WASHINGTON, Aug. 21, 2007

Report Cites Major CIA Lapses Before 9/11

Watchdog Slams Agency For Failing To Tackle Al Qaeda Effectively

  • Photo

     (AP / CBS)

  • Who's Who Spy Agency Chiefs

    A glimpse at those who have headed the Central Intelligence Agency since its inception.

  • Interactive 21st Century Spying

    The biggest overhaul of the U.S. intelligence community in half a century.

  • Interactive Sept. 11 And Since

    Reflecting on the events of Sept. 11, 2001, the day that changed America.

(CBS/AP)  The CIA's top leaders failed to use their available powers, never developed a comprehensive plan to stop al Qaeda and missed crucial opportunities to thwart two hijackers in the run-up to Sept. 11, the agency's own watchdog concluded in a bruising report released Tuesday.

Completed in June 2005 and kept classified until now, the 19-page executive summary finds extensive fault with the actions of senior CIA leaders and others beneath them. "The agency and its officers did not discharge their responsibilities in a satisfactory manner," the CIA inspector general found.

"They did not always work effectively and cooperatively," the report stated.

Nearly three years before 9/11, then-CIA Director George Tenet signed a directive declaring "we are at war" with Osama Bin Laden and directed that "no resources or people (be) spared," reports CBS News national security correspondent David Martin. But the inspector general found "no…strategic plan was ever created" and no extra money or people were added to operations against Bin Laden.

Yet the review team led by Inspector General John Helgerson found neither a "single point of failure nor a silver bullet" that would have stopped the attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people.

In a statement, CIA Director Michael Hayden said the decision to release the report was not his choice or preference, but that he was making the report available as required by Congress in a law President George W. Bush signed earlier this month.

"I thought the release of this report would distract officers serving their country on the front lines of a global conflict," Hayden said. "It will, at a minimum, consume time and attention revisiting ground that is already well plowed."

The report does cover terrain heavily examined by a congressional inquiry and the Sept. 11 Commission. However, the CIA watchdog's report goes further than previous reviews to examine the personal failings of individuals within the agency who led the pre-Sept. 11 efforts against al Qaeda.

Helgerson's team found that no CIA employees violated the law or were part of any misconduct.

The report recommends Tenet and other senior officers face possible disciplinary action, adds Martin, but a statement by the current CIA director says that's not going to happen.

In October 2005, then-CIA Director Porter Goss also rejected the recommendation. He said he had spoken personally with the current employees named in the report, and he trusted their abilities and dedication. "The report unveiled no mysteries," Goss said.

Hayden stuck by Goss's decision.

Providing a glimpse of a series of shortfalls laid out in the longer, still-classified report, the executive summary says:

  • U.S. spy agencies, which were overseen by Tenet, lacked a comprehensive strategic plan to counter Osama bin Laden prior to Sept. 11. The inspector general concluded that Tenet "by virtue of his position, bears ultimate responsibility for the fact that no such strategic plan was ever created."

  • The CIA's analysis of al Qaeda before Sept. 2001 was lacking. No comprehensive report focusing on bin Laden was written after 1993, and no comprehensive report laying out the threats of 2001 was assembled. "A number of important issues were covered insufficiently or not at all," the report found.

  • The CIA and the National Security Agency tussled over their responsibilities in dealing with al Qaeda well into 2001. Only Tenet's personal involvement could have led to a timely resolution, the report concluded.

  • The CIA station charged with monitoring bin Laden, code-named Alec Station, was overworked, lacked operational experience, expertise and training. The report recommended forming accountability boards for the CIA Counterterror Center chiefs from 1998 to 2001, including Black.

  • Although 50 to 60 people read at least one CIA cable about two of the hijackers, the information was not shared with the proper offices and agencies. "That so many individuals failed to act in this case reflects a systemic breakdown.... Basically, there was no coherent, functioning watch-listing program," the report said. The report again called for further review of Black and his predecessor.

    While blame is heaped on Tenet and his deputies, the report also says that Tenet was forcefully engaged in counterterrorism efforts and personally sounded the alarm before Congress, the military and policymakers. In a now well-known 1998 memo, he declared, "We are at war."

    The trouble, the report said, was follow-up.

    In a statement, Tenet said the inspector general is "flat wrong" about the lack of plan.

    "There was in fact a robust plan, marked by extraordinary effort and dedication to fighting terrorism, dating back to long before 9/11," he said. "Without such an effort, we would not have been able to give the president a plan on Sept. 15, 2001, that led to the routing of the Taliban, chasing al Qaeda from its Afghan sanctuary and combating terrorists across 92 countries."

    © MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Video and Galleries from War On Terror

    Add a Comment See all 407 Comments
    by misssuzq August 21, 2007 3:53 PM PDT

    "Report Cites Major CIA Lapses Before 9/11"

    Ya think?


    Reply to this comment
    by jshmks August 21, 2007 3:54 PM PDT
    I think the whole short bus ride even knew this.
    Reply to this comment
    by nexgen99 August 21, 2007 3:56 PM PDT
    All, these failures occurred under the Clinton Administration. Why, because he was a coward of infinite proportion, his administration starved the military and the CIA of needed budget dollars. Bill Clinton was too busy looking for his next BJ instead of dealing with the threats this nation faced. Had he done his job, maybe Bin Laden would be in jail and 3,000 Americans would still be alive and we would not be in Iraq today.
    Reply to this comment
    by infidel_us August 21, 2007 3:59 PM PDT
    Dommit ROVE! You and Bush gutted the CIA and outed Plame! It doesn''t matter that you were only in office for a few months....it''s YOUR fault!!! You and your hole administration should be impounded!!!! :)
    Reply to this comment
    by pepperp1 August 21, 2007 3:59 PM PDT
    We kind of figured that out for ourselves the day the planes hit the pentagon, twin towers and the field in Pa. Medal of Freedom huh ya think Bush will ask for it back, what ***. But what the heck Tenet is a good friend of the Bush family ya know.
    Reply to this comment
    by patriotnw August 21, 2007 4:01 PM PDT
    Oh my... it''s another "blame Clinton" robot. If that''s the case, then why didn''t Bush go after the perpetrators of the U.S.S. Cole bombing? And let''s not forget the memo Bush received "Bin Laden determined to attack U.S.", which he swept aside like an old Sunday comic strip.
    Reply to this comment
    by j4401 August 21, 2007 4:04 PM PDT
    The Real Reason We''re In Iraq: An influential group of conservatives convinced President George W. Bush that it was in America''s best interests to conquer Iraq as a first step toward dominating the oil-producing nations in the Middle East. There was no "exit plan" because we never intended to exit. The plan was, and is, to build military bases in Iraq and stay there forever. Our leaders also see Iraq as a place to make money. So Bush & Co. have set up their friends to cash in on the rebuilding of Iraq.
    Reply to this comment
    by infidel_us August 21, 2007 4:06 PM PDT
    Bush received "Bin Laden determined to attack U.S.", which he swept aside like an old Sunday comic strip.
    Posted by patriotnw at 04:01 PM : Aug 21, 2007

    Yeah, he didn''t have anyone to read it to him! Bush lied and soldiers died!!!! Long live Cindy Sheehan! Power to da people! :)
    Reply to this comment
    by nyckate August 21, 2007 4:06 PM PDT
    I think most of us are perfectly aware that prior to 9/11 that all of our intelligence agencies badly let the country down - they seemed to be stuck in retro still looking at the world as if it were US against the Russians.

    What I find scary is that they don''t seem to have learned to act much differently - we still don''t have enough agents who can act in the middle east or in middle eastern cultures - we still don''t have enough arab-speaking personnel and they''re now all headed by Waste of Space Chertoff who heads a mostly defunct poorly operating Homeland Defense.

    We''re screwed.
    Reply to this comment
    by nexgen99 August 21, 2007 4:06 PM PDT
    Posted by patriotnw at 04:01 PM : Aug 21, 2007
    Oh my... it''''s another "blame Clinton" robot. If that''''s the case, then why didn''''t Bush go after the perpetrators of the U.S.S. Cole bombing? And let''''s not forget the memo Bush received "Bin Laden determined to attack U.S.", which he swept aside like an old Sunday comic strip.
    ---------------------------------
    Get an eductation, the USS COLE Bombing occured under Clinton not Bush.
    Reply to this comment
    by nyckate August 21, 2007 4:09 PM PDT
    j4401 - Cheney and his energy commission had already decided in April 2001 that Saddam needed to be replaced - that regime change was a necessary operation - for energy company welfare.

    Cheney never believed that there were WMDs there - he can''t be that insane - but man - isn''t it a great way to feed into the fear of the cowardly Bushies. They''re such fools - Bush could tell them the moon was made out of cheese and they''d believe him.
    Reply to this comment
    by antoniof123 August 21, 2007 4:09 PM PDT
    Did someone miss the fact that there was no silver bullet so that means it would have happened no matter what. Clinton is not to blame as the neocons hope they can get some milage out of this for their cause YOU CAN''T SO FORGET IT. The next thing is stop being afarid this has been happening forever so most likly it will happen again. Same old blame game instead of trying to unite the country and meet in the middle the neocons want absolute dominations and that time has passed America is not too angry with the way you did things.
    Reply to this comment
    by pastdue1 August 21, 2007 4:13 PM PDT
    Always have been and always will be ~ too many egos involved in every department in Washington. None is more dangerous than in the intelligence gathering. What now will happen in this department now that we are out-sourcing more and more. Scary, isn''t it?
    Reply to this comment
    by nyckate August 21, 2007 4:14 PM PDT
    nexgen99 - Dear God - you are SUCH a fool - if you need to assign blame then place it were it belongs - Bush Sr. Director of the CIA.

    Sheesh - you lot get dumber by the second.
    Reply to this comment
    by nexgen99 August 21, 2007 4:14 PM PDT
    antoniof123 their is a silver bullet, Clinton gave a speech where is stated he was given the opportunity to take bin laden into custody but refused because he had nothing to charge him with. Talk about not taking the initiative.
    Reply to this comment
    by infidel_us August 21, 2007 4:14 PM PDT
    We''''re screwed.
    Posted by nyckate at 04:06 PM : Aug 21, 2007

    Sure we are....that''s why we haven''t been attacked since 2001. We''ll BE screwed if a dem gets elected.
    Reply to this comment
    by nyckate August 21, 2007 4:17 PM PDT
    nexgen99 - the first WTC bombing happened one month into CLinton''s presidency -- meaning it was hatched, planned and implemented during Bush Sr. presidency.

    But you know what? Clinton didn''t blame Bush - CLinton''s a grownup - you''re an immature whining whinging fool who supports other fools.
    Reply to this comment
    by nexgen99 August 21, 2007 4:18 PM PDT
    nyckate: Most of the attacks on America and American assets occured under Clinton. You need to stop reading the funny papers
    Reply to this comment
    by infidel_us August 21, 2007 4:20 PM PDT
    But you know what? Clinton didn''''t blame Bush - CLinton''''s a grownup - you''''re an immature whining whinging fool who supports other fools.
    Posted by nyckate at 04:17 PM : Aug 21, 2007

    But is was CLINTON''S responsibility to do something about it! The people were put in jail, but the scope of the attact was not taken in to account.

    Further, impediments were put in place by flunkies in Clinton''s administration that actually made it impossible for agencies to share intelligence.

    Have you seen my BJ? I had it here a minute ago.....
    Reply to this comment
    by nyckate August 21, 2007 4:21 PM PDT
    infidel_us -- Dear God - you are SUCH a fool.

    AQ has plenty of Americans to attack -- they''re in Iraq, Kuwait, Afghanistan, Saudie Arabia, Turkey, etc you ignorant ignorant stupid fool.

    You people are never going to wise up are you? You''re just like Bush - so long as your cowardly behinds are safe let other Americans die in your place. God may be able to forgive you - we won''t.
    Reply to this comment
    by gunownerdan August 21, 2007 4:21 PM PDT
    The first time the World Trade Center got bombed in 1993, the terrorists promised to finish what they started and on 9/11/2001 they did. Why Clinton and Bush didn''t take them seriously is almost obvious. Nothing can give a government more power than using foreigners as an excuse to trample rights "for our protection".
    Reply to this comment
    by patriotnw August 21, 2007 4:21 PM PDT
    POSTED BY NEXGEN99

    ORIG: "If that''s the case, then why didn''t Bush go after the perpetrators of the U.S.S. Cole bombing?"

    NEXGEN RESPONSE: "Get an eductation, the USS COLE Bombing occured under Clinton not Bush."

    MY RESPONSE TO NEXGEN:

    I said "why didn''t he go after the perpetrators"? Remember, oh convenient Clinton-blamers, it was established that al Qaeda was responsible for the Cole bombing and the president was briefed in January of 2001, soon after he took office, by George Tenet, head of the CIA, telling him of the finding that al Qaeda was responsible, Well, why wouldn%u2019t Bush go after the Taliban in order to get them to kick bin Laden out of Afghanistan? Maybe then 9/11 would never have happened...
    Reply to this comment
    by nexgen99 August 21, 2007 4:22 PM PDT
    nyckate: And the KoBAR towers, The USS Cole, The only idiot on this board is you.
    Oct. 12, 2000 - A terrorist bomb damages the destroyer USS Cole in the port of Aden, Yemen, killing 17 sailors and injuring 39.
    Aug. 7, 1998 - Terrorist bombs destroy the U.S. embassies in Nairobi, Kenya and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. In Nairobi, 12 Americans are among the 291 killed, and over 5,000 are wounded, including 6 Americans. In Dar es Salaam, one U.S. citizen is wounded among the 10 killed and 77 injured.
    June 21, 1998 - Rocket-propelled grenades explode near the U.S. embassy in Beirut.
    June 25, 1996 - A bomb aboard a fuel truck explodes outside a U.S. air force installation in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. 19 U.S. military personnel are killed in the Khubar Towers housing facility, and 515 are wounded, including 240 Americans.
    Nov. 13, 1995 - A car-bomb in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia kills seven people, five of them American military and civilian advisers for National Guard training. The "Tigers of the Gulf," "Islamist Movement for Change," and "Fighting Advocates of God" claim responsibility.
    Reply to this comment
    by nyckate August 21, 2007 4:24 PM PDT
    nexgen99 - pull your head out of your behind.

    You''re blaming 9/11 on Clinton cause the attack was planned under his presidency.

    You''re blaming the 1993 attack on clinton cause the attach was planned under Bush Sr. presidency but your own immature personal hatred/envy of Bill Clinton shows you up for a fool.

    You probably would like the blame the 1983 attack against US base in Lebanon on Clinton too. SOmehow it must be his fault.

    You hate that Clinton bombed Sudan to try and get bin Laden, you hate that Clinton bombed suspected sites of WMD in Iraq and got not one American killed. You hate that Clinton sent troops to stop genoicide there and not one Amerian soldier lost his life there either.

    What you really hate is that Goergie Bush Junior is a complete and utter failure - he should you just what a girly-man sissified fake cowboy drunken trust fund baby could do -- FAIL

    Oh - and it''s raining today and that''s Bill''s fault too.
    Reply to this comment
    by feelfree1 August 21, 2007 4:27 PM PDT

    Re: "Report Cites Major CIA Lapses Before 9/11"

    These weren''t "lapses". The PNAC traitors needed a "new Pearl Harbor" in order to advance their idiot plan for global hegemony.

    www.zeitgeistmovie.com
    Reply to this comment
    by infidel_us August 21, 2007 4:27 PM PDT
    God may be able to forgive you - we won''''t.
    Posted by nyckate at 04:21 PM : Aug 21, 2007

    I''ll try my best to live with my guilty conscience....if you can, I can. :)
    Reply to this comment
    by goldesprit August 21, 2007 4:30 PM PDT
    The day of 911, the only ones allowed to fly (even the ex-President Bush Senior could not fly)--no planes were in the air (I personally viewed nation wide radar and there was no air traffic)--was the Bin Laden family, apparently by special order of the administration (George W. Bush).

    Unless that action gets REVERSED and addressed to the exclusion of other shell games, you can focus on lots of other *** until the cows come home, and it will be a deliberate idotic whitewwash.

    It isn''t a myth.
    Reply to this comment
    by nexgen99 August 21, 2007 4:31 PM PDT
    nyckate: I am not a fan of Bush either but your just blinded by the Clinton mystique. The blame for the lead up to 9/11 lies squarely with the Clinton Administration.
    Reply to this comment
    by rushlimpdrug August 21, 2007 4:32 PM PDT
    NEXGEN99 and infidel_us
    While you two giggle in the same bed saying, "Clinton, b.j. giggle, giggle" the world is still going through this helll after 9/11.
    So get back under the sheets and keep giggling while this mess continues and others deal with the present.
    I for one am totally tired of stupid "reasoning" as your "Clinton b.j." sophomoric game.
    Reply to this comment
    by fascistusa August 21, 2007 4:35 PM PDT
    This is Corporate Mainstream "News" attempt to reinforce their

    BRAINWASHING.

    ZEITGEISTmovie.com.

    The History Channel and their FAKE 9/11 PROPAGANDA.

    ZEITGEISTmovie.com
    Reply to this comment
    by goldesprit August 21, 2007 4:37 PM PDT
    The trick is to ignore animal entries to this forum, and introduce meaningful stuff. I don''t bother to respond to the ccccrappp, because --...need there be a "because"? (rehetorical question)

    The day of 911, the only ones allowed to fly (even the ex-President Bush Senior could not fly)--no planes were in the air (I personally viewed nation wide radar and there was no air traffic)--was the Bin Laden family, apparently by special order of the administration (George W. Bush).

    Unless that action gets REVERSED and addressed to the exclusion of other shell games, you can focus on lots of other *** until the cows come home, and it will be a deliberate idotic whitewwash.

    It isn''''t a myth.
    Reply to this comment
    by one_american August 21, 2007 4:39 PM PDT
    This shortfall of the CIA was a direct result of the "peace dividend" policy that Bill Clinton enacted in 1993;

    -severe cutbacks in funding for CIA

    -500,000 troop reduction for military

    -severe cutbacks in military spending


    Deal with it, liberals.
    Reply to this comment
    by lars2008-2009 August 21, 2007 4:42 PM PDT



    Everyone knows that 9/11 happened under Clinton''s watch.


    Reply to this comment
    by nexgen99 August 21, 2007 4:42 PM PDT
    goldesprit OK, here is meaningful stuff. Bill Clinton gave a speech is long Island on why he did not take Bin laden into custody when he was offered to him. Had he done his job, been more proactive and arrested bin laded, perhaps the 9/11 plot would have been interrupted, Bin Laden would be in jail and 3,000 Americans would still be alive and we would not be in Iraq today.
    Reply to this comment
    by bareemperor August 21, 2007 4:43 PM PDT
    CIA - Failed US on 9/11

    FBI - Failed US on 9/11

    Bu$h - Failed US on 9/11
    Reply to this comment
    by marcodele August 21, 2007 4:44 PM PDT
    Bush had nine months to prevent 9/11 but he didn''t.

    Deal with it neocons.
    Reply to this comment
    by feelfree1 August 21, 2007 4:45 PM PDT

    Re: ""The report unveiled no mysteries," Goss said."

    On 9/11/01, Porter Goss was having breakfast with the head of Pakistan''s ISI- the man who supposedly ordered $100,000 to be wired to the alleged "lead hijacker", Mohamed Atta.

    Anything coming out of Goss'' mouth on this topic is almost certainly a lie.

    www.zeitgeistmovie.com
    Reply to this comment
    by nexgen99 August 21, 2007 4:45 PM PDT
    jh6379: When we face the biggest threat to our civilization and culture in history, yes military cutbacks are a big thing.
    Reply to this comment
    by nyckate August 21, 2007 4:45 PM PDT
    nexgen99 - clinton ordered CIA to get Osama - they couldn''t get the job done -- that''s the CIA he inherited from none other than Bush and Reagan - Bush had even been director of CIA before he was Reagan''s VP -- so in 16-20 years of hand''s on ability to change revamp the CIA not a soul - not Bush, not rumsfeld, not cheney did a flaming thing to fix the CIA.

    But yeah - that''s clinton''s fault too. Sheesh -what the heck are we going to do with you whining, whinging cowards when Goergie is out of office??? Maybe he''ll let ya''ll put trailers in Crawford or something and you can whine and whinge together.
    Reply to this comment
    by pastdue1 August 21, 2007 4:48 PM PDT
    I do not understand why we are playing the blame game ~ it does not change anything ~ it does not vindicate or condemn anyone. Why all the rhetoric trying to place blame? It is great to analyze past mistakes and anyone who would be president needs to looks carefully at those mistakes ~ not to place blame, but to avoid perpetuating those mistakes. What is needed now, is for someone, anyone to step forward and work at correcting the insanity that is happening in the world and in our United States. We need solutions by our most honest, ethical, brightest and unaffiliated thinkers ~ not rhetoric.
    Reply to this comment
    by nexgen99 August 21, 2007 4:49 PM PDT
    nyckate, Clinton was given the opportunity to arrest bin laden and he refused please get your facts correct before you dribble your nonsense
    Reply to this comment
    by gunownerdan August 21, 2007 4:50 PM PDT
    Sad but true:
    If the "WAR ON TERROR" works as good as the "WAR ON DRUGS", terrorists will be in control of America in no time.
    Reply to this comment
    by nexgen99 August 21, 2007 4:51 PM PDT
    pastdue1: you are correct we should avoid perpetuating those mistakes. We do that by not electing another Clinton into the white house.
    Reply to this comment
    by ghostcommand August 21, 2007 4:51 PM PDT
    What happened in July and August prior to 911? This article is a smoky mirror.
    Reply to this comment
    by nyckate August 21, 2007 4:52 PM PDT
    nexgen99 -- come on now - Cheney made THE largest military cutbacks in history.

    Rumsfeld also ran Pentagon as if it were their private feifdom - today''s Pentagon couldn''t successfully organize a tea party without 10 committees and $30 billion.

    We need to FIX what''s broken - Rumsfeld and Bush tried to run a military on politics and theories of war games they thought might work - any general who dared disagree with them was forced out -- their delusions of grandeur aren''t funny - they''re harmful.

    Pentagon is a huge wasteful corporation - how else to describe a department that paid two texas spinsters $20 million in shipping fees for $1.19 washers over and over and over again.

    They''ve been ''developing'' weapons for decades - and each of the approving officers always leave and go work for that contractor. A payoff is a payoff is a payoff.

    Then we have a white house that has apparently no ability to write a legal contract writing them to Halliburton - they dont'' even have to perform well just submit bills that Bush keeps approving.
    Reply to this comment
    by clestes-2009 August 21, 2007 4:52 PM PDT
    "I thought the release of this report would distract officers serving their country on the front lines of a global conflict," Hayden said.

    Of all the lame excuses this one ranks at the top!

    The other agency that should examine its record is the FBI. A senior FBI agent, man by the name of John Powell, tried over and over to get Mueller''s top people to listen to him about Bin Laden. He was ignored, passed over for promotion for making waves and finally took a job of head of security at World Trade Center. He died Sept 11 trying to save others.

    Or how about that complete *** that kept refusing Colleen Rowley the right to search Moussoui''s computer. That ****** was actually promoted!! Or the memo written my agent Ken Williams about his concern of terrorist taking flying lessons.

    The top tier of the FBI, CIA, NSA are all at fault and should all be forced out of their jobs. There were plenty of warnings from agents all over that were ignored over and over.

    So instead of being investigated, Tenet actually gets the medal of freedom from dubya.

    That really speaks volumes about how totally screwed up our defense system is.
    Reply to this comment
    by nexgen99 August 21, 2007 4:57 PM PDT
    nyckate. regardless of it''s faults, our military has kept this nation safe for over 200 years and it''s what has made this nation great. I don''t agree with the way Bush has handled the war, I think Rumsfield was an idiot for not listening to the generals. But I also believe Clinton was devasting to the military.
    Reply to this comment
    by nyckate August 21, 2007 4:57 PM PDT
    nexgen99 - stop lying. Do you really think lying is going to cut it? One thing is clear - America is sick and tired of Bush and Bushits'' lies.

    Sudan REFUSED to hand bin Laden over to America - they did say they would give him to saudies and then the saudies could hand him over.

    Strangely Bush''s Family Friends the Saudies refused.

    That''s when Clinton ordered the bombing of the factory in SUdan.

    On August 10, 1998, Clinton authorized a bombing campaign on alleged terrorist targets in Sudan and Afghanistan -- including a suspected terrorist training compound in Afghanistan where bin Laden was believed to have taken refuge at the time -- in response to the August 7, 1998, twin bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.

    Sen. John D. Ashcroft (R-MO) declared that "there is a cloud over this presidency;" and then-Sen. Dan Coats (R-IN) asserted:

    The president has been consumed with matters regarding his personal life. It raises questions about whether or not he had the time to devote to this issue, or give the kind of judgment that needed to be given to this issue to call for military action."
    Reply to this comment
    by feelfree1 August 21, 2007 5:00 PM PDT

    nyckate,

    Re: "Pentagon is a huge wasteful corporation - how else to describe a department that paid two texas spinsters $20 million in shipping fees for $1.19 washers over and over and over again."

    That is chump change.

    On September 10, 2001, Donald Rumsfeld announced that the Pentagon could not account for $2.3 trillion.
    Reply to this comment
    by nexgen99 August 21, 2007 5:00 PM PDT
    nyckate, I am not lying, just go an listen to Clintons speech, it was recorded by the major media outlets. Those were his exact words as to why he did not arrest bin laden.
    Reply to this comment
    See all 407 Comments
    • MOST POPULAR
    • Viewed
    • Commented
    Latest News
    Featured Blogs