The Madness Of "King George"

The Nation: Across The Atlantic, Britons View The U.S. As A Little Brother Gone Astray

(The Nation)  This column was written by Simon Prentis.

---

To those of us here in Britain, there is an Orwellian edge to the news that George Bush is invoking executive privilege to protect his policies from Congressional investigation. Just like that scene in "Animal Farm," when the newly-liberated animals start to believe that some are more equal than others, it sounds like the President of the United States has reverted to the divine right of kings. Wasn't that something you guys fought so hard to escape from? The phrase "I'm the decider" may have a certain folksy charm that Charles I would never have stooped to, but it's clearly coming from the same stable. And we should be just as suspicious of it now as we were then.

I say "we," because even though you decided it was wiser to cut and run, risking all for a new life across the pond, those of us you left behind in the seventeenth century didn't like it any more than you did. Nobody does; it's humiliating to have to submit to someone who thinks he's unaccountable. We tried our hand at civil war, cut the head off our king and toughed it out for a while, but in the end our nerve failed us. And as we negotiated our shabby compromise with royalty, you moved the project forward with a nation devoted for the first time to the cause of liberty - leaving us to watch with an older brother's bitter blend of scorn and envy as his younger sibling threatened to outdo him.

As, of course, you eventually did. And little wonder. With the dispossessed of every land flocking to your shores in search of life on a level playing field, you were a beacon of hope for those on the run from tyranny and oppression. France even sent you the Statue of Liberty, a gift to mark your first centenary, and a fitting symbol of what you represented to ordinary people everywhere. Fueled by the power of this American Dream, you were then the beneficiary as the Old World fell apart over its ancient tribal rivalries. For a while, you shone as the best hope for stability and civilization in a world now facing a new kind of tyranny, the ideological impasse of the totalitarian state. But as the cold war ended, the mad math of the military buildup left you the de facto policeman of the world.

What a chance you had then to use such awesome power for the good! To use that unique moment in history to reform the international institutions, make them truly democratic and bring the dream of world peace to fruition by consent! But the price of freedom, then as now, is vigilance; and somehow the lumbering giant of American democracy fell asleep at the wheel, tranquilized by its own success. The neocons - cheered on by our very own neocon-man, Tony Blair - were allowed to let that power go to their heads. And what they decided was not that the world was to be one but that it was theirs to be won - by force if necessary.

Back here in Britain, when Bush came to shove and we were asked to sign up for the Iraq debacle, we turned out for the biggest demonstration in British history, with more than a million people choking the streets of London in protest against such lunacy. I know - I was there with my family, and old friends and new from all walks of life. We were there because we knew there was more at stake than the same old corruption of power. We were there to protest the assertion of executive privilege on the grand scale - the sidelining of the UN, the flouting of international law and the principle of the pre-emptive strike.

Of course, it didn't do much good. As an old Empire on our uppers, we can only ever hope to play Greece to your Rome, with our leaders clinging lamely to your coattails. But this is not about empire anymore. It's about the future of our children, the future of the human project, the future of our planet. Because unlike the days of the Founding Fathers, there's nowhere else for us to go - the ground has run out under our feet. Whether we like it or not, we're all in this together now. The only place left to make a fresh start is where we already are.

So as we watch your President elevate an excuse for evasion into a point of principle, we can't help wondering whether history has come full circle. Does this mean the world's most successful political experiment is destined to fail after all? Will the land of life, liberty and happiness succumb to presidential prerogative? For the sake of the rest of us, for the sake of the world, we can only hope you care enough to call your neo-King George to account, and say it ain't so.

[socrates392]

The Brits should look after their own fascist country. I''m sick of their whinning. If they want to complain, they should petition officially to become the 51st state. Otherwise, they are just our lackey partners in crime, who must do what their puppet master GWB tells them.

[alanrobisch]

Yes, they were...
Posted by brianbwb at 05:37 AM : Sep 05, 2007

Well I guess illegal actions? can sometimes be the right thing. Can you imagine if saddam had actually invaded Kuwait and had nuclear weapons. What a mess.

[ressigmann]

Funny how this article failed to mention John Edwards plan of mandatory health checkups. Mabye he''s the Democratic decider.

[emma915]

I say, "OFF WITH HIS HEAD!!!!"

[oleander8]

"Does this mean the world''s most successful political experiment is destined to fail after all? Will the land of life, liberty and happiness succumb to presidential prerogative?"

Wonderful article. But I am not hopeful that democrats will reject the powers that little king george assumed once they come to power again.

Take heart - Your empire lasted 100''s of years - ours, barely two hundred.

[knyghtwolf]

Republican, and Democrat, pacifist and defeatist, liberal and extremist, spiritualist and religious nut, moral majority and Libertine, Black and White, Asian and Native American, S* E*X* and love, gay or straight, drug dealer or doctor, bird%u2019s eye or great value, Clinton = out of control passionate biological urges with a mere intern, bush = out of control passionate biological urges with an ENTIRE country & way of life? What happened to "wrongs" just being plain "wrongs"? Does a label help identify or define a person and their beliefs? Sheesh, no wonder his wife Laura has stock in Fun Parties, INC and EverReady Battery Corporation. It is not madness, its religious insanity. "And Jesus spoke to the masses, "do nothing in my Father%u2019s Name that would be shameful or bring shame to His House, for that which does is of the evil wicked that is false and full of self pride." Yeah, full of something alright. So sorry CBS, forgot to spell it out correctly for you bible thumping nanny watch dogs.

[knyghtwolf]

Republican, and Democrat, pascfist and defeatist, liberal and extremeist, spiritualist and religious nut, moral majority and Libertine, Black and White, Asian and Native American, *** and love, gay or straight, drug dealer or doctor, bird''s eye or great value, Clinton = out of control passionate biological urges with a mere intern, bush = out of control passionate biological urges with an ENTIRE country & way of life? What happened to "wrongs" just being plain "wrongs"? Does a label help identify or define a person and their beliefs? Sheesh, no wonder his wife Laura has stock in Fun Parties, INC and EverReady Battery Corporation. It is not a madness, it''s religious insanity. "and Jesus spoke to the masses, "do nothing in my Father''s Name that would be shameful or bring shame to His House, for that which does is of the evil wicked that is false and full of self pride." Yeah, full of something alright.

[brianbwb-2009]

Posted by xzavierbrown,

Who, other than yourself, cares what you expect? Many of us, myself included, oppose the "war" because it was an illegal invasion, and loss of innocent life, justified by lies intentionally put forth by Bush, for personal profit, and for the profit of his "friends".

If we don''t hold him accountable, we set precedent for the future "ethnic cleansing" (read, genocide) of America, by the same tactics employed for Iraq, and supported by the new Nazi party, of which it appears you are a card carrying member...

[r9119111]

WHAT IS YOUR TRUE AGENDA??
Posted by xzavierbrown at 09:52 PM : Sep 04, 2007

I don''t wnat to argue with anyone. My only agenda is to seek the truth and I invite everyone else to do the same.

[brianbwb-2009]

How do you feel about Israel''''s preemptive strike on the nuclear bomb making facilities that saddam had. I don''''t think they got permission first. Or how about our attempt to take out bin laden by clinton Was this illegal? Maybe the attempt to assasinate moamar Khadaffi by Reagan in 1983 was also illegal?
Posted by alanrobisch2

Yes, they were...

[taylpatr]

If this country does indeed, fail, it will no doubt be because of the Cheney-Bush regimes tactics with runaway capitalism. People are getting it, finally. I just hope it''s not too late.

[ioweign]

Typical leftwing dribble. The left in this country have the misguided impression that the majority of Americans are in agreement with there extreme views which are pascfist and defeatist. This couldn''''t be farther from the true reality. Then to believe the liberals know what the English opinion of America is typical of this false misguided view. This ongoing rationalization that other countires agree with there ideology is the only thing that gives them this false "selfperceived" relevance.
Posted by notblue at 10:26 AM : Sep 04, 2007

If every nation believed your dibble they would be with us in Iraq. They know war crimes when they see them !!

[idlepugilist]

When Bush decided to invade Afghanistan and Blair backed us, I was fully supportive, and grateful to Mr. Blair. That''s where it should have ended. Unfortunately, there are yet so many who are willing to act blind in order to be led by the blind. Have we forgotten that WMD became "Liberate Iraq"? Our President is a man of slogans, none of which fit or reflect truth, but they are delivered with determination.
Bush followers won''t believe their neighbors that Bush is very wrong for America, and they won''t buy it from our allies, either. Nevertheless, thank you for your candid humility, and poignant reflections on the arrogance and misguided intentions of the current President. Iraq is his undoing; much worse, it''s undone the families of over 3700 American soldiers.

[alanrobisch]

If not, I would have to say I prefer the previous administrations infidelities and its balanced federal budget.


Posted by the74blaster at 09:52 PM : Sep 04, 2007
+ report abuse

My memory is that it took a republican congress willing to make cuts and an exploding economy which was based on the dot com bubble aand raising taxes only one thing did mr clinton advocate. You can guess which raising taxes

[xzavierbrown]

Sometimes the Brits get it right and this is one of those times. Thanks from all of us that have a brain.
Posted by Rayuk at 05:27 PM : Sep 04, 2007

*********************
THE BRITS HAVE CAMERAS ALL OVER THE PLACE...AND YOU THINK THAT IS NOT MADNESS?? UK has more skeletons in this closet..PAST AND PRESENT..
the problem here is you think exactly like a brit...you think your sh*t dont stink.

[xzavierbrown]

Please tell us you don''''t honestly believe that what this administrations has done is morally right?
Posted by r9119111 at 07:20 PM : Sep 04, 2007
+ report abuse
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

**********

and you honestly think you can morally wage warfare? the really question here..is do you think I expect you to oppose this war because you are morally obligated to do so...

WHAT IS YOUR TRUE AGENDA??

[alanrobisch]

Please tell us you don''''t honestly believe that what this administrations has done is morally right?
Posted by r9119111 at 07:20 PM : Sep 04, 2007
+ report abuse
yup just not successful

[the74blaster]

Bushs failure to progress is due to the opposition of the liberals who only oppose him because he is a Republican. How they can justify their opposition to strong morals is beyond me.

Posted by Hwy71So,

I am a little confused. Does strong morals include misrepresenting the costs of invading Iraq, using our fears of another 9-11 attack,and exaggerating the threat of Iraqi WMDs to build support for an optional war?

If not, I would have to say I prefer the previous administrations infidelities and its balanced federal budget.

[r9119111]

Bush''''s failure to progress is due to the opposition of the liberals who only oppose him because he is a Republican. How they can justify their opposition to strong morals is beyond me. Their black hearted attacks are constant with a white hat so as to make it appear they are in the right. When in fact, beneath that white hat is a black heart.
Posted by Hwy71So at 11:54 AM : Sep 04, 2007

Please tell us you don''t honestly believe that what this administrations has done is morally right?

[knyghtwolf]

Hwy71So, it has got to be lonely as all get out being on your own and being so far out in left field that it feels like going full circle. Hollywood is but a very small fraction of people opposing bush. Try to be a bit more factual when who you are blaming for the current administrative fiasco. It''s BUSHCO my son.