December 5, 2007 11:58 AM

Audit Gives Iraq Leaders Failing Grade

(CBS/AP)  The Iraqi government has failed to meet the vast majority of political and military goals laid out by lawmakers to assess President Bush's Iraq war strategy, congressional auditors have determined.

The Associated Press has learned the Government Accountability Office, or GAO, will report that at least 13 of the 18 benchmarks to measure the surge of U.S. troops to Iraq are unfulfilled ahead of a Sept. 15 deadline. That's when Mr. Bush is to give a detailed accounting of the situation eight months after he announced the policy, according to three officials familiar with the matter.

The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the report has not been made public, also said the administration is preparing a case to play down the findings, arguing that Congress ordered the GAO to use unfair, "all or nothing" standards when compiling the document.

The GAO is to give a classified briefing about its findings to lawmakers on Thursday. It is not yet clear when its unclassified report will be released but it is due Sept. 1 amid a series of assessments called for in January legislation that authorized the president's plan to send 30,000 more troops to Iraq, where there is now a total of more than 160,000 American service members.

Among those Mr. Bush will hear from are the Joint Chiefs of Staff; Defense Secretary Robert Gates; the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus; and the U.S. ambassador to Iraq, Ryan Crocker. The Pentagon said Wednesday Mr. Bush was likely to get a variety of views from different military officials. Mr. Bush will then deliver his own report to Congress by Sept. 15.

Iraq's top diplomat said Thursday that more progress had been made in bringing security to the country than in advancing the tumultuous political situation, and cautioned against expecting "magical solutions" from Petraeus and Crocker's upcoming report.

"The whole world is waiting anxiously to see what this report will indicate," Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari told reporters. "I personally believe that this report would not provide any magical solutions or provide any instant answers to the difficulties and challenges we are going through."

The GAO report comes at a pivotal time in the Iraq debate. So far, Republicans have mostly stood by the president on the war and staved off Democratic demands of troop withdrawals. But in exchange for their support, many GOP members said they wanted to see substantial progress in Iraq by September or else they would call for a new strategy, including possibly a withdrawal of troops.

Democrats are expected this fall to push for another round of votes on their legislation ordering most troops out by spring. A likely target for the debate will be a $147 billion bill the military needs to fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The money covers the 2007 budget year, which begins Oct. 1.

The GAO, the congressional watchdog, is expected to find that the Iraqis have met only modest security goals for Baghdad and none of the major political aims such as passage of an oil law.

The White House brushed the GAO report off as "not news" Thursday, reports CBS News correspondent Peter Maer.

White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said the administration had already acknowledged that the Iraqi government was not meeting most benchmarks, but the GAO failed to take "progress" into consideration.

"There are people who want to play politics with this matter," Perino said, reports Maer.

"While we've seen progress in some areas, it would not surprise me that the GAO would make this assessment given the difficult congressionally mandated measurement they had to follow," said Gordon Johndroe, spokesman for the National Security Council.

In other developments:

  • A U.S. soldier was killed in a roadside bomb attack during combat operations in Iraq's eastern Diyala province, the U.S. command said Thursday. The Task Force Lightning soldier was killed Wednesday by the explosion next to his vehicle, the military said in a statement.

  • An al Qaeda front group claimed Thursday on an Islamic Web site known to be used by extremists that it had executed an employee of the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad. The claim could not be independently verified and the U.S. Embassy said it was looking into the report but had no immediate comment. The Islamic State of Iraq claimed the execution of an "official" it identified as Zaher Abdel Mohsin Abdel-Saheb took place Saturday as revenge for "the Muslim women who are still captives in the prisons of Shiites and crusaders."

  • A military jury reprimanded Army Lt. Col. Steven L. Jordan for disobeying an order to keep silent about an investigation into the abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib in 2003. Jordan could have been sentenced to up to five years in prison.

  • Iraqis and their U.S. advisers are stepping up efforts to bring many ex-officers from Saddam Hussein's army back into the fold, a measure they say will improve the quality of the country's forces.

  • Most U.S. troops can be withdrawn safely from Iraq in roughly one year and the Bush administration should begin planning the pullout immediately, according to a study from a progressive think tank.


  • © 2007 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
    Add a Comment See all 191 Comments
    by me4prezz September 1, 2007 11:53 PM EDT
    Perhaps Bush should travel to Iraq to evaluate it himself. He says that it is improving and as safe as it has ever been, so what is the problem??
    Reply to this comment
    by tbweb August 31, 2007 5:11 AM EDT
    Many Americans do not understand the complex relationship the United States has with Israel, including myself, I fully admit it, I do not understand it! But one fact of that relationship is clear, it can''t be broken, the U.S. has to support Israel no matter what, the U.S. has to give Israel billions and billions of U.S. Taxpayer dollars, the U.S. can''t break it''s relationship with Israel even though Israel continues to arm China and does things against the Palestinians the U.S. does no agree with. Israel can do no wrong, the U.S. will Veto any resolution against Israel in the U.N. even when Israel is wrong in the eyes of the majority on U.N. Members! The United States should convene an impartial, fair and 9/11 type commission to explore, examine and report to the American people what the real deal is with this U.S. Israeli connection so that Americans can understand it in its entirety once and for all. This idea that Israel is this untouchable topic, can''t be discussed issue and off limits to Americans is b.u.l.l.s.h.i.t, and as everyone who read my Post know I''m an Israeli supporter! Let''s know the deal, the truth and lets talk about untouchable, un-discussable Israel. If everything is on the table then so is the status of Israel and its lock on the U.S. Taxpayers money! nuff said.
    Reply to this comment
    by oakishpines August 31, 2007 3:16 AM EDT
    '' ... putting women in mens armys did not turn men into gardenets, it turned women into rapists of husbands and children ... putting children into armys does not turn women and men into gardenets, it turns children into parent rapists ... if men are to treat children with respect, then men are to start acting like children ... and are to start treating two year olds like two year olds ... ''

    '' ... all the front pages would have been covered in photos of local children dancing get well feed world songs rallied around the sick beds drifting the farm trails, except a terrorist warned against it ... ''
    Reply to this comment
    by usayesterday August 31, 2007 3:00 AM EDT
    The U.S. has a defense pact with Taiwan, it blows my mind that if the U.S. has to come to Taiwan''''s defense in the event of a Chinese invasion, it will be against Israeli supplied weapons that Israel created with billions of dollars in U.S. loans and aid! Does Israel share the profits from those sales with the U.S.? Israel knows the status of U.S. Chinese relations, why is Israel still armimg China? Israel wants U.S. help with Iran but doesn''''t seem to reciprocate with China! Keeping it real.
    Posted by tbweb at 10:55 PM : Aug 30, 2007
    ............

    Oooh! China versus Taiwan/U.S., my favorite subject!

    China''s vast expansion of its military force has mostly come from Russia in the past decade or more, and China has also been very expedient in developing their own military technologies/hardware.

    We''d be fvcked if we even attempted to fight against China. They wouldn''t have to fire one missile at us...

    ...all they''d have to do is cut off their monetary bail-out of the U.S. debt, and VOILA! Instant death for the U.S.
    Reply to this comment
    by j-whitman August 31, 2007 2:35 AM EDT
    good night folks sweet dreams
    Reply to this comment
    by tbweb August 31, 2007 2:29 AM EDT
    radio,,, Having multinational force in Iraq hasn''''t worked & wont work, that would be seen as a complete take over of a country & permant occupation come & it would be.... Bad idea, & will aggravate the problem even more.... Don''''t forget,,,, Iran will fight back & Arabs are tired of our failures & also tired of the occupation of non-muslem countries......... FUBAR

    Posted by j-whitman at 11:26 PM : Aug 30, 2007,,,

    All of which at it''s core, at it''s root, is to prevent them from successfully attacking Israel! Israel is the hidden part of this entire equation whether it wants to be or not. All roads lead to Rome!
    Reply to this comment
    by j-whitman August 31, 2007 2:26 AM EDT
    radio,,, Having multinational force in Iraq hasn''t worked & wont work, that would be seen as a complete take over of a country & permant occupation come & it would be.... Bad idea, & will aggravate the problem even more.... Don''t forget,,,, Iran will fight back & Arabs are tired of our failures & also tired of the occupation of non-muslem countries......... FUBAR
    Reply to this comment
    by tbweb August 31, 2007 2:18 AM EDT
    tbweb,,,, What''''s Tiawan going to do, throw everything China doesn''''t make at them ??

    Posted by j-whitman at 11:09 PM : Aug 30, 2007,,,

    China is technically at war with Taiwan now, employing an strategy of isolation and systematic strangulation! Either Taiwan is free or it is not, in effect Taiwan is a Chinese hostage!

    Reply to this comment
    by j-whitman August 31, 2007 2:09 AM EDT
    tbweb,,,, What''s Tiawan going to do, throw everything China doesn''t make at them ??
    Reply to this comment
    by tbweb August 31, 2007 1:55 AM EDT
    Radio,,,,, We''''ve got a hell of a lot greater stategic threats & problems in our face than to have to deal with Iraq...... To hell with international forces,, We have no defense except for nuclear missiles..... Our Strategic Reserves are gone..

    Posted by j-whitman at 10:47 PM : Aug 30, 2007,,,

    The U.S. has a defense pact with Taiwan, it blows my mind that if the U.S. has to come to Taiwan''s defense in the event of a Chinese invasion, it will be against Israeli supplied weapons that Israel created with billions of dollars in U.S. loans and aid! Does Israel share the profits from those sales with the U.S.? Israel knows the status of U.S. Chinese relations, why is Israel still armimg China? Israel wants U.S. help with Iran but doesn''t seem to reciprocate with China! Keeping it real.
    Reply to this comment
    See all 191 Comments
    .
    Scroll Left
    Scroll Right More »
    CBS News on Facebook