Gore: Companies Fund Anti-Warming Research
ExxonMobil Rejects Allegation That It Funds Research Aimed At Misleading The Public
-
Former Vice President Al Gore waves to the press in Singapore on Aug. 7, 2007, during the Global Brand Forum where he received the Brand Icon of Year Award. (AP Photo/Wong Maye)
-
Photo Essay A Warming Effect A behind-the-scenes look at the 60 Minutes team's trip to Patagonia, Chile and Antarctica.
ExxonMobil, the world's largest publicly traded oil company, rejected the allegation.
"There has been an organized campaign, financed to the tune of about $10 million a year from some of the largest carbon polluters, to create the impression that there is disagreement in the scientific community" about global warming, Gore said at a forum in Singapore. "In actuality, there is very little disagreement."
"This is one of the strongest of scientific consensus views in the history of science," Gore said. "We live in a world where what used to be called propaganda now has a major role to play in shaping public opinion."
Gore likened the campaign to that of the millions of dollars spent by U.S. tobacco companies years ago on creating the appearance of uncertainty and debate within the scientific community on the harmful effects of smoking cigarettes.
"Some of the tobacco companies spent millions of dollars to create the appearance that there was disagreement on the science. And some of the large coal and utility companies and the largest oil company, ExxonMobil, have been involved in doing that exact same thing for the last several years," Gore said.
After the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, made up of a number of the world's top climate scientists, released a report in February that warned the cause of global warming is "very likely" man-made, "the deniers offered a bounty of $10,000 for each article disputing the consensus that people could crank out and get published somewhere," Gore said.
"They're trying to manipulate opinion and they are taking us for fools," he said.
Last year, British and American science advocacy groups accused ExxonMobil of funding groups that undermine the scientific consensus on climate change. The company said the scientists' reports were just attempts to smear ExxonMobil's name and confuse the debate.
ExxonMobil spokesman Gantt Walton said Tuesday that the company's financial support for scientific reports did not mean it influenced the outcome of those studies. ExxonMobil believes the risk that greenhouse gas emissions are contributing to climate change warrants taking action to limit them, he said.
"The recycling of this type of discredited conspiracy theory diverts attention from the real challenge at hand: how to provide the energy needed to improve global living standards while also reducing greenhouse gas emissions," he said.
Gore said that with growing awareness of climate change, the world will see an acceleration in efforts to fight the problem, and urged businesses to recognize that reducing carbon emissions is in their long-term interest.
But while Washington should lead by example, he said developing nations also have to play a part.
"Countries like China, just to give an example, which will next year be the largest emitter in the world, can't be excluded just because it's technically a developing country," Gore said. "When you look at the absolute amount of CO2 each year and going forward, China will soon surpass the U.S."
As its economy expands, China faces an increased risk from the effects of climate change and must find ways to leapfrog old, polluting technologies in ways that can maintain growth, Gore said.
In June, the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency said China overtook the United States in carbon dioxide emissions by about 7.5 percent in 2006. China was 2 percent below the U.S. in greenhouse gas emissions in 2005, the agency said.
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- next
See all 36 Commentswhat are you on?
%u201CThe Dodo (Raphus cucullatus) was a flightless bird that lived on the islands of Mauritius. Related to pigeons and doves, it stood about a meter tall (three feet), lived on fruit and nested on the ground.
%u201CThe dodo has been extinct since the mid-to-late 17th century. It is commonly used as the archetype of an extinct species because its extinction occurred during recorded human history, and was directly attributable to human activity. The phrase "as dead as a dodo" means undoubtedly and unquestionably dead.%u201D -- Wikepedia
I wish this arseclown would just GO AWAY! Shoo Al, shoo!!!!! Go run for president or something.
Posted by tcoleman12 at 07:36 PM : Aug 07, 2007
Are you right wing nuts kidding? You may not suffer from global warming, but your children will. You were wrong on tobacco and millions have died. How many will die from your obfuscating on global warming? Right-wing nut = short-sighted fools.
This statement applys to almost everything coming from politicians mouths nowdays. Both partys play the propaganda game well.
Their patients, since they rather inconveniently died at vastly higher rates than those of more far-sighted doctors, soon put them out of business.
Unfortunately, when it comes to manmade global warming the doctor is Big Business and the patient is the Earth.
Whatever side of the global warming issue you are on, you better hope (or pray, as the case may be) that either Al Gore and the majority of the planet's scientific community are wrong or Big Business wises up.
While you are crawling up Al Gore's butt, turn off the methane while you're up there, OK?
Liberal shill.
Posted by One_American at 07:10 PM : Aug 07, 2007
Whoooooo the bad righting Cheney assistant Bush bot, thinks liberals are shrill, wahhhhh boo hoo, boo hoo, Rosie is fat, Kos will eat your children, Clinton got a BJ, Sandy stuffed his pants, whah wha, booo bad liberal. Talk to the hand poodle as usual you are on the uninformed side of the issue.
While you are crawling up Al Gore's butt, turn off the methane while you're up there, OK?
Liberal shill.
You have to admire his genius for taking the tinniest bit of the truth and spinning a web of lies and deceit to suit his own purposes. After all he did %u201CINVENT%u201D the internet! I personally feel that if AlGore was to move to the back side of the moon, and shut his mouth the cooling trend would be immediately noticed.
Then you should be thrown out of your house and denied any sort of carbon-based heating or transportation, as well - for your contribution to the problem, numbskull.
Where do idiots like you come up with hair brained ideas like that? The Daily Kos?
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 36 Comments