WASHINGTON, Aug. 27, 2007

Gonzales-Bush Loyalty A Two-Way Street

Washington Post Analysis: Examining The Career Of The Attorney General Upon His Resignation

  • Video Timing Of Gonzalez Resignation

    Only On The Web: Bill Plante takes a look at why Attorney General Alberto Gonzales submitted his resignation prior to Congress reconvening after a summer hiatus.

  • Video Gonzales Steps Down

    Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has resigned but remains a controversial figure due to his involvement in secret government wiretapping and firing U.S. district attorneys. Pauline Chiou reports.

  • Attorney General Alberto Gonzales announces his resignation at a press conference at the Justice Department Headquarters in Washington, Aug. 27, 2007.  (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

  • Interactive Tumultuous Tenure

    Attorney General Alberto Gonzales resigns amid firings firestorm, questions over handling of terror investigations.

  • Photo Essay Alberto Gonzales

    Attorney General resigns after lengthy standoff over U.S. attorney firings, terror probes.

From Our Partner:
(WASHINGTONPOST.COM)  This story was written by Michael A. Fletcher and R. Jeffrey Smith.

After arriving in Washington with President Bush in 2001, Alberto Gonzales stood out for his unflappable nature and intense loyalty to the president. With what some called his willingness to interpret the law to fit his boss's priorities and his long political ties with Bush, Gonzales was among the president's closest confidants.

It is for good reason that Bush sometimes referred to Gonzales as "mi abogado" and kept him close by. In 1996, he helped then-Texas Gov. Bush avoid jury duty where he might have been forced to reveal a 20-year-old charge of driving while intoxicated, which later surfaced anyway. Dozens of Gonzales memos to Bush supported the governor's desire to implement the death penalty in Texas.

And as White House counsel and later as attorney general, Gonzales endorsed the creation of the controversial legal framework that guided the administration's war on terror, strongly backed by Vice President Cheney and legal conservatives but opposed by many scholars and partly overturned by the courts.

If Gonzales, who resigned as attorney general Monday, served Bush well over the years, the reverse is also true. Through Bush's sponsorship, Gonzales ascended to the top of the Texas legal establishment before becoming what some scholars call one of the most influential Hispanic officials in the history of United States government. Through more than six years in Washington, Gonzales was unable to expand his base of support beyond the president and his inner circle, and finally appeared to succumb to blunt attacks from Republican as well as Democratic lawmakers over his mishandling of the firings of nine U.S. attorneys.

"He had very much a one-to-one relationship with the president," said David Frum, a former Bush speechwriter. "That is where he started, and that is where he finished."

In the end, Gonzales was a man without a constituency outside of the White House. At a Senate hearing on April 19, he endured withering criticism over his professed inability to recall key events in the attorney firings, including details of a meeting on the topic with President Bush and Karl Rove. As the controversy swirled over a period of several months, conservative figures questioned both his legal competence and his ability to manage the sprawling Justice Department.

"We have never seen evidence that he has a fine legal mind, good judgment, or managerial ability," read an editorial in the conservative National Review in late March. "Nor has his conduct at any stage of this controversy gained our confidence."

The controversy over the prosecutor firings expanded in recent months to encompass other issues, all with a focus on whether lawmakers considered Gonzales trustworthy or competent to run the Justice Department.

In one key example, Gonzales repeatedly testified that the administration's warrantless surveillance program had caused no serious disagreement among Justice Department officials. But that claim was contradicted by testimony from former deputy attorney general James B. Comey and FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III.

Both described how Gonzales, then the White House counsel, visited former Attorney General John D. Ashcroft in the hospital in March 2004 after Justice lawyers had refused to reauthorize parts of the program to be illegal. Gonzales said Ashcroft was "lucid" during the visit, while Mueller described him as "feeble" and "barely articulate."

The mounting evidence prompted Gonzales to clarify his remarks about the program earlier this month.

These and other episodes led several congressional Democrats to call for perjury investigations of Gonzales. During a particularly hostile Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on July 24, Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, D-Vt., told Gonzales bluntly: "I don't trust you."

Continued



© 2007 The Washington Post Company
Add a Comment See all 173 Comments
by sgtrds August 28, 2007 4:36 AM EDT
Posted by red164 at 12:38 AM : Aug 28, 2007


Yawn............
Reply to this comment
by red164 August 28, 2007 3:41 AM EDT
George W. Bush Telling His Own Trifecta Joke

President''s Remarks at GOP Luncheon, 2-27-02
Remarks by the President to Robin Hayes for Congress and Elizabeth Dole for Senate
North Carolina Republican Party Luncheon, Charlotte Convention Center, Charlotte, North Carolina

Bush: You know, I was campaigning in Chicago and somebody asked me, is there ever any time where the budget might have to go into deficit? I said only if we were at war or had a national emergency or were in recession. (Laughter.) Little did I realize we''d get the trifecta. (Laughter.)


How will President George W. Bush personally make millions (if not billions) from the War on Terror and Iraq? The old fashioned way. He''ll inherit it. The Carlyle Group
Former World Leaders and Washington Insiders Making Billions in the War on Terrorism


They say I shot a man named Gray and took his wife to Italy.
She inherited a million bucks and when she died it came to me.
I can''t help it if I''m lucky. - Bob Dylan

"It also gives us a very special, secret pleasure to see how unaware the people around us are of what is really happening to them."
- Adolf Hitler

Reply to this comment
by red164 August 28, 2007 3:38 AM EDT
Which is why we need a criminal/Senate investigation into the hiring of Richard Stickly as head of MSHA!
Posted by SgtRDS at 11:54 PM : Aug 27, 2007

Hey, Sgt coincidence theorists how about a new investigation into 9/11?

Robert Fisk: Even I question the ''truth'' about 9/11

Robert Fisk
London Independent
Saturday, August 25, 2007

University of Massachusetts Professor Calls For New 9/11 Investigation

Patriots Question 9/11
Sunday, August 26, 2007

Lynn Margulis, AB, MS, PhD %u2013 Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts - Amherst. Elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1983.




Reply to this comment
by usayesterday August 28, 2007 2:59 AM EDT
Loyalty: Codependency
Cronysim: hiring friends over competency.

Above describes the Southern Conservative culture.
Posted by ConDumism at 11:41 PM : Aug 27, 2007
.......

Now being unemployed, I kinda wish I was "really good friends" with Bush!

I could use a job in the "Justice" Department, (or any Department) right now!

:-)
Reply to this comment
by sgtrds August 28, 2007 2:54 AM EDT
Loyalty: Codependency
Cronysim: hiring friends over competency.

Above describes the Southern Conservative culture.
Posted by ConDumism at 11:41 PM : Aug 27, 2007

Which is why we need a criminal/Senate investigation into the hiring of Richard Stickly as head of MSHA!
Reply to this comment
by condumism August 28, 2007 2:41 AM EDT
Loyalty: Codependency
Cronysim: hiring friends over competency.

Above describes the Southern Conservative culture.
Reply to this comment
by redwilma August 28, 2007 2:25 AM EDT
I want them to continue the investigations. Clearly Gonzales lied under oath about the Ashcroft visit, and that was just sick! And, it was on Bush''s behalf! If there is evidence that Mueller''s version is incorrect, then let that come out. But, if Gonzales lied under oath (repeatedly), as the Attorney General, to the Congress, he should answer for that. (At least he should be disbarred.)
Reply to this comment
by usayesterday August 28, 2007 2:17 AM EDT
The replacement for Gonzales may be Chertoff?!

How would that make the "Justice" Department any more credible?

A Mob boss doesn''t replace a hitman with a representative from the Church, no, he replaces the hitman with another killer!

CREDIBILITY IS NOT A GOAL OF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION. NEVER HAS BEEN. NEVER WILL BE.
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 August 28, 2007 2:12 AM EDT
Really, where can we find these "lies" in print, ''''cause as far as I know, the "lies" were never proven. This was a witch hunt plain and simple, Gonzales finally broke to the constant hammering. That''''s all.
Posted by katg21 at 04:15 PM : Aug 27, 2007


HERE YA GO: SPIN IT IF YOU CAN. LMAO:


His support among Republicans in Congress, already weak, eroded markedly, then suffered further with word of the bedside meeting in the intensive care unit of George Washington University Hospital three years earlier.

Former Deputy Attorney General James Comey testified that Ashcroft had refused to reauthorize the wiretapping program. Appearing before the Judiciary Committee, he described a confrontation in which Gonzales _ White House counsel at the time _ and White House Chief of Staff Andy Card had appealed to Ashcroft to overrule his deputy. The ill Ashcroft refused, saying he had transferred power to Comey.

Comey described the events as "an effort to take advantage of a very sick man who did not have the powers of the attorney general."


"Gonzales subsequently denied that the dispute was about the terrorist surveillance program, but his credibility was undercut when FBI Director Robert S. Mueller contradicted him.

Several Democrats called for a perjury investigation, but no further action has been taken.

Reply to this comment
by lastdance2 August 28, 2007 1:16 AM EDT
There are Still - 60 - Active investigations going on ! ! !

There was one comment posted here earler
that - Now has been deleted ! ! !

The statement claimed :
The Criminal Investigation Division of :
The Internal Revenue Service was Responsible -
For conducting a Criminal Investigation against members of :
The Bush Administration - The FBI - and The Justice Department.

If anyone copied that Statement - Comment
Re-post it here for me.
I have a Profound Interest in that Particular :
"Criminal Investigation"

Lastdance
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 August 28, 2007 1:05 AM EDT
Gonzales - who had repeatedly asked, "are we in policy discussions on interrogations - admitted no personal error in those events. "Sometimes people do things that they shouldn''t do," Gonzales said at his confirmation hearing in Jan. 2005. "People are imperfect...and so the fact that abuses occur, they''re unfortunate but I''m not sure that they should be viewed as surprising."
said Bill Minutaglio, author of "The President''s Counselor," a biography of Gonzales. "As a personality he exhibits almost a mortician''s calm. He is emotionally flat-lined."

Himmler, Hitler''s torture boy and architect of the "Final Solution" was said to be emotionally flat lined" also. Dead pan is the word--disconnected and therefore capable of anything. Like Jason in the movies--slasher-Halloween.

Reply to this comment
by the74blaster August 28, 2007 12:59 AM EDT
Maybe the first order of business is to start investigations of crooked Democrat leaders like Jack Murtha, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi.

This game should be alot of fun.
Posted by One_American at 03:12 PM : Aug 27, 2007

What has Murtha, Reid or Pelosi done that even compares with Bush administrations track record?

How many wars did they start based on false pretenses?

How many times have they violated the rights we have according to our constitution?

How many times have they lied about the real cost of the Iraq war?

I say why not, lets investigate them all!

However, lets post the score when its all over and vote accordingly.

Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 August 28, 2007 12:51 AM EDT
Could you honestly say that anyone he''''d have chosen would be qualified in your eyes?
Posted by katg21 at 04:42 PM : Aug 27, 2007


You have a point. A POS will only choose other turds that stink as much or more than he. LOL
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 August 28, 2007 12:46 AM EDT
Really, where can we find these "lies" in print, ''''cause as far as I know, the "lies" were never proven. This was a witch hunt plain and simple, Gonzales finally broke to the constant hammering. That''''s all.
Posted by katg21 at 04:15 PM : Aug 27, 2007


That''s why all of you still love Bush and Gonzo--you are all liars too. Of course the lies were proven. We all heard him deny ever being in any meetings, and then we watched his flunkies all sell him out one by one and we heard him lie about what was said to Ashcroft too---and then heard the contradiction of another staff member. And since, most of what Gonzo said he later either contradicted or did not remember....he not only was and is a liar but a stupid one at that--and you are a liar. Write a book: "***. Lies, Liars, and the Lying Liars who Love Them" at least 29% of you will buy it, sure that you are in it somewhere.
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 August 28, 2007 12:43 AM EDT
Hmmm based on Bush''s MO and his unwavering support to the people he then throws under the train...somebody better tell Al Maliki that he is next. When Bush claims undying loyalty no matter what, he is just mulling over where to stick the knife while saving face and demanding that his flunkee resign so that he looks like he keeps his word.
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 August 28, 2007 12:40 AM EDT
You are selective moralists. Posted by mudrose at 04:13 PM : Aug 27, 2007

Remember those words when your Republican voter choice boils down to a man who not only had a mistress who performed more than bj, but was a home wrecker and now wants to validate his behavior by installing his mistress as our first lady. Since by your words, you appear to be above selective morality--We just "know" that such a moral misfit such as Guiliani and his mistress wife/judy ---would never get your vote, right? LOL.
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 August 28, 2007 12:37 AM EDT
Gonna have to challenge you on that one... Jimmy Carter was the worst.
Posted by katg21 at 04:11 PM : Aug 27, 2007


Nope Carter was inept, worse than ineptitude will always be pure power hungry evil, and unforgiveable and contemptible is the double whammy of ineptitude and power hungry evil--THAT is this administration. So Nixon and Bush win the FU-America -BAR Darwin prize hands down.

For those who never learned that acronym: Fvckkked Up America Beyond All Recognition.
Reply to this comment
by jetranger7 August 28, 2007 12:34 AM EDT
Run little GONZO , Run, Run little Gonzo, Run !! Go knock on Dumsfield House, or Carl Fraudulent Rove''s Door, some crooked SOB will taken you in and give you a job !! Hey, Cheney, guess what, your up Next, you lying Corrupt SOB !!!!!
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 August 28, 2007 12:33 AM EDT
Wonder what made him bugger off? Felt sure he said he served at the pleasure of the President. And the President was still supposedly supporting him. Hmmmmmm Him and Karl leaving---bet the Democrats must have a particular nasty ace up their sleeve to make Bush jettison his most reliable henchmen. Hope they did not promise to back off in exchange for those resignations. After all of the slime and evil of the past 7 years--we really do need to see someone go to jail big time from this most corrupt, duplicitous, warmongering administration.
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 August 28, 2007 12:30 AM EDT
You left out those missing WH emails - those WILL be alot of fun !!
Posted by IOWEIGN at 03:25 PM : Aug 27, 2007


CORRECTION: You left out those ILLEGALLY WRITTEN ON FORBIDDEN LAPTOPS--missing WH emails - those WILL be alot of fun !!
Posted by IOWEIGN at 03:25 PM : Aug 27, 2007

If I were the Democrats and pretty well knowing how Bush works, I would not move too quickly to help him install another devoted thug in the DOJ. They should take their time confirming and verifying independence. None with Bush''s *** on their lips or residual stuff streaming from ***** or azzes need apply. Get ''er done by Nov. 2008. Just in time to do a poor job shredding and erasing the data.
Reply to this comment
See all 173 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: