an extra fee (on top of any connectivity charges) to website owners.
I''m not surprised that you''re confused, though: the way the Justice department makes the analogy between these levels of service and the USPS is not only confusing but intellectually dishonest.
BROADBAND IS FASTER.
MOST BUSINESSES ARE ON A NETWORK AND THAT CAN BE DIAL UP AS MOST ARE.
THE MORE COMPUTERS ON A NETWORK THE SLOWER THEY ARE.
Posted by ke6960
No, they KNOW they can lie, and that many will believe it, while the majority who don''t can''t do anything about it anyway.
Boycotts anyone?
- President John F. Kennedy, January 29, 1961
It is time to get the lead out.
take me to your $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $