Boss A Jerk? Think About Suing Him
The Skinny: Legislation To Let Employees Sue Bad Bosses Under Consideration In 4 States
-
Is your boss a jerk? At least four state legislatures are considering legislation that could make bullying by bosses grounds for a lawsuit. (iStockphoto)
Is your boss a nightmare? Not just annoying, but so completely lacking in people skills as to possibly be a sociopath?
There may now be more you can do than simply renting "Office Space" for the 11th time. The Los Angeles Times reports that lawmakers across the country are considering legislation that would give workers grounds to sue their superiors "for being, basically, jerks."
The specific standards for behavior that would justify such lawsuits are still being worked out. At least four state legislatures, including those in New Jersey, New York, Vermont and Washington, are considering such a measure.
Impetus for the legislation comes at a time of rising awareness of bad boss behavior, the L.A. Times reports. The AFL-CIO is set to announce the winner of its My Bad Boss contest based on who had the most ghoulish tale of boss misbehavior.
Top contenders include a boss who called the office every morning to give instructions as he brushed his teeth and conducted other business in the bathroom. Another boss told his workers to use pencils when he was told the office was so cold that the ink in their pens stopped flowing.
To those who would argue that pushing around employees has been a part of bosshood since the advent of work, the Times offers a few theories to explain the recent surge of worker whining.
Some experts contend the ranks of bullying bosses are growing as short-staffed companies tap managers with lousy people skills. Other experts point out that "baby boomers on the cusp of retirement and restless younger employees are more likely to complain or quit than suffer in silence."
The disgruntlement is fairly widespread. This year the Employment Law Alliance, a San Francisco clearinghouse for employment and labor lawyers, conducted a nationwide survey and found that 44 percent of employees said they worked for an abusive supervisor.
All good stuff to remember the next time your boss says, after asking you to work Saturday, "Ahh, I'm also gonna need you to go ahead and come in on Sunday, too."
Maliki Malaise
U.S. lawmakers and military commanders alike have had it up to here with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, according to the top of the Wall Street Journal's newsbox and the front page of the Washington Post.
The Post delivers fightin' words from the influential chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., who just got back from a three-day trip to Iraq and Jordan apparently unimpressed with what he saw.
"I hope the parliament will vote the Maliki government out of office and will have the wisdom to replace it with a less sectarian and more unifying prime minister and government," he declared in a clear strike across the bow of the Maliki-backing President Bush. The Post called his statement "the most forceful call for leadership change in Iraq from a U.S. official."
Meanwhile, the Journal focuses on the deeply divided opinion of Maliki among military commanders, led by top U.S. commander in Iraq Gen. David Petraeus (pro) and Army Chief of Staff George Casey (anti). Petraeus says Maliki has been making baby steps and needs more time, but Casey, who held the top slot in 2005 and 2006, said "the U.S. may have erred in believing that Mr. Maliki, with a lifetime of Shiite activism, would be willing or able to make political compromises with the country's Sunnis."
"It would be a huge shame if, after all the military has accomplished with the surge, we don't get a political accommodation," Casey said. "But I'm not optimistic."
Airport Anger Is The New Road Rage
Casey and Levin aren't the only Iraq watchers in a dour mood. One congressman on his way to check out the situation over there had a little episode at Dulles International Airport over the weekend that resulted in his being charged with misdemeanor assault and battery for allegedly pushing an airline employee during a dispute over baggage, the Washington Post reports.
After "experiencing a delay claiming his bag," Rep. Bob Filner, D-Calif., allegedly attempted to enter an employees-only area, pushed aside an employee's arm and wouldn't leave when asked, according to the airport's statement. Filner's office called the charges "ridiculous."
That's as far as the Post is willing to go on the story, but a source familiar with the incident reportedly told Fox News that when airport agents told Filner to leave the off-limits area, her responded: "I'm not going until I get my bag. You're treating us like animals."
Considering the degeneration of the flying experience during the past few months, it's quite possible that the ornery lawmaker's behavior was the only logical response to the situation.
A NOTE TO READERS: The Skinny is available via e-mail. Click here and follow the directions to register to receive it in your inbox each weekday morning.
©MMVII, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





As for whistle-blowing, this is a matter of conscience. If there are serious labor or financial irregularities, it may be a civic duty to handle this. This is not much different than other civic duties, such as serving on a jury or accepting service in the military. There are risks to be taken to preserve democracy. If a future employer does not understand that, then one should not work for such an organization.
But is is only because he is a lawmaker that he is not being investigated as a "terrorist".
And this is what the lawmakers voted to bail out the airlines for.
hehe...
I''m loving it!
NETWORK NEWS RACE
Total Viewers, Week of 8/13/07
ABC: 8,010,000
NBC: 7,430,000
CBS: 5,790,000
Couric: still not enough tarting-up, dumbing-down!!!!
.
Saw ya on philadelphiaweekly.com spouting the same crapola as ya do here. E X A C T L Y the same.
Get a life.
Posted by random_radar
But there''s always the tip to the police or the IRS, the anonymous email to the wife, not to mention the ice pick to the auto tires, wire cutters to the brake lines, or even the bullet to the head.
In a world of abuse, boss killing may be the best way to dissuade the abusers. It''s like immunization--every year a few innocent little kids die from vaccination, but try to get your child into school without one. Boss killings are the same, a few (not so innocent) ones dies, too bad, so sad, but the rest get the message, one hopes, that there''s a limit to how much you can degrade a human being.
you think this is bad ... wait till the ''anal cavity bomber'' strikes ... how ya gonna screen for that!
plenty of people in China and India that would just love to take over your job
Never have to worry about your boss again
and of course the lawyers don''t care about you
they''ll always find something and someone new to sue
It''s about time someone made these miniature despots accountable.
'' ... most get sick tax world authorities most time remind all that most folk most time dance get well feed world songs rallied around sick beds drifting tens millions spore bloom weed dragon trail fickle first aid lunch farm cottage studio trail groups ... ''
'' ... folk were born to consume the weeds, and with no obligation to drip compost fertilize and drip water irrigate for the purpose of producing more weeds, though most folk most time choose to do so ... ''
'' ... if 210 million, or 3 percent, oligopolize nearly all the wealth, then 210 million makes a good target audience ... however, most of the audience will be not the wealthy, but their clients whose dollar must be wooed away ... by sharing products and services with 400 or 500 new consumets each day and praying eleven or so percent (50 folk) offer pitch a dollar into the pot ... ''
'' ... i take jot notes / poems and snap clips from the audience at large, paying 10 or so cent or 100 or so cent or a cent or two for each of 50 one minute note/poem/clip from 50 folk each day, in order to ''pass the mike'' ... i also jot or snap 50 of my own notes / poems / clips so as not to ''sacrifice myself to the mic'' ...
... but to give 99% to the audience or 99 % to myself ... it''s me against the world, the 7 billion, so i deserve 99 % for security ... but the 7billion occupy 99% of the space, so they deserve 99% of my share of the market share ... so i defend us each and split the difference and go 50% / 50% ... ''
Hm, yeh either HR does something about it or your miserable for the rest of your life because you can''t work at the place you love, or your dealing with a jerk everyday? Yeh, maybe a law suit will wake some people up and show them that employees need to be treated with respect and spoken to properly when at work.
If women can sue for " hey how about a quickie "
Then anyone should be able to sue for a boss who treats you in any demeaning way possible. Verbal Abuse is Abuse whether it''s sexual by nature or otherwise. Every company no matter how big or small should have a Company Manual that dictates behavior for Managers as well as subordinates. Using the chain of command should be your first choice and leave a law suit for last but when you love what your doing, why should you be run out of a company because your manager can''t speake to you with a civil tongue or treat you in a respectful manner.
- by random_radar August 21, 2007 1:47 PM EDT
- If you don''t like your boss, find another job. Never, ever sue your employer. That will be the end of your career anywhere.
- Reply to this comment
See all 19 CommentsSure, the government says you deserve a break, but consider the fact that the government won''t let you sue them.
Would you hire a whistle blower or someone who sued? No, you would not because you are afraid something bad could happen despite your best efforts to be honest and good.
So don''t even think about suing, let alone breath the word or do the deed. There will always to another job--probably a better job--for you...unless you sue your last employer.