Polls Show Skepticism Of Katrina Recovery
By Kathy Frankovic, CBS News director of surveys
It's been two years since Hurricane Katrina devastated the Gulf Coast, and the failure of the levees flooded much of New Orleans. How did the hurricane affect public opinion - and does it still have an impact?
In the immediate aftermath of Katrina, there wasn't any change in President Bush's approval rating. From August, before the disaster, through the following January, the president's approval rating hovered between 37 percent and 42 percent - and the low point came in October, a month and a half after the tragedy.
However, there was little positive reaction to his management of the hurricane. The public's first response to a crisis is usually to rally around the flag and the president. But in this case that feeling quickly dissipated. As public realization of the magnitude of the event grew, so did criticism of Bush and his emergency team. A CBS News Poll conducted August 30-31 in the two days following Katrina's landfall showed support for what the President was doing: 51 percent approved of the way he was handling the response to Katrina, and only 12 percent disapproved. Many people - about a third - weren't sure. The Katrina approval rating was significantly higher than the president's overall job rating, which was 41 percent in the same poll.
But within a week, opinion had changed. By the time CBS News polled on Sept. 6-7, nearly everyone had an opinion - and it was overwhelmingly negative. Only 38 percent approved of the president's handling of the response to Katrina. Fifty-eight percent disapproved!
This castigation of the president became a criticism of the government, too, particularly its ability to handle natural disasters and crises. Some of those negative assessments continue today.
After Katrina, we asked Americans how much confidence they had in the ability of the government to respond to natural disasters. Barely half said they had confidence, and only 19 percent had "a great deal" of confidence. While confidence rebounded to 63 percent a month later, it was back down below 50 percent six months after Katrina.
Worse, the share of the public who said they had some confidence in the government's ability to protect its citizens from future terrorist attacks dropped 10 points: from 69 percent in July, before the hurricane, to 59 percent afterward.
And something comparable happened to public confidence in the president's ability to handle a crisis, something on which positive assessment had soared after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. In September 2001, nine out of 10 Americans had confidence in the president's ability to handle a crisis, and 66 percent had a lot of confidence. But in September 2005, barely half had any confidence, and only 32 percent had a lot of confidence.
Thirteen years earlier, in 1992, the president's father - George H.W. Bush - had faced Hurricane Andrew, which devastated parts of Florida. But 64 percent of Americans approved of the way the senior Bush handled the response to Andrew, even though his overall approval rating was stuck at just over 40 percent. And that year, he was also trailing Bill Clinton in the race for the presidency.
In 1992, Americans were negative about whether the government's hurricane response was adequate: 52 percent of registered voters said it was not; just 41 percent said it was. But that evaluation seems rosy compared with the post-Katrina assessment. Just 20 percent of Americans said that response was adequate, while 77 percent said the government should have done much better. It's worth noting, however, that Katrina affected more people than Andrew. Sixteen percent of Americans said they knew someone directly affected by Hurricane Andrew, while nearly twice as many - 29 percent - knew someone affected by Katrina.
One year after the hurricane, the evaluation of the president's ability to handle a crisis had barely budged. Just about half said they had confidence, and only 27 percent had a lot of confidence - a far cry from the post-9/11 assessments. And his approval ratings kept falling, and are now even lower than they were then.
There has been some recovery - but only on some issues, not on others. One year after Katrina, four in five Americans still thought the government response was not adequate, but generally, confidence in the government's ability to respond to natural disasters has improved. In the most recent CBS News Poll, 59 percent have confidence (although only 16 percent have a lot of confidence). And in July of this year, nearly as many say they have confidence in the government's ability to protect citizens from another terrorist attack as said so before Katrina.
There has been little change, however, in the public's view of the recovery effort in New Orleans and the Gulf Coast. Opinion has remained almost constant from the first time we asked about the recovery, six months after the hurricane struck. In February 2006, 41 percent saw at least some progress. After another six months, in August 2006, 45 percent saw some progress. And we received the same response in the most recent poll this month, when just 45 percent saw progress. What is most striking is that, in every one of those three polls, fewer than one in 10 Americans (and hardly any African-Americans) said they saw "a lot" of progress.
Just like New Orleans and the other affected areas of the Gulf Coast, public opinion has yet to recover fully from Katrina's impact.
By Kathy Frankovic
Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved. It's been two years since Hurricane Katrina devastated the Gulf Coast, and the failure of the levees flooded much of New Orleans. How did the hurricane affect public opinion - and does it still have an impact?
In the immediate aftermath of Katrina, there wasn't any change in President Bush's approval rating. From August, before the disaster, through the following January, the president's approval rating hovered between 37 percent and 42 percent - and the low point came in October, a month and a half after the tragedy.
However, there was little positive reaction to his management of the hurricane. The public's first response to a crisis is usually to rally around the flag and the president. But in this case that feeling quickly dissipated. As public realization of the magnitude of the event grew, so did criticism of Bush and his emergency team. A CBS News Poll conducted August 30-31 in the two days following Katrina's landfall showed support for what the President was doing: 51 percent approved of the way he was handling the response to Katrina, and only 12 percent disapproved. Many people - about a third - weren't sure. The Katrina approval rating was significantly higher than the president's overall job rating, which was 41 percent in the same poll.
But within a week, opinion had changed. By the time CBS News polled on Sept. 6-7, nearly everyone had an opinion - and it was overwhelmingly negative. Only 38 percent approved of the president's handling of the response to Katrina. Fifty-eight percent disapproved!
This castigation of the president became a criticism of the government, too, particularly its ability to handle natural disasters and crises. Some of those negative assessments continue today.
After Katrina, we asked Americans how much confidence they had in the ability of the government to respond to natural disasters. Barely half said they had confidence, and only 19 percent had "a great deal" of confidence. While confidence rebounded to 63 percent a month later, it was back down below 50 percent six months after Katrina.
Worse, the share of the public who said they had some confidence in the government's ability to protect its citizens from future terrorist attacks dropped 10 points: from 69 percent in July, before the hurricane, to 59 percent afterward.
And something comparable happened to public confidence in the president's ability to handle a crisis, something on which positive assessment had soared after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. In September 2001, nine out of 10 Americans had confidence in the president's ability to handle a crisis, and 66 percent had a lot of confidence. But in September 2005, barely half had any confidence, and only 32 percent had a lot of confidence.
Thirteen years earlier, in 1992, the president's father - George H.W. Bush - had faced Hurricane Andrew, which devastated parts of Florida. But 64 percent of Americans approved of the way the senior Bush handled the response to Andrew, even though his overall approval rating was stuck at just over 40 percent. And that year, he was also trailing Bill Clinton in the race for the presidency.
In 1992, Americans were negative about whether the government's hurricane response was adequate: 52 percent of registered voters said it was not; just 41 percent said it was. But that evaluation seems rosy compared with the post-Katrina assessment. Just 20 percent of Americans said that response was adequate, while 77 percent said the government should have done much better. It's worth noting, however, that Katrina affected more people than Andrew. Sixteen percent of Americans said they knew someone directly affected by Hurricane Andrew, while nearly twice as many - 29 percent - knew someone affected by Katrina.
One year after the hurricane, the evaluation of the president's ability to handle a crisis had barely budged. Just about half said they had confidence, and only 27 percent had a lot of confidence - a far cry from the post-9/11 assessments. And his approval ratings kept falling, and are now even lower than they were then.
There has been some recovery - but only on some issues, not on others. One year after Katrina, four in five Americans still thought the government response was not adequate, but generally, confidence in the government's ability to respond to natural disasters has improved. In the most recent CBS News Poll, 59 percent have confidence (although only 16 percent have a lot of confidence). And in July of this year, nearly as many say they have confidence in the government's ability to protect citizens from another terrorist attack as said so before Katrina.
There has been little change, however, in the public's view of the recovery effort in New Orleans and the Gulf Coast. Opinion has remained almost constant from the first time we asked about the recovery, six months after the hurricane struck. In February 2006, 41 percent saw at least some progress. After another six months, in August 2006, 45 percent saw some progress. And we received the same response in the most recent poll this month, when just 45 percent saw progress. What is most striking is that, in every one of those three polls, fewer than one in 10 Americans (and hardly any African-Americans) said they saw "a lot" of progress.
Just like New Orleans and the other affected areas of the Gulf Coast, public opinion has yet to recover fully from Katrina's impact.
By Kathy Frankovic
Recommended
- Is 60 The New 40 Or Is 40 The New 60?
- Top Twelve Most Patriotic Songs Ever
- Who Lives The American Dream?
- Here's Why People Don't Buy Global Warming
- Michelle Obama's Hopeless America
- American dystopia more reality than fiction
- Poll: Blacks See Improved Race Relations
- What Obama Did As A Community Organizer
+ report abuse
******
GIMME GIMME...give me the justice "THAT I WANT" because I am black.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/08/30/national/main3220685.shtml
Now, is anyone surprised? Nope, another campaign contributon scandal and just one little story. So libs, just why is that??
From what I understand there was more than norman hsu in this little tryst of money exchanging hands. I guess there was another guy who gave the clintons home address as his. Nice people, the clintons.
But then, many will say "they didn''t know" and these are supposed to be the smartest people in the world.
Bush awarded all the - Construction Contracts to his :
Former Campaign manager.
His former - Campaign Manager - Gave the contracts to :
His own family members.
His own family members gave contracts to :
Their own In-laws
The headlines read :
10''s of Millions of Dollars - Mis-used in the Wake of : - "Katrina"
No Criminal Complaint from : The Justice Department ! ! !
The FBI - Does a fine job - Protecting and Covering the - a*s*s* of :
Criminal Corporate America - and - The Republican (Nazi) Party
Lastdance
I hate to disturb a great mind like yours with the facts. Clearly you''ve had a long dialogue with yourself about this. based on your numerous nutty postings.
Ansewer this Smart One: when was the last time the Netherlands had a category 5 Hurricane?
Investigate the nature of land reclaimation in Holland and you may discover they have been preparing for tidal flooding through an estuary system for more centuries than New Orleans has existed.
But like every other mindless Bush Basher that blogs here you couldn''t let the facts get in the way of talking thru your butt crack. SEE YA!
+ report abuse
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
to retort to that, Katrina WAS NOT THE ONLY AND WILL BE THE LAST DISASTER to hit this country. A lot of those other disasters were not as fu*cked as n.o. because the people involved were not as dependent as the ones in N.O.
the people of N.O. who are, till now. still crying for more assistance had either misapprorpiated thier relief because they know that morons like you will be around to rally for them when that relief dries up BECAUSE THEY ARE UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT its another welfare giveaway.
If I see you in a car accident or some other injurious situation, I''''ll ask about your politics or where you live before I lend a helping hand.
Posted by ainttaken at 04:52 PM : Aug 30, 2007
+ report abuse
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
****
chances are.. you are the type who would not stop but gawk as you slow down traffic THEN whine about it later
I am not as dependent as you hope. I know better than to expect anything but lip service from a bleeding heart liberal..MAYBE you can hold a concert then pocket the money..ha?
but either way, just think that ''you thought of helping'' and IF THINK OF IT HARD ENOUGH YOU COULD FOOL YOUR BRAIN enough to make you sleep better at night
Posted by ainttaken at 08:36 AM : Aug 30, 2007
+ report abuse
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How come those euro-wannabee liberals are so concerened about those europeans who really dont give a da*mn to begin with??
+ report abuse
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*****
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/08/29/eveningnews/main3218613.shtml
when you are done vomting..maybe you can have a second and control those poor miunderstood N.O. citizens of yours..SO WE CAN FINALY HELP THEM..and next time we can save them from a more dangerious threat..BLEEDING HEART LIBERALS