WASHINGTON, Aug. 22, 2007

Devices Aim To Stop Drunken Drivers

Automakers Are Developing Ignition-Interlock Systems That Could Help Keep Drunken Drivers Off The Road

  • Play CBS Video Video Device Stops Drunk Driving

    Repeat DUI offenders in many states are required to have ignition interlocks that keep the car from starting if the driver has been drinking. Nancy Cordes reports.

  •  (CBS)

  • Interactive Motor Away

    Things to know before hitting the road.

(CBS)  If friends don't let friends drive drunk, there's one car that's a driver's best friend. It's equipped with a breathalyzer linked to the ignition, and it won't start if the driver is intoxicated.

"Interlock devices are up to 90 percent effective in reducing repeat offenses. This really can stop repeat offenders from continuing to drink and drive," says MADD CEO Chuck Hurley.

Now mandatory for repeat offenders in 19 states, ignition interlocks, as they're called, have been installed in about 100,000 cars. But that number is tiny compared to the 1.4 million drunken driving arrests made in the United States each year, reports CBS News transportation and consumer safety correspondent Nancy Cordes.

"We see them as a benefit — a technology that's being underutilized," says Nicole Nason of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

But maybe not for long: At least four major automakers are working on their own versions.

Saab's AlcoKey, a key and breathalyzer in one, is already in field trials.

In Nissan's concept, sensors in the gearshift and seats would pick up alcohol in perspiration, whole a camera mounted on the instrument panel would detect drowsiness.

"They just touch or their regular breathing activates these systems, and they're able to warn them about their alcohol level," explains Bob Yakushi, Nissan's director of product safety.

It's still a good five years from reality.

For now, Steve Carter is using an interlock which he had installed after his third DUI.

"I'm not invincible, and if I continue behaving in this manner and drinking in this manner, it's going to kill me," he said.

While critics argue the technology isn't foolproof, highway safety advocates say otherwise.

"They're not that easy to defeat, but there's a perception out there that they are," Nason says. "They may have been in the beginning."

The devices have a track record, she says, for stopping would-be drunken drivers cold.


© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 16 Comments
by drummer94 August 24, 2007 5:31 AM EDT
Why not is right. I shouldnt have been drivin when I did. I appoligize to everyone. I made a stupid mistake but I should not pay for the rest of my life. Never say never because it happens- trust me.
Reply to this comment
by drummer94 August 24, 2007 5:21 AM EDT
I am not Drummer but i am his old lady. I got a Impaired driving but I delt with it. I didnt like it but I jumped threw their hoops
Reply to this comment
by grammawhamma August 24, 2007 12:47 AM EDT
What about all the people who drink in the car while they are driving...unfortunately it is a common thing in my area. Will the car just shut off when they reach their limit? If they had breathalyzers at bars I can foresee the drunks compeating to see who can blow the highest number. I am not sure what the solution is.
Reply to this comment
by caeric August 23, 2007 11:08 PM EDT
who will bring their children with them to blow into the device for the offender.

This is a valid concern if the device only checks at vehicle startup. However, if the devices are integrated into the vehicle and do periodic checks (such as with the perspiration monitor mentioned in the article) such activity can be reduced or eliminated.
Reply to this comment
by lisakbryant August 23, 2007 8:26 PM EDT
There have been numerous accounts of repeat offenders with these devices in their cars as part of their sentence who will bring their children with them to blow into the device for the offender. This now puts a minor in the vehicle with a drunk driver. Technology should be able to find a solution for this problem.
Reply to this comment
by myidoncbs August 23, 2007 8:12 PM EDT
The interlock is likely to work very well for drunks who really do not want to drive drunk, but are unable to judge for themselves when they are drunk. But it is not a panacea. If the safety advocates believe it can''t be easily defeated, they are really fooling themselves.

ralan40 suggested a typical authoritarian approach to getting drunks off the road: incarceration. But, guess what ralan? Incarceration does not actually solve the problem. It only keeps them off the road while they''re in jail. Even if we wanted to do so, our country can not afford to build enough jails to house all of our drunks for their entire lives-- those jails are already full of people who smoked a little weed or crack!

The USA has the largest documented prison population in the world, and it has not solved the problem of crime one bit.

So, I applaud the effort, but I wish someone would put a little more attention on whatever it is that causes people to feel the need to get drunk, and what keeps them from realizing that they can''t drive once they are drunk.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan August 23, 2007 1:56 PM EDT
This should be mandatory for all repeat drunk driving offenders in all 50 states.
It''s certainly a lot better than those nazi-style police checkpoints!
Reply to this comment
by rational_1 August 23, 2007 1:39 PM EDT
Anyone that has as much as one drink at a bar and then drives home should have access to a device before leaving the bar. Just a quick check before driving and the penalties should be posted on the exit door as you leave. Just like labor dept info in the workplace. You just blew .07 at the machine and...... your penalty could be XYZ if you drive. Slowly it would begin to sink in.
Posted by magoo2u1 at 08:03 AM : Aug 23, 2007

There''s the potential problem of the person who blows 0.07 mg% at the door, thinks he''s okay to drive because he''s below 0.08, but his blood alcohol level is still on the rising phase because of the three shots he had immediately before leaving the bar. Half an hour later, while he''s driving, his BAC hits 0.12. So, what should your car do if it detects a BAC higher than the legal limit in your perspiration while you''re meandering down the highway - assuming it was below the legal limit when you started off? Wonder if they''ve thought of that.
Reply to this comment
by octavianfdlr August 23, 2007 12:59 PM EDT
"Interlock devices are up to 90 percent effective in reducing repeat offenses."

"...ignition interlocks, as they''re called, have been installed in about 100,000 cars."

Does this mean that 10,000 drunks have been arrested driving cars equipped with these interlocks? Or does this mean that 90,000 had fewer repeat offenses, and the remaining 10,000 had the normal number of repeat offenses?
Reply to this comment
by ralan40 August 23, 2007 12:02 PM EDT
Here''s an idea, a device that keeps drunk drivers off the road....we could call it ''incarceration''
Reply to this comment
See all 16 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: