Ben Stein Says Craig Was Lynched Twice
Commentator Says GOP Senator Was Set-Up By "Stalinist" Police, And Then Tossed Overboard By Own Party
-
Photo
Ben Stein says Republican Sen. Larry Craig has been lynched twice first by the Minneapolis police, and secondly by the leaders of his own party. (AP)
-
Photo Essay
Larry Craig
Idaho senator embroiled in scandal after arrest at Minneapolis airport comes to light.
The whole story of Senator Larry Craig, the Republican of Idaho who announced his resignation yesterday, is a nightmare of out-of-control police and weak politicians.
Senator Craig has been the innocent victim of a set-up by the evil-minded police of Minneapolis-St. Paul that Stalin would have admired.
Here's the deal: Senator Craig went into a men's room at the Twin Cities airport. He entered a lavatory stall. He tapped his foot. He may or may not have reached his hand down under the lavatory partition to pick up a piece of paper or to make a signal.
That's it. That's the whole thing. There was no sex act of any kind.
So the policeman who happened to be in the next stall walks Senator Craig off, starts bullying him, accusing him of lying and, implicitly, threatens to ruin Senator Craig's career.
ALL FOR A MAN TAPPING HIS FOOT IN A PUBLIC BATHROOM.
This is insane.
If a police officer can wreck a man's career over this trifle, then we might as well not have a Constitution or a Bill of Rights.
Look, I spend a lot of time in Idaho. These are good people. I can readily see why a Senator from there would quietly plead guilty to a small charge rather than risk a public fight - even though the police seem to have wrecked Craig's career anyway.
What I don't understand is why the GOP is tossing Senator Craig overboard as if he were a terrorist.
Even if it turns Senator Craig is gay, so what? Barney Frank is gay and he's one of the best members of the Congress. There are lots of fine gay public servants.
Senator Craig has been the victim of a police lynching. A party that believes in individual rights should be rallying to his defense, not making him walk the plank.
Shame on the GOP leadership, and utter disgrace to the airport police and their thug behavior.
These are security people in airports. Hello! An airport? Don't they have anything better to do?
© MMVII, CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Video and Galleries from Sunday Morning
- Latest in Sunday Morning
- Rediscovering Henry Hudson
- Some Educated Opinions on Pundits
- MTV's Bill Flanagan On Jackson's Music



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 7
- next
See all 326 CommentsIf hypocrisy was against the law we''d have to put a fence around pretty much the whole country and call it prison. It has certainly never been in short supply in Washington.
After I listened to the tape of the policeman and Craig I had not doubts whatsoever why that manipulative little worm was on toilet detail at the airport. I doubt if anybody else on the force can stand having him around.
If I decide to go out tonight, have a few beers, drive down on the nastiest street in town and innocently ask a strange girl under the streetlight for a date, that does not mean that I am soliciting prostitution. Maybe I like night owls. I hope you will speak for me at my arraignment, Mr Stein.
Additionally, your comparison of Craig to Barney Frank is ludicrous. Craig, if he is gay, is a self loathing self agrandizing buffoon who uses his power to keep *** as second class citizens, who votes against any equality measure for ***, who votes for discrimination against *** while simultaneously and anonymously playing bathroom antics with men. It shocks the conscience that you could make such a comparison. The sheer ignorance you displayed by broadcasting such nonsense is stunning. You owe Barney Frank an apology and you need to wake up to what Craig is. He''s a pervert of the highest order and he''s got you convinced he''s not.
I agree. We now seem to live in a media world where good, productive ideas and facts are far less important than opinions.
Who brought this story to national attention anyway?
I agree. We now seem to live in a media world where good, productive ideas and facts are far less important than opinions.
Who brought this story to national attention anyway? I guess he was just doing his job.
I''m a registered Democrat, by the way.
I agree. We now seem to live in a media world that extends into the real world. A world where good, productive ideas and facts are far less important than opinions and innuendo.
Who brought this story to national attention anyway? I guess he was just doing his job.
First there''s the issue of police entrapment and the question of whether Idaho crime rates are so wonderfully low that law enforcement has nothing better to do than to try to out closeted gay men. I agree that the foot tapping is flimsy evidence to arrest somebody on, let alone to ruin their career.
Having said that, I think it''s pretty clear (from common sense if perhaps not from the legally questionable evidence) that the senator is indeed gay, and that he was indeed trying to hook up with another guy in a public bathroom. If this had been John Q Public, or perhaps a congressman whose policies focused exclusively on important national issues and not on meddling in people''s *** lives, then it should have been a non-news event - perhaps handled with some small fine. But because this congressman is 1) Republican and 2) somewhat outspoken on *** issues, that makes him a TOTALLY valid target, deserving of all the public ridicule and the ruined political career.
It''s a question of hypocrisy, plain and simple. If you live in a glass house...
Aside from this subject, can someone please explain why this third rate actor-wannabe (Stein) is regarded by some news organizations as some sort of pundit whose opinions matter to anyone? This right-wing hack would be the first to condemn the Senator if only he''d been a Democrat.
Where are all the gay people now, who should be supportive of Craig if he is truly gay?
Gee, tapping foot...having PROVEN oral *** in the Oval office...one is adultry with lying to the American Public. The other?
Come on people...this is getting rediculous. I agree with the statement above that many gay people are less tolerant of those that oppose gay behaviour.
The left wing just doesn''t like a right wing Congressman...let''s see - tapping foot or frozen money in your freezer that you had no idea how it got there?
Let''s get real.
but somehow, the other side of the story is isn''t he against gay mariage or something ? and family value''s and stuff ?
when someone ''admits'' or pleads guilty with his expierence just when some officer is bullying, .. i must admit that i don''t believe he ''just'' pleaded guilty of he wanted to get rid of the problem.
that is too much of a shortcut
but .. and in this is Stein right, no matter what, if he got arrested for this, and even indeed he is gay or whatever, then it''s pretty obvious the GOP doesn''t want any gay''s, however, this is also a shortcut, because the GOP just don''t want very obvious hypocrites in it''s party.
i think this is logical to be honest.
(he pleaded guilty, so conclusion: he pleaded guilty), not that that does matter, but in contrast of being against gay marriage and value of family and betraying his wife (she might get disseases from him and die and stuff) .. so.. it''s a complicated issue. I think it''s good they pushed him out. No place for hypocrties, gay or not.
I agree. We now seem to live in a media world that extends into the real world. A world where good, productive ideas and facts are far less important than opinions and innuendo.
Who brought this story to national attention anyway? I guess he was just doing his job.
I agree. We now seem to live in a media world that extends into the real world. A world where good, productive ideas and facts are far less important than opinions and innuendo.
Who brought this story to national attention anyway? I guess he was just doing his job.
I agree with Mr. Stein also regarding the republican party. They should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves for their non-actions. Being a republican I am mystified by this.
Now please everyone cut out the name calling and let justice take its course. The Senator DID NOT plead guilty to soliciting ***. " Let he who is without sin cast the first stone." No stones will be cast by anyone!!
Stein''s basic message is: it''s OK to harrass and deny rights to people who aren''t conservative but if you touch one of our people it''s a crime against humanity. OF COURSE Craig was treated unfairly. And so were a lot of people who''ve been stung by the stupid laws in Minnesota and elsewhere, but that''s not a problem, is it, Stein? There is a word for Stein''s argument: unprincipled.
if this was first time,
or the second time
or maybe even the third time,
but Ben baby...
enough with the quiet sexual desperation
seeking solace in a men''s room.
He plead guilty Ben.
I don''t really care who screws who,
Larry should of been a man defended himself,
if was innocent.
He went and hid under the bed
only sissies go hide
under the bed Ben.
Larry''s a sexually confused man
living in Idaho.
Ben I think you sort of glossed over what seemed to have happened. First Craig stood outside of the stall for a couple of minutes, then he went to the adjacent stall.
Both in the audio and the written transcript, the police officer(s) were very polite. There was a moment there though when the police officer expressed his disappointment in Craig, but as other readers have mentioned, Craig''s hypocrisy seems to have been his real downfall.
In the book, "Why Smart People Do Dumb Things," these types of mistakes are mostly the result of hubris, arrogance, narcissism or an unconscious need to fail.
The airport security people WERE DOING THEIR JOB -- responding to complaints about ilicit *** in that particular restroom - which had rightly offended unexpecting travelers. The Senator did know which restroom to seek out. Security was not there to entrap "THE SENATOR" -- but it turned out that the Senator was one of the offenders that the police were there to catch.
HOWEVER, I do believe that it is the Senator''s right to be gay, and that the Republicans in Washington are making a big mistake in forcing him out. It only reinforces the party''s assumed image of homophobia.
Senator Craig lynched himself. If he looks a bit more closely into his bible from which his ''family values'' are derived, a curious axiom often mentioned apparantly was forgotten. ''That which a man sows, this shall he reap''. You are defending not a victim, but the worst kind of moral decay which, unfortunately, is endemic in this country in these times. ''Do as I say, not as I do'' seems the rule of the day. Had Craig forgotten that he railed against homosexuals his entire career? I don''t think so. He ignored it for his own gain and pleasure. He also desired preferential treatment from the police because he is a Senator. How can you possibly defend that!? HYPOCRISY is become the rule for the Republican party, and the rule is wielded from the top down. THis is no longer the honest party of Lincoln. This is a mess. And so are you.
So What! Get a safe *** life! Don''t we still sell condoms in the men''s and women''s bathrooms?
How about a sign for a *** stall? Unisex restrooms with *** *** stalls and condoms and lube would be even better! Why spend time going when we can spend time coming! LOL!
We could have *** bathrooms separate from Family restrooms with diaper changing stations, breastfeeding stations, rocking chairs toys and wet wipes!
He''s trolling for a BJ in a public rest room. He pleaded guilty to a lesser charge. Again Craig is not the victim, we are every time we use public rest rooms Ben Stein would have us have to suffer from people like Craig. I don''t care if hes gay, I don''t want his smarmy life to touch me in his random casting. Good *** riddance.
Wrong perception, he claims membership of a political party that has been stridently oppressive against lifestyles they profess not to condone, then in (semi) private, engages in those very activities.
It is the hypocrisy he should be held accountable for.
"2) He is a liar and/or hypocrit (both unproven leaps to judgments),"
Consider this, he plead guilty, to the information in the police report, but now says he is innocent, either he did, or he didn''t, but he has claimed both.
One of his claims is a lie. Clear enough proof?
"therefore he should be bullied, threatened, & cajoled to forego a trial and plead guilty. That is a lynch." Posted by Threejay2,
No, a lynch is an act of punishment inflicted without due process at all, if the dead could speak, many Black men could tell you this...
Ben Stein is off the mark, defending the indefensible because of political affiliation. Ben might also occasionally tap a few toes himself, he does exhibit stereotypical behavior suggestive of such.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 7
- next
See all 326 Comments