Hillary Gets Big Bucks From A Bungalow

The Skinny: Clinton Gets $45,000 In Donations From Humble Homestead; Is A Big Donor Involved?

(CBS)  The Skinny is Keach Hagey's take on the top news of the day and the best of the Internet.

---

The Wall Street Journal smells something fishy emanating from a "tiny lime-green bungalow" in a working class suburb of San Francisco that's home to one of the biggest sources of political donations to Hillary Clinton.

After poring over the candidate's campaign filings, the paper reports that all six members of the Paw family who list the house as their home have contributed a total of $45,000 to the Democratic senator since 2005 and a total of $200,000 to Democratic candidates since 2000.

Considering that the head of the household is a mailman and his wife is a homemaker, the Journal notes "it isn't obvious how the Paw family is able afford such political largess."

The paper then notes with suspicion that the Paw family's substantial political donations "closely track" donations made by Norman Hsu, a wealthy New York businessman who is one of the top contributors to Clinton's campaign.

Hsu once listed the Paw's house as his address. The Journal quotes a former Federal Election Commission official saying the circumstantial evidence is enough to merit investigation.

The newspaper then goes on to print the denials of everyone involved, including Clinton's campaign manager.

Iraq, Afghanistan Wars Lead To Ammo Shortage For U.S. Cops

All those who bemoaned the lack of character-building, World War II-style homefront rationing involved in the current U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan can now take heart.

The Washington Post reports that local police forces have begun rationing bullets used in target practice because the wartime demand overseas has caused ammo shortages and delivery delays at home.

So far, none of the police forces contacted by the Post admit to running out of ammunition, but some did say they've been limiting for the amount of ammunition available to officers on the practice range for the past year. This solution has caused "concern that a prolonged shortage could eventually affect officers' competence as marksmen."

Where Did All The Guns Go?

That's the question at the heart of a "widening network" of federal criminal cases involving the purchase and delivery of billions of dollars of weapons and supplies to Iraqi and American forces, the New York Times reports.

The investigations come from "serious discrepancies" in military records of where thousands of weapons intended for Iraqi security forces actually ended up. Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, said that he made a decision, in the face of soaring violence in 2004 and 2005, that providing arms to Iraqi security forces was "more important than keeping impeccable records."

The details are sketchy and complex, but the juiciest morsel of the scoop is that one of the federal fraud investigations names "a senior American officer who worked closely with Gen. David Petraeus in setting up the logistics operation to supply Iraqi forces when General Petraeus was in charge of training and equipping those forces in 2004 and 2005."

Considering that President Bush is hanging all his hopes for Iraq on the weight of Petraeus' word when he reports in September, don't expect this story - however mindbending - to be swept under the rug.

OMG! California Votes To Ban Cellphones, Texting For Teen Drivers

It's the kind of bill you've got to suspect was written by a parent having to ride alongside their yammering 16-year-old as she tooled around town gossiping with her friends. The Los Angeles Times reports that California's legislature voted to ban drivers under 18 from using a cellphone, pager, text-messaging device or laptop while driving. The bill now heads for the governor's desk.

The bill's supporters say the legislation is needed because car crashes are the number one killer of teens and all those distracting gizmos just increase their already substantial hormonally-induced spaceyness.

The few detractors - obviously terrified that approval would embolden the government to come after their highway Blackberry-chattering next -- said they used their hands-free device without problems and teens ought to be able to, too.

One teen, Arian Moreh, 19, agreed. In his view, the problem of distracted teen drivers wasn't bad driving skills so much as poor text messaging technique. "You've just got to be good at it," he said.

A NOTE TO READERS: The Skinny is available via e-mail. Click here and follow the directions to register to receive it in your inbox each weekday morning.

[jack3213]

"The Wall Street Journal smells something fishy..." ..and that smell is the odor of a woman who is nothing more than deceitful manipulator. The picture of her speaks volumns. It is enough already with her nonsense!

[pepperp1]

Did not take Murdoch and his fox noise approach long what 3 weeks, what bull a former official says, who Scotter Libby, what bull

[pepperp1]

Did not take Murdoch and his fox noise approach long what 3 weeks, what bull a former official says, who Scotter Libby, what bull

[pwrslm]

Billy boy had campain finance irregularities tied to the Chinese.

These folks are selling us down the river. If the truth is told, you will probably find the trail goes directly to the Chinese Communist Party (CPC).

[elichez1]

Hillory Clinton is a carpet-bagging, grand band standing, political piece of Democratic S%$T!!! Her husband open the door for the Chinese and every other greasy foreign nation to take all the respectable jobs away from millions of hard working Americans. Do you really want another Clinton in office????
Don''t vote Republican either!!! Vote "GRIPPS"!! GET RID OF POLITICAL PIECES OF S%$T!!!!!!! Whoever is in office, vote them out w/ a 3rd party candidate. Get rid of the 2 party system.

[realpatriot1]

I''m hoping that one of those partison hack federal prosecutors at DOJ will do their job and be all over this.

[drputt45]

You get what you pay for.

[reporter21]

ATTACK NOW!!TIME TO GET OUT OF AMERICA!!!
She says she is the Democrat best equipped to fight terrorists, but White House hopeful Sen. Hillary Clinton told New Hampshire voters Thursday that another attack on the United States would likely help Republican candidates at the polls. IN OTHER WORDS BIN ARE YOU WATCHING IF YOU DONT WANT A DEM IN OFFICE AND WANT TO CONTINUE WITH THIS WAR THAN GO AHEAD AND ATTACK US..


Sen. Hillary Clinton said the Republicans would benefit politically if a terrorist attack occurred before the ''''''''08 vote.

"It''''''''s a horrible prospect to ask yourself, ''''''''What if? What if?'''''''' " Clinton, a New York Democrat, told a house party in Concord, according to the New York Post and The Associated Press and confirmed by her campaign.

"But, if certain things happen between now and the election, particularly with respect to terrorism, that will automatically give the Republicans an advantage again, no matter how badly they have mishandled it, no matter how much more dangerous they have made the world."

Clinton added that if such a scenario occurred, she is the best Democratic presidential candidate "to deal with that." AND YOU WANT THIS TRAILER TRASH AS PRESIDENT..RIGHT...

GO AHEAD AMERICA AND VOTE HER IN AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS... WASN''T SHE THE ONE THAT SAID SHE WOULD NOT GET IN A ( WHAT IF, WHAT IF) SCENARIO ON A DEBATE????

Read More About This At A Link At: www.poconocommunitynews.com

[actornaught]

And what would Hillary''s responsibility be for this apparent infraction? Why doesn''t this article say? It''s early enough to replace her with Obama or Edwards, no biggie.

[pwrslm]

And what would Hillary''''s responsibility be for this apparent infraction? Why doesn''''t this article say? It''''s early enough to replace her with Obama or Edwards, no biggie.
Posted by actornaught

If you take a dump, you will notice that it drops right by the ahold it comes from. This is how to ID hillary''s "responsibility" for this "apparent infraction". The Clintons have done this before..

[dzfromsc]

Edwards is the best choice...I sincerely like him but for those of you upset that he is wealthy, he''s still the lesser of all evils. And those of you fussing about his hedge funds need to google hedge funds. Hedge funds are investments that allow for the fund to take long and short positions. They are managed by a hedge fund manager and can be moved very quickly. Edwards probably had very little knowledge about what his fund was invested into on a daily basis...he paid a hedge fund manager to do that. Don''t believe everything you hear: research for yourself!
Anyway, as a woman, even I don''t trust Hillary.
But my comment is about the texting: I am capable of texting and driving because I don''t have to look at my phone to do it. However, a law banning it would make things safer and everyone should support that.

[chicagopoet]

John Edwards is by far the best candidate of the three front runners. If Clinton is elected that will mean the same two families have run this country for over two decades. We need new blood. I think Richardson is an interesting person to consider as Vice President. I think an Edward / Richardson ticket would be a guarantee to end the war.

[gunownerdan]

Today in politics the best prostitute will get the most money.

[barbjc1]

O.K. how much more bad mouthing of Hillary Clinton is going to happen? Those of you wanting John Edwards, why was he only a Senator from North Carolina for one term.

[lorinkundert]

When you have Fidel Castro endorsing a Clinton-Obama ticket you should really feel scared, you don''t get a higher socialist rating than that and we all know from the example of the Soviet Union what that kind of system does to the people, (Gulags, Secret Police and many more benefits). The benefits will actually be for the Elite.

[rebsue1]

the ticket''s gonna be hillary/barack -- am l wrong?

[rebsue1]

the ticket''s gonna be hillary/barack -- am l wrong ?

[brianbwb-2009]

Haven''t figured it out yet? The most money goes to the likely winner, If Edwards were the front runner, Hsu and his ilk would be funneling money to him.
The very same people are most likely also greasing the Republican front runners from another address.

No one even close to the AH is immune from, or untainted by the hundreds of millions of dollars that bribe policy.

[katg21]

Whos betting this news will NOT be on the Katie Couric network tonight, BUt Katie has enough trouble brewing, with her bio coming out and the Katie camp trying to squash it.
Posted by airmanc5 at 03:57 PM : Aug 28, 2007

You aren''t kidding! I''m surprised this article even made it on CBS! Plus, notice how long it is? If they were talking about a Republican this would be a three piece spread, instead it''s shared with two other stories. No, there is no media bias! I can''t believe that any one can deny this.

[gunownerdan]

The more I look at Hillary, the uglier she seems to get. No wonder Bill cheated with Monica!

[Joe posey]

i suggest we all just vote for ronald mc donald, at least that clown appears to know what he''s doing!

[infidel_us]

"Hillary Gets Big Bucks From A Bungalow"

Don''t you LOVE the way CBS relagated this to an almost "Yawn....another Clinton scandal" piece? If this were a republican, it would have already trumped the Craig story. CBS = Clinton Broadcasting Service!

[actornaught]

This is an abridged version of a WSJ article. It doesn''t even list all the professions of the Paw family. Lawrence Barcella, a Washington attorney representing Mr. Hsu, said in an August 28 statement, that he offered to provide financial information regarding "how the Paw family is able to afford such political largess.":

"I told the reporter and his editor that I had reviewed the Paw''s [sic] financial records, which clearly demonstrated that they easily had the financial wherewithal to make any level of contributions. ... I asked the reporter, in the presence of his editor, if I got permission to let them see the Paws'' financial information, which shows their resources, would they not run the story? His editor responded 3 times that they were running the story anyway."

Good ol'' right wing press distortions...

[actornaught]

Further, in aswer to my own posted question about a candidate''s culpability, another writer stated:

"The Journal did not go beyond this general statement that these types of cases don''t ''necessarily implicate ... candidates.'' At no point did Brody specifically note the absence of evidence implicating Clinton."

[actornaught]

Obviously, the Paws'' campaign contributions needed further research in order to implicate Hillary in any way. As such, this article is rumor and half truth, a weird attempt to take a non-story and make it even more of a non-story.

[bks59]

it does not appear that the CA legislature is banning faxing while driving!

[ralan40]

Our country was founded and built around the fact that Humans can have differing opinions on things.

However, I guess if a person is intellectually limited or lacks the self-esteem to be satisfied with their own opinions....demonizing the opposing side is their only option...

Here''s to hoping this line of reasoning is helping make our country a better place for all Americans.

[flreason]

Campaign contributions are a thorny issue for any candidate. I expect that if an ivestigation of the contributions produces a smoking gun, Clinton will return Paws''/Hsu''s donations. Chances are an investigation of the finances of most of the candidates would turn up similar irregularities. In no way does that mean that we should ignore or condone it.

OMG--I can''t believe you guys feel justified in juding Hillary by her LOOKS!!! What sexist BS! On her worst day, she looks better than just about every male candidate except Edwards. I don''t fault you for taking exception to any number of her political positions (that is NOT intended as a double entendre!), but stick to issues. Washington was no beauty when he served as President--and Lincoln would have given Boris Karloff a run for his money.

[flreason]

OOPS--make that "judging," not "juding." Guess I''m not a G whiz.

[oakishpines]

'' ... putting women in mens armys did not turn men into gardenets, it turned women into rapists of husbands and children ... putting children into armys does not turn women and men into gardenets, it turns children into parent rapists ... if men are to treat children with respect, then men are to start acting like children ... and are to start treating two year olds like two year olds ... ''

'' ... all the front pages would have been covered in photos of local children dancing get well feed world songs rallied around the sick beds drifting the farm trails, except a terrorist warned against it ... ''