Aug. 30, 2007

Was There Time To Save Diana?

New Relevations On The 10th Anniversary Of Princess' Death Raise Questions

  • Play CBS Video Video Could Diana Have Been Saved?

    A medical report suggests that mistakes made by emergency personnel may have decreased Princess Diana's chances of surviving her fatal car crash. Erin Moriarty reports.

  • Video Notebook: Dianabilia

    On the 10th anniversary of Princess Diana's death, Katie Couric says it's a tragedy that her image is being turned into a cash cow for memorabilia marketers.

  • Video The Legacy Of Princess Diana

    As Sheila MacVicar reports, it has been 10 years since the passing of Princess Diana and not a hospital or shelter that bears the name of a woman who cared so deeply for others.

  • A 40-page report raises questions about the treatment of Princess Diana after the Paris auto accident that resulted in her death 10 years ago.

    A 40-page report raises questions about the treatment of Princess Diana after the Paris auto accident that resulted in her death 10 years ago.  (CBS)

(CBS)  Glamorized in life, Princess Diana continues to be scrutinized 10 years after her death.

An early-morning traffic accident in a Paris tunnel killed Diana's companion, Dodi Al-Fayed, and the driver of their car. But Diana was conscious after the accident and did not appear to be seriously hurt. In truth, she was bleeding internally.

Had the accident occurred in the United States, Diana would have been rushed to a hospital. However, the French have a different system: They first try to stabilize the patient at the scene. Still, as CBS News correspondent Erin Moriarty reports, that difference doesn't explain the series of missteps and delays in Diana's medical care that experts say never should have happened.

"My first reaction was this is not what should be expected of emergency medical services for anybody in this type of circumstance," says Chicago's Dr. Stanley Zydlo, a pioneer of emergency medical care in the U.S.

Zydlo and three other emergency medicine specialists analyzed a 40-page French accident report obtained by CBS News. All four agreed that mistakes were made.

Diana: Remembering A Princess
"Yes, with hindsight, they probably would have done it differently, I suspect," says Dr. Annie McGuinness of London.

At 12:32 a.m. on Aug. 31, 1997, rescue workers arriving at the scene find Diana conscious, but agitated.

At 12:45 a.m., a French doctor arrives. Not initially recognizing the extent of her injuries, he gives Diana Hypnovel and Fentanyl - a combination of drugs that calmed her down, but is also known to sometimes cause heart and respiratory problems.

"Do you believe that these sedatives could actually have aggravated her situation?" asks Moriarty.

"The word is 'could have.' Yes, they could have," says Zydlo.

Time is lost as rescuers remove an already dead Al-Fayed from the car first.

When emergency workers ask to take Diana to a hospital just four miles away, it takes another 10 minutes for the hospital to agree. It is now 1:29 a.m.

"They should have had a receiving hospital before they were ready to leave the scene, given that they had already spent nearly an hour on the scene," says McGuinness.

Even more time is lost as the doctor orders the ambulance to drive slowly for fear of aggravating Diana's condition.

The result: Diana doesn't arrive at the hospital until 2:06 a.m. - nearly two hours after the accident.

All told, Zydlo estimates 70 minutes were lost by bad decisions.

How crucial is that time in an injury like Diana's?

"Anybody that's bleeding has to have the bleeding stopped as soon as possible," Zydlo said.

Diana is pronounced dead at 4 a.m.

Could she have been saved?

McGuinness believes Diana was too badly injured. Zydlo says we'll never know.

"I can't say she definitely would have survived, but it certainly took away all of her chances," Zydlo said.

No official from the French emergency system would comment on Princess Diana's treatment for this report - but in 2002, five years after her accident, the French emergency guidelines were changed. Today, a patient with the same the unstable blood pressure would be rushed to a hospital.



© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Add a Comment See all 30 Comments
by extremophil September 1, 2007 12:36 PM EDT
Ohhhhhhhh...Sooo much more could have been done to save her! Her death was all our fault, JFKs death was our fault too. Vietnam, WW II, 911, it''s all our fault. I hate myself (sniff), why did I have to be born a sinful human.....sob sob.
Reply to this comment
by socrates392 September 1, 2007 12:42 AM EDT
What is the point to this article? She''s been dead for ten years, let it go. If the French didn''t change their medical practices then, they certainly aren''t going to change them now. So what is the point of this?

It''s all a morbid waste of time.
Reply to this comment
by gramto7 August 31, 2007 11:17 PM EDT
The bottom line is, had she been at home with her sons instead of w*horing around Paris with Dooooodi, she''''d still be alive. Live by the sword, die by the sword.
Posted by infidel_us

If Charles hadn''t been tomcatting around with Camilla, Diana would have still been married to him and wouldn''t have been with "Dooooodi"!
Reply to this comment
by virginiamayclark August 31, 2007 6:56 PM EDT
If the media scrutiny about Diana''s death contributed to an improvement in emergency care in France, then the publicity given to this case has undoubtedly saved the lives of many Parisians.



Reply to this comment
by oakishpines August 31, 2007 4:10 PM EDT
'''' ... more nerf buses, less rolling coffins no one (too short too tall too young too old too injured too nervous) wants to drive anyway ... ''''

'''' ... when i was like six or seven, i was dancing in some field with a bunch of folk (rallyd round sick beds playing get well feed world), and some girl was dancing through the crowd, claiming ''''tax the world is feed the world'''', and promising to rid the world of naked folk and ignorant folk and lazy profane blemished folk, and to replace all the free food and free medicine crowds with free gun and free bomb buttons, and, when she touched my hand, i felt all warm and fuzzy inside, and ive always wondered what happened to her ... i wonder if shes still out there somewhere, conquering folk like me ... i sooo hope so ... ''''

'''' ... she''''d let the dog free and the parrot too, and give up on having to feed the cats, and just hike away forever, but theres no get well feed world folk there, only get sick tax world: and theres nothing they wont do to keep her in her clothes and in her chair ... ''''

'''' ... lots of folk say they hate heteros and homos, but lots of folk say they dont want to get chewed up and spit out and put back together by a dinosaur, but almost everyone has done it, and almost everyone will do it again ... ''''
Reply to this comment
by emma915 August 31, 2007 1:48 PM EDT
". . .five years after her accident, the French emergency guidelines were changed. Today, a patient with the same unstable blood pressure would be rushed to a hospital." So, even in dying, Diana saves others. The ruckus over the whole thing has done some good by helping those who might have died the same way, but who now will have a chance to be saved.
Reply to this comment
by oleander8 August 31, 2007 1:36 PM EDT
"Was There Time To Save Diana?"

Why even go there? She''s dead. Ten years dead. You could ask the same question 20 years from now and her injuries might not even be considered life-threatening.
Reply to this comment
by infidel_us August 31, 2007 1:07 PM EDT
Vive La France!
Posted by mick7744 at 05:22 AM : Aug 31, 2007

The bottom line is, had she been at home with her sons instead of w*horing around Paris with Dooooodi, she''d still be alive. Live by the sword, die by the sword.
Reply to this comment
by infidel_us August 31, 2007 1:04 PM EDT
There was, but Bush, under orders from Rove, made a phone call to Buckingham Palace and told the Queen to call Jacques Cousteau and have teh paramedics break off CPR. See, it''s the military industrial complex - you wouldn''t understand it.

Reply to this comment
by mldugan2 August 31, 2007 12:20 PM EDT
The only thing this story does is bring pain to her children - the boys do NOT need this!

And the same kinds of questions and answers have been said over countless othere "needless" deaths over the years, like Elvis, Marilyn Monroe, and others. Where does good journalism start and where does it stop?

And yes, the "bottom feeders" will always be "bottom feeders" because they do not have it in themselves to be better or do better - they are controlled by something other than the desire to do a good job and provide quality work.
Reply to this comment
by whatithink-2009 August 31, 2007 11:12 AM EDT
Was There Time To Save Diana?

Don''t know. But, there is time to save thousands of children who are dying needlessly from preventable diseases.

Maybe somebody should focus on this?

What can we do for the dead? Nothing.

Let''s try to help the living.
Reply to this comment
by mick7744 August 31, 2007 8:22 AM EDT
Some thoughts about the death of Lady Diana.

Had the Royal Family not pulled her SAS-trained security off her...had the bodyguard truly been in charge of their movements, the crash probably would not have occurred. Of course, had the security man present tried to overrule "Mister Dodi''s" order to outrun the paparazzi, he would have been quickly unemployed...and unemployable.

My one lasting impression of that night is of Lady Diana...stunned and seriously injured immediately after the crash, being blinded by the flash of cameras instead of being offered assistance by the bottom feeders pursuing the car.

As I recall, one of her chief tormentors, who was arrested and tried (and found not guilty) was named Andre Rat. How appropriate!

Vive La France!
Reply to this comment
by mick7744 August 31, 2007 8:04 AM EDT
She''''s dead, people. Let it go. Move on with your lives.

P.S.- Elvis is dead, too.
So is Jim Morrison.
Posted by ecuadoriana

Yes ecuadoriana, Lady Diana is dead...so is Elvis, but Jim Morrison...?

Maybe!
Reply to this comment
by erasmus6 August 31, 2007 5:35 AM EDT
"She''s dead people. Let it go. Move on with your lives." posted by ecuadorianna

I had let it go and moved on, that is until I read that it took two hours to get her to a hospital. That is absolultely ridiculous. They should have been charged! Where I live you are put in an ambulance and they work to stabilize you ON THE WAY to the hospital. This is something I would expect from a primitive country!
Reply to this comment
by galaxiana August 31, 2007 4:43 AM EDT
Sigh....

CBS does it again. (Quote):

"Today, a patient with the same the unstable blood pressure would be rushed to a hospital."

If CBS bothers to hire proofreaders, they''re definitely not doing their job!
Reply to this comment
by oakishpines August 31, 2007 3:36 AM EDT
'' ... putting women in mens armys did not turn men into gardenets, it turned women into rapists of husbands and children ... putting children into armys does not turn women and men into gardenets, it turns children into parent rapists ... if men are to treat children with respect, then men are to start acting like children ... and are to start treating two year olds like two year olds ... ''

'' ... all the front pages would have been covered in photos of local children dancing get well feed world songs rallied around the sick beds drifting the farm trails, except a terrorist warned against it ... ''
Reply to this comment
by itgranny August 31, 2007 3:09 AM EDT
CBS, you''re being insensitive jerks. Why did you stop the video on the controversial picture taken by paparizzi from the accident? I''ve been deliberately avoiding it for years but you''ve made it so that like it or not, without warning we have to look at it. A little courtesy is in order for her family and your viewers. At least give us warning so we can choose whether or not we want to see the graphics.
Reply to this comment
by incog-nito August 31, 2007 2:12 AM EDT
Sure, mistakes were made. A drunk should never have been allowed to drive the car. She should have worn her seatbelt. They shouldn''t have been doing 70 in a 30 mph zone, etc., etc. There''s plenty of blame to go around. It''s all moot anyway.
Reply to this comment
by netadmin1-2009 August 31, 2007 2:06 AM EDT
There is no way to know if Diana would have survived - If, her aorta was torn as they say - not a chance - We, in the ems profession go by the 1 hour golden rule - we have 10 minutes to get the patient moving to the hospital and turn them over to the ER personnel. Too much time lasped to get her in the hands of the ER personnel. Decision was made and there is no way to take it back - you have to move on.
Reply to this comment
by kaiyo4u August 31, 2007 2:05 AM EDT
why can''t these people rest in peace? Geez...
Reply to this comment
See all 30 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • Fort Hood's Fallen Heroes Fort Hood's Fallen Heroes

    A Look at Those Who Lost Their Lives in the Fort Hood Massacre

  • BMI Country Awards BMI Country Awards

    Country's Finest Walk the Red Carpet for the 57th BMI Country Music Awards

  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

  • Celebrity Circuit Celebrity Circuit

    James Woods in Court, Michelle Obama on "Sesame Street"; Plus, Premieres for "The Road" and "A Single Man"

  • Memorial at Fort Hood Memorial at Fort Hood

    President Obama Speaks at Ceremony Honoring Soldiers Who Died in Mass Shooting

  • School Hostage Drama School Hostage Drama

    School in Pine Plains, N.Y., Locked Down After Former Student Takes Administrator Hostage

Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: